1,721,916 research outputs found
Ku xing ju le bu
No full textChapter 第一輯性犯罪故事護士兇殺案 ---p.1離魂記 ---p.13莎拉與魔鬼 ---p.25以毒攻毒 ---p.39酷刑俱樂部 ---p.51Chapter 第二輯怪異武俠小說女妖劍 ---p.61浴血奪寶記 ---p.93劍鬼 ---p.117禁魂幡 ---p.159林眞譯作.小說."最上乘的男性讀物".Lin Zhen yi zuo.Xiao shuo."Zui shang cheng de nan xing du wu"
PENYIMPANGAN MAKSIM-MAKSIM PRINSIP KERJA SAMA PADA TUTURAN 林真心 (LIN ZHEN XIN ) DALAM FILM《我的小女时代》(OUR TIMES) DARI KARYA FRANKIE CHEN
Full text linkAbstrak Suatu tuturan membutuhkan kerja sama yang dilakukan antar penutur dan mitra tutur untuk memenuhi kebutuhannya berupa pemahaman. Kegiatan tindak tutur akan terlaksana dengan baik apabila tuturan yang digunakan dapat dimengerti dan tersampaikan secara tepat, sesuai dengan maksud penutur. Terkadang hal tersebut membutuhkan pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama untuk menjaga Percakapan agar percakapan tetap berjalan sesuai dengan tujuan. Hal ini dapat terjadi seperti pada Tuturan 林真心 (Lin Zhen Xin ) dalam film 《我的小女时代》(Our Times) yang di sutradarai oleh Frankie Chen merupakan salah satu gambaran nyata tentang penerapan pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama dalam bahasa Mandarin. Kemudian untuk mengetahui gambaran bentuk tuturan penyimpangan maksim dalam prinsip kerja sama, dilakukan penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan teori H.P Grice. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu (1) bentuk pelanggaran maksim prinsip kerja sama pada tuturan林真心 (Lin Zhen Xin ) dalam film 《我的小女时代》(Our Times) yaitu tuturan yang melanggar maksim kuantitas, melanggar maksim kualitas, melanggar maksim relevan dan melanggar maksim cara, (2) fungsi pelanggaran maksim-maksim prinsip kerja sama yaitu maksim kuantitas, maksim kualitas, maksim relevansi dan maksim cara, (3) faktor pelanggaran maksim prinsip kerja sama berupa peserta tutur tidak memiliki pengetahuan, tidak sadar, tidak tertarik, tidak berkenan, tidak punya, tidak paham dan terkendala kode etik. Kata Kunci: Pelaggaran maksim, Prinsip kerja sama, Our Times, Frankie Chen Abstract FLOUTING MAXIMS OF COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE IN ZHEN XIN LIN’S (林真心) SPEECH IN FRANKIE CHEN’S WORK ENTITLED OUR TIMES《我的小女时代》 Cooperation between the speaker and the listener is needed during a speech (conversation) to understand each other’s meaning. This conversation will be carried out well if the speech itself can be understood easily and conveyed properly based on the speaker’s intention. Sometimes, it needs the flouting of the cooperative principle to maintain the objectives of the conversation. The speech by (林真心) Lin Zhen Xin in Frankie Chen’s 《我的小女时代》Our Times was one of the real depictions about the flouting of cooperative principle in Mandarin. To find out the flouting maxims in the cooperative principle, this study was conducted thoroughly. It used a descriptive qualitative method by comparing Grice’s theory. The results of the study were (1) the flouting maxims of cooperative principle in (林真心) Lin Zhen Xin’s speech in 《我的小女时代》Our Times were the flouting quantity, the flouting quality, the flouting relevance, and the flouting manner, (2)The functions of these flouting maxims of the cooperative principles were the maxim of quantity, the maxim of quality, the maxim of relevance, and the maxim of master. (3) these fluoting maxims occur because of some factors; the speaker and the listener were uneducated, unconscious, uninterested, unwilling, unaware, ignorant and constrained by the code ethics
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
sj-docx-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X221125053 - Supplemental material for Two New Abietane Diterpenes From the Stems of <i>Clerodendrum trichotomum</i> Thunb
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X221125053 for Two New Abietane Diterpenes From the Stems of Clerodendrum trichotomum Thunb by Lin-Zhen Li, Yu Zhang, Liang Chen, Yin-Zhi Cen and
Yang-Li Tu, Xiao-Sheng Yang, Yong-Jun Li in Natural Product Communications</p
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
