4 research outputs found
Evaluating CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Multicenter Study
Background: Metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer is commonly treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach in elderly patients (≥70 years) remain unclear, particularly in the context of real-world clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and tolerability of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatments in this fragile population, which is often under-represented in randomized clinical trials. Patients and methods: This retrospective multicenter study included elderly patients with metastatic HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer receiving first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints focused on the overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability, considering variables such as tumor subtype, age, comorbidities, and treatment specifics. Results: The median PFS and OS were slightly lower than those reported in clinical trials, reflecting the inclusion of a more fragile population. The luminal B subtype was linked to a poorer PFS, while other factors like age, BMI, and ECOG status did not significantly affect the outcomes. A safety analysis indicated a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicities, especially in frail patients, leading to dose reductions. Despite these challenges, CDK4/6 inhibitors were generally well-tolerated, allowing most patients to continue therapy. Conclusions: CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy are effective in elderly patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, though careful management is crucial to balance efficacy and minimize adverse events
Serum parathyroid hormone and calcium changes in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients receiving enzalutamide in post-docetaxel setting.
349 Background: Among novel hormonal therapeutic targets for post docetaxel mCRPC, Enzalutamide is an oral androgen-receptor blocker disrupting the androgen-receptor nuclear translocation that significantly increases the OS. In this study we evaluated the potential association of both PTH and Ca levels change in pts with mCRPC after the first Enzalutamide administration. Methods: Between 01 and 05/2015, 20 mCRPC pts relapsed after 2-3 prior lines of therapy (docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone) have been treated with Enzalutamide that was orally administered at 160 mg/day as continuous dosing. Patient characteristics included: median age 67 years (range 50-84), median baseline PSA 120 ng/ml (range 6-1200), median ECOG P S: 1 (range 0-2), Gleason score ≥ 7. In addition 80% of pts had ≥ 2 metastatic sites. Pretreatment baseline and follow up data including measurement of serum Ca and PTH levels (6.5-36.8 pg/ml), ALP, PSA and QoL parameters were evaluated through all lines of therapy. Pts with bone metastasis received zoledronic acid or denosumab with Ca and vitamin D supplementation. Results: In 18/20 pts with bone disease progression we recorded increased PTH levels and, contrarily, decreased Ca levels after 1 month of Enzalutamide despite vit. D and Ca supplementation. PTH levels remained unchanged after 3 months. In 2/20 pts without bone disease progression PTH ranged normal. All pts reported PSA response ≥ 50%, with improved QoL and are still on treatment since Enzalutamide is well tolerated. We did not find PTH change in bone mCRPC pts treated with prior therapy. Conclusions: Our study showed that increase in PTH levels and reduction in Ca levels and increase in PTH levels after 1 month of Enzalutamide treatment is associated with a dramatic reduction of PSA level. These data support a relationship between PTH and Ca changes in pts treated with Enzalutamide and, thus, their changes level may be adopted in clinical practice as surrogate to reflect the drug activity. No studies have evaluated the variations in serum PTH levels following Enzalutamide treatment and whether these early changes relate to the clinical outcome. </jats:p
The Treatment Landscape of Elderly Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Her2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions
Breast cancer (BC) in elderly women is an increasing health issue due to demographic changes. BC tends to present later and may receive less than standard treatment options. More often, BC in elderly patients is endocrine-positive (HR+). The treatment of elderly patients with metastatic BC (mBC) represents a therapeutic challenge. In recent years, the treatment landscape of patients that are HR+/Her2-negative has changed due to the introduction in clinical practice of new targeted drugs, which have improved patient outcomes. Elderly patients are a small percentage of all patients enrolled in clinical trials and, to date, there are no standardized guidelines that define the best treatment option for this patient population. This can lead to undertreatment or overtreatment, impacting patient morbidity and mortality. Geriatric Assessment tools to tailor the treatment in elderly patients are underused because they are long and difficult to apply in a busy routine clinical practice. For all these reasons, there is an urgent need to produce data about the best treatment for elderly patients with HR+ mBC. Herein, we report data from randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence on the therapeutic options for HR+ Her2-negative mBC elderly patients and explore future treatment directions
CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Patients Aged 80 and Older with HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Study
Background: Older adults aged ≥80 with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are often underrepresented in clinical trials, leaving clinicians with limited data to guide treatment decisions. Given the increasing prevalence of this age group, real-world evidence is crucial to inform therapeutic strategies. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study across seven Italian oncology units, focusing on patients aged 80 or above who received CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy between January 2020 and May 2024. Baseline characteristics, treatment details, and adverse events were recorded. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v5.0. Follow-up was estimated using the reverse Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Eighty patients were included, with a median age of 83. Over half had visceral metastases, and 41.0% were frail (G8 ≤ 14). Approximately 44.0% of patients started treatment at a reduced dose. The median PFS was 13 months (95.0% CI 9.3–18.0), and the median OS was 15 months (95.0% CI 11.8–18.2). Hematologic toxicity was frequent, with neutropenia occurring in 58.8% (25.0% grade ≥ 3) and anemia in 12.5% (2.5% grade ≥ 3). Asthenia was reported in 16.2% (5.0% grade ≥ 3). Diarrhea occurred in 3.8% overall, mainly in patients treated with abemaciclib (42.9% any grade; 14.3% grade ≥ 3). ALT/AST elevations were observed in 8.8% (1.2% grade ≥ 3), and QTc prolongation in 2.5% (1.2% grade ≥ 3, all with ribociclib). Grade ≥ 3 events were uncommon and generally manageable. Conclusions: CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy is feasible in patients aged ≥80 years, with outcomes and tolerability comparable to those observed in younger elderly. Our results highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies in this oldest-old population
