2,763 research outputs found
Development of a clinical risk score for pain and function following total knee arthroplasty : results from the TRIO study
Funding Targeted Rehabilitation to Improve Outcome after knee replacement (TRIO) was supported by Arthritis Research UK (Grant No: 20100) (chief investigator TRIO-Physio, Prof. Hamish A Simpson; chief investigator TRIO-POPULAR, Prof. Gary J Macfarlane). Erratum: Development of a clinical risk score for pain and function following total knee arthroplasty: Results from the TRIO study (Rheumatology Advances in Practice (2018) DOI: 10.1093/rap/rky021) Joanna Shim, David J. McLernon, David Hamilton, Hamish A. Simpson, Marcus Beasley, Gary J. Macfarlane, 2018, vol. 5, issue 3. Rheumatology Advances in PracticePeer reviewe
Michael Rodriguez interviews author Gary Gildner
Author Gary Gildner explains why he left his tenured teaching position to move to Idaho to became a full-time writer of poetry. Gildner talks about donating his personal papers to Michigan State University Libraries' Special Collections, his writing style and how he approaches writing. Gildner is interviewed by MSU Librarian Michael Rodriguez for the MSU Libraries' Michigan Writer Series. Held at the MSU Main Library
Widespread body pain and mortality:: Prospective population based study
Objective: To determine whether there is excess mortality in groups of people who report widespread body pain, and if so to establish the nature and extent of any excess. Design: Prospective follow up study over eight years. Mortality rate ratios were adjusted for age group, sex, and study location. Setting: North west England. Participants: 6569 people who took part in two pain surveys during 1991-2. Main outcome measures: Pain status at baseline and subsequent mortality. Results: 1005 (15%) participants had widespread pain, 3176 (48%) had regional pain, and 2388 (36%) had no pain. During follow up mortality was higher in people with regional pain (mortality rate ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.44) and widespread pain (1.31, 1.05 to 1.65) than in those who reported no pain. The excess mortality among people with regional and widespread pain was almost entirely related to deaths from cancer (1.55 (1.09 to 2.19) for regional pain and 2.07 (1.37 to 3.13) for widespread pain). The excess cancer mortality remained after exclusion of people in whom cancer had been diagnosed before the original survey and after adjustment for potential confounding factors. There were also more deaths from causes other than disease (for example, accidents, suicide, violence) among people with widespread pain (5.21, 0.94 to 28.78). Conclusion: There is an intriguing association between the report of widespread pain and subsequent death from cancer in the medium and long term. This may have implications for the long term follow up of patients with "unexplained" widespread pain symptoms, such as those with fibromyalgia
Does chronic pain predict future psychological distress?
Cross-sectional studies have consistently shown a relationship between chronic widespread pain, the clinical hallmark of fibromyalgia, and psychological distress. These studies cannot distinguish the direction of any causal relationship. Recent population based studies have reported that such pain is predictive of future distress. However, chronic pain is often associated with physical and psychological co-morbid features which may confound this relationship. The aim of this study was to examine the hypothesis that chronic widespread pain increases the risk of future distress after adjusting for the effects of possible confounding factors. A population based survey of 1953 individuals identified subjects' psychological status and whether they satisfied criteria for chronic widespread pain. At baseline co-morbid features of chronic widespread pain, including reporting other somatic symptoms, abnormal illness behaviour, health anxiety, fatigue and low levels of self-care, were measured. All subjects were followed up after 12 months to determine levels of psychological distress. Subjects with chronic widespread pain at baseline were much more likely to be distressed at follow up (OR=4.0, 95% CI (2.5,6.3)). As levels of distress at follow up may simply reflect those at baseline the association was adjusted for baseline levels of distress. Chronic widespread pain was, however, still associated with future distress although the relationship was slightly attenuated (odds ratio, OR=3.0, 95% CI (1.8,5.1)). To examine our main hypothesis a final analysis was undertaken adjusting this association for those co-morbid features assessed at baseline. Following these adjustments chronic widespread pain was no longer significantly associated with future distress (OR=1.5, 95% CI (0.8,2.9)). Chronic widespread pain was associated with increased levels of psychological distress at follow up. However, a more rigorous analysis indicated that the association between baseline pain status with future distress was explained by concomitant features of chronic pain rather than pain per se. These findings indicate that it is those persons with chronic widespread pain in the presence of other physical and psychosocial factors who will become distressed. © 2002 International Association for the study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved
Association of widespread body pain with an increased risk of cancer and reduced cancer survival: a prospective, population-based study
Objective: to determine whether reported widespread body pain is related to an increased incidence of cancer and/or reduced survival from cancer, since our previous population surveys have demonstrated a relationship between widespread body pain and a subsequent 2-fold increase in mortality from cancer over an 8-year period.Methods: a total of 6,565 subjects in Northwest England participated in 2 health surveys during 1991–1992. The subjects were classified according to their reported pain status (no pain, regional pain, and widespread pain), and were subsequently followed up prospectively until December 31, 1999. During followup, information was collected on incidence of cancer and survival rates among those developing cancer. Associations between the original pain status and development of cancer and cancer survival were expressed as the incidence rate ratio (IRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR), respectively. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and study location, the latter being a proxy measure of socioeconomic status.Results: among the study population, 6,331 had never been diagnosed with cancer at the time of participation in the survey. Of these subjects, 956 (15%) were classified as having widespread pain, 3,061 (48%) as having regional pain, and 2,314 (37%) as having no pain. There were a total of 395 first malignancies recorded during followup. In comparison with subjects reporting no pain, those with regional pain (IRR 1.19, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.94–1.50) and widespread pain (IRR 1.61, 95% CI 1.21–2.13) experienced an excess incidence of cancer during the followup period. The increased incidence among subjects previously reporting widespread pain was related, most strongly, to breast cancer (IRR 3.67, 95% CI 1.39–9.68), but there were also cancers of the prostate (IRR 3.46, 95% CI 1.25–9.59), large bowel (IRR 2.35, 95% CI 0.96–5.77), and lung (IRR 2.04, 95% CI 0.96–4.34). Subjects reporting widespread pain who subsequently developed cancer, in comparison with those previously reporting no pain, had an increased risk of death (MRR 1.82, 95% CI 1.18–2.80). This decreased survival was highest among subjects with cancers of the breast and prostate, although the effects on site-specific survival were nonsignificant.Conclusion: this study has demonstrated that widespread pain reported in population surveys is associated with a substantial subsequent increased incidence of cancer and reduced cancer survival. At present there are no satisfactory biologic explanations for this observation, although several possible leads have been identified
Features of somatization predict the onset of chronic widespread pain: Results of a large population-based study
Objective. Chronic widespread pain, the clinical hallmark of the fibromyalgia syndrome, is associated with other physical and psychological symptoms both in patients studied in a clinical setting and in those identified in the community. The present study was undertaken to examine the hypothesis that psychological and physical indicators of the process of somatization predict the development of new chronic widespread pain. Methods. In this population-based prospective study, 1,658 adults ages 18-65 years completed a detailed pain questionnaire, which included a pain drawing. They also completed the following psychosocial instruments: General Health Questionnaire, Somatic Symptom Checklist, Fatigue Questionnaire, and Illness Attitude Scales. Individuals were followed up at 12 months, at which time 1,480 (93% of subjects still living at their baseline address) provided data on pain status, using the same instruments. Results. At baseline, 825 subjects were classified as pain free and 833 as having pain not satisfying criteria for chronic widespread pain. Of those, 18 (2%) and 63 (8%), respectively, were classified as having chronic widespread pain at followup. After adjustment for age and sex, there were strong relationships between baseline test scores and subsequent risk of chronic widespread pain (odds ratio for the Somatic Symptom Checklist 3.3; odds ratio for the Illness Behavior subscale of the Illness Attitude Scales 9.0). All 95% confidence intervals excluded unity. These associations were independent of baseline pain status. Conclusion. Subjects who are free of chronic widespread pain are at increased future risk of its development if they display other aspects of the process of somatization. Data from this population-based prospective study lend powerful support to the hypothesis that chronic widespread pain can be one manifestation of the somatization of distress
Somatization and development of chronic widespread pain: Comment on the article by McBeth et al and the editorial by Winfield
Whether the weather influences pain? Results from the EpiFunD study in North West England
<b>Objective</b> To determine whether the report of pain is influenced by meteorological conditions.<p></p>
<b>Methods</b> A population-based study (Epidemiology of Functional Disorders) was conducted in North West England. Subjects were mailed a questionnaire that enquired about pain on the day of completion (‘any pain’) and chronic widespread pain (CWP) as defined by the ACR, as well as about the potential mediating factors, sleep quality, exercise and mood, between the weather and pain. Hourly information on sunshine, precipitation, air temperature and pressure was available from a local weather station. Analysis of relationships was done by Cox regression and described as prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% CIs.<p></p>
<b>Results</b> Between January 2005 and December 2006, questionnaires from 2491 subjects were returned: 42% of the subjects reported ‘any pain’ on the day of completion, whereas 15% of the subjects had CWP. For both ‘any pain’ and CWP, the PR was the highest in winter (46.1 and 22.2%, respectively) followed by autumn (45.4 and 17.9%, respectively) and spring (41.9 and 14.7%, respectively) and lowest in summer (35.6 and 9.5%, respectively). Persons were less likely to report pain on days with >5.8 h of sunshine (any pain: PR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.82, 0.93; CWP: PR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.38, 0.84) and with average temperature of >17.5°C (any pain: PR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.66, 0.83; CWP: PR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.34, 0.48). These relationships were partly explained by persons reporting taking more exercise and having better sleep quality and a more positive mood on days with sunshine and higher temperatures.<p></p>
<b>Conclusions</b> Although a strong relationship between lack of sunshine, lower temperatures and pain reporting has been demonstrated, pain is not an inevitable consequence of such climatic conditions
- …
