3,754 research outputs found
Ritual Origins of Warring States
No full textLewis Mark Edward. Ritual Origins of Warring States. In: Bulletin de l'Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient. Tome 84, 1997. pp. 73-98
Mark Edward Lewis, The Flood Myths of Early China, 2006
No full textMathieu Rémi. Mark Edward Lewis, The Flood Myths of Early China, 2006. In: Études chinoises, n°25, 2006. pp. 212-223
Mark Edward Lewis, Sanctionned Violence in Early China
No full textLevi Jean. Mark Edward Lewis, Sanctionned Violence in Early China . In: Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 46ᵉ année, N. 1, 1991. pp. 128-129
The construction of space in early China
No full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 431-470) and index.Mark Edward Lewis
The flood myths of early China
No full textIncludes bibliographical references (p. 153-229) and index.Mark Edward Lewis
Marianne Bujard, Le Sacrifice au ciel dans la Chine ancienne : Théorie et pratique sous les Han occidentaux, 2000
No full textLewis Mark Edward. Marianne Bujard, Le Sacrifice au ciel dans la Chine ancienne : Théorie et pratique sous les Han occidentaux, 2000. In: Études chinoises, n°22, 2003. pp. 313-320
Mark Edward Lewis, Writing and Authority in Early China
No full textOn le sait depuis longtemps, Écriture et Pouvoir ont partie liée et marchent la main dans la main. Mais de quelle façon s’articulent leurs rapports, comment se manifeste cette complicité et quelles sont ses visées ? Ordinairement, les chercheurs s’accordent à voir dans l’écriture un instrument indispensable à la pratique administrative et un puissant auxiliaire de l’État pour asseoir son autorité. Inversant la perspective traditionnelle adoptée par la plupart des sinologues, Mark Edward Lewis..
Correspondence from Edward Kennedy to John Lewis, October 26, 1971
No full textCorrespondence from Edward Kennedy to John Lewis about supporting the promotional campaign of the Voter Education Project after the 1969 Tax Reform Act
The Gospel on the Margins: The Ideological Function of the Patristic Tradition on the Evangelist Mark
No full textIn spite of the virtually unanimous patristic opinion that the evangelist Mark was the interpreter of Peter, one of the most prestigious apostolic founding figures in Christian memory, the Gospel of Mark was mostly neglected in the patristic period. Not only is the text of Mark the least well represented of the canonical Gospels in terms of the number of patristic citations, commentaries and manuscripts, the explicit comments about the evangelist Mark reveal some ambivalence about its literary or theological value. In my survey of the reception of Mark from Papias of Hierapolis until Clement of Alexandria, I will argue that the reason why the patristic writers were hesitant to embrace the Gospel of Mark was that they perceived the text to be amenable to the Christological beliefs and social praxis of rival Christian factions. The patristic tradition about Mark may have little historical basis, but it had an important ideological function in appropriating the text in the name of an apostolic authority from the margins or periphery
Sinclair Lewis Society Newsletter, Vol. 26, No. 1
No full text“It Happened Here: Sinclair Lewis, White Nationalism, and the 2016 Presidential Election,” by Anthony Di Renzo, Ithaca College
“Sinclair Lewis in Business and Politics: A Great Success,” by Alexis Foran and Taneka Newman, Illinois State University
“Gideon Planish as Part of Lewis’s Critique of Language,” by George Killough, College of St. Scholastica
“German Author Weighs in on It Can’t Happen Here,” by Frederick Betz, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale
“Mary Astor, Edith Cortright, and Dodsworth,” Two Reviews of Mary Astor’s Purple Diary: The Great American Sex Scandal of 1936, by Edward Sorelhttps://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/slsn/1015/thumbnail.jp
- …
