249 research outputs found

    Self-care Problems and Management Strategies Experienced by Rural Patient/Caregiver Dyads Living With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study

    No full text
    Background: Rural patients with heart failure (HF) have higher mortality and hospitalization rates compared with their urban counterparts. Although research supports the inclusion of informal caregivers in daily self-care activities, data are limited regarding the problems encountered by rural patient/caregiver dyads living with HF in managing HF in the home and how these problems are managed. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and describe HF self-care problems experienced by rural dyads in the home and how these problems are managed. Methods: Using a descriptive qualitative design, data were collected from rural patient/caregiver dyads living with HF via individual, semistructured, telephone interviews and analyzed using schematic content analysis. Interviews and data analysis occurred concurrently until data saturation was reached. Results: Thematic data saturation was obtained with 11 dyads. On average, patients were 65.3 (±13.9) years old, and caregivers were 62 (±12.37) years old. Four themes illustrating dyadic HF self-care problems and management strategies emerged: (1) HF self-care components, namely, maintenance, symptom monitoring, and management (diet, exercise, activities, strategies); (2) environment (rural barriers, COVID-19); (3) caregiver contributors (confidence, role); and (4) dyadic contributors (dyadic relationship). Dyads described various self-care problems, with the type of relationship and presence of mutuality influencing the problem-solving process and development of management strategies. Conclusions: The identified themes emphasize the self-care problems experienced by rural dyads living with HF and the contributions of both dyad members to effectively manage these challenges. Findings support the need for culturally sensitive, tailored interventions targeting self-care in rural dyads living with HF

    Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)

    No full text

    Adherence

    No full text

    Examination of risk factors for discontinuation of follow‐up care in patients with head and neck cancer

    No full text
    Abstract Background Little research has examined discontinuation of follow‐up care in patients with head and neck cancer. This exploratory study sought to examine key demographic, disease, and behavioral factors as possible correlates of discontinuation (N = 512). Methods Cross‐sectional study examined correlates of discontinuation of follow‐up care within 1 year. The primary outcome was defined as a disease‐free survivor not returning to cancer clinic for two consecutive follow‐up appointments within the first year of care and not reentering oncologic care at any point thereafter. Demographic, disease, and behavioral factors were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results One hundred twenty‐six (24.6%) patients discontinued by 12‐month follow‐up. Being unmarried (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.01–1.63, p = 0.041) and having elevated depressive symptomatology (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.07, p = 0.034) were significantly associated with discontinuation. Receipt of a single (vs. multimodal) treatment approached significance (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.96–3.07, p = 0.071). Conclusion Approximately one quarter of patients disengaged from important follow‐up care within 1 year. Lack of social support, depressive symptomatology, and single treatment modality may be important correlates of discontinuation of care in patients with head and neck cancer. Additional studies of this outcome are needed. Improved understanding of correlates associated with discontinuation could facilitate the identification of at‐risk patients and further development of interventions to keep patients engaged at a crucial time in the survivorship care trajectory
    corecore