1,721,468 research outputs found
M. Probst: Über den Hirnmechanismus der Motilität. Jahrbücher für Psych. u. Neurol. 1901
No full textM. PROBST: ÜBER DEN HIRNMECHANISMUS DER MOTILITÄT. JAHRBÜCHER FÜR PSYCH. U. NEUROL. 1901
Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (-)
Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (32) (a0001)
M. Probst: Über den Hirnmechanismus der Motilität. Jahrbücher für Psych. u. Neurol. 1901 (32) (p0296
M. Probst: Über das Gedankenlautwerden und über Halluzinationen ohne Wahnideen. Monatsschr. f. Psych. u. Neur. 13 (Ergh.), 401-423. 1903
No full textM. PROBST: ÜBER DAS GEDANKENLAUTWERDEN UND ÜBER HALLUZINATIONEN OHNE WAHNIDEEN. MONATSSCHR. F. PSYCH. U. NEUR. 13 (ERGH.), 401-423. 1903
Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (-)
Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (37) (a0001)
M. Probst: Über das Gedankenlautwerden und über Halluzinationen ohne Wahnideen. Monatsschr. f. Psych. u. Neur. 13 (Ergh.), 401-423. 1903 (37) (p0311
sj-docx-1-jvb-10.1177_0145482X221121353 - Supplemental material for The Online National Intervener Training Pilot Project
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-jvb-10.1177_0145482X221121353 for The Online National Intervener Training Pilot Project by Kristi M. Probst and Sam Morgan in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness</p
M. Probst: Ueber den Verlauf der Sehnervenfasern und deren Endigung im Zwischen- und Mittelhirn. Monatsschr. f. Psychiatr. u. Neurol. 8 (3), 165-181. 1900
No full textM. PROBST: UEBER DEN VERLAUF DER SEHNERVENFASERN UND DEREN ENDIGUNG IM ZWISCHEN- UND MITTELHIRN. MONATSSCHR. F. PSYCHIATR. U. NEUROL. 8 (3), 165-181. 1900
Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (-)
Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (27) (a0001)
M. Probst: Ueber den Verlauf der Sehnervenfasern und deren Endigung im Zwischen- und Mittelhirn. Monatsschr. f. Psychiatr. u. Neurol. 8 (3), 165-181. 1900 (27) (p0416
sj-docx-2-jvb-10.1177_0145482X221121353 - Supplemental material for The Online National Intervener Training Pilot Project
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-2-jvb-10.1177_0145482X221121353 for The Online National Intervener Training Pilot Project by Kristi M. Probst and Sam Morgan in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness</p
Does safety climate predict safety performance in Italy and the USA? Cross-cultural validation of a theoretical model of safety climate
No full textPrevious studies have acknowledged the relevance of assessing the measurement equivalence of safety related measures across different groups, and demonstrating whether the existence of disparities in safety perceptions might impair direct group comparisons. The Griffin and Neal (2000) model of safety climate, and the accompanying measure (Neal et al. [NGH], 2000), are both widely cited and utilized. Yet neither the model in its entirety nor the measure have been previously validated across different national contexts. The current study is the first to examine the NGH measurement equivalence by testing whether their model of safety climate predicting safety performance is tenable in both English speaking and nonEnglish speaking countries. The study involved 616 employees from 21 organizations in the US, and 738 employees from 20 organizations in Italy. A multi-group confirmatory factor analytic approach was used to assess the equivalence of the measures across the two countries. Similarly,the structural model of relations among the NGH variables was examined in order to demonstrate its cross-country invariance. Results substantially support strict invariance across groups for the NGH safety scales. Moreover, the invariance across countries is also demonstrated for the effects of safety climate on safety knowledge and motivation, which in turn positively relate to both compliance and participation. Our findings have relevant theoretical implications by establishing measurement and relational equivalence of the NGH model. Practical implications are discussed for managers and practitioners dealing with multi-national organizational contexts. Future research should continue to investigate potential differences in safety related perceptions across additional non-English speaking countrie
Safety culture, moral disengagement, and accident underreporting
No full textMoral disengagement (MD) is the process by which individuals mitigate the consequences of their own violations of moral standards. Although MD is understood to be co-determined by culture norms, no study has yet explored the extent to which MD applied to safety at work (JS-MD) fosters safety violations (e.g. accident underreporting), nor the role of organizational culture as a predictor of JS-MD. The current study seeks to address this gap in the literature by examining individual- (MD) and organizational-level (culture) factors that explain why employees fail to report workplace accidents. We tested a latent variable structural model positing organizational culture typologies (autocratic, bureaucratic, clan-patronage, technocratic, and cooperative) as predictors of JS-MD, which in turn is expected to mediate the relationship with accident underreporting. Using data from 1033 employees in 28 Italian organizations, findings suggest that Bureaucratic Safety Culture was related to lower levels of JS-MD, whereas Technocratic Safety Culture was related to greater JS-MD. In turn, JS-MD positively predicted employee accident underreporting and fully mediated the relationship between culture and underreporting. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of the increasing focus on underreporting as well as the adverse individual and organizational consequences of failing to report workplace accidents.Moral disengagement (MD) is the process by which individuals mitigate the consequences of their own violations of moral standards. Although MD is understood to be co-determined by culture norms, no study has yet explored the extent to which MD applied to safety at work (JS-MD) fosters safety violations (e.g. accident underreporting), nor the role of organizational culture as a predictor of JS-MD. The current study seeks to address this gap in the literature by examining individual- (MD) and organizational-level (culture) factors that explain why employees fail to report workplace accidents. We tested a latent variable structural model positing organizational culture typologies (autocratic, bureaucratic, clan-patronage, technocratic, and cooperative) as predictors of JS-MD, which in turn is expected to mediate the relationship with accident underreporting. Using data from 1033 employees in 28 Italian organizations, findings suggest that Bureaucratic Safety Culture was related to lower
The relationship between job insecurity and accident under-reporting: A test in two countries
No full textAlthough the problem of accident under-reporting is increasingly recognized in the literature, less is known regarding work environment variables that predict the severity of such under-reporting. Data on perceived job insecurity and on the numbers of both accidents that were experienced and accidents that were actually reported over a period of one year were obtained from 786 employees in 24 US organizations and 563 employees in 20 Italian organizations in sectors where safety is highly relevant. Analysis of these data suggested that not only is job insecurity related to the likelihood of experiencing an accident, but also perceptions of job insecurity may serve to inhibit the reporting of accidents to appropriate company officials. Overall, the rate of accidents was lower in Italy than the United States. Moreover, in both countries, when job insecurity was low, there was little difference between the total number of experienced accidents and the number that employees reported. However, as job insecurity increased, the under-reporting of accidents increased. The implications of these results are discussed in light of the globally increasing prevalence of job insecurity in today's workplace.Although the problem of accident under-reporting is increasingly recognized in the literature, less is known regarding work environment variables that predict the severity of such under-reporting. Data on perceived job insecurity and on the numbers of both accidents that were experienced and accidents that were actually reported over a period of one year were obtained from 786 employees in 24 US organizations and 563 employees in 20 Italian organizations in sectors where safety is highly relevant. Analysis of these data suggested that not only is job insecurity related to the likelihood of experiencing an accident, but also perceptions of job insecurity may serve to inhibit the reporting of accidents to appropriate company officials. Overall, the rate of accidents was lower in Italy than the United States. Moreover, in both countries, when job insecurity was low, there was little difference between the total number of experienced accidents and the number that employees reported. Howev
- …
