26,045 research outputs found
Replication Data for: Does delegation of drafting duties to law clerks result in judgments that show lack of confidence in terms of writing style? A stylometric analysis
No full textThe data set contains all the variables and cases on which the analysis for the articles has been based
Law and Behavioral Sciences: Why We Need Less Purity Rather than More
No full textIn his inaugural lecture, Peter Mascini takes issue with the goal of scientific purity in the behavioral study of the law, conceived as the deliberate choice to postulate a limited number of universally applicable behavioral principles. The guiding principle of behavioral sociology is that law behaves in correspondence to social space, while the guiding principle of law and economics is that individuals behave rationally.
Peter Mascini defends a two-fold thesis: first, that the purification of sociology proposed by behavioral sociology is a blind alley that can only be exited by allowing impurity. Second, that the behavioral economics movement has offered law and economics an opportunity to reinvigorate by embracing impurity. He continues by arguing that we need even less purity in the behavioral study of the law than is offered by behavioral economics. He proposes a more modest empirical approach that no longer searches for universally applicable predictions and that allots an important role to the meanings actors attribute to their own behavior
Replication Data for: Does delegation of drafting duties to law clerks result in judgments that show lack of confidence in terms of writing style? A stylometric analysis
No full textThe data set contains all the variables and cases on which the analysis for the articles has been based
Author Peter FitzSimons speaking at the National Library of Australia, Canberra, 13 November 2012 /
No full textTitle from acquisitions documentation.; Part of the collection: Portraits of author Peter FitzSimons speaking at the National Library of Australia, Canberra, 13 November 2012.; Acquired in digital format; access copy available online.; Mode of access: Online.; Photographed by a staff member of the National Library of Australia
Explaining users' support for public and private modes of content moderation on social media platforms
No full textPeter Mascini and Franziska Weber study the user perspective with a view to different forms of content moderation on social media in a representative survey of the Dutch population in the age group 18-35. They find mixed support for the hypothesis that trust in a particular actor operating in the regulatory space of the governance triangle – for profit, not-for profit and public moderation – is positively related to support for a mode of content moderation dominated by the very same actor. They consequently relate their findings to Michael’s work on smart mixes
Explaining users' support for public and private modes of content moderation on social media platforms
Get PDFPeter Mascini and Franziska Weber study the user perspective with a view to different forms of content moderation on social media in a representative survey of the Dutch population in the age group 18-35. They find mixed support for the hypothesis that trust in a particular actor operating in the regulatory space of the governance triangle – for profit, not-for profit and public moderation – is positively related to support for a mode of content moderation dominated by the very same actor. They consequently relate their findings to Michael’s work on smart mixes
Explaining users' support for public and private modes of content moderation on social media platforms
Get PDFPeter Mascini and Franziska Weber study the user perspective with a view to different forms of content moderation on social media in a representative survey of the Dutch population in the age group 18-35. They find mixed support for the hypothesis that trust in a particular actor operating in the regulatory space of the governance triangle – for profit, not-for profit and public moderation – is positively related to support for a mode of content moderation dominated by the very same actor. They consequently relate their findings to Michael’s work on smart mixes
Moral Good, the Beatific Vision, and God’s Kingdom Writings by Germain Grisez and Peter Ryan, S.J.. Edited by Peter J. Weigel
No full textFor close to half a century, the work of Germain Grisez has been highly influential, and his writings continue to receive considerable attention from philosophers and theologians of diverse viewpoints. His co-author for this work is the professor and noted moral theologian Fr. Peter Ryan, S.J., currently the executive director of the Secretariat of Doctrine and Canonical Affairs of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). These two eminent scholars explore fundamental questions about Christian eschatology, moral theory, the purpose of human life, and the promise of human fulfilment. The authors examine Christian teaching on the final destiny of persons, investigating the meaning of God's kingdom, the hope of the beatific vision, and the centrality of moral goodness and divine grace in one's final end. This work is an ideal source for students, scholars, ministers and lay persons interested in basic questions of Christian theology, the philosophy of religion, ethical theory, and Catholic doctrin
Murder on the mountain: author talk with Peter J. Wosh
No full textAuthor talk by Peter J. Wosh on May 5th, 2022, on his book, "Murder on the Mountain: crime, passion, and punishment in gilded age New Jersey.
- …
