408,017 research outputs found
Replication Data for: "The Reverse Matthew Effect: The Consequences of Retraction in Scientific Teams"
Jin, Ginger Zhe, Jones, Benjamin, Lu, Susan Feng, and Uzzi, Brian, (2019) "The Reverse Matthew Effect: The Consequences of Retraction in Scientific Teams." Review of Economics and Statistics 101:3, 492-506
Replication Data for: "The Reverse Matthew Effect: The Consequences of Retraction in Scientific Teams"
Jin, Ginger Zhe, Jones, Benjamin, Lu, Susan Feng, and Uzzi, Brian, (2019) "The Reverse Matthew Effect: The Consequences of Retraction in Scientific Teams." Review of Economics and Statistics 101:3, 492-506
Changshou er Feng xian sheng ji /
Imprint date from postscript.[1-2] Moan xian sheng ji 10 juan fu lu feng shu zhu -- [3-6] Dun yin xian sheng ji: Feng shi xiao ji 3 juan Dun yin ji 3 juan bie ji Yu ji you xian ji 2 juan ji wai shi yu fu wen gao za lu 10 juan feng ban shu jiao kan ji.Mode of access: Internet
Rohdea wangiana H. Z. Feng & Z. Qiang Lu 2021, sp. nov.
<i>Rohdea wangiana</i> H. Z. Feng & Z. Qiang Lu, <i>sp. nov.</i> (Fig. 1) <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> The new species resembles <i>R. pachynema</i>, but differs based on absence of slender stolons, the leaf blade with serrate margin, one bract per flower, peduncle ebracteate, with protuberance between two filaments and the positions of filaments and stigma in the perianth tube.</p> <p> <b>Type</b>:— CHINA. Sichuan, Xichang, alt. 3250 m, 12 April 2021, <i>H. Z</i> <i>. Feng & Z. Q.</i> <i>Lu 1327</i> (holotype, HITBC!).</p> <p>Chamaephytic herb. Rhizome cylindrical, up to 3.5 cm ca. in diameter, without slender stolons. Roots fibrous, to 3 mm in diameter. Leaves up to 15, sword-shaped, acute at apex, coriaceous, margin sparsely serrulate, 25–40 cm long, 2–3 cm broad. Peduncle 2–5 cm long, ebracteate. Spike oblong, densely many-flowered, 3–5 cm long, 1.5– 2 cm in diameter, without marked terminal tuft of sterile bracts. One bract per flower, lanceolate, usually obtuse at apex, exceeding flower, up to 10–15 mm long. Perianth campanulate, succulence, 5–10 mm across; 5 (6)-lobes; lobes broadly ovate, some lobes with dorsal angular protuberance 3–5 mm long, subacute to obtuse at apex, inflexed above, sometimes 3-lobed, or denticulate, imbricate below, 3–5 mm long, 3–8 mm broad; tube 3–5 mm long. Anthers orbicular-elliptic, ovate or broadly ovate, 1–1.3 mm long; filaments are inserted to the base of the perianth segments, free part incurved, deltoid or broadly dilated toward base, often slightly connate basally with adjacent ones, fleshy, with one small protuberance between two filaments, 2 mm long. Pistil 2.5–3 mm long; stigma trisected, lower than anthers; style columnar, 1–1.5 mm long; ovary slightly depressed globose, 1–1.5 mm long.</p> <p> <b>Etymology</b>:—The specific epithet is in honor of Professor Fa Tsuan Wang (1899-1985, PE), a pioneer in study of Liliflorae in China.</p> <p> <b>Distribution</b>:—This new species is currently known only from Xichang, Liangshan, Sichuan, China.</p> <p> <b>Taxonomic relationships</b>:—Comparison with known species of <i>Rohdea</i> indicates that <i>R. wangiana</i> is similar to <i>R. pachynema</i> by lack of marked terminal tuft of sterile bracts and filaments (free part) deltoid or prominently dilated below. However, <i>R. wangiana</i> differs from <i>R. pachynema</i> by serrate (vs. entire) margin of leaf blade (Fig. 3A, C), ebracteate peduncle (Fig. 3A), one bract per flower (Fig. 2), obvious angular protuberance at some perianth lobes (Fig. 1E, F, H, Fig. 2G, H), and small protuberance between filaments (Fig. 1G). According to Tanaka (2010), <i>R. pachynema</i> has slender subterranean stolons, whereas stolons are absent in <i>R. wangiana</i> under both wild and cultivated conditions. In <i>R. pachynema</i>, filaments are inserted slightly below the base of perianth segments, but inserted to the base of the perianth segments in <i>R. wangiana</i>. According to Tanaka (2010) and Wang & Tang (1949), the stigma and stamens are in the same plane in <i>R. pachynema</i>, but the stigma obviously lower than stamens in <i>R. wangiana</i> (Fig. 1F). Hence, this new species differs from <i>R. pachynema</i> based on multiple lines of evidence from phenological isolation and phenotypic divergence.</p>Published as part of <i>Feng, Hui Zhe, Lu, Zhi Qiang, Han, Qingxiang & Shen, Henglun, 2021, Rohdea wangiana (Asparagaceae), a new species from southwestern Sichuan, China, pp. 247-253 in Phytotaxa 523 (3)</i> on page 248, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.523.3.5, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5591444">http://zenodo.org/record/5591444</a>
Echinax baisha Lu & Li 2023
<i>Echinax baisha</i> Lu & Li, 2023 (白沙NJu) <p>Figs 4–6, 13</p> <p> <i>Echinax baisha</i> Lu & Li, in Lu <i>et al.</i>, 2023: 22, figs 3A–C, 4A–B (♂).</p> <p> <b>Material examined:</b> <b>CHINA:</b> 1♂ (MHUB-ARA-2011-2), <i>Hainan Province</i>, Cangjiang County, Bawang Mountains 30.Ⅴ.2011, leg. F. Zhang. 1♀ (HBUARA#2022-123), <i>Hainan Province,</i> Cangjiang County, Bawang Mountains, Baishi Tan scenic spot (19.131058°N, 109.056163°E, 739 m), 14.VII.2022, leg. L. Zhang.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> <i>E. baisha</i> is similar to <i>E. oxyopoides</i> and can be distinguished from it by: 1) the short, sickle-shaped embolus (<i>vs</i> long embolus in <i>E. oxyopoides</i>) (cf. Figs 6A–C, 13E with Figs 9A–C, 13A); 2) the slightly curved terminal part of embolus in retrolateral view (<i>vs</i> curved and C-shaped in <i>E. oxyopoides</i>) (cf. Fig. 13H with Fig. 13B); 3) posteriorly straight copulatory ducts (<i>vs</i> curved in <i>E. oxyopoides</i>) (cf. Fig. 6E with Fig. 9E).</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> <i>Male</i> (Figs 5A–B, 6A–C, 13E–F). For a detailed description see Lu <i>et al.</i>, 2023.</p> <p> <i>Female</i> (Fig. 5C–D). TL 5.83; CL 2.65, CW 2.03; AL 3.23, AW 1.64. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.16, ALE 0.10, PME 0.12, PLE 0.14; AME–AME 0.06, AME–ALE 0.03, ALE–ALE 0.42, PME–PME 0.16, PME– PLE 0.05, PLE–PLE 0.55, ALE–PLE 0.04; MOA 0.24 long, anterior width 0.32, posterior width 0.36. Clypeal height 0.22. LL 0.12, LW 0.31. SL 1.04, SW 0.96. Measurements of legs: I 8.62 (2.60, 0.81, 2.08, 2.15, 0.98), II 8.34 (2.46, 0.82, 2.00, 2.14, 0.92), III 8.18 (2.32, 0.82, 1.88, 2.19, 0.97), IV 10.00 (2.77, 0.85, 2.31, 3.01, 1.06). Carapace creamy, surface smooth; with radial marks, black feathery setae covering markings and dark marginal bands. Endites creamy, apical margin brown. Labium light brown; sternum creamy. Legs creamy, with half ring ventrally. Abdomen oval, creamy, with brown marks and small dorsal scutum.</p> <p>Epigyne as in Fig. 6D–E. Copulatory openings situated laterally in epigastric plate, with arc-shaped edges (Fig. 6D). Copulatory ducts approximately long, longer than receptacle, C-shaped, anterior of copulatory ducts parallel to posterior (Fig. 6D–E). Spermathecae folded, with wrinkles, close to each other.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> China (Hainan).</p>Published as part of <i>Zhang, Lu & Zhang, Feng, 2023, Review of the genus Echinax Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001 from China (Araneae: Corinnidae), pp. 39-56 in Zootaxa 5383 (1)</i> on page 43, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5383.1.3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10301580">http://zenodo.org/record/10301580</a>
Zong jing lu yao yi tiao mu lu
v.1-50. 宗鏡錄 : 一百卷 -- v.51. 宗鏡錄要義條目錄 : 上, 中卷 -- v.52. 宗鏡錄要義條目錄 : 下卷.v.1-50. Zong jing lu : yi bai juan -- v.51. Zong jing lu yao yi tiao mu lu : shang, zhong juan -- v.52. Zong jing lu yao yi tiao mu lu : xia juan.智覺禪師集.綫裝, 5函.框23.5 x 15.7公分, 10行20字, 無界行, 上白口下黑口, 無魚尾, 四周雙邊. 版心上鐫"支那撰述", 中鐫卷次, 下鐫葉次. 字旁刻有日文注音.明翻刻本?內封面背頁牌記刻"皇圖鞏固, 帝道遐昌, 佛日增輝, 灋輪常轉".每卷卷末均有牌記, 刻有原書施資者, 刻書者名字及刻書年 (明萬曆壬寅-癸卯 [30-31年, 1602-1603]).第一百卷卷末牌記刻"寬永壬午小春吉辰中野氏是誰新刻".《宗鏡錄要義條目錄下卷》卷末牌記刻"明曆元稔九月良辰野田彌兵衛刊行".(日)明寬永壬午即明崇禎15年 ; 明曆元年即1655.With: 宗鏡錄要義條目錄 : [三卷].Xian zhuang, 5 han.Kuang 23.5 x 15.7 gong fen, 10 hang 20 zi, wu jie hang, shang bai kou xia hei kou, wu yu wei, si zhou shuang bian. ban xin shang juan "Zhina zhuan shu", zhong juan juan ci, xia juan ye ci. Zi pang ke you Ri wen zhu yin.Ming fan ke ben?Nei feng mian bei ye pai ji ke "Huang tu gong gu, di dao xia chang, fo ri zeng hui, fa lun chang zhuan".Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Detailed notes in vernacular field only.Zhijuechanshi ji.With: Zong jing lu yao yi tiao mu lu : [san juan]
Qi lu shang gu chuan tong; Wei Jin Sui Tang Song Yuan juan
Ben shu jie shao le qi feng yu yun:wei jin nan bei chao shi qi de qi lu shang jia chuan tong;Sui tang wu dai shi qi qi lu shang jia chuan tong de ping huan fa zhan;Song yuan shi qi qi lu shang jia chuan tong de zhong xin zhen xing deng nei ron
The Authorship of the "Feng Shen Yen I".
The "Feng Shen Yen I" is a novel written by an unknown writer in the later part of the 16th century (Ming dynasty). No modern scholar specializing in the history of Chinese literature, was able to identify the author of this novel. Quite recently a certain edition(Shu Tsai-yang's) printed in the Ming dynasty was found by Prof. Sun K'ai-ti who discovered that the name of the author appears at the beginning of his 2nd vol. which reads "edited by Hsu Chung-lin, the Old Hermit of Chung-shan". But most of other scholars, including Dr. Hu Shih, Dr. Tung Kang and myself, doubted this very much, and in 1935, we discovered from other sources that this novel was compiled by a Taoist Lu Hsi-hsing in the reign of the Emperor Shih-tsung(Chia-ching) of the Ming dynasty. Yet the evidences given are again not enough because we knew only a little of the life of this author. I discovered later a very rare Ming edition of the work of one of Lu Hsi-hsing's contemporaries, Tsung Ch'en, and from it I have found out that there might be a counterpart to Lu Hsi-hsing in the novel who is named Lu Ya, the wonderful Taoist. Investigating again into other historical and geographical materials I can compose a vague but true biography of Lu, and by examining most of the poems in the novel I find they resemble to a great extent the life of its author. The discovery of Wu Wang Fa Chou P'ing-hua and Chuan 1 of the Lieh Kuo Chih Chuan in Japan serves to prove that Lu's novel was written based upon the earlier storytellers' work, but he wrote it in a different style, and enriched very much the con-tent. From the comparison made between the earlier materials and the novel, I have found that Lu added something to its content which again proves that only Lu would be qualified to do so. In my thesis I shall give detailed evidence about this discovery, illustrating which parts are the earlier scholars' or other contemporaries' work, and which parts are, my own contribution
Tetra shiheziensis Wang & Lu 2004
<i>Tetra shiheziensis</i> Wang & Lu, 2004 <p> <i>Tetra shiheziensis</i> Wang & Lu, 2004: 266 –267.</p> <p> <b>Host.</b> <i>Populus</i> sp. (Salicaceae).</p> <p> <b>Relation to host.</b> Vagrant on leaf undersurface, causing no apparent damage. <b>Distribution.</b> China (Gansu, Xinjiang).</p>Published as part of <i>Song, Zi-Wei, Xue, Xiao-Feng & Hong, Xiao-Yue, 2008, Eriophyoid mite fauna (Acari: Eriophyoidea) of Gansu Province, northwestern China with descriptions of twelve new species, pp. 1-48 in Zootaxa 1756</i> on page 38, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/181815">10.5281/zenodo.181815</a>
- …
