1,416 research outputs found
New Suggested Regulations on Mediation in Cases of Minors
No full textThe aim of the article is to take a deeper look at the new regulations on mediation in juvenile cases. At the beginning of the paper, the author refers to the effects of mediation proceedings as assessed by its participants, including both the victim and the offender. The problem highlighted in the paper is connected with the still insufficient number of practical referrals of juvenile cases to mediation, caused mainly by imperfections in the legal regulations, which the new draft bill of 2008 attempts to eliminate. The subject of the text is therefore an in-depth analysis of the new regulations. Beata Czarnecka-Dzialuk points out such changes asbroadening the circle of people who can apply for proceedings to be submitted to mediation (by including the director of a juvenile correctional institution or a youth detention centre), making voluntary the withdrawal from the mediation proceedings at any stage, and extending the mediation model by educational activities other than just reparation. Additionally, the author points out the establishment of the principle of impartiality of the mediator and the right to exclude a judge whose impartiality may be questioned in such proceedings, and finally the introduction of a provision guaranteeing the confidentiality of mediation and the prohibition to request from a mediator information obtained during mediation. Czarnecka-Dzialuk focusses on the issue of regulations that should be improved and introduced into the Act in order to make it practically possible to apply these ideas in the future.Cel artykułu stanowi pogłębione spojrzenie na nowe regulacje dotyczące mediacji w sprawach nieletnich. Na wstępie artykułu autorka powołuje się na skuteczne skutki postępowań mediacyjnych oceniane przez jej uczestników, wśród których wymienia się zarówno pokrzywdzonych jak i sprawców. Problem podkreślony w opracowaniu związany jest z wciąż niewystarczającą ilością praktycznego kierowania spraw nieletnich do mediacji powodowanych przede wszystkim niedoskonałościami regulacji prawnych, które nowy projekt ustawy z 2008 roku próbuje zniwelować. Przedmiot tekstu stanowi zatem pogłębiona analiza nowych przepisów. Autorka podkreśla między innymi zmiany takie jak: poszerzenie kręgu osób mogących wystąpić z wnioskiem o skierowanie postępowania do mediacji (o dyrektora zakładu poprawczego czy też schroniska dla nieletnich), dobrowolność wycofania się z postępowania mediacyjnego na każdym etapie, czy rozszerzenie modelu mediacji o działania wychowawcze inne niż jedynie zadośćuczynienie. Dodatkowo B. Czarnecka-Dzialuk zwraca uwagę na ustanowienie zasady bezstronności mediatora i prawa do wyłączenia sędziego, którego bezstronność może być wątpliwa w analizowanym postepowaniu, czy wreszcie wprowadzenie w nowym projekcie zapisu gwarantującego poufność mediacji i zakaz przesłuchiwania mediatora odnośnie uzyskanych podczas mediacji informacji. B. Czarnecka-Dzialuk w swoim artykule zwraca przede wszystkim uwagę czytelnika na kwestię unormowań, które należałoby poprawić i wprowadzić do ustawy w celu praktycznej możliwości stosowania tych pomysłów w przyszłości.
The aim of the article is to take a deeper look at the new regulations on mediation in juvenile cases. At the beginning of the paper, the author refers to the effects of mediation proceedings as assessed by its participants, including both the victim and the offender. The problem highlighted in the paper is connected with the still insufficient number of practical referrals of juvenile cases to mediation, caused mainly by imperfections in the legal regulations, which the new draft bill of 2008 attempts to eliminate. The subject of the text is therefore an in-depth analysis of the new regulations. Beata Czarnecka-Dzialuk points out such changes asbroadening the circle of people who can apply for proceedings to be submitted to mediation (by including the director of a juvenile correctional institution or a youth detention centre), making voluntary the withdrawal from the mediation proceedings at any stage, and extending the mediation model by educational activities other than just reparation. Additionally, the author points out the establishment of the principle of impartiality of the mediator and the right to exclude a judge whose impartiality may be questioned in such proceedings, and finally the introduction of a provision guaranteeing the confidentiality of mediation and the prohibition to request from a mediator information obtained during mediation. Czarnecka-Dzialuk focusses on the issue of regulations that should be improved and introduced into the Act in order to make it practically possible to apply these ideas in the future
“Greenwashing” in the EU, the selected EU Member States and the UK
No full textPublished September 27, 2024 by Routledge (https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-of-Consumer-Protection-and-Behaviour-in-Energy-Mark/Czarnecka-Hunter-Kraniewski-Malinauskaite/p/book/9781032452012, pp. 54 - 66)
Das hinduistische Kastenwesen im nepalischen Hügelgebiet
No full textPfaff-Czarnecka J. Das hinduistische Kastenwesen im nepalischen Hügelgebiet. In: Brauen M, ed. Nepal, Leben und Überleben. Zürich: Völkerkunde Museum; 1984: 78-98
Dynamiken des Studierens: Zum Konzept des universitären Parcours
No full textPfaff-Czarnecka J, Prekodravac M. Dynamiken des Studierens: Zum Konzept des universitären Parcours. In: Pfaff-Czarnecka J, ed. Das soziale Leben der Universität. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2017: 61-90
Ritual Distances, Territoral Divisions: Land, Power and Identity in Central Nepal
No full textPfaff-Czarnecka J. Ritual Distances, Territoral Divisions: Land, Power and Identity in Central Nepal. In: Saltman M, ed. Land and Territoriality. Ethnicity and Identity. Oxford, New York: Berg; 2002: 113-133
Gesellschaften im Umbau: Identitäten, Konflikte, Differenzen
No full textPfaff-Czarnecka J, Honegger C, Gabriel M, eds. Gesellschaften im Umbau: Identitäten, Konflikte, Differenzen. Zürich: SEISMO-Verlag; 1996
Ethnisierung und De- Ethnisierung des Politischen. Aushandlungen um Inklusion und Exklusion im andinen und im südasiatischen Raum
No full textPatch test results with the European baseline series and additions thereof in the ESSCA network, 2015‐2018
No full textDifferential diagnosis of contact dermatitis: A practical-approach review by the EADV Task Force on contact dermatitis.
No full textThe diagnosis of eczema ('dermatitis') is mostly clinical and depends on the clinical history and exploratory objective findings (primary lesions, patterns). Contact dermatitis remains as an important condition in the group of eczematous disorders, with important socioeconomic and occupational relevance. Although irritant and allergic contact dermatitis have a different pathogenesis, both are characterized by a rather typical morphology, are triggered by external factors and tend to occur primarily in the area of contact with the exogenous agent. In addition, allergic and irritant dermatitis may also co-exist. The importance of diagnosing contact dermatitis, especially when allergic in nature, is both due to the possibility of avoiding the trigger, and due to its role in aggravating other skin conditions. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of clinical presentations in daily practice may pose an important challenge for the suspicion and correct diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Furthermore, other conditions, with different pathogenesis and treatment, may clinically simulate contact dermatitis. The Task Force aims to conduct a review of the unifying clinical features of contact dermatitis and characterize its main clinical phenotypes, and its simulators, in order to contribute to an early suspicion or recognition of contact dermatitis and enable a correct differential diagnosis
- …
