34 research outputs found
sj-docx-2-ggm-10.1177_23337214231167980 – Supplemental material for 10-Year Follow-up of the Original Faroese Septuagenarian Cohort: Focus on Frailty and Association With All-cause Mortality
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-2-ggm-10.1177_23337214231167980 for 10-Year Follow-up of the Original Faroese Septuagenarian Cohort: Focus on Frailty and Association With All-cause Mortality by Eina H. Eliasen, Pál Weihe, Fróði Debes, Marjun Tróndarson and Maria Skaalum Petersen in Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine</p
sj-docx-1-ggm-10.1177_23337214231167980 – Supplemental material for 10-Year Follow-up of the Original Faroese Septuagenarian Cohort: Focus on Frailty and Association With All-cause Mortality
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-ggm-10.1177_23337214231167980 for 10-Year Follow-up of the Original Faroese Septuagenarian Cohort: Focus on Frailty and Association With All-cause Mortality by Eina H. Eliasen, Pál Weihe, Fróði Debes, Marjun Tróndarson and Maria Skaalum Petersen in Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine</p
Research on present crustal horizontal deformation feature of Weihe Basin and its tectonic activity
No full textIn this paper, two dimensional finite model of elastic mechanics is established according to
the geological structure features of Weihe Basin. And the author obtains the stress and strain
characteristics by the 2001~2007 GPS data in this region. In the end combine with the characteristic of
recently seismic activity in Weihe basin, the relation between crustal deformation characteristics and
the seismic activity is also discussed. The results show that current tectonic stress field of
this basin presents tensile stress with NNW-SSE direction. The spatial distribution of
maximum shear strain rate in Weihe Basin has a very good correlation with small modern
seismic belt. The region of Jingyang-Xiany ang-Xi an-Lintong-Sanyuan belongs to the weak
zone in the crust of Weihe Basin which is apt to basin extension and earthquake preparation
Crustal structures across the western Weihe Graben, North China: Implications for extrusion tectonics at the northeast margin of Tibetan Plateau
No full textThe stable Ordos Plateau, extensional Weihe Graben, and Qinling orogenic belt are located at the northeast margin of the Tibetan Plateau. They have been thought to play different roles in the eastward expanding of the Tibetan Plateau. Peking University deployed a linear seismic array across the western end of the Weihe Graben to investigate the crustal structures of the tectonic provinces of this structure. Receiver function analyses revealed low-to-moderate Poisson's ratios and anticorrelations between Poisson's ratios and topography beneath the Qinling Orogen. These features may indicate a tectonic thickening of the felsic upper crust by folding and thrusting within the Qinling Orogen. We observed a strong horizontal negative signal at the midcrust beneath the Ordos Plateau which may indicate a low-velocity zone. This observation would suggest the stable cratonic Ordos Plateau had been modified due to the compression between the Tibetan Plateau and the Ordos Plateau. We also observed an abrupt 4km Moho offset across the Weihe Fault, changing from similar to 44km beneath the Ordos Plateau to similar to 40km beneath the Qinling Orogen. We conclude that the Weihe Fault is a lithosphere-scale fault/shear zone, which extends into the upper mantle beneath the Weihe Graben. It acts as the major boundary separating the stable Ordos Plateau and the active Qinling Orogen.NSFC [91128210, 90814002]; Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [2462013YJRC014, PRP/indep-4-1316]; MOST in China [2009AA093401]SCI(E)[email protected]
Diversity and temporal dynamics of Southern California coastal marine cyanophage isolates
No full text. Funding for
this research was provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore
Foundation, the National Science Foundation (OCE-
1005388 and OCE-1031783), and a NOAA NERRS Graduate
Research Fellowship (Estuarine Reserves Division, Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) to C.A.H
Geomorphological observations of active faults in the epicentral region of the Huaxian large earthquake in 1556 in Shaanxi Province, China
No full textThe Huaxian magnitude 8 great earthquake of January 23, 1556, is the largest one recorded in the Weihe basin. Shaanxi Province, China and caused 830,000 people either injury or death. The epicenter is located in the southeastern part of the Weihe basin, around Huaxian City. Earthquakes are closely related to active faults and active Faults are well developed in the epicentral ai ea of the Huaxian large earthquake. Thus we will discuss the activity of the major faults in the epicentral area by geomorphological observations. There are three major fault sets in the study area: striking approximately east-west, northeast and northwest. These are inhomogeneous in spatial distribution, rates and manners of faulting, as shown by geomorphological observations such as faulted fluvial terraces and alluvial fans. The ages of the second and first terraces are around 20,000 and 5,000 years B.P. by thermoluminescent dating, Carbon-14 dating and archeology. The terraces were faulted by the North Huashan fault (F-1), the main boundary fault of Weihe basin and the Piedmont fault (F-2) after the second and the first terraces formed. The distribution of the displacement shows that the intersections of the North Huashan fault and the Chishui fault (F-4) striking northwest, and the western margin fault (F-5) of Tongguan loess tableland, have the largest in offsets in the area. Perhaps the Huanxian great earthquake in 1556 A.D. had a close relation to the North Huashan fault. The Weihe fault (F-3) striking east-west is also an active Fault by analysis of the flood plain structure. Thus we should pay attention to the activities of the faults to take precautions against another possible large earthquake in this region. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.Geosciences, MultidisciplinarySCI(E)EI4ARTICLE5549-5572
Nomenclatorische en taxonomische toelichting op de naamlijst van de Nederlandse bramen (Rubus L.)
No full textDe publikatie van de naamlijst van de Nederlandse bramen vereiste een aanzienlijk aantal taxonomische en nomenclatorische beslissingen. In dit artikel worden deze toegelicht.
The publication of the checklist of the Dutch brambles required a considerable number of taxonomic and nomenclatorial decisions. This article provides an argumentation for the choices that are made.
Because many of these are of international interest the main decisions are summarized in English below: New combination Rubus nemoralis fo. laciniatus (Willd.) A.Beek. R. laciniatus Willd. is a later homonym of R. laciniatus Tollard (lectotype designated in this paper), which is a laciniate form of R. ulmifolius. A status as species is not apt for these laciniate forms.
Restoration of names previously in use but recently changed Suberecti (Lindl.) Focke: because the included R. fruticosus L is not a previously (art. 52.2) indicated type of the genus the name is not illegitimate.
Rubus affinis Weihe & Nees: the reference to the Fl. Suec. of Linnaeus in the protologue does not make the name superfluous. The Fl. Suec. was published before 1753 and the specimen is not previously (art. 52.2) indicated as type. Weihe & Nees split R. fruticosus L. into the typical form (the plant of the Hort. Cliff. – a Corylifolii species) and another taxon (that of the Fl. Suec.), R. affinis. Their choice would have to be followed if R. fruticosus was not recently conserved.
Candicantes Focke: Reichenbach refers in his description of Rubus candicans to ‘R. silesiacus olim’. This is not a reference to a publication but refers to a herbarium specimen as is clear by comparison to similar cases in his work. Thus, his name is not illegitimate and R. candicans is identical to R. montanus Lib. ex Lej, which is the type of the series Candicantes. This name is older than Discolores. Besides, R. silesiacus cannot be the type of the Candicantes because Focke explicitly excludes it from this series.
Rubus procerus P.J.Müll. ex Boulay: Weber18 identifies R. praecox Bertoloni as an older synonym.
Investigations both in BOLO and by field research in the region of Bologna make clear that the specimen that Weber selected as lectotype is only an extreme form (that does not match the protologue) of a large group of plants that are intermediate between R. canescens and R. ulmifolius. A new lectotype that fits into the protologue is selected. R. praecox is identical to R. collinus DC and the old name R. procerus can be restored for the taxon in debate.
Hayneani Tratt.: because the included Rubus fruticosus L. is not a previously (art. 52.2) indicated type of the genus, the name is not illegitimate. The name Rhamnifolii Focke, which is also in use for this series, is incorrect because the protologue of R. rhamnifolius Weihe & Nees includes R. thuillieri Poir. ex Steud. This is not a reference to R. thuillieri sensu Steud. Rather the publication by Steudel is the validation of the nomen provisorium by Poiret as replacement for the later homonym R. tomentosus Thuill. (lectotype designated in this paper). The correct name of R. rhamnifolius auct. non Weihe & Nees is R. germanicus (Focke) Thomé.
Rubus bellardii Weihe. The reference to R. glandulosus in the protologue is not to the publication by Bellardi, but to R. glandulosus sensu Willd., sensu Hayne, and sensu Guimpel. Weihe52 indicates synonyms that are not misidentifications by page numbers of the original publication.
Saving current use of correct names The remark about Rubus opacus Focke ex Bertram by Focke5 does not match the requirements of art. 38.1a and 38.2 (it does not mention any characteristic wherein it is intermediate between R. affinis and R. plicatus, cf. 38.2 ex. 4). However, because Bertram6 includes Focke's plants in his description of R. opacus, the type can be chosen from these specimens (only the leaf of the previously selected lectotype, because the inflorescence is collected on another date), so that only a change of author name is required. Rubus bertramii G.Braun then is R. opacus Focke ex Bertram typ. excl.
Typification Rubus bergii Cham. & Schltdl. ex Eckl. & Zeyh. (= R. affinis Weihe & Nees) Rubus spina-curva Boulay & Gillot Rubus eglandulosus P.J.Müll. & Lefèvre Rubus splendidus P.J.Müll. & Lefèvre (= R. approximatus Questier ex Billot – lectotype designated in this paper) Serie Grandifolii Focke Rubus viridis Kalt. (= R. iuvenis A.Beek) Rubus rotundatiformis Sudre Rubus horrefactus P.J.Müll. & Lefèvre Rubus grandiflorus Kalt. (= R. parahebecarpus H.E.Weber; there is no reason to doubt the identity of the neotype in W).
Change of correct names Rubus umbrosus (Weihe & Nees) Arrh. is an older legitimate name for the ambiguous R. pyramidalis auct. an Kalt.? and must thus be considered as the correct name.
Rubus horrefactus P.J.Müll. & Lefèvre: according to comparison of the types and to intensive field research this species is taxonomically identical to R. tuberculatus Bab.
Different author Rubus conspicuus P.J.Müll. Müller58 must be considered as the author of this species and thus the type must be selected from his collection.
Rubus schleicheri Weihe. The publication of Trattinick49 of this species is a nomen provisorium (‘interim ipse designavi’).
Retypification Rubus flexuosus P.J.Müll. & Lefèvre. Because the protologue in the appendix includes R. pyramidalis sensu Questier, the exsiccate of Questier in Billot, Flora Galliae et Germaniae exsiccata nr. 2058, can be a lectotype, replacing the neotype by Weber.18 Rubus glareosus W.C.R.Watson. The previously selected type by Edees & Newton46 consisted of two specimens.
Identification Rubus leucandrus Focke, R. leucandrus subsp. belgicus H.E.Weber and R. ambigens (Boulay) Boulay (lectotype designated in this paper) turned out to be identical.
Correction The type of Rubus calvus H.E.Weber is not identical with R. calviformis H.E.Weber, but with R. contractipes H.E.Weber; the latter is thus a nomen superfluum
