1,721,384 research outputs found
Objective and Subjective L2 English AoA
This is database on objective and subjective L2 English AoA.
We are grateful for the helpful comments from Marc Brysbaert
Objective and Subjective L2 English AoA
This is database on objective and subjective L2 English AoA.
We are grateful for the helpful comments from Marc Brysbaert
QJE-STD-18-094.R2-Supplementary_Material – Supplemental material for Studying texts in a non-native language: A further investigation of factors involved in the L2 recall cost
Supplemental material, QJE-STD-18-094.R2-Supplementary_Material for Studying texts in a non-native language: A further investigation of factors involved in the L2 recall cost by Heleen Vander Beken, Ellen De Bruyne and Marc Brysbaert in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</p
Dutch Author Recognition Test
Book reading shows large individual variability and correlates with better language ability, more empathy, and higher theory of mind skills. This makes reading exposure an interesting variable to study. Research in English suggests that an author recognition test is the most reliable objective assessment of reading frequency. In this article, we describe the efforts we made to build and test a Dutch author recognition test (DART for older participants and DART_R for younger participants). Our data show that the test is reliable and valid, both in the Netherlands and in Belgium (split-half reliability over .9 with university students, significant correlations with language abilities) and can be used with a young, non-university population. The test is free to use for research purposes
IRT analysis of vocabulary tests
In this tutorial I describe how to analyze the Author Recognition Test and the StuVoc test with item response theory (IRT). In particular, I want to see whether the new analysis proposed by Huang & Bolt (2024) is better than the traditional analysis
- …
