11,798,164 research outputs found
Scyloxinae Zamani, Magalhaes & Rheims 2022, subfam. n.
No full textSubfamily Scyloxinae Zamani, Magalhaes & Rheims, subfam. n. Type genus. Scyloxes Dunin, 1992. Diagnosis. Males of Scyloxinae subfam. n. differ from those of Scytodinae by the palp with a short cymbium, without a digitiform extension (Fig. 13E–F) (vs. long, with digitiform extension in Scytodinae). Females differ by the absence of epigynal fovea and positioning ridges (Fig. 13G–H) (vs. present in Scytodinae). Included genera. Scyloxes and Stedocys.Published as part of Zamani, Alireza, Stockmann, Mark, Magalhaes, Ivan L. F. & Rheims, Cristina A., 2022, New taxonomic considerations in the spitting spider family Scytodidae (Arachnida: Araneae), pp. 151-175 in Zootaxa 5092 (2) on page 168, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5092.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/587655
Pikelinia brevipes Magalhaes & Ramírez, 2019, comb. nov.
No full text<i>Pikelinia brevipes</i>, comb. nov. (Keyserling, 1883) <p> <i>Filistata brevipes</i> Keyserling, 1883: 221. Female holotype from Peru, should be deposited in the University of Warsaw (“ <i>In der Sammlung der Universität in Warschau</i> ”), not located, probably lost.</p> <p> <i>Kukulcania brevipes:</i> Lehtinen, 1967: 242 (incorrect transfer to <i>Kukulcania</i>).</p> <p> REMARKS: Most early authors lumped filistatids in <i>Filistata</i> when describing new species, and Keyserling (1883) was no exception. He described this species based on females from Peru and provided a verbose description, but no illustrations. Mello-Leitão (1946) presented a small revision of Neotropical filistatids and correctly recognized that New World species do not belong in <i>Filistata</i>, transferring most prithine species to the New World genera <i>Filistatoides</i> F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899, <i>Pikelinia</i> Mello-Leitão, 1946, or <i>Malalistata</i> Mello-Leitão, 1946 (= <i>Pikelinia</i>). However, he overlooked <i>Filistata brevipes</i>, and this species remained listed in this genus along with <i>F. hibernalis, F. tractans, F. arizonica, F. geophila, F. utahana</i>, and <i>F. hurca.</i> When Lehtinen (1967) erected <i>Kukulcania</i>, he transferred all American <i>Filistata</i> to his newly created genus, including <i>F. brevipes</i>, despite the fact that he could not locate or examine its type specimen. As this species continued to be listed in <i>Kukulcania</i>, Brescovit and Santos (2013) thought the material they had collected from Peru belonged to this species and proceeded to present a redescription of what they believed to be conspecific with the type of <i>Filistata brevipes</i>. This type material could not be located by Lehtinen (1967), Brescovit and Santos (2013), by C.J. Grismado (in litt.), or by one of us (I.L.F.M.). It is not in the collections of the Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw) (Brescovit and Santos, 2013), nor could be found in other collections where some of Keyserling’s types are to be found (MCZ, NHM, OUNHM). At this point, the type material of <i>Filistata brevipes</i> should be regarded as lost. However, Keyserling’s (1883) description presents two key characters that allow us to unambiguously identify his species as as a Prithinae: (1) yellow palps and legs, the latter with two brown rings in all articles except the tarsi (“ <i>Palpen und Beine gelb, die ersteren an den Endgliedern dunkler, die letzteren an allen Gliedern, mit Aus-nahme der Tarsen, mit zwei, mehr oder weniger deutlichen, braunen Ringen versehen</i> ”), and (2) an inconspicuous calamistrum (“ <i>ein Calamistrum ist an dem hinteren Beinpaar nicht zu bemerken</i> ”). Yellow legs with brown rings are never present in <i>Kukulcania</i> (even in immature stages); this character is present in some <i>Filistata</i> (see Marusik and Zonstein, 2014) but is much more typical of Prithinae spiders (see Magalhaes, 2016, Magalhaes and Ramírez, 2017). The calamistrum in Filistatinae is on a crest, has broadened setae, and is generally very conspicuous (figs. 13F, 75D). Conversely, the calamistrum in Prithinae has unmodified setae and is not placed on a crest, and may be very difficult to distinguish among the other setae of the metatarsus (Magalhaes, 2016: fig. 26D). If <i>Filistata brevipes</i> was a filistatine, it is unlikely that Keyserling would have overlooked its calamistrum, since in 1879 he clearly recognized the peculiar morphology of this structure in <i>K. hibernalis</i> (sub <i>F. capitata</i>): “ <i>Am Anfange an der Innenseite der Metatarsen des vierten Beinpaares befindet sich das Calamistrum, eine kurze kammförmige Erhöhung, die mit einer dichten Reihe nicht langer Stachelborsten besetzt ist.</i> ” Thus, we can safely conclude that <i>Filistata brevipes</i> is a Prithinae, most likely in the genus <i>Pikelinia</i>. Its specific identity cannot be ascertained at this time: several species of <i>Pikelinia</i> occur in Peru (I.L.F. Magalhaes, unpublished data), and Keyserling’s description could apply to many of these. Considering this and the impossibility of examining the type specimen, this species might eventually need to be regarded as a nomen dubium, although not until a revisionary study of South American prithine spiders is carried out. Reinforcing our point of view, W.J. Gertsch applied the name “ <i>Filistatoides brevipes</i> (Keyserling) ” (a combination never formally proposed) to a Peruvian <i>Pikelinia</i> Mello-Leitão, and identified the Peruvian <i>Kukulcania</i> as a new species under the manuscript name “ <i>Filistata tropica</i>.”</p>Published as part of <i>Magalhaes, Ivan L. F. & Ramírez, Martín J., 2019, The Crevice Weaver Spider Genus Kukulcania (Araneae: Filistatidae), pp. 1-153 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 426</i> on page 147, DOI: 10.1206/00030090-426.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/3259018">http://zenodo.org/record/3259018</a>
Labahitha Zonstein, Marusik & Magalhaes 2017
No full textGenus Labahitha Zonstein, Marusik & Magalhaes, 2017 Mystes Bristowe, 1938: 319 (preoccupied in Coleoptera; see Zonstein et al. 2017). Labahitha Zonstein, Marusik & Magalhaes, 2017: 305. Type species Mystes oonopiformis Bristowe, 1938, by monotypy. Emended diagnosis Labahitha is closely related to Wandella Gray, 1994 and Yardiella Gray, 1994, with whom it shares a dorsal paraembolic lamina on the palp of males (Fig. 5), excavated tegulum, microteeth combs on the tegulum (Fig. 5H), and complete absence of the macrosetae on the legs of females. Males can be distinguished from Wandella and Yardiella by: (1) the rounded clypeus, similar to that of the female (Figs 7, 17) (vs anterior margin of the carapace straight, with acute clypeus in males), (2) paraembolic lamina, which has a ragged margin (Figs 5, 12A–D) (vs entire margin), and may be divided into two parts (Figs 5, 15, 20) or reduced to a small proximal keel almost completely fused to the tegulum (Figs 12A–D, 25) (vs a single free-ending, unfused part); in addition, they usually have an apical macroseta on the ventro-retrolateral face of metatarsal I (vs macroseta usually absent; present in at least W. murrayensis Gray, 1994). Females are distinguished from Wandella and Yardiella by the less contrasting colouration pattern, with weak or absent submarginal bands, leg rings and chevron pattern on the abdomen (Figs 2–3) (vs submarginal bands, chevron and leg rings well-marked). The female genitalia is variable, with paired (Figs 6, 12) or unpaired (Fig. 19) receptacles; the median receptacles may be well-developed (Fig. 12) or reduced (Fig. 6). Relationships Labahitha forms a clade with Wandella and Yardiella on the basis of shared possession of a paraembolic lamina with micro-teeth (Figs 5, 12A–D) and micro-teeth in the male clypeus (Fig. 23F) (see also Gray 1994; Magalhaes 2016; Zonstein et al. 2017). Tentative transfers The following three species are known only from the females mentioned in the original descriptions, which include poor figures, if any at all. Based on the textual description and their distribution, they are here provisionally transferred to Labahitha, taking into account that their current placement in the mainly Eurasian genus Pritha (proposed by Lehtinen 1967: 260) is poorly justified. Examination of their type material should be carried out to confirm the generic placement and clarify their identities, as it is not unlikely that they are synonyms of the other species treated here. This is especially important in the case of Filistata insularis Thorell, 1891, which has nomenclatorial priority over any of the names treated in this paper. (1) Labahitha littoralis (Roewer, 1938) comb. nov. (Filistata littoralis Roewer, 1938: 8, fig. 3. Female holotype from Indonesia, New Guinea, Kamana, 19 Mar. 1929, deposited in the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Belgium, not examined). Roewer (1938) describes the colouration of the carapace as yellowish brown, without spots or markings; the abdomen as dark grey; the legs as pale yellow and uniform, except for the darker femora. This is similar to pattern in other species of Labahitha (Fig. 2C). (2) Labahitha insularis (Thorell, 1891) comb. nov. (F. insularis Thorell, 1891: 17. Female (subadult?) from India, Car Nicobar, repository unknown, not examined). Lehtinen (1967) mentions that the types are deposited in Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Austria, but the only specimens identified as Filistata insularis in this collection come from Sumatra and were collected in 1938 (C. Hörweg, pers. com.), and thus cannot possibly be the types. The description mentions a dark spider, consistent with some species of this genus; the type locality is the same as that of L. nicobarensis (Tikader, 1977) comb. nov. and it is not unlikely the two species are synonyms (Fig. 2A). (3) Labahitha sundaica (Kulczyński, 1908) comb. nov. (Filistata sundaica Kulczyński, 1908: 579. Female holotype from Indonesia, Java, deposited in Instytut Zoologiczny, Polska Akademia Nauk, Poland, labelled Filistata biroi according to Lehtinen 1967, not examined). Kulczyński (1908) states that the carapace, the sternum, palps and legs are pale yellow, the abdomen is hazelnut brown, and that the mouth parts and distal portion of the legs are suffused with rusty red. This is similar to pattern in other species of Labahitha (Fig. 2C). Composition Eight species surely belong in the genus: Labahitha fuscata (Nakatsudi, 1943) comb. nov., Labahitha garciai (Simon, 1892) comb. nov., Labahitha gibsonhilli (Savory, 1943), Labahitha marginata (Kishida, 1936) comb. nov., Labahitha nicobarensis (Tikader, 1977) comb. nov., Labahitha oonopiformis (Bristowe, 1938), Labahitha platnicki sp. nov. and Labahitha ryukyuensis (Ono, 2013) comb. nov. Four other species are tentatively allocated here: Labahitha incerta sp. nov., Labahitha littoralis (Roewer, 1938) comb. nov., Labahitha insularis (Thorell, 1891) comb. nov. and Labahitha sundaica (Kulczyński, 1908) comb. nov. Distribution The genus is mainly distributed in Oceania and adjacent areas (Fig. 1). Species occur in a wide range spanning the Seychelles, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia, New Guinea and several islands in the Pacific Ocean; records from the American continent likely represent human-mediated introduction. Material examined by us from India, Sri Lanka, China, Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand belongs to other Prithinae genera, thus we suspect that Labahitha is not diverse in continental Asia.Published as part of Magalhaes, Ivan L. F., Berry, James W., Koh, Joseph K. H. & Gray, Michael R., 2022, Labahitha spiders (Arachnida: Araneae: Filistatidae) from islands in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, pp. 1-51 in European Journal of Taxonomy 805 (1) on pages 3-6, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.805.1693, http://zenodo.org/record/637382
Labahitha ryukyuensis Magalhaes & Berry & Koh & Gray 2022, comb. nov.
No full textLabahitha ryukyuensis (Ono, 2013) comb. nov. Tricalamus ryukyuensis Ono, 2013: 16, figs 1–11. Holotype male (NSMT-Ar 9930) and paratype males and females (NSMT-Ar 9931–9935) from Kamara, Okinawa-shi, Okinawa Prefecture (Okinawajima Island), Japan, 22 May 2011, T. Naka leg., deposited in the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, not examined. Notes The structure of the male palp (drop-shaped bulb with a keel-shaped paraembolic lamina; Ono 2013: figs 1–3) and somatic morphology indicate this species belongs in Labahitha and is a close relative of L. oonopiformis, L. garciai and L. nicobarensis, thus we propose the new combination. Diagnosis Males are similar to those of L. oonopiformis, L. garciai and L. nicobarensis by the teardrop-shaped bulb with a keel-shaped paraembolic lamina. They differ by the more slender palpal tibia, the less globose base of the bulb (Ono 2013: figs 1–3) (vs palpal tibia shorter and stouter, bulb base globose). Females are more similar to those of L. oonopiformis, L. garciai and L. gibsonhilli by the large membranous base of the receptacles and well-developed median receptacle; they differ in having the median receptacles smaller than the laterals (Ono 2013: fig. 9) (vs median receptacles subequal in size or larger than the laterals). Description See Ono (2013). Natural history Ono (2013) reports that specimens were collected in delicate webs with a central tubular retreat in inclined ground in the edge of a forest. One egg-sac had approximately 40 eggs. Distribution Known only from the type locality (Okinawajima Island, Japan) (Ono 2013) (Fig. 1).Published as part of Magalhaes, Ivan L. F., Berry, James W., Koh, Joseph K. H. & Gray, Michael R., 2022, Labahitha spiders (Arachnida: Araneae: Filistatidae) from islands in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, pp. 1-51 in European Journal of Taxonomy 805 (1) on pages 41-43, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.805.1693, http://zenodo.org/record/637382
Wandella infernalis Magalhaes, 2016, sp. nov.
No full textWandella infernalis sp. nov. (Figures 15, 19 – 21) Type material Holotype. Male from AUSTRALIA: Western Australia, 25 km northeast of Fitzroy Crossing, Geikie Range, cave KG- 47 (125.7416, − 18.04027), S. Eberhard & G. Forte, 1 / VII/ 1998 (WAM T 132988). Paratypes. Two females in the same vial. Etymology The specific name is an adjective referring to the subterranean habitat of this species, and is also a tribute to the notorious Australian rock band AC/DC, whose members have written several songs about hell. Diagnosis Males are most similar to those of Wandella centralis Gray and Wandella pallida Gray in having a long and slender palp; they can be distinguished from these and all other Wandella species by having a strong ventral bump in the bulb just basal to the embolus (W. pallida Gray has a similar, but much more tenuous bump: see his fig. 114), and by the subtriangular paraembolic lamina ending close to the embolus (Figure 19 G). Females can be distinguished from other species by the subtriangular inner spermathecae, which point laterad (Figure 20 E). Description Holotype male from Cave KG- 47, Geikie Range, Western Australia, Australia (WAM T 132988) (Figures 19, 21 A). Coloration: carapace cream, with brown median pattern and incomplete clypeal markings, and light brown median area, with slightly dark submarginal bands; chelicerae cream; labium and endites light cream; sternum light cream, with a pair of brown markings anteriorly; legs light cream, with incomplete light brown rings in the base and apex of the femora, tibiae and metatarsi; abdomen dorsum cream, with five light brown subtriangular markings; abdomen venter cream. Anterior margin of the carapace nearly straight. Sternum subrounded, sigillae not visible. Total length 2.74. Carapace length 1.16, width 0.90. Clypeus length 0.25. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.06, PME 0.09, ALE 0.11, PLE 0.1, AME – AME 0.01, PME – PME 0.08. Palp: femur length 0.67, width 0.13, tibia length 0.36, width 0.14. Leg I: femur 2.11, patella 0.41, missing from tibia. II: fe 1.31, pa 0.37, ti 1.24. III: fe 1.18, pa 0.31, ti 1.04. IV: fe 1.56, pa 0.42, ti 1.45, mt 1.55, ta 0.69. Abdomen: length 1.65, width 1.01. Leg macrosetae: absent (leg I missing from tibia). Palp: cymbium horseshoe-shaped, prolateral excavation very large, occupying most of the prolateral face of the tegulum (Figure 19 F, Ex), paraembolic process subtriangular, distally detached, pointy, embolus short and nearly straight. Paratype female from Cave KG- 47, Geikie Range, Western Australia, Australia (WAM T 132988, preparation IFM-0824) (Figure 20 A – C). Coloration as in male. Sternum as in male. Total length 3.53. Carapace length 1.37, width 1.08. Clypeus length 0.24. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.07, PME 0.09, ALE 0.11, PLE 0.09, AME – AME 0.02, PME – PME 0.07. Sternum length 0.86. width 0.62. Palp: femur length 0.96, width 0.23, tibia length 0.61, width 0.18. Leg I: femur 2.05, patella 0.41, tibia 2.5, metatarsus 2.02, tarsus 1.22. II: fe 1.43, pa 0.47, ti 1.26. III: fe 1.25, pa 0.43, ti 1.10. IV: fe 1.77, pa 0.42, ti 1.52, mt 1.45, ta 0.86. Abdomen: length 2.07, width 1.39. Leg macrosetae: absent. Calamistrum with three rows with 7 - 4?- 7 setae (inner to outer row). State of the specimen: left leg I missing from tibia, not dissected, carapace cuticle somewhat displaced beneath. Paratype female from the same locality (WAM T 132988, preparation IFM-0651) (Figures 20 D, E, 21 B). Epigastric furrow adorned with thick setae posteriorly, and a row of long setae anteriorly. Spermathecae: inner spermathecae subtriangular, more sclerotized than the laterals, pointing laterad, outer spermathecae rounded, on the top of a short annulated stalk. Variation Females (n = 2): total length 3.53 – 4.52 (4.03), carapace length 1.37 – 1.71 (1.54), femur I length 2.05 – 2.56 (2.31). Note Males and females have been matched because they have been collected in the same cave. Distribution Known from a single cave in Western Australia (Figure 15). Material examined Only the types.Published as part of Ivan L. F. Magalhaes, 2016, On new or poorly known Australian Filistatidae spiders (Araneae: Araneomorphae), including a study on the fine morphology of Wandella, pp. 1815-1858 in Journal of Natural History 50 (29 - 30) on pages 22-25, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1181805, http://zenodo.org/record/26906
Labahitha nicobarensis Magalhaes & Berry & Koh & Gray 2022, comb. nov.
No full textLabahitha nicobarensis (Tikader, 1977) comb. nov. Filistata nicobarensis Tikader, 1977: 160, fig. 1A–C. Holotype female and paratype male and females from India, Car Nicobar, 8 Mar. 1970, B.K. Tikader leg., deposited in the National Collection, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta or in the Zoological Survey of India, Poona, not examined. Pritha nicobarensis – Patel 1978: 186. Notes We have not examined the type specimens, but the teardrop-shaped bulb with a keel-like paraembolic lamina figured in the original description (Tikader 1977: fig. 1C) clearly indicates this species belongs to Labahitha. We provided a tentative diagnosis and consider this species as valid, but re-examination of the type material would be desirable to confirm its validity. It should be noted that there is an older available name based on specimens also from the Nicobar islands, Filistata insularis Thorell, 1891, which we were unable to examine; it is not unlikely that they could be synonyms. Diagnosis Males are similar to those of L. oonopiformis, L. ryukyuensis and L. garciai by the teardrop-shaped bulb with a keel-shaped paraembolic lamina. They differ from all these species by the shorter, more straight and robust embolus (Tikader 1977: fig. 1c). The female genitalia has never been illustrated and thus we are unable to provide a diagnosis for the female at this time. Description See Tikader (1977). Distribution India, Andaman and Nicobar islands (Fig. 1B).Published as part of Magalhaes, Ivan L. F., Berry, James W., Koh, Joseph K. H. & Gray, Michael R., 2022, Labahitha spiders (Arachnida: Araneae: Filistatidae) from islands in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, pp. 1-51 in European Journal of Taxonomy 805 (1) on page 36, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.805.1693, http://zenodo.org/record/637382
Kukulcania chingona Magalhaes & Ramírez 2019, sp. nov.
No full textKukulcania chingona, sp. nov. Figures 4C, 9C, 77–78 TYPE MATERIAL: HOLOTYPE: MEXICO. Michoacán: 6 miles S of Arteaga [N18.35625°, W102.29199°, 790m], V.F. Lee, 9.xi.1987, 1♀ (CAS 9057614). PARATYPES: Guerrero: 23 miles S Chilpancigo [N17.20936°, W99.50272°], V. Roth and W. Gertsch, 31.vii.1956, 1♀ (AMNH IFM-1541); 3 km SE Tuxpán [N18.34917°, W99.47861°, 1768m], E.S. Ross, 3.xi.1976, 2♀ (CAS 9060649). Michoacán: Tuxpán [N19.56839°, W100.46382°, 1829m], S.C. Williams, 19.vi.1969, 1♀ (CAS 9060636). ETYMOLOGY: The Mexican slang terms chingón (masculine) and chingona (feminine) have a variety of meanings, including to denote something of high quality, and is here applied as an adjective. DIAGNOSIS: The male is unknown. Females can be distinguished from other species lacking sclerotized bars by the unsclerotized spermathecae with glandular pores grouped into several small patches (instead of a single, large patch) (fig. 78). DESCRIPTION: Female holotype from 6 miles S of Arteaga, Michoacán Mexico (CAS 9057614). Coloration brown. Carapace light orange-brown, densely stippled with brown. Labium endites and sternum light orange. Ster- num not particularly hirsute. Legs brown, with yellowish-brown longitudinal stripes on coxae, femora, and tibiae; femora and tibia I and II hirsute, with long setae. Abdomen dorsum brown. Anterior margin of the carapace unmodified. Sternum oval, with two pairs of sigillae. Total length 12.77. Carapace length 5.31, width 3.94, clypeus length 0.73. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.295; PME 0.32; ALE 0.293; PLE 0.328; AME–AME 0.07; PME– PME‰.391. Sternum length 2.4, width 2.23. Palp: femur length 2.97, height 1.08; tibia length 1.8, height 0.88. Leg I: femur (fe) 5.84; patella (pa) 2.05; tibia (ti) 5.32; metatarsus (mt) 4.71; tarsus (ta) 2.6. II: fe 4.68; pa 1.72; ti 4.01; mt 3.67; ta 2.03. III: fe 3.76; pa 1.52; ti 3; mt 3.19; ta 1.77. IV: fe 5.05; pa 1.65; ti 4.23; mt 3.93; ta 2.12. Abdomen: length 7.84, width 5.54. Palp macrosetae on ventral surface of tibia and tarsus. Leg macrosetae present on ventral surfaces of tibiae, metatarsi, and tarsi; all femora and metatarsi III with 2–4 dorsal macrosetae. Calamistrum with three rows with 9–12 setae each. Interpulmonary fold large, rounded, covering the spermathecae dorsally. Sclerotized lateral bars absent; spermathecae unsclerotized, with sparse patches of glandular pores in its base and an unsclerotized rounded apex lacking glands. State of the specimen: good, genitalia dissected, right leg IV disarticulated from tibia, left leg III missing from tibia. Male unknown. INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION: Females (N = 2): total length 8.41–12.77 (10.59), carapace length 3.63–5.31 (4.47), femur I length 4.16–5.84 (5), tibia I length 3.75–5.32 (4.54), femur/carapace ratio 1.1–1.15 (1.13). The genitalia do not vary noticeably (fig. 78). NATURAL HISTORY: Unkown; the few specimens in collections do not have natural history data associated with them. DISTRIBUTION: Western Mexico, in Guerrero and Michoacán states. The record from Nayarit is based on a subadult female and thus should be taken with caution (fig. 4C). ADDITIONAL MATERIAL EXAMINED: MEXICO. Nayarit: 5 miles NE San Blas (N21.34°, W105.12°), W.J. Gertsch and W. Ivie, 14.v.1963, subadult♀ (AMNH IFM-1636).Published as part of Magalhaes, Ivan L. F. & Ramírez, Martín J., 2019, The Crevice Weaver Spider Genus Kukulcania (Araneae: Filistatidae), pp. 1-153 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 426 on pages 127-130, DOI: 10.1206/00030090-426.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/325901
José Calvet de Magalhaes. A diplomacia pura
No full textD. E. José Calvet de Magalhaes. A diplomacia pura. In: Politique étrangère, n°3 - 1983 - 48ᵉannée. pp. 719-720
Yardiella Gray 1994
No full textGenus Yardiella Gray 1994 Yardiella Gray 1994, p. 59. Type species Yardiella humphreysi Gray 1994 by original designation and monotypy.Published as part of Ivan L. F. Magalhaes, 2016, On new or poorly known Australian Filistatidae spiders (Araneae: Araneomorphae), including a study on the fine morphology of Wandella, pp. 1815-1858 in Journal of Natural History 50 (29 - 30) on page 42, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2016.1181805, http://zenodo.org/record/26906
Fig. 10 in On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts
Get PDFFig. 10. Geographic distribution records of species of Loxosceles in Chile. Records of L. laeta (Nicolet, 1849) are based on the material examined in this study and on Gertsch (1967). Stars under L. surca Gertsch, 1967 and L. coquimbo Gertsch, 1967 are records from Gertsch (1967).Published as part of Brescovit, Antonio D., Taucare-Ríos, Andrés, Magalhaes, Ivan L. F. & Santos, Adalberto J., 2017, On Chilean Loxosceles (Araneae: Sicariidae): first description of the males of L. surca and L. coquimbo, new records of L. laeta and three remarkable new species from coastal deserts, pp. 1-20 in European Journal of Taxonomy 388 on page 17, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.388, http://zenodo.org/record/113357
- …
