1,721,216 research outputs found
L'Isagoge latine de Marius Victorinus
No full textMonceaux Paul. L'Isagoge latine de Marius Victorinus. In: Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 51ᵉ année, N. 4, 1907. pp. 205-208
Oeuvres théologiques de Marius Victorinus
No full textHadot Pierre. Oeuvres théologiques de Marius Victorinus. In: École pratique des hautes études, Section des sciences religieuses. Annuaire 1958-1959. 1957. pp. 123-128
Marius Victorinus, ars
No full textDe Nonno, M. (1988), "Tradizione e diffusione di Mario Vittorino grammatico con edizione degli Excerpta de orthographia", Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica, 116, p. 5-59; 379-380. Gaisford, T., ed. (1837), Scriptores Latini rei metricae manuscriptorum codicum ope, Oxford, xiv & 616 p. Mariotti, I., ed. (1967), Marius Victorinus. Ars grammatica, Firenze, ix & 264 p. Putschen, H. van, ed. (1605), Grammaticae latinae auctores antiqui. Charisius, Diomedes, Priscianus, Probus, Magno,..
Marius Victorinus Rhetor und seine Beziehungen zu Augustin
No full textMARIUS VICTORINUS RHETOR UND SEINE BEZIEHUNGEN ZU AUGUSTIN
Marius Victorinus Rhetor und seine Beziehungen zu Augustin ([1])
Binding ( - )
Title page ([1])
Einleitung. ([3])
I. Leben und Schriften des Victorinus. ([6])
II. Die theologischen Anschauungen des Victorinus. ([17])
A. Seine Stellung zu Dogma, Schrift und Kirche. ([17])
B. Der Gottesbegriff. (21)
C. Die Homousie des Sohnes. (24)
D. Die Homousie des Geistes. (41)
E. Die Schöpfung. (45)
F. Christus und das Heil. (54)
G. Die Aneignung des Heils. (61)
III. Victorinus und Augustin. ([68])
Inhalts-Verzeichnis. ([81])
Druckfehler. (82)
Thesen. ( - )
Lebenslauf. ( - )
Binding ( -
W. Erdt. Marius Victorinus Afer, der erste lateinische Pauluskommentar
No full textNautin Pierre. W. Erdt. Marius Victorinus Afer, der erste lateinische Pauluskommentar. In: Revue de l'histoire des religions, tome 200, n°4, 1983. p. 439
Candidus, Marius Victorinus’ fictitious friend, and his doctrine of the “Logos”
Full text linkThis article elaborates the term Logos in two fictitious letters of Candidus, which Marius Victorinus wrote to present Arian points of view concerning the Trinitarian debate in the middle of the 4th century. The article investigates these two short letters and their historical and theological sources to demonstrate Marius Victorinus’ knowledge and understanding of the Arian controversy and the mystery of the Triune God. Although he wrote these letters himself, this research seems to be a particularly important in the interpretation of Marius Victorinus’ theological views and arguments presented in his writings against the Arians, in which he undertakes the most difficult questions concerning the unbegotten and simultaneously begetting God. This article elaborates the term Logos in two fictitious letters of Candidus, which Marius Victorinus wrote to present Arian points of view concerning the Trinitarian debate in the middle of the 4th century. The article investigates these two short letters and their historical and theological sources to demonstrate Marius Victorinus’ knowledge and understanding of the Arian controversy and the mystery of the Triune God. Although he wrote these letters himself, this research seems to be a particularly important in the interpretation of Marius Victorinus’ theological views and arguments presented in his writings against the Arians, in which he undertakes the most difficult questions concerning the unbegotten and simultaneously begetting God
Candidus, Marius Victorinus’ fictitious friend, and his doctrine of the “Logos”
No full textThis article elaborates the term Logos in two fictitious letters of Candidus, which Marius Victorinus wrote to present Arian points of view concerning the Trinitarian debate in the middle of the 4th century. The article investigates these two short letters and their historical and theological sources to demonstrate Marius Victorinus’ knowledge and understanding of the Arian controversy
and the mystery of the Triune God. Although he wrote these letters
himself, this research seems to be a particularly important in the interpretation of Marius Victorinus’ theological views and arguments presented in his writings against the Arians, in which he undertakes the most difficult questions concerning the unbegotten and simultaneously begetting God
L’id ipsum de Marius Victorinus à Porphyre
No full textId ipsum (idipsum) et les deux sortes d’identité Avec Marius Victorinus, nous entrons dans le domaine latin, auquel appartient en propre le groupe de mots id ipsum, qu’il soit écrit en un mot ou en deux. C’est un démonstratif neutre, composé du démonstratif de rappel id, signifiant « cela », renforcé par le démonstratif d’insistance ipsum, signifiant « lui-même ». Ce second démonstratif renvoie à l’identité de la chose désignée par « cela », même si cette identité n’est pas précisée. On pourr..
P. Henry et P. Hadot. Marius Victorinus : Traités théologiques sur la Trinité
No full textMeslin Michel. P. Henry et P. Hadot. Marius Victorinus : Traités théologiques sur la Trinité. In: Revue de l'histoire des religions, tome 164, n°1, 1963. pp. 96-100
Du nouveau sur la vie et les œuvres de Marius Victorinus
No full textCourcelle Pierre. Du nouveau sur la vie et les œuvres de Marius Victorinus. In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 64, 1962, n°1-2. pp. 127-135
- …
