102,079 research outputs found

    Review of G. Fletcher, Understanding Dennis Robertson. The Man and His Work

    No full text
    This book is likely to be received with mixed feelings by readers, who may be attracted or repelled by its approach. The methodological position defended by the author is that biography expresses a point of view and is more akin to presenting and developing an argument, than collecting and recording facts. The way the main argument is pursued is at times fascinating, at times contorted, leaving the reader now convinced, now puzzled

    recensione di G. La Malfa, Keynes

    No full text
    Questo è un volume elegante, ben scritto, con un serio background nella letteratura, frutto di uno sforzo ben riuscito di parlare ad un pubblico ampio, senza scivoloni nella divulgazione spicciola

    Review of G. Deleplace, Ricardo on Money. A Reappraisal

    No full text
    An essential part of Deleplace’s endeavour was to dismantle layers of interpretations that misrepresented Ricardo’s own thought, superimposing concepts and language that pertained to a different theory or applied to a different context. So it may be useful to start this review by stating right away, in full agreement with Deleplace and against much of the extant literature, that in Ricardo’s theory of money: a) gold is the standard of money; b) the depreciation/appreciation of money is measured by the purchasing power of the currency over the standard; c) there is only one monetary theory, applicable to both convertible and inconvertible paper money with or without coins in circulation

    Cambridge School of economics

    No full text

    Introduction

    No full text
    In contrast to the reorientation of political economy implemented by Keynes with his General Theory less than seven years after the 1929 Wall Street crash, no substantial change in the mainstream approach to economics can be detected twelve years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers. The same Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model which had been unable to anticipate the crisis still rules research, teaching and economic policy, only marginally modified to take account of the most obvious flaws of the economic system. In this intellectual environment, going back to past authors may be of some help, not to fuel nostalgia for times gone by but to explore modern economic issues along new perspectives—in short to build theory and understand facts. This is the task of the history of economic thought, when it is not understood as a graveyard for respected albeit no longer read authors but as a living corpus of debates on the same old issues shrunk and distorted by the present mainstream
    corecore