542 research outputs found
Performance Management
Decramer, A., Audenaert, M., George, B., & Van der Heijden, B. (2021). Performance Management. In B. Steijn & E. Knies (Eds.), Research Handbook on HRM in the Public Sector (pp. 91-104). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc
Performance Management
Decramer, A., Audenaert, M., George, B., & Van der Heijden, B. (2021). Performance Management. In B. Steijn & E. Knies (Eds.), Research Handbook on HRM in the Public Sector (pp. 91-104). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc
In memoriam Prof. Peter T. Macklem, 1931-2011: a tribute from the European Respiratory Society IN MEMORIAM
A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Background Previous studies showing that tiotropium improves multiple end points in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) led us to examine the long-term effects of tiotropium therapy.
Methods In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared 4 years of therapy with either tiotropium or placebo in patients with COPD who were permitted to use all respiratory medications except inhaled anticholinergic drugs. The patients were at least 40 years of age, with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 70per cent or less after bronchodilation and a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) of 70per cent or less. Coprimary end points were the rate of decline in the mean FEV1 before and after bronchodilation beginning on day 30. Secondary end points included measures of FVC, changes in response on St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), exacerbations of COPD, and mortality.
Results Of a total of 5993 patients (mean age, 65±8 years) with a mean FEV1 of 1.32±0.44 liters after bronchodilation (48% of predicted value), we randomly assigned 2987 to the tiotropium group and 3006 to the placebo group. Mean absolute improvements in FEV1 in the tiotropium group were maintained throughout the trial (ranging from 87 to 103 ml before bronchodilation and from 47 to 65 ml after bronchodilation), as compared with the placebo group (P<;0.001). After day 30, the differences between the two groups in the rate of decline in the mean FEV1 before and after bronchodilation were not significant. The mean absolute total score on the SGRQ was improved (lower) in the tiotropium group, as compared with the placebo group, at each time point throughout the 4-year period (ranging from 2.3 to 3.3 units, <P0.001). At 4 years and 30 days, tiotropium was associated with a reduction in the risks of exacerbations, related hospitalizations, and respiratory failure.
Conclusions In patients with COPD, therapy with tiotropium was associated with improvements in lung function, quality of life, and exacerbations during a 4-year period but did not significantly reduce the rate of decline in FEV1
Impact of care pathways for in-hospital management of COPD exacerbation: a systematic review
In-hospital management of COPD exacerbation is suboptimal, and outcomes are poor. Care pathways are a possible strategy for optimizing care processes and outcomes
Inhospital management of COPD exacerbations: a systematic review of the literature with regard to adherence to international guidelines.
Rationale Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are a leading cause of hospitalization. Suboptimal inhospital management is expected to lead to more frequent exacerbations and recurrent hospital admission, and is associated with increased mortality. Aims To explore inhospital management of COPD and to compare the results with recommendations from international guidelines. Methods A literature search was carried out for relevant articles published 2000-2009 in the databases Medline, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Invert. In addition, the reference lists of the selected articles were examined. Main inclusion criteria were as follows: COPD, exacerbation, hospitalization, description of inpatient management, and clinical trials. Assessment and treatment strategies in different studies were analysed and compared with American Thoracic Society-European Respiratory Society and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines. Outcomes were analysed. Results Seven eligible studies were selected. Non-pharmacological treatment was infrequently explored. When compared with international guidelines, diagnostic assessment and therapy were suboptimal, especially non-pharmacological treatment. Respiratory physicians were more likely to perform recommended interventions than non-respiratory physicians. Conclusions Adherence to international guidelines is low for inhospital management of COPD exacerbations, especially in terms of non-pharmacological treatment. Further investigation is recommended to explore strategies like care pathways that improve performance of recommended interventions.sponsorship: This study was supported by the Clinical Research Council of the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) and by the European Pathway Association (http://www.E-P-A.org) with an unconditional educational grant from Pfizer. The funding sources played no role in the design, execution and analysis of this study. (Clinical Research Council of the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium), European Pathway Association, Pfizer)status: Publishe
Eight-step method to build the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway: the case for COPD exacerbation
Abstract Background Optimization of the clinical care process by integration of evidence-based knowledge is one of the active components in care pathways. When studying the impact of a care pathway by using a cluster-randomized design, standardization of the care pathway intervention is crucial. This methodology paper describes the development of the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway for in-hospital management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation in the context of a cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) on care pathway effectiveness. Methods The clinical content of a care pathway for COPD exacerbation was developed based on recognized process design and guideline development methods. Subsequently, based on the COPD case study, a generalized eight-step method was designed to support the development of the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway. Results A set of 38 evidence-based key interventions and a set of 24 process and 15 outcome indicators were developed in eight different steps. Nine Belgian multidisciplinary teams piloted both the set of key interventions and indicators. The key intervention set was judged by the teams as being valid and clinically applicable. In addition, the pilot study showed that the indicators were feasible for the involved clinicians and patients. Conclusions The set of 38 key interventions and the set of process and outcome indicators were found to be appropriate for the development and standardization of the clinical content of the COPD care pathway in the context of a cRCT on pathway effectiveness. The developed eight-step method may facilitate multidisciplinary teams caring for other patient populations in designing the clinical content of their future care pathways.</p
- …
