1,721,373 research outputs found
La autonomía del derecho de la UE: una celebración conjunta de Kadi II y Van Gend en Loos
Fil: Martinico, Giuseppe. Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna. Catedra Derecho Publico ccomparado. Pisa, ItaliaLa cátedra Jean Monnet es una cátedra universitaria otorgada por la Comisión Europea en el marco de su plan de acción. Tienen como objetivo reforzar la docencia y la investigación sobre la integración europea en las universidades, tanto de los Estados miembros como de terceros países. Su nombre hace honor a quien fuera un político francés que, como asesor de Robert Schuman, contribuyó decisivamente a poner los cimientos de las entonces Comunidades Europeas. -- La primera etapa de esta publicación concluyó en el año 2018, comenzó una segunda época en el año 2019 con el nombre Revista "Integración Regional y Derechos Humanos". -- Sección Ensayos
G. Delledonne, G. Martinico, L. Pierdomimnici, Il costituzionalismo canadese a 150 anni dalla Confederazione. Riflessioni comparatistiche
Constitutional Failure or Constitutional Odyssey? What can we learn from Canada and Switzerland
According to many scholars, the rejection of the Constitutional Treaty and the disappointment caused by the contents of the Lisbon Treaty –- defined by Somek (2007) as a mere post-Constitutional Treaty – mark the failure of any possible constitutional ambition for the European Union (EU). In this paper I argue that the so-called constitutional “failure” of the EU is actually a confirmation of the current constitutional nature of the EU rather than proof of the impossibility of transplanting the constitutional discourse to the EU level. This point can be challenged both from a theoretical point of view – by describing the EU as an example of “evolutionary constitutionalism” – and a pragmatic one (i.e., looking at the functioning of concrete constitutional experiences), I will focus my paper on this second point, insisting on comparative argument. The research question of this work is: Can we compare the “constitutional crisis” of the EU to the constitutional difficulties encountered by other multinational experiences? My idea is that the latest attempts at amending the EU treaties – the period of the “Conventions” – can be traced back to the genus of mega-constitutional politics and starting from this parallelism I argue that the so-called constitutional “failure” of the EU is actually a confirmation of the current constitutional nature of the EU rather than the proof of the impossibility of transplanting the constitutional discourse to the EU level
Book Review “M.Forowicz, The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights”, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010”,
The Importance of Consistent Interpretation in Subnational Constitutional Contexts: Old Wine in New Bottles?
The “Polemical” Spirit of European Constitutional Law: On the Importance of Conflicts in EU Law
Book Review on “Armin von Bogdandy and Pál Sonnevend (eds), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania, C. H. Beck-Hart- Nomos, Oxford”
- …
