1,776 research outputs found
Sometimes more equal than others: How the choice of welfare indicator can affect the measurement of health inequalities and the incidence of public spending
No full textIn recent years, a large body of empirical work has focused on measuring and explaining socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes and health service use. In any effort to address these questions, analysts must confront the issue of how to measure socioeconomic status. In developing countries, socioeconomic status has typically been measured by per capita consumption or an asset index. Currently, there is only limited information on how the choice of welfare indicators affect the analysis of health inequalities and the incidence of public spending. The paper focuses on five key health service outcomes in Mozambique. It uses the concentration index approach to measures both socioeconomic inequality in the utilization of health services and the sensitivity of measured inequality to the choice of welfare indicator. The results illustrate that, at least in some contexts, the choice of welfare indicator can have a large and significant impact on socioeconomic inequalities in service use and on the “perceived” incidence of public spending. The findings point at the need to be cautious in measuring inequality, but also to extend and deepen the analysis of service use.
Sometimes more equal than others : how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator
No full textA large body of empirical work in recent years has focused on measuring and explaining socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes and health service use. In any effort to address these questions, analysts must confront the issue of how to measure socioeconomic status. In developing countries, socioeconomic status has typically been measured by per capita consumption or an asset index. Currently, there is only limited information on how the choice of welfare indicators affects the analysis of health inequalities and the incidence of public spending. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the potential sensitivity of the analysis of health-related inequalities to how socioeconomic status is measured. Using data from Mozambique, the paper focuses on five key health service indicators and tests whether measured inequality (concentration index) in the five health service variables is different depending on the choice of welfare indicator. The paper shows that, at least in some contexts, the choice of welfare indicator can have a large and significant impact on measured inequality in utilization of health service and on the perceived incidence of public spending. Consequently, we can reach very different conclusions about the"same"issue depending on how we define socioeconomic status. The results call for more clarity and care in the analysis of health-related inequalities and for explicit recognition of the potential sensitivity of findings to the choice of welfare measure. The results also point to the need for more careful research on how different dimensions of socioeconomic status are related, and on the pathways by which these dimensions affect health-related variables.Public Health Promotion,Economic Theory&Research,Health Systems Development&Reform,Housing&Human Habitats,Environmental Economics&Policies,Housing&Human Habitats,Environmental Economics&Policies,Inequality,Economic Theory&Research,Poverty Assessment
Sometimes More Equal than Others How the choice of welfare indicator can affect the measurement of health inequalities and the incidence of public spending
No full textIn recent years, a large body of empirical work has focused on measuring and explaining socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes and health service use. In any effort to address these questions, analysts must confront the issue of how to measure socioeconomic status. In developing countries, socioeconomic status has typically been measured by per capita consumption or an asset index. Currently, there is only limited information on how the choice of welfare indicators affect the analysis of health inequalities and the incidence of public spending. The paper focuses on five key health service outcomes in Mozambique. It uses the concentration index approach to measures both socioeconomic inequality in the utilization of health services and the sensitivity of measured inequality to the choice of welfare indicator. The results illustrate that, at least in some contexts, the choice of welfare indicator can have a large and significant impact on socioeconomic inequalities in service use and on the “perceived” incidence of public spending. The findings point at the need to be cautious in measuring inequality, but also to extend and deepen the analysis of service use.
Health facility surveys : an introduction
No full textHealth facility surveys come in various guises. One dimension in which they vary is their motivation. Some seek to understand better links between households and providers. Others seek to understand better provider behavior and performance. Still others seek to understand the interrelationships between providers, while yet others seek to shed light on the linkages between government and providers. Health facility surveys differ too in the data they collect, in part due to the different motivations. Surveys also vary in the way they collect data, some relying on direct observation, some on record review, and some on interview. Some quality data are collected through clinical vignettes. Facility data have been put to a variety of uses, including planning and budgeting; monitoring, evaluation, and promoting accountability; and research. Lindel and Wagstaff review some of the literature under each heading and offer some conclusions regarding the current state of health facility surveys.Health Monitoring&Evaluation,Public Health Promotion,Health Systems Development&Reform,Early Child and Children's Health,Housing&Human Habitats,Health Monitoring&Evaluation,Health Systems Development&Reform,Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems,Housing&Human Habitats,Health Economics&Finance
The socio-geography of mining and hydro in Lao PDR: Analysis Combining GIS Information with Socioeconomic Data
No full textMemorandum : betr. die Sicherung und Erschliessung der Quellen zur juedischen Kulturgeschichte und Familienkunde.
No full textDocument about the proposed establishment of a center for German Jewish culture and genealogy in Berlin or HamburgdigitizedThe manuscript has been removed from the ‘Lehranstalt fuer die Wissenschaft des Judentums Collection’, AR 11844Born in Hamburg on February 26, 1896, Erna Magnus was a social worker who was engaged in an historical study of the Jewish community of Hamburg during the 1930s. She emigrated to the United States in 1939, where she held various social work and teaching position
Portrait of Paul Heyse.
No full textPhotograph of an oil painting by Eduard Magnus depicting the author, translator and Nobel laureate for literature (1910), Paul Johann Ludwig von Heyse.Digital ImageArtwork
Das rhetorische Ich: Hans Magnus Enzensbergers Selbstinszenierungen
No full textThe article discusses the rhetorical strategies underlying Hans Magnus Enzensberger's presentation of his work as an author, editor and poet
Das rhetorische Ich: Hans Magnus Enzensbergers Selbstinszenierungen
No full textThe article discusses the rhetorical strategies underlying Hans Magnus Enzensberger's presentation of his work as an author, editor and poet
Comparing consortial repositories: a model-driven analysis
No full textThis study aims to provide a comparative assessment of different repository consortia as a reference to inform future work in the area. A review of the literature was used to identify repository consortia, and their features were compared. Three models of consortial repositories were derived from this comparison, based on their structure and aims. The consortial models were based around either: creating a shared repository for the members, developing a repository software platform or creating a metadata harvesting service to aggregate content. Using case studies of each type of repository consortium, each model was assessed in terms of its particular strengths and weaknesses. These strengths were then compared across the models to enable those considering a consortial repository project to assess which model, or combination of models, would best address their needs and to aid in project planning
- …
