507 research outputs found
Diestrammena (Gymnaeta) tianmushanensis Liu et Zhang 2001
No full textDiestrammena (Gymnaeta) tianmushanensis Liu et Zhang, 2001 (Figs. 50–53) Tachycines (Gymnaeta) tianmushanensis Liu et Zhang, 2001. In Wu et Pan: Insects of Tianmushan National Nature Reserve. P. 98–99; Jiao et al., 2008. Zootaxa, 1917: 57–58, Figs. 4–6. Specimens examined: 13, Anhui (Wenquan Huangshan), 23. X. 1985, leg. Liu Xian-Wei; 1 Ƥ, Zhejiang (Linan Tianmushan), 1989. IX. 2. Distribution. China (Zhejiang; Anhui).Published as part of Zhang, Feng & Liu, Xian-Wei, 2009, A review of the subgenus Diestrammena (Gymnaeta) from China (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae Aemodogryllinae), pp. 21-36 in Zootaxa 2272 on page 33, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19100
100 Italian Architects and their works
No full text100 italian architects.
Il libro traccia un quadro puntuale della produzione architettonica italiana degli ultimi venti anni, cogliendone in particolar modo le espressioni più significative nei diversi ambiti regionali. Ne emerge una varietà di posizioni nell’ambito di alcune costanti come, ad esempio, la diffusione di opere di piccole dimensioni nei centri minori e il senso di appartenenza ai luoghi che le architetture selezionate manifestano, senza tuttavia escludere sperimentalismo e innovazione
sj-docx-1-ict-10.1177_15347354241233258 – Supplemental material for The Herbal Combination Shu Gan Jie Yu Regulates the SNCG/ER-a/AKT-ERK Pathway in DMBA-Induced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Cell Lines Based on RNA-Seq and IPA Analysis
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-ict-10.1177_15347354241233258 for The Herbal Combination Shu Gan Jie Yu Regulates the SNCG/ER-a/AKT-ERK Pathway in DMBA-Induced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Cell Lines Based on RNA-Seq and IPA Analysis by Yi Zhao, Linan Zhao, Tao Wang, Zhenghao Liu, Suyuan Tang, Hongxia Huang, Li Wu and Youzhi Sun in Integrative Cancer Therapies</p
sj-docx-2-ict-10.1177_15347354241233258 – Supplemental material for The Herbal Combination Shu Gan Jie Yu Regulates the SNCG/ER-a/AKT-ERK Pathway in DMBA-Induced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Cell Lines Based on RNA-Seq and IPA Analysis
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-2-ict-10.1177_15347354241233258 for The Herbal Combination Shu Gan Jie Yu Regulates the SNCG/ER-a/AKT-ERK Pathway in DMBA-Induced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Cell Lines Based on RNA-Seq and IPA Analysis by Yi Zhao, Linan Zhao, Tao Wang, Zhenghao Liu, Suyuan Tang, Hongxia Huang, Li Wu and Youzhi Sun in Integrative Cancer Therapies</p
sj-xls-3-ict-10.1177_15347354241233258 – Supplemental material for The Herbal Combination Shu Gan Jie Yu Regulates the SNCG/ER-a/AKT-ERK Pathway in DMBA-Induced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Cell Lines Based on RNA-Seq and IPA Analysis
No full textSupplemental material, sj-xls-3-ict-10.1177_15347354241233258 for The Herbal Combination Shu Gan Jie Yu Regulates the SNCG/ER-a/AKT-ERK Pathway in DMBA-Induced Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Cell Lines Based on RNA-Seq and IPA Analysis by Yi Zhao, Linan Zhao, Tao Wang, Zhenghao Liu, Suyuan Tang, Hongxia Huang, Li Wu and Youzhi Sun in Integrative Cancer Therapies</p
Pholetesor salalicus Mason 1959
No full textPholetesor salalicus Mason, 1959 Figures 8, 19 Apanteles salalicus: Papp, 1983: 253; Nixon, 1973: 216. Pholetesor salalicus: Mason, 1981: 39. Diagnosis. Metacarp about 4× as long as its distance from apex of marginal cell; inner spur of hind tibia markedly longer than outer one; postscutellum with an emargination between its middle point and forwarding-pointing projection, phragma exposed; scutellar sulcus reduced to a fine groove in which there is no obvious foveolation; propodeum shining, punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly, two series of ridges converging from either side to nucha, their apices more or less connected by a series of transverse ridges; posterolateral areas weakly and irregularly sculptured; apical part of T1 and T2 densely rugose all over; T3 virtually entirely smooth, shining; T1 not much narrowed towards apex; T2 more nearly triangular; and hind coxa almost yellow. Material examined. 1♀, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 1981. IV.20, Ma Yun, No. 810394; 1♀, West Mt. Tianmu, Linan, Zhejiang, 1984. VII.27, Wu Xiaojing, No. 844122; 1♀, Mt. Tianmu (Laodian), Linan, Zhejiang, 1998. VIII.23, Zhao Mingshui (light trap), No. 20001124; 1♀, Qingliangfeng, Linan, Zhejiang, 2005. VIII.12, Shi Min, No. 200607639; 1♀, Qingliangfeng, Linan, Zhejiang, 2005. VIII.11, Shi Min, No. 200607578; 1♀, Mt. Fengyang (Datianping), Longquan, Zhejiang, 2007. VII.28, Liu Jingxian, No. 200802797; 1♀, Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve (Shilingou), Guizhou, 2010. VI.9, Tan Jiangli, No. 201004483; 1♀, Dushan, Guizhou, 1986. V.18, Chen Demao, No. 864766; 9♀♀, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 1982, Peng Quxian, Nos. 824919 (3), 824920 (3), 824924 (2), 824933; 10♂♂, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 1982, Peng Quxian, Nos. 824919 (3), 824920 (2), 824924 (3), 824933 (2), ex. larvae of Pyralidae. Male. Similar to female, except for propodeum mostly polished, T2 less rugose and antenna much longer (penultimate antennomere at least 2.3× longer than wide) (Described here for the first time). Host. Larvae of Pyralidae (new record); Cosmopterigidae, Gracillariidae, Tischeriidae, and Tortricidae (Yu et al, 2012). Distribution. China (Guizhou, Jiangsu, Zhejiang) new record; Finland, Netherlands, Norway, U.S. A, United Kingdom. Note. This species is recorded from China for the first time. Characteristics of the specimens examined here mostly agree with the original species description of Mason (1959) except central basal third of T3 not longitudinally aciculate, at most a little uneven or rough anteriorly, and specimens from Jiangsu bred from pyralids in willow with reddish tergites (2+3).Published as part of Liu, Zhen, He, Jun-Hua & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2016, The genus Pholetesor Mason, 1981 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from China, with descriptions of eleven new species, pp. 351-387 in Zootaxa 4150 (4) on page 366, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4150.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/26759
Microtachycines elongatus Qin, Liu & Li, 2017, sp. nov.
No full text<i>Microtachycines elongatus</i> sp. nov. <p>(Figs. 4–9)</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Male. Body rather large. Vertex of head divided into conical tubercles, slightly separated (Fig. 5). Legs long and slender; fore femora about 1.5 times as long as the pronotum, beneath unarmed, internal knee lobe with a small spine, genicular lobe with 1 long movable spur; fore tibiae beneath with 2 external and 1 internal spur(s), between the paired apical spurs with a short spur. Mid femora with a long movable spur on the internal and genicular lobe, beneath unarmed; mid tibiae beneath with 1 external and 1 internal spur, between the paired apical spurs with a short spur. Hind femora beneath with 7–9 inter spines and without outer spines; hind tibiae above with 65–75 outer spines and 66–74 inter spines, arrange in groups, inner subapical spur of hind tibiae almost equal the length of hind metatarsus. Hind metatarsus with bristles beneath and an apical spine above. Epiproct prolong backwards and with a hollow in the middle part from above, apex with a distinct incision (Fig. 6). Lateral lobes of male genitalia distinctly sclerotized (Fig.7), basal part with a large projection (Fig. 8).</p> <p>Female. Subgential plate nearly trapezoidal and hind margin with a small spine (Fig. 9). Ovipositor shorter than the half of hind femora.</p> <p> <b>Coloration.</b> Body yellowish brown with dark streaks. Face yellowish with 4 dark longitudinal bands. Legs with dark annular stripes.</p> <p> <b>Measurements.</b> (length in mm) Body ♂ 15.0, ♀ 14.0; pronotum ♂ 6.0, ♀ 6.0; fore femora ♂ 9.0, ♀ 10.0; hind femora ♂ 16.0, ♀ 18.0; ovipositor 5.5.</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> Holotype, 2♂♂, Qingliangfeng, Linan, Zhejiang, alt. 1000m, 2009. VII.20, collected by Yin Hai-sheng <i>et al</i>.; paratype, 1♂, 2♀♀, same data as holotype; 1♂, Gutian Mountain, Kaihua, Zhejiang, alt. 330– 800m, 2012. IX.18–20, collected by Liu Xian-wei <i>et al</i>.; 1♀, Tianmu Mountain, Zhejiang, alt. 350m, 2009. X.14– 15, collected by Liu Xian-wei <i>et al</i>.; 1♀, Tianmu Mountain, Zhejiang, alt. 1012m, 2010. VII.28–IX.2, collected by Pan Hui.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> China (Zhejiang).</p> <p> <b>Discussion.</b> This species is very similar to <i>Microtacheines fallax</i> <b>sp. nov.</b>, but differs from the latter in: hind femora armed with 7–9 spines ventrally, outer lobes of male genitalia with a large basal projection.</p>Published as part of <i>Qin, Yanyan, Liu, Xianwei & Li, Kai, 2017, Review of the genus Microtachycines Gorochov with two new species (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae, Aemodogryllinae) from China, pp. 596-600 in Zootaxa 4216 (6)</i> on pages 597-599, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/242493">10.5281/zenodo.242493</a>
Dolichogenidea unicarina Liu & He & Chen 2018, sp. n.
No full textDolichogenidea unicarina Liu & Chen, sp. n. Figures 34, 39 Description. Female. Body length 3.1 mm, fore wing length 3.4 mm. Head. Rather transverse in dorsal view, 2.1× as wide as long and nearly as wide as mesoscutum. Temple shiny and impunctate, rather constricted. Face relatively shiny, with shallow punctures, sparsely pubescent, inner margin of eyes subparallel, transverse, 0.7× as high as wide. Ocelli relatively large, distance between fore and a hind ocellus smaller than diameter of an ocellus, posterior imaginary tangent to fore ocellus virtually transecting hind two ocelli, POL:OD:OOL=5.0:2.8:4.2. Antenna distinctly shorter than body, penultimate antennomere 1.6× longer than wide. Mesosoma. Length:breadth:height=46.5:32.0:36.0. Disc of mesonotum relatively shiny, with much silvery pubescence, finely punctate, interspaces not larger than diameter of punctures. Scutellar sulcus straight, deep, narrow but only with one carina in between. Scutellum shiny, with shallow punctures. Propodeum shiny, with setose punctures anterior-laterally, base of areola U-shaped, a few carinae inside U-shaped and on posteral-lateral field. Mesopleuron highly polished, with shallow setose punctures anteriorly. Legs. Hind femur stout, 2.8× longer than wide. Spines on outer side of hind tibia sparse. Spurs of hind tibia of equal size, over half length of hind basitarsus. Basitarsus of hind leg weakly shorter than tarsomeres 2–4 combined (12.0:15.0). Wings. Pterostigma3.4× as long as its widest part. Vein 1-R1 (metacarp) 1.2× longer than pterostigma, 5.1× as long as its distance from the apex of the marginal cell. Vein r arising from apex of pterostigma, nearly as long as width of pterostigma, vein r shorter than vein 2-SR, indistinctly angled at their meeting, vein 2-M 2/5 length of vein 2-SR. 1 st discal cell almost as wide as high. 1 st submarginal cell of hind wing 2× wider than high. Vein cu-a strongly curved. Metasoma. Distinctly longer than thorax (60.0:46.5). T1 broad (weakly widen apically), wide of hind 1.4× longer than length, concave at basal third, turned-over with shallow punctures, weakly rugulose along middle and hind. T2 weakly uneven, nearly straight apically, 3.3× wider than long in the middle. T3 1.4× longer than T2. Tergites after T1 shiny, polished, pubescent. Hypopygium shorter than apex of abdomen. Ovipositor sheath 4/5 length of hind tibia, fusiform, expanded after anterior fifth, then gradually narrowing towards apex. Colour. Body black. Tegula black. Spurs pale yellow. Palpi most dirty yellowish brown, darker basally. Antennae and ovipositor sheath evenly dark brown. Labrum and mandible dark red. Hind leg dark red to black, fore and middle legs plus anterior half of hind tibia bright yellow (except fore and mid coxae). Wing membrane hyaline, vein 1-R1, r, 2-SR, 2-M and pterostigma brown, other veins pale brown, pterostigma with pale basal spot. Male. Similar to female, except: antenna much longer, penultimate antennomere 2.3× longer than wide; T1 slightly longer; T1 indistinctly constricted behind; and T2 much longer. Variation. Body length 2.8–3.4mm. Host. Unknown. Material examined. Holotype: ♀, Mt. West Tianmu (Sanmuping), Linan, Zhejiang, 1999. V.24, Zhao Mingshui, No. 20003612. Paratypes: 1♀, Mt. West Tianmu (Sanmuping), Linan, Zhejiang, 1999. V.24, Zhao Mingshui, No. 20003615; 1♀, Mt. Longwang, Anji, Zhejiang, 1996. VI.25, Zhao Weichun, No. 963856; 1♀, Erlonghe, Jingyuan, Ningxia, 2008. VII.3, Yao Jiemin, No. 200808407; 1♀, Guimagou, Pengyang, Ningxia, 2008. VII.10, Yao Jiemin, No. 200808661; 1♀, Dushan, Guizhou, 2008. VII.10, Zhou Shengzhen, No. 860194; 1♀, Houzhenzi, Zhouzhi, Shannxi, 1998. VI.2–3, Ma Yun, No. 981715; 2♀♀, Huoditan (Banqiaogou), Shannxi, 1998. VI.5, Ma Yun, Nos. 982163, 982373; 2♀♀, Mt. Laoshan, Shangdong, 1995. VIII.2, Cai Ping, Nos. 958206, 958237; 4♀♀1♂, Licun, Qingdao, Shangdong, 1995. VIII.2, He Junhua, Nos. 955610, 955621, 955642, 955637, 955638(♂). Distribution. China (Zhejiang, Ningxia, Guizhou, Shannxi, Shandong). Etymology. The specific name “ unicarina ” derived from the Latin adjective “unicus” and noun “carina”, referring to scutellar sulcus only with one carina in between. Remarks. This species is similar to D. aegeriphagous Liu & Chen, sp. n., but differs from the latter by the following: T1 transverse; ovipositor sheath fusiform; and hind femur stout.Published as part of Liu, Zhen, He, Jun-Hua & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2018, The laevigata - group of the genus Dolichogenidea Mason, 1981 from China, with descriptions of 26 new species, pp. 1-74 in Zootaxa 4436 (1) on pages 66-70, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4436.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/129268
Quality Evaluation of Three Kinds of Hickories Based on Grey Relational Analysis and Entropy-Weight Theory
No full textIn this paper, the nutritional ingredient, aroma component, and texture of three kinds of hickories, including American hickory, Chinese Linan hickory, and Chinese Hunan hickory, were tested by instruments. The quality of different hickory varieties was analyzed at three levels by using the grey entropy correlation analysis, namely, the single nutrient composition analysis; nutritional composition and texture analysis; nutrient composition, texture, and aroma analysis. Through the analysis of nutritional composition, American hickory gets the highest score (80.6945), followed by Linan hickory (74.9987), and Hunan hickory has the lowest score (58.5925). Through the analysis of nutrition composition and texture, Linan hickory has the highest score (80.89), American hickory is the second (71.77), and Hunan hickory is last (61.62). Through the analysis of nutrition composition, texture and aroma, Linan hickory has the highest score (75.91), followed by American hickory (74.17), and Hunan hickory has the lowest score (64.20). Finally, the comprehensive evaluation of Linan hickory quality index score is the highest. The main factors contributing to the high score of Linan hickory include superior fatty acid spectrum, aminogram and higher initial chewing hardness, moderate crispness of secondary chewing, optimal palatability, and unique aroma components ((S)-2-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-2-pentene, (+/−)-2-methylbutyric acid methyl ester ethyl butyrate, ethyl 2-methylbutyrate, methyl phthalate, decene, (1S)-(−)-β-pinene). The research results provide a basis for consumers to understand the quality differences of different hickories
Acrorrhinium dolichantennatum Zhang & Liu, 2010, sp. nov.
No full textAcrorrhinium dolichantennatum sp. nov. (Figs. 3, 4, 9, 16– 19) Type specimens: Holotype: male, CHINA: Linan County (30 ° 14 'N, 119 ° 43 'E), Zhejiang Province, alt. 900m, 13. VIII. 2007, light trap, Geng-ping Zhu and Wei-bing Zhu leg.. Paratype: 1 female, same data as holotype. Diagnosis: Recognized by the large and elongate body appearance, the deep brown body and the rather mottled hemelytra, the length of antenna more than that of the body, the distinctly long antennal segment III subequal to the length of segment II, and the male genitalia; this species could be easily distinguished from its congeners by the distinctive elongate body and the extremely long and twisted vesica. The shape of vesica is similar to that of A. amblyangulum sp. nov., but can be separated from the latter by the shape of apical membrane on the vesica. Description: Male (Fig. 3): Macropterous, relatively large-sized. Coloration: Body generally deep brown and mottled with irregular yellow spots; head yellow-brown; labium reddish brown with apex darkened; antenna dark brown, segment I with two tiny dirty yellow spots; corium with obscure, oblique dark strap mesially, not reaching clavus; cuneus deep brown with proximal margin dirty yellow; legs deep brown except meso- and meta-coxae white-yellow; abdomen reddish to dark brown. Vestiture: Dorsum covered with short, declined, dark brown simple setae and decumbent, shining sericeous setae, both types sparse; abdomen covered with declined simple setae. Structure: Head (Fig. 9): Rounded in dorsal view; vertex smooth, weakly convex, mesially with complete longitudinal sulcus, posterior margin of vertex necklike, weakly convex; spiniform frons moderate-sized; clypeus rounded, nearly vertical; mandibular plate small, maxillary plate flattened, smooth; buccula slender; labium reaching abdominal segment III; antenna long, more than length of body, antennal segment I slightly enlarged, subequal to segment IV in length, segment II and III subequal in length and diameter; eyes protuberant laterally, removed from anterior margin of pronotum by distance equal to about the diameter of basal apex of segment II. Thorax: Pronotum trapeziform, weakly declined anteriorly, anterior and posterior lobes finely demarcated, collar thick, calli slightly convex; length of mesoscutum exposed equal to 1 / 2 that of scutellum; scutellum convex mesially; hemelytra distinctly elongate, exterior margin straight; cuneus weakly declined, broadly triangular; veins of membrane indistinct; femora stout and weakly flattened, tibiae cylindrical and straight, with two rows of deep brown short teeth; length of tarsal segment I and II weakly less than that of segment III. Abdomen: Relatively stout and broad, its basal segments not being obviously constricted. Male genitalia (Figs. 16–19): Vesica distinctly long and twisted with distinctive shape of apical membrane, secondary gonopore well developed, situated near apex of vesica (Fig. 16); left paramere boatshaped, hypophysis elongate, sensory lobe blunt apically (Fig. 17); right paramere extremely small, leaflike (Fig. 18); phallotheca enlarged, distinctly curved (Fig. 19). Female (Fig. 4): Macropterous. Body size, surface and coloration similar to male. Etymology. Named for its distinctly long antenna. Distribution. China (Zhejiang).Published as part of Zhang, Xu & Liu, Guo-Qing, 2010, The hallodapine plant bug genus Acrorrhinium Noualhier, 1895 from China (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae), pp. 24-32 in Zootaxa 2524 on pages 28-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19637
- …
