1,721,079 research outputs found
Time Extraction from Real-time Generated Football Reports
Get PDFProceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference
of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA-2007.
Editors: Joakim Nivre, Heiki-Jaan Kaalep, Kadri Muischnek and Mare Koit.
University of Tartu, Tartu, 2007.
ISBN 978-9985-4-0513-0 (online)
ISBN 978-9985-4-0514-7 (CD-ROM)
pp. 37-43
Author Index
Get PDFProceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference
of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA-2007.
Editors: Joakim Nivre, Heiki-Jaan Kaalep, Kadri Muischnek and Mare Koit.
University of Tartu, Tartu, 2007.
ISBN 978-9985-4-0513-0 (online)
ISBN 978-9985-4-0514-7 (CD-ROM)
pp. 410-411
RINGVAADE. Tavakeelest ja tavamatemaatikast
Get PDFEttekanne 24. mail 2005 Tartu Ülikooli pidulikul seminaril “Mare Koit – 60
Reasoning and communicative strategies in a model of argument-based negotiation
No full textWe are developing a model of negotiation in a natural language where the communicative goal of the initiator is to achieve the decision of the communication partner about doing a certain action. In order to make a decision, the partner starts a reasoning process checking the existence of the needed resources as well as the positive and negative aspects of doing the proposed action. If the partner does not make the expected decision then in the following communication, arguments for and against of doing the action will be presented by the participants. We discuss the involvement of a reasoning model as well as the notions of communicative strategy and communicative tactics in the negotiation model. We consider how the partners can influence each other when reasoning in order to achieve their communicative goals. A limited version of the model of negotiation is implemented on the computer. We discuss some implementation details
Läbirääkimiste modelleerimine arvutil
No full textIn the paper, a model of negotiation is developed which includes a model of argument. The topic of negotiation between two participants is an action to be performed by one of them. The initial communicative goals of the participants can match or not. In the first case, they are cooperatively looking for reasons why performing (or not performing) the action is useful, pleasant, etc. In the second case, they are involved in debate. They present arguments and counter-arguments and in the end, one of them will abandon his or her initial communicative goal. An analysis of human- human negotiations is carried out in order to give a preliminary evaluation of the introduced model. A limited version of the model is implemented on the computer
Argumendid ja nende kasutamine seaduseelnõude menetlemisel kahe parlamendi näitel
Get PDFArgument on loomuliku keele lausung või lausungite järjend, mis koosneb väitest ja ühest või mitmest eeldusest. Lihtsaim argument sisaldab üheainsa eelduse ja väite, mis võivad (kuid ei pruugi) paikneda samas lausungis. Argumentide vahel esineb kolme liiki suhteid: argument võib toetada teise argumendi väidet või eeldust, rünnata teist argumenti või selle eeldust või kummutada teise argumendi. Artiklis võrreldakse seaduseelnõude menetlemisel kasutatud argumentide ülesehitust kahes parlamendis – Eesti Vabariigi riigikogus ja Ühendkuningriigi parlamendis. Võrdlemine põhineb parlamendiistungite stenogramme sisaldaval argumendikorpusel, kus on märgendatud argumentide struktuur, suhted argumentide vahel ja dialoogiaktid. Seaduseelnõu menetluse käiku kirjeldab parlamendiliikmete toetavate ja ründavate või kummutavate argumentide vahetamine. *** "Arguments and their use in the processing of bills on the example of two parliaments" *** An argument is a natural language statement or sequence of statements consisting of a claim and one or more premises. The simplest argument contains a single premise and a claim. There are three types of relationships between arguments: an argument can support the claim or premise of another argument, attack another argument or its premise, or rebut another argument. The article compares the structure of arguments used in the proceedings of bills in two parliaments – the Riigikogu of the Republic of Estonia and the British Parliament. The comparison is based on the argument corpus containing transcripts of parliamentary sessions, where the structure of arguments, relationships between arguments and dialogue acts are annotated. The course of the procedure of the bill is described by the exchange of supporting and attacking or rebutting arguments by members of parliament
Towards automatic recognition of the negotiation strategies: Analysis of human-human dialogues
No full text- …
