27 research outputs found
NDFMF: An Author Name Disambiguation Algorithm Based on the Fusion of Multiple Features
Author name disambiguation is a very important and complex research topic. During the retrieval and research of literature the quality of the investigation results has been reduced because of the high probability of different authors sharing the same name, which lengthens the whole cycle of the scientific research. Therefore, it is necessary to find a reasonable and efficient method to distinguish the different authors who share the same name. In this paper, an author name disambiguation algorithm based on the fusion of multiple features (NDFMF) is proposed. First we proposed a single feature similarity detection algorithm (SFSD). SFSD is used to compute the degree of similarity between two features of a paper and to assess the threshold value. Then, SFSD is used to realize the preliminary SFSD-based disambiguation algorithm (SFSDD). Furthermore, different features are evaluated according to the disambiguation results of author names and the evaluation metrics, including precision, recall and F-measure with SFSDD. The evaluation parameter of weight (W) is introduced to express each feature's influence in disambiguation. NDFMF can disambiguate author names more efficiently based on the fusion of multiple features. Experiments were implemented to test the performance of NDFMF. Experimental results show that NDFMF was effective in the disambiguation precision, recall and F-measure.</p
e-Voting: Same Pilots, Same Problems, Different Agendas
Abstract: This paper outlines the preliminary findings of the empirical stage of the research to establish the reasons that in 2003 some English local authorities decided to trial e-voting and others did not. The key findings demonstrate that central and local governments have different agendas and there is little momentum from central government to increase the number of pilot schemes. The central government policy to introduce e-voting via voluntary pilot schemes is only providing a limited insight into the problems surrounding the operation of the new voting methods. The findings are derived from comparative semi-structured interviews with Election Officers from pilot and non-pilot authorities, and the analysis is based upon Rogers ’ diffusion of innovations theory framework. The findings illustrate that in the case of e-voting, central government has not adopted a formal diffusion strategy and that a most influential driver to adopt e-voting is not prominently acknowledged in diffusion theory. The results suggest that the theory of perceived attributes needs modification and the issue of the diffusion of a public policy should be considered by government earlier in the public policy process
Tackling the Digital Divide: The Shift from Access to Capacity
A focus of daily life in the UK now revolves around the adoption of technology and the impact of Internet based technology raises issues of the digital divide, knowledge divide, social empowerment and socio economic effects. This paper focuses on the impact of the UK government’s policy, ‘digital by default’, on individuals with limited IT skills living in an area of deprivation. Following a review of prior research, the paper analyses data from semi structured interviews with progression support workers in their roles supporting individuals in their use of computers to find employment. Research results identify barriers inhibiting individuals from using IT and the discussion reflects whether the inclusion of concepts of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations theory into the design of the ‘digital by default’ policy has the potential to address the digital divide. The Conclusion draws on the research results to recommend a revised policy strategy
Learning From Evaluation: The Relevance Of An Evaluation Strategy To The Voluntary Adoption Of E-Initiatives
This paper argues that the implementation evaluation of the UK policy introducing e-voting was a missed opportunity to gather information to better inform policy revisions. Using a heuristic framework to identify stages in the policy process, the final evaluation stage was recognised as useful to inform policy revisions. However, the evaluation did not ask potential adopters their reasons for non-participation in the pilot program introducing e-voting, so failed to establish policy adoption blocking mechanisms. The discussion relates the introduction of the new voting methods to the UK drive for greater political participation. It identifies variables influencing e-voting participation in the pilot program of 2003 and tested in the pilots of 2007. The results demonstrate that information is available to provide an insight into reasons for non-participation in such e-initiatives. However, evaluative strategies are sometimes so limited in scope that this source of information is not acknowledged. The Conclusion draws on the variables to suggest broad spectrum lessons which may furnish revised policy modifications to address innovation adoption blocking mechanisms
e-Voting in the UK: A Work in Progress
Abstract: The research project on which this paper is based is investigating the reasons that some English local authorities engaged in pilot projects of e-voting and some did not. This paper offers a brief summary of the initial findings of the literature review as it identifies factors, which impact upon the decision-making process of English local authorities. The factors identified include the local authorities ’ attitude to e-voting, their consideration of the citizens ’ attitude to voting, the risks to the integrity of the ballot and the changing political environment instigated by central government. The analysis is based on Rogers ’ diffusion of innovations theory. Early results of this on-going research suggest that in a voluntary situation where there is an over arching organisation (central government) trying to introduce an innovation to an agency organisation, Rogers ’ diffusion of innovations framework requires modification
