1,720,970 research outputs found

    Between “challengers and powerholders”: Framing of issues through dynamic discursive processes in a digital arena

    No full text
    This study explores how the selection of discursive and interactive processes generates specific framings of an issue to advocate opposite positions and to represent a struggle of power between parties with their own agendas. This paper draws from literature on public relations framing, issue arenas and multimodal discourse and reports detailed explorations of qualitative data retrieved from two websites, Protect Mauna Kea and Maunakea and TMT, which frame the Thirty Meter Telescope’s construction on Mauna Kea Mountain in Hawaii from alternative perspectives. The empirical evidence suggests that by connecting the respective issue and related issues to specific concerns, values and beliefs in novel ways, the challengers and powerholders (Steinberg, 1998) attempt to monitor the way in which the issue is understood by existing and potentially supporting groups. The findings also illustrate how the qualitative methodological approach characteristic of discourse analysis can be employed in order to reveal dynamic framing strategies

    Bridging diversity management and CSR in online external communication

    No full text
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to address the need to reconsider online external communication that integrates diversity management (DM) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) by examining the multimodal discursive strategies purposefully employed by organizations to reflect the symbiotic relationship between these two areas of management practice and to communicatively emphasize their corporate commitment. Design/methodology/approach Building on the recently emerged stream of literature linking DM and CSR, and adopting a critical perspective on discourse analysis, this study delves into the multimodal discursive strategies that help bridge DM and CSR in online external communication. The analytical approach proposed is used for the qualitative analysis of 43 web pages selected from Microsoft company’s “Global Diversity and Inclusion” website. Findings Findings highlight the discursive efforts made by the organization to strategically integrate DM and CSR communication into one single framework. The analysis reveals how the coordinates of social practices (social actors and social actions) are purposefully and multimodally recontextualized in the corporate discourse when communicating this integration. Originality/value This study extends the focus of critical discourse analysis from exclusively language to the interplay of different semiotic modes, offering a fine-grained exploration of the multimodal meaning construction performed by organizations in the context of online external communication

    Aspects of organizational diversity commitment articulated in the Googlers’ digital communication strategy

    No full text
    Based on a constructive-critical perspective, the paper intends to determine how diversity commitment is discursively articulated and legitimized by Google through a variety of digital media and semiotic modes

    To Be Responsible, or Not to Be Responsible: Managing Guilt After Organization-Level Failures

    Full text link
    Organizational responses to failures are traditionally classified into accommodative strategies, through which the organization accepts responsibility for the failure by apologizing and implementing corrective action, and defensive strategies, through which the organization does not accept responsibility by denying or by providing justifications. However, the complexity of large organizations entails that it can take years to establish whether an alleged failure has occurred at all and to what extent a specific organization is responsible for it. Given the high level of media interest after an organization-level failure, organizations need to communicate with the public about their potential guilt, but are ill-advised to deny or admit any guilt, before they are eventually either convicted or exonerated. We refer to this discursive practice of addressing guilt without admitting or denying it as guilt management. The contribution of this paper is twofold. Based on a review of guilt in the fields of psychology, philosophy, and law, we first contribute a theoretical understanding of organizational guilt, which is not an established concept yet. Second, we conduct a fine-grained discourse analysis of organizational guilt management to arrive at an empirically grounded understanding of guilt-management strategies used by organizations under suspicion of a large-scale failure

    Multimodal sensemaking and sensegiving processes of discursive threat appraisal in environmental crisis communication

    No full text
    This study investigates how multimodal sensemaking and sensegiving processes of discursive threat appraisal are employed by global movements in their environmental crisis communication when disclosing how corporate commitments are failing to reduce the global plastic pollution. The theoretical framework includes perspectives on global sticky crises, threat appraisal, framing, crisis sensemaking and sensegiving, and multimodal discourse. Empirically, a series of brand audits reports of #breakfreefromplastic global movement are systematically examined. The analytical focus transcends the usual monomodal approach and is directed towards the multimodal interplay that builds strategic discourses through images and texts. Findings details, on the one hand, the multimodal discursive sensemaking processes of content enrichment and appeal bolstering as well as their outcomes related to the building of common sense, new sense, and non‐sense; on the other hand, they clarify how prognostic, diagnostic, and motivational framing tasks are accomplished in environmental crisis sensegiving by the global movement. This study provides insights useful to corporations when reevaluating their own crisis sensemaking and sensegiving in corporate communications and, ultimately, contribute to changing risky corporate behaviour toward more effective and ethical environmental crisis prevention and communication

    CSR reporting after the financial crisis: Reconciling pro-sociality with profitability

    No full text
    Purpose: Our point of departure is the discretion companies have in their CSR reports to emphasize positive aspects of their CSR performance and downtone or omit negative events. We study this discretion in the specific context of CSR reporting by companies that are under a high-profile legal investigation for alleged mismanagement. These companies are in a situation where the very idea of transparency and accountability inherent in CSR reporting is at odds with the business logic of profitability. They face the dilemma of inflating a potential fine when acknowledging any responsibility for the alleged misdeeds in their CSR reports, but at the same time cannot not address this issue in their CSR reports, if these reports are to be of any value to their stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach: Adopting a discursive approach, we selected the case of large U.S. banks after the financial crisis to study how they handled this communicative challenge of needing to rebuild their legitimacy in their CSR reports while being under a high-profile criminal investigation. We combine the fields of organizational discourse with CSR communication in a cross-disciplinary study of CSR reports. This is a rare combination, as CSR communication has traditionally been based on quantitative, content-analytic analyses of CSR reports. Findings: The study shows how CSR reports do not just disseminate information about a company's social and environmental performance, but contribute to the definition of these very responsibilities towards stakeholders through positive identity claims, the discursive construction of relationships, and the discursive connection of the company with favorable events and the disconnection from unfavorable events. Originality/value: Our study is qualitative in nature and contributes to the relatively small, but growing stream of research that has adopted a discursive, constructivist approach to CSR communication. Specifically, our study contributes an understanding of how discourse strategies are used to define and redefine responsibilities in CSR reports, especially in times of legal uncertainties
    corecore