1,721,035 research outputs found
ASO Author Reflection: Location of Nodal Metastases in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Cancer: Which Station Matters?
No full textNo abstract availabl
ASO Author Reflections: Does Site Matter? Impact of Tumor Location on Pathologic Characteristics, Recurrence, and Survival of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
No full textReflections on our manuscript "Does Site Matter? Impact of Tumor Location on Pathologic Characteristics, Recurrence, and Survival of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Pasireotide for the Prevention of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Time to Curb the Enthusiasm?
No full textThis is a Letter to the Editor on the use of Pasireotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistul
ASO Author Reflections: Recurrence Following Post-neoadjuvant Pancreatectomy: How Can We Do Better?
Full text linkN/
Response to Comment on "Reappraising the Concept of Conditional Survival After Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma"
No full textResponse to the comment by Kawaguchi et a
Response to: Managing the High-risk Pancreatic Anastomosis
No full textThis a response to Pedrazzoli et al on our paper "Characterization and Optimal Management of High-risk Pancreatic Anastomoses During Pancreatoduodenectomy
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
No full textthis chapter outline the Mechaniss of Tumour Dissemination in Pancreatic cance
Analysis and proceeding to full publication of abstracts presented at the Pancreas Club annual meeting
No full textIntroduction: The editorial fate of pancreatology conference abstracts has been scarcely defined. Objective: To examine the editorial fate of abstract presented at the Pancreas Club Annual Meeting (PC) and identify factors associated with successful publication. Methods: Abstracts presented at PC (2011-2013) were retrieved. Factors associated with full publication and post-publication impact were analyzed. Top publications were defined as those falling in the upper quartile of impact factor and citation distributions. To avoid lead-time bias, a search strategy limited to four years after each meeting was established. Results: Overall, 309/497 abstracts (62.2%) proceeded to full publication, after a median of 14 months. Multicenter status was the only factor independently associated with publication. The median impact factor of published manuscripts was 3.27, with a median of 13 citations/paper. Basic science and orally presented papers were independently associated with high-impact publication and high citation number, despite five of top-ten cited papers had been allocated to poster presentation. Conclusions: 62.2% of abstracts presented at the PC attained full publication, indicating a high meeting quality. Research works with the highest impact were frequently selected for podium presentation. However, several best-published papers were presented as posters. Our results may provide practical hints for quality promotion in pancreatology at a meeting level
- …
