360,527 research outputs found
OBREGON, Alvaro (Gral.); MARQUES S., Homobono
No full textInformation card titled “Gen. Alvaro Obregón. File number 5. Notebook number 14. Subject: Homobono Marques S.”. Correspondence exchanged among Mr. Fernando Torreblanca, Gen. Alvaro Obregón and Mr. Enrique Torreblanca, regarding an issue pertaining to Mr. Homobono Marques, which is not specified. / Cédula titulada "Señor Gral. Alvaro Obregón. Expediente número 5. Cuaderno número 14. Asunto; Homobono Marques S.". Correspondencia entre el Sr. Fernando Torreblanca, el Gral. Alvaro Obregón y el Sr. Enrique Torreblanca, relativa a un asunto del Sr. Homobono Marques que no se especifica
OBREGON, Alvaro (Gral.); MARQUES S., Homobono
No full textInformation card titled “Gen. Alvaro Obregón. File number 5. Notebook number 14. Subject: Homobono Marques S.”. Correspondence exchanged among Mr. Fernando Torreblanca, Gen. Alvaro Obregón and Mr. Enrique Torreblanca, regarding an issue pertaining to Mr. Homobono Marques, which is not specified. / Cédula titulada "Señor Gral. Alvaro Obregón. Expediente número 5. Cuaderno número 14. Asunto; Homobono Marques S.". Correspondencia entre el Sr. Fernando Torreblanca, el Gral. Alvaro Obregón y el Sr. Enrique Torreblanca, relativa a un asunto del Sr. Homobono Marques que no se especifica
Eudendrium pocaruquarum Marques 1995
No full textEudendrium pocaruquarum Marques, 1995 Remarks: species endemic to Brazil. Taxonomical remarks in Marques (1995). Distribution in South America: polyp—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, from 3°S to 4°S, from 23.25°S to 24°S (Marques 1993, 1995, 2001; Rosso & Marques 1997; Oliveira 2003; Marques et al. 2006; Oliveira et al. 2006; Shimabukuro et al. 2006; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2 0 11; Shimabukuro 2007; Silveira & Morandini 2011; Miranda et al. 2015). Habitat: polyp—at intertidal zone, on algae, bryozoans, Clavelina oblonga, mussels, polychaete tubes, and rock (Marques 1995; Oliveira 2003; Oliveira et al. 2006; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2011; Shimabukuro 2007).Published as part of M. P. Oliveira 1,16, S P. Miranda 2, *,, Es W. Mianzan 10,, Ro E. Migotto 11,, Ne B. Nascimento 2,11, Eli Nogueira Júnior 12,, Er Quiñones 13,, Izio Scarabino 14,, Tín Schiariti 10,, Io N. Stampar 15,, Tronolone 2, , Quíria B. & Onio C. Marques 2,11, 2016, Census of Cnidaria (Medusozoa) and Ctenophora from South American marine waters, pp. 1-256 in Zootaxa 4194 (1) on pages 59-60, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4194.1.
Eudendrium caraiuru Marques & Oliveira 2003
No full text<i>Eudendrium caraiuru</i> Marques & Oliveira, 2003 <p> Synonyms in the area: <i>Eudendrium glomeratum</i> —Marques 1993; Rosso & Marques 1997; Oliveira <i>et al.</i> 2000; Marques 2001; Migotto <i>et al.</i> 2001; Silveira & Morandini 2011 [polyp] [non <i>Eudendrium glomeratum</i> Picard, 1951].</p> <p> Remarks: common species on the Brazilian coast (Marques <i>et al.</i> 2006). Further taxonomic details in Marques & Oliveira (2003).</p> <p> Distribution in South America: polyp—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, from 3°S to 4.50°S, from 22.75°S to 25.58°S, from 38°S to 38.10°S (Marques 1993; Migotto 1996; Rosso & Marques 1997; Oliveira <i>et al.</i> 2000; Marques 2001; Migotto <i>et al.</i> 2001; Marques & Oliveira 2003; Oliveira & Marques 2005; Marques <i>et al.</i> 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a, abstract; Shimabukuro <i>et al.</i> 2006; Shimabukuro 2007; Silveira & Morandini 2011; Marques <i>et al</i>. 2013; Fernandez <i>et al</i>. 2014, 2015; Miranda <i>et al</i>. 2015).</p> <p> Habitat: polyp—in shallow waters, on fouling, ascidians, bryozoans, barnacles, gastropods, mussels, polychaete tubes, rocks, test panels and other artificial substrates (Migotto <i>et al.</i> 2001; Marques & Oliveira 2003; Marques <i>et al.</i> 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a; Shimabukuro 2007; Fernandez <i>et al</i>. 2014, 2015).</p>Published as part of <i>OLIVEIRA, OTTO M. P., MIRANDA, THAÍS P., ARAUJO, ENILMA M., AYÓN, PATRICIA, CEDEÑO-POSSO, CRISTINA M., CEPEDA-MERCADO, AMANCAY A., CÓRDOVA, PABLO, CUNHA, AMANDA F., GENZANO, GABRIEL N., HADDAD, MARIA ANGÉLICA, MIANZAN, HERMES W., MIGOTTO, ALVARO E., MIRANDA, LUCÍLIA S., MORANDINI, ANDRÉ C., NAGATA, RENATO M., NASCIMENTO, KARINE B., JÚNIOR, MIODELI NOGUEIRA, PALMA, SERGIO, QUIÑONES, JAVIER, RODRIGUEZ, CAROLINA S., SCARABINO, FABRIZIO, SCHIARITI, AGUSTÍN, STAMPAR, SÉRGIO N., TRONOLONE, VALQUÍRIA B. & MARQUES, ANTONIO C., 2016, Census of Cnidaria (Medusozoa) and Ctenophora from South American marine waters, pp. 1-256 in Zootaxa 4194 (1)</i> on page 58, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4194.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10068449">http://zenodo.org/record/10068449</a>
Ectopleura obypa Migotto & Marques 1999
No full textEctopleura obypa Migotto & Marques, 1999a Distribution in South America: polyp—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, from 23.50°S to 24°S (Migotto & Marques 1999a; Migotto et al. 2002; Oliveira 2003; Oliveira et al. 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a, abstract; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2011; Silveira & Morandini 2011; Miranda et al. 2015); medusa—Atlantic Ocean, Brazil, at 23.83°S 45.42°W (Migotto & Marques 1999a; Migotto et al. 2002; Silveira & Morandini 2011). Habitat: polyp—from 1 to 15m depth, on algae, ascidians, barnacles, mussels, light buoys (Migotto & Marques 1999a; Oliveira 2003; Oliveira et al. 2006; Shimabukuro & Marques 2006a; Oliveira & Marques 2007, 2011).Published as part of M. P. Oliveira 1,16, S P. Miranda 2, *,, Es W. Mianzan 10,, Ro E. Migotto 11,, Ne B. Nascimento 2,11, Eli Nogueira Júnior 12,, Er Quiñones 13,, Izio Scarabino 14,, Tín Schiariti 10,, Io N. Stampar 15,, Tronolone 2, , Quíria B. & Onio C. Marques 2,11, 2016, Census of Cnidaria (Medusozoa) and Ctenophora from South American marine waters, pp. 1-256 in Zootaxa 4194 (1) on pages 35-36, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4194.1.
Tetralidia Marques-Costa & Cavichioli
No full textTetralidia Marques-Costa & Cavichioli Diagnosis. Crown approximately quadrangular, with two pairs of orange maculae, one close to anterior margin and another close to posterior margin, adjacent to compound eyes (Fig. 1); transverse carina present at transition between crown and frons (Figs 2, 3); ocelli on anterior margin of head, at transition between crown and frons (Fig. 3); clypeus with lateral margins convergent apically (Fig. 2); posterior margin of pronotum emarginated and Vshaped (Fig. 1); forewings with venation indistinct or slightly distinct with four apical cells and three anteapical cells (Fig. 4); hindwings with R 4 + 5 and M 1 + 2 preapically convergent, fused at apex, forming single vein. Male genitalia. Pygofer without processes or teeth (Fig. 5); connective variable, bifurcated or not at articulation point with aedeagus (Fig. 8); aedeagus long with pair(s) of apical or preapical process(es) or lamellae (Figs 9, 10); anal tube with pair of variable basal processes (Fig. 5) Marques-Costa & Cavichioli (2008); subgenital plates narrowed basally or pre-apically, separated only in most distal portion of apex (Fig. 6) and style with truncated apex (Figs 7, 8). Tetralidia closely resembles Tozzita Kramer, 1964 in having the clypeus with lateral margins convergent apically; the pygofer without processes; the aedeagus long and the anal tube with a pair of basal processes. It differs from Tozzita by the absence of a black spot at the apex of the crown; the ocelli on the transition between crown and frons (in Tozzita located on the crown, near the anterior margin) and the pygofer with a rounded apex (flattened and spatulate in Tozzoita) Marques-Costa (2008).Published as part of Gonçalves, Clayton Correa, Marques-Costa, Ana Paula & Ale-Rocha, Rosaly, 2011, A new species of Tetralidia Marques-Costa & Cavichioli (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Neocoelidiinae) from Amazon Region, pp. 23-28 in Zootaxa 3070 on page 24, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27902
Eudendrium caraiuru Marques & Oliveira, 2003, sp. n.
No full textEudendrium caraiuru sp. n. Figures 1–19 Eudendrium glomeratum; Marques, 1993: 68 –75, pl. 3; 2001: 361–369, figs. 23–30; Migotto, 1996: 122; Rosso and Marques, 1997: 417; Oliveira et al., 2000: 519 –525; Migotto et al., 2001: 289, 294– 296; 2002: 11. non Eudendrium glomeratum Picard, 1951. Type material. Holotype: Brazil: São Sebastião: Baleeiro Point, female colony, 08.iii. 1988, formol, on rock, 3m, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0385; former ACMSP029). Paratypes: Brazil: São Sebastião: Cigarras Beach: male colony, 15.vii. 1988, formol, intertidal, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0388; former ACMSP034); Pitangueiras Beach (north rocky shore): male colony, 24.x. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (ROMIZ B 1223; former ACMSP 162); Jarobá Point, Parque: male colony, 17.ix. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0394; former ACMSP056); Baleeiro Point:; Baraqueçaba Beach: female colonies, 12.xii. 2001, formol, on metallic structures, 7m, col. H.K. Boscolo (MZUSP 0372); Lage dos Moleques: female colony, 05.xii. 1991, formol, on rock, 5m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0423; former ACMSP 114). Additional material. Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Urca: colony without gonophores, ix. 1990, leg. I. Zalmon (MZUSP 0375; former ACMRJ008); Ubatuba: Lázaro Beach: colony without gonophores, 28.vii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0427; former ACMSP 120); colony without gonophores, 28.vii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0428; former ACMSP 121); Maranduba Beach: colony without gonophores, 30.vii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0429; former ACMSP 123); São Sebastião: Pier Sul (Petrobrás): male colony, 18.vii. 1990, formol, on Perna perna, 1m, col. J.C. de Freitas (ACMSP064); Pitangueiras Beach (north rocky shore): colony without gonophores, 18.viii. 1988, formol, 6m, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0458; former ACMSP 159); male colony, 03.iv. 1992, formol, on Schizoporella, 3m, col. A.E. Migotto (MZUSP 0459; former ACMSP 161); Jarobá Point (23 º 49,654´S 45 º 25,366´W): colony without gonophores 17.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. A.C. Marques (MNRJ 2043; former ACMSP044); colony without gonophores, 17.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. A.C. Marques (ROMIZ B 1221; former ACMSP045); colony without gonophores, 20.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MNRJ 2044; former ACMSP048); colony without gonophores, 20.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MNRJ 2045; former ACM SP049); colony without gonophores, 20.viii. 1990, formol, on test panel, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (ROMIZ B 1222; former ACMSP050); colony without gonophores, 15.ix. 1990, formol, on rope, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0392; former ACMSP054); male colony, 15.ix. 1990, formol, on rope, 2m, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0393; former ACM SP055); colonies without gonophores, 22.i. 2000, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. O.M.P. Oliveira (MZUSP 0368); female colonies, 22.i. 2000, formol, on test panel, 1m, col. O.M.P. Oliveira (MZUSP 0369); colonies without gonophores, 25.i. 2002, alcohol, on ropes, 1m, col. O.M.P. Oliveira (MZUSP 0370); Barequeçaba Point (23 º 49,979´S 45 º 25,843´W): colonies without gomophores, 12.xii. 2001, formol, on metallic structures, 7m, col. H.K. Boscolo (MZUSP 0371); female colonies, 12.xii. 2001, formol, on metallic structures, 7m, col. H.K. Boscolo (MZUSP 0372); Cananéia: Cardoso Island, costão do Pereirinha: colony without gonophores, 26.viii. 1992, formol, on rock, intertidal, col. A.C. Marques (MZUSP 0447; former ACMSP 145). Diagnosis. Large euryteles with shaft:capsule proportion 3.0– 3.6; in pads on hydranth body, spadix of female gonophores, and in a whorl of 16–25 around hypostome. Female blastostyles with reduced hypostome and tentacles. Etymology. From the Tupi native language “ cáraiurú ” (= powerful mouth), in reference to the presence of large euryteles on the hypostome. Description. Colonies dioecious, arborescent, up to 54 mm in height, main stems unfascicled. Hydrocauli arising from creeping hydrorhiza; branches many, more or less alternate, occurring over entire hydrocaulus, branches up to third order, in radiate planes or rarely more or less planar; pedicels arising from main stem or branches of first, second or third order. Perisarc of main stem strongly developed, dark brown, single tubes 0.40 mm in diameter, with scarce annulations, in sets of 3–8 rings. Branches with 3–7 rings at origin, 0.20–0.25 mm in diameter. Pedicels sometimes completely annulated, yellowish, ca. 0.10 mm in diameter. Hydranths 0.18–0.75 mm in height, 0.18–0.57 mm in diameter (measured in the body region just below the tentacles), orange in color, with a distinct groove in the aboral region; tentacles 23–34 in number, occurring in a whorl below hypostome. Some hydranths with reduced tentacles juxtaposed in two close whorls. Gonophores styloids, arising from body of hydranth. Immature styloids placed in a circle around body of hydranth. Male blastostyle orange, with 10–29 sporosacs, each sporosac 1–2 chambered, linked to blastostyle body by a stalk, with a very distinct spadix over its longitudinal axis, and a terminal tubercle on its apex; distal chamber 0.12–0.18 mm in diameter. Male blastostyles completely reduced over earlier stages of their development with pedicels corrugated throughout. Female gonophores orange, arising on partially reduced blastostyles with highly atrophied hypostome and degenerated tentacles. Immature eggs having a simple and curved spadix over a single egg. Blastostyle reducing completely during development or at maximum with 1–5 stumps (tentacles), and spadices shed. Mature oval eggs thickened by perisarc and linked directly to the wrinkled pedicel by short and shallow concave peduncles. Eggs 4–7 in number, 0.24–0.39 mm in diameter. Nematocysts of two categories, heterotrichous microbasic euryteles and heterotrichous macrobasic (or mesobasic) euryteles. Small microbasic euryteles (seen discharged), 6.1 –8.0 X 2.9–3.9 m, L / W = 1: 2.05– 2.1, oval, abundant; distributed over hydranth body, hypostome, coenosarc, and tentacles. Large macrobasic euryteles (seen discharged), 18.7–22.7 X 7.1–9.3 m, L / W 1: 2.4– 2.6, bean shaped, common. Discharged shaft up to 60 m in length, 3. 0–3.6 times length of capsule; undischarged shaft in 1.5 coils inside capsule; distributed on hydranth body sometimes forming pads to a continuous ring, up to 25 capsules on hypostome, coenosarc, terminal tubercle, and immature female spadix sometimes forming pads. Distribution. Brazil: Rio de Janeiro State: Rio de Janeiro (Marques, 2001); São Paulo: Ubatuba (Marques, 2001), São Sebastião (Oliveira et al., 2000; Marques, 2001), Cananéia (Marques, 2001).Published as part of Marques, Antonio C. & Oliveira, Otto M. P., 2003, Eudendrium caraiuru sp. n. (Hydrozoa; Anthoathecata; Eudendriidae) from the southeastern coast of Brazil, pp. 1-12 in Zootaxa 307 on pages 3-6, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15661
Notoschoenomyza diminuta Couri & Marques 2004
No full textNotoschoenomyza diminuta Couri & Marques, 2004 Distribution. Chile. CHILE, Aisen del General Carlos Ibanez del Campo, Chile Chico, -46.5500, -71.7333 (Couri & Marques 2004); Magallanes, Puerto Natales, -5.7333, -72.5167 (Couri & Marques 2004); S. Porvenir, Bahia, Inutil, Tidel Fuego (Couri & Marques 2004).Published as part of LÖWENBERG-NETO, PETER & DE CARVALHO, CLAUDIO J. B., 2013, Muscidae (Insecta: Diptera) of Latin America and the Caribbean: geographic distribution and check-list by country, pp. 1-147 in Zootaxa 3650 (1) on page 120, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3650.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/526463
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
- …
