1,354,742 research outputs found
Wendy Mangiaracina
No full textWendy Mangiaracina is a New Orleans native with thirty-three years of experience in child nutrition programs. She chose Southwest Louisiana University for her post-secondary education, where she earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Dietetics. She later attended Tulane University and obtained a Master of Public Health degree. After a long and dedicated career Wendy retired in the summer of 2009. Melba Hollingsworth interviewed Wendy in January 2009.https://egrove.olemiss.edu/icn_ohistories/1092/thumbnail.jp
Le tecniche investigative nel contrasto ai traffici di migranti, stupefacenti e sigarette
No full textThe paper is aimed at analysing investigative techniques used in the fight against trafficking of migrants, drugs and tobaccos at national as well as at European leve
Premessa
No full textIt explains the evolution of the ne bis in idem principle at national as well as at supranational leve
Il riconoscimento facciale: nuove sfide nel processo penale
No full textAI and especially facial recognition techniques are increasing their use also in the contest of criminal investigations. It is necessary a clear regulation of these instruments that have a considerable impact on fundamental rights
Artt. 696 bis-696 decies c.p.p.
No full textIl lavoro esamina i nuovi articoli introdotti nel libro XI del codice di procedura penale, sotto il titolo "Principi generali del mutuo riconoscimento delle decisioni e dei provvedimenti giudiziari tra Stati membri dell'Unione europea
Dan v. Moldavia 2: la rinnovazione in appello tra itinerari sperimentati e cedimenti silenziosi
No full textAfter several years, the European Court of Human Rights comes back on the case of Dan v. Moldova: a
judgment that has had a significant impact on our appeal process. The key question is whether a new
shock wave is to be expected by this further ruling
Report on Italy
No full textThe right to take part personally in criminal proceedings, although not expressly provided at a Constitutional level, is an expression of the principle of a fair trial upheld by Article 6 of the ECHR and translated into Article 111 of the Italian Constitution. In the course of years, the CCP, also following some condemnations by the Strasbourg Court, underwent several modifications aimed at implementing principles and conditions affirmed by the ECHR that can legitimate proceedings in absentia of a defendant.
This study is structured into different parts. In the first, an analysis of national rules concerning the participation of a defendant and other private parties at each stage of proceedings is provided. It reveals that the right to participation is less guaranteed in proceedings – such as proceedings in front of the Supreme Court – where the technical character of questions involved do not require the personal contribution of parties, the activity of a defence lawyer being sufficient. A matter of concern is the recent reform regarding participation by means of videoconference: according to our legislators “video” participation should become a rule for certain categories of defendants, therefore undermining the right to self-defence.
In the second part, the structure of in absentia proceedings, following a reform introduced in 2014, is examined. Notwithstanding good intentions of legislators, it remains possible to celebrate proceedings in absentia also in cases where it is not certain that a defendant has received notice of the request for committal to trial. In this regard, the remedy is appreciable, introduced by the same legislators, and recently modified, which works after a conviction against an inculpable absent has become res judicata, by which judgment is quashed and the case file is forwarded to the first instance judge, with the possibility to request special proceedings (such as a summary trial and an application of penalty upon request of the parties).
In the third part, the right to participation in the field of transnational criminal justice is analysed, where new instruments adopted at EU level, such as the EIO, recently implemented in Italy, represent a lost opportunity in order to make effective the principle of equality of harms, from the perspective of the defence
Una <<nuova>> forma di detenzione per l'identificazione dei migranti. Note a margine del d.l. n. 13/2017
No full textL'articolo esamina il d.l. n. 13 del 17 febbraio 2017, convertito, con modifiche, nella l. 13 aprile 2017, n. 46, che ha introdotto una nuova forma di detenzione per i migranti che rifiutino di essere identificati. La riforma continua a porre numerose problematiche sul versante della tutela dei diritti umani
Commento agli artt. 148-176 c.p.p.
No full textIl lavoro esamina la disciplina codicistica in tema di notificazioni e restituzione nel termin
A new and controversial scenario in the gathering of evidence at the European level: The proposal for a directive on the European investigation order
No full textIn April 2010 a group of EU Member States proposed a Directive on the European Investigation Order, an instrument which, if adopted, will significantly change the way in which evidence is gathered at the EU level. After the failure of the EEW, which focused on the exchange of evidence which had already been gathered, the objective of the new text is to create a single instrument for obtaining all kinds of evidence located in another Member State. The aim of this paper is to examine, within the current framework, the suitability of this new instrument, with particular reference to its impact on the rights of defendants
- …
