150 research outputs found
In Conversation with Jonah Conversation Analysis, Literary Criticism and the Book of Jonah
No full textThe author analyses the various conversations that occur between the characters in the Jonah narrative and the 'conversation' that occurs between the text and its readers. The study opens with an introduction to the field of conversation analysis, with a focus on one feature of conversation analysis-that a fundamental structure in the organization of language is adjacency pairs (for example, question/answer and invitation/refusal). Person notes how complex the adjacency pairs in the Jonah narrative are, and shows how they contribute to the narrative elements of plot, characterization, atmosphere and tone. He then refines reader-response theory (especially that of Wolfgang Iser) and provides a reader-response commentary on the book. The study ends with an analysis of the history of the interpretation of the book of Jonah, demonstrating how the structures of adjacency pairs in the narrative have been successfully and unsuccessfully interpreted.Intro -- Contents -- Preface -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- Chapter 1 CONVERSATION ANALYSIS AND NARRATIVE -- 1. Conversation Analysis -- 2. From 'Ordinary' Conversation to Narrated Conversation -- 3. Summary -- Chapter 2 COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF JONAH FROM A CONVERSATION ANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE -- 1. Translation -- 2. Commentary -- 3. Conclusion: The Use of Adjacency Pairs in the Jonah Narrative -- Chapter 3 NARRATIVE IN THE BOOK OF JONAH -- 1. Plot in the Jonah Narrative -- 2. Character in the Jonah Narrative -- 3. Atmosphere in the Jonah Narrative -- 4. Tone in the Jonah Narrative -- 5. Conclusion: The Jonah Narrative -- Chapter 4 READING THE JONAH NARRATIVE: THE IMPLIED READER -- 1. The Implied Reader: Interaction between Text and Reader -- 2. Principles Guiding the Interaction between Text and Reader -- 3. Who is the Implied Reader of the Jonah Narrative? -- 4. The Implied Reader of Jonah Reads his Narrative -- Chapter 5 READING THE JONAH NARRATIVE: ACTUAL READERS -- 1. The (Almost) Universal Recognition of Jonah's Omitted Refusal (1.3 -- 4.2) -- 2. Omitted Dialogue other than Jonah's Account -- 3. The Narrator's Satirical Tone -- 4. Flashback (4.1-11) -- 5. Conclusions Concerning the Interaction between the Text and Actual Readers -- Chapter 6 CONCLUSION -- Appendix 1 THE EXPLAINING AND HEIGHTENING OF JONAH'S ACCOUNT (4.2) -- Appendix 2 JONAH'S OMITTED ANSWER TO THE LORD'S LAST QUESTION (4.10-11) -- Bibliography -- Index of References -- Index of Authors -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- V -- W -- ZThe author analyses the various conversations that occur between the characters in the Jonah narrative and the 'conversation' that occurs between the text and its readers. The study opens with an introduction to the field of conversation analysis, with a focus on one feature of conversation analysis-that a fundamental structure in the organization of language is adjacency pairs (for example, question/answer and invitation/refusal). Person notes how complex the adjacency pairs in the Jonah narrative are, and shows how they contribute to the narrative elements of plot, characterization, atmosphere and tone. He then refines reader-response theory (especially that of Wolfgang Iser) and provides a reader-response commentary on the book. The study ends with an analysis of the history of the interpretation of the book of Jonah, demonstrating how the structures of adjacency pairs in the narrative have been successfully and unsuccessfully interpreted.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
Notes on the Determiner Ge and Related Problems
No full text[[abstract]]This work presents some reflections on the determiner ge ‘each, numerous’ in Mandarin Chinese, focusing on its quantificational properties and related questions. T.-H. Lin (1998, 2004) examines the syntactic and semantic properties of ge; also see Kung 1993 and Soh 1998). But these works only discuss the adverbial use of ge, not its determiner use.[[fileno]]204_JA07_2005_v1_p267[[department]]語言學研究
The topology and electrical properties of nanoparticle networks
No full textIncludes bibliographical references.The bulk and surface network topologies of milled silicon nanoparticle aggregates in layers deposited on porous and non-porous substrates have been quantitatively characterised using laboratory and synchrotron based small angle X-ray scattering and ultra-small angle X-ray scattering, as well as with a new surface scattering technique developed for this research, which can be described as wide angle low q scattering. A new scaling model applied to the small angle and ultra-small angle X-ray scattering data which was originally developed to describe branched polymers was shown to be applicable to the description of the networks of silicon particles. The milled particles which have a highly polydisperse size distribution, form agglomerates, which in turn cluster to form larger structures with a very high degree of aggregation. Results from the new scattering technique showed the rough surface of the printed layers to have a fractal structure with step heights of 10% to 20% between adjacent particles. This value is consistent with the topology of the particle aggregates in the layer inferred from ultra-small angle X-ray scattering. Flow properties of the inks on different substrates lead to quantitative differences in the mean aggregate separation, with slowly curing systems on materials which allow good capillary flow resulting in denser networks with smaller aggregates and better contact between particles. The electrical conductance of the layers was shown to be linearly related to parallel connections of the minimum paths of particles through the aggregates as determined from the analysis of ultra-small angle X-ray scattering data. The capacitance of the layers was shown to have a linear dependence on both the separation between primary particles and series connection of the minimum paths
Is there TP in Mandarin Chinese?
No full text[[abstract]]This paper shows that Lin’s (2003, 2006) argument that Mandarin Chinese has not TP is fallacious in logic, and hence is invalid. It is pointed out that some of his analyses are based on semantic rules and principles and also hold in languages like English. As a result, if MC doesn’t have TP simply because those rules and principles may help to derive the temporal interpretations of MC sentences without recourse to the function of T, English shouldn't have TP as well, since those rules and principles apply to English too. Thus Lin’s (2003, 200) analyses are based on a wrong assumption: T in English determines the temporal interpretation of sentences. The contrary is more correct; that is, the choice of tense in English is determined by those semantic rules and principle.[[fileno]]204_JA07_2007_v3_p35[[department]]語言學研究
Structures and Functional Categories of Mandarin Sentences
No full text[[abstract]]This paper examines the functional categories in Mandarin sentences. It argues that the “backbone” of Mandarin sentences consists of a series of light verbs and mood heads. It also discusses the status and structural properties of the sentence-final particle le, showing that le denotes perfect aspect and is a predicate-level aspectual element. Other aspectual elements in Mandarin sentences are also examined.[[fileno]]204_JA07_2010_v6_p41[[department]]語言學研究
Jona: Die rekonstruksie van 'n karakter
No full textJonah: The reconstruction of a character
The purpose of this article is twofold: (i) first to present a useful model of characterization postulated by De Beus, expanded by Brink, and, on narratological grounds, corrected by the present author; (ii) this model is accordingly applied to reconstruct the character of Jonah in the Septuagint version of this Biblical narrative
Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties
No full textThis work examines multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese. It is shown that modals in Mandarin Chinese are ordered in specific ways, and, while a number of factors contribute to the determination of the hierarchical order of modals, the finiteness of the complement clauses that the modals take plays a particularly important role. A generalization proposed in this paper is that (i) if a modal takes a finite clause as complement, then the modal itself can only occur in a finite context; and (ii) if a modal takes a nonfinite clause as complement, then it can occur in a nonfinite context too. This generalization is shown to account for some ordering phenomena of modals in Mandarin Chinese that would otherwise remain mysterious.</jats:p
Significant geographical differences in prevalence of mutations associated with Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax drug resistance in two regions from Papua New Guinea
No full textDrug resistance remains a major obstacle to malaria treatment and control. It can arise and spread rapidly, and vary substantially even at sub-national level. National malaria programmes require cost-effective and timely ways of characterizing drug-resistance at multiple sites within their countries.; An improved multiplexed post-PCR ligase detection reaction-fluorescent microsphere assay (LDR-FMA) was used to simultaneously determine the presence of mutations in chloroquine resistance transporter (crt), multidrug resistance 1 (mdr1), dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (dhps) genes in Plasmodium falciparum (n = 727) and Plasmodium vivax (n = 574) isolates collected in 2006 from cross-sectional community population surveys in two geographically distinct regions (Madang and East Sepik) of Papua New Guinea (PNG) where strong regional differences in in vivo aminoquinoline and antifolate therapeutic efficacy had previously been observed. Data were compared to those of a follow-up survey conducted in 2010.; Despite some very low parasite densities, the assay successfully amplified all P. falciparum and P. vivax loci in 77 and 69 % of samples, respectively. In 2006, prevalences of pfdhfr (59R-108 N) double mutation/wild type pfdhps haplotype, pfcrt SVMNT haplotype (72S-76T double mutation), and 86Y pfmdr1 mutation all exceeded 90 %. For P. vivax, 65 % carried at least two pvdhfr mutations, 97 % the 647P pvdhps mutation and 54 % the 976F pvmdr1 mutation. Prevalence of mutant haplotypes was higher in Madang than East Sepik for pfcrt SVMNT (97.4 vs 83.3 %, p = 0.001), pfdhfr (59R-108 N) (100 vs 90.6 %, p = 0.001), pvdhfr haplotypes (75.8 vs 47.6 %, p = 0.001) and pvmdr1 976F (71.2 vs 26.2 %, p < 0.001). Data from a subsequent Madang survey in 2010 showed that the prevalence of pfdhps mutations increased significantly from <5 % to >30 % (p < 0.001) as did the prevalence of pvdhfr mutant haplotypes (from 75.8 to 97.4 %, p = 0.012).; This LDR-FMA multiplex platform shows feasibility for low-cost, high-throughput, rapid characterization of a broad range of drug-resistance markers in low parasitaemia infections. Significant geographical differences in mutation prevalence correlate with previous genotyping surveys and in vivo trials and may reflect variable drug pressure and differences in health-care access in these two PNG populations
Cataloochee tract 284: Jonah Phillips
No full textThis 64-acre tract 284 in the Mount Sterling section of Cataloochee was owned by Jonah Phillips. While, in general, the Great Smoky Mountains region was sparsely populated, the Cataloochee Valley remained an exception. By 1900, the population of Cataloochee had grown to 1,000 residents living in hundreds of log and frame homes. A few historic buildings have been preserved on site, including two churches, a school, several homes, and outbuildings. The North Carolina Park Commission was tasked with purchasing land for the Great Smoky Mountains National Park and people living in Cataloochee were among those displaced. Cataloochee families continue to return for annual reunions. In 2001, the National Park Service re-introduced elk into the valley.87
··- ., .• 'l J·' "'.
ABSTRACT OF TITLE
of
Lands of ·············································:·············4lans:b:···ptr1·t lip s ·-------------------------------------------------------------·---------------------------------------
········:·:···:··········································································.-·· Township ···'···························H-aywoo-d················-············ County. -
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DESCRIPTION
( 284)
JO'm ; All bofi rtnga i n ttd.e aeao tpt ton ,~-re t urne4
fro~ tt\J! ·true ~1'itl1~!,_ ~nu ~11 f.Usta ncea sre expreao-
et 1» otu.vl ns t;>f £6 t •t•
Boginn1ng !l ~ ~r~n•e-r 1 . J 1~* ot-eetnu.t .en~g on top of
t ~e ~-a"ttl b~he;en C~et.tmlt Er~neh end Le!lthet'V!OOt
Brm"Je-h. b"&tng Cor~r _.5 td tbe ~a lter Cr.oom r r soi
( ! 8~ } end Cor ;er 2 of the Jolin B•11-.ul TI.-t\ot ( 2t0);
:~h ence .. a tmn th• r14 p .. it b
'tbel'1.:2p the Job:n He ilmfln Yrao' C 2.'90}
4 . 00 -Co¥>nel" ~ . e 15" pin~ on top of t he r14g-e , ble.s• 4 an4
aer l.bed r. c .. Cor .. 2. L·ei n.:~ ;;or.ner 1, vf tbe ~!:.>hn
Ee t lme.n " r ~c t- ( :;s o } · r: ti:! Car r.or :5 of ·the I'r~so;ter1all
~ .· tiftOn ~ CiHl Ol • rt:..ct ( lei!) •
A !4~t p1no blfittM e.n4 t:Crlbel B ... ~· .;r . c . Oor . It bettr s s .. '1 -~K> N.,. ,.09 e.bttlr dietmt ;
;.·hence . lee.vins the Jotm lie11-
rr..Mt 1'r~ot u~go) wi th the FroebJte:rlen M1 . ..:e1on sobool
: J"act ( gac;} Ulil doiin t he :ridge w1tll 1'a mc:tuA•ra
N. '18..01 E.
a.u Corn~r 5 , o 24" caaetnut etttmp •1tb pa.1nt ani • 1tneeeee
on tcp of t~-e ridge. Col'Jler 2 of the Preebtt orian
111 es1 on Sebool t r net C !621
A 10" black pi ne blEJ$84 end sor1bo4 :s. ,r.J • .P. Cor. 1.
b&e.J"e s. ea.-oo iJ •• lS ebuin 4lstont;
heno.. les't'tng the !Jto•b7ter1an
t:icb.ool ·rr .not ( f tB) ec\t l.-e&'V1niJ u. r J4 ge .
Sheet A
- ' .. ~
.• ~::,.;-·~ . ·-~· _:......_. ~- ·-~ -...~:.-..::_,.,_ __ ~ .~ .... ··-·------.-~-....... ..,...._._,_ __' ""~-·......::....:,. .. "'--'-....:..""~~-. ~-~.._,...__ __.__ - ·. -'-'""~~• ... .-;_..........,_. ....,.• . . ,. _...,,:...*'" "-"'...-.."' '3""'"*""*:.,..-c... x..+a. .·.'.-,-·· ac-""~',-.:,..&~~~·t;.. .*"'""--'w· -...:,. .:...r ..r. ..__""""""__ · · ;;·,~;;-~
\____..- .
. /
u.e&
5.1t
Oor~r 4. a 9" 4••d eh•·attmt •1 til Wl4a ln fGJtM oomer.
Set a 6" oat. po•'\ 1 11 a moca-n4 of •toaea. "":ritie4 J.p.
Co·.l'• a. .
J l!" .otld~t. l1lAa~e.4 ld . eo.r1b.t lltol'.J. p. Cor. e. bee.re .
· li . M..OO J • • &'1 ebe1n diat.a.u\;
:run'• 5. H..lt • ·
Le~ tlUti'W004 bl'a•1a fiov:.a .I'O at hefllt
Cor.ntr e. a l0""116btnias ta.'tl'tlok" obaatonat Ot!lt 1tltla palnt
erA wttn•ue.a, me.r to» of a 1'148•• aor1be4 J.,JJ. Cor. r .•
A 12" 4bt•tJl.~t Q&k bl&i'~d ana SOt'ibe4 .B. '.r.J.J?. eor. :;.
be&ra s. 'lh~ ~~~ . .z.r.; chain d lsttmt
l'beaoe ~ . 46~.,, '•
Cort:ctr 6 , e 10" hickory i n old l.&{-< t hel'~ 09 d llne, aor1be4
1'1. P. Co~ . 1. b~tn ~ Corner 2 of the J . ~ 111e i~1ll.1pa
T-rec.t {261);
l hence . down e spar ridge • d. ttl
1 ts mef.'indtt"l an i with t t e ~1. r'l'Jlie Pbill1pe 'i'rriot C 1:86 )
J ~o int
1 • . SS-M· .a.
2.!9 A Fo1nt
a.oe A Polut
a.co f ' Po1n\
.J. 7'-'81.
•
B. '1'1•11 E.
COftl.W '• • -'pc>:1nt fJ-t a •h'• fmce _OO!'MI' -_ b.tna
Oorner s of •• d. Wtllo Pbilllpa 'i!r-ao\ fee!)
Tbtu;;.ce li. 6·19 R.
Cortlll" a. • JOint st a sst• po·•'• CoJ'nu • of ta.
J. I JU• ftllU .. tpa 'l'raot ( t86l •n« com.r 1 of t. a.
Yi el tel" ~- '?;oaet ( ~8!) •
'l'bettce. lea ~ tns t be J. t:7Ue
Phillip• Traci (!ail, \\\ tb tile Y':altel" GI'OiJfD8 f .rsot
( !!8Z)
:;. '14-21 ~ .
Oor•:r t. a •~~ pottt sorlbe4 w. G. cor. 2. be ins
Corner B o1 tho >1 t&r Ct"voma I r uot ( 265) ;
'J.!bc cce n. 8-IH s.
·_ \ . NORTH CAROLINA PARK COMMISSION
TAXES
(Fill in all blanks indicating year, and show on lines opposite the year whether or not the taxes have been paid.
If paid an affirmative showillg must be made by us~ _of the word "Paid." The use of ditto marks is not permissible).
_ The property in question is assessed for . taxal>ton for the current year, 19 .. ZO .. , at .8 ... 8.6 .................. , in the name
..... ~.!-~-~-~~~-~~P-~---·······-············--·--·and the taxe~ for the past ten years have been paid or not paid as follows :
19:?.~---·
19?.?. ....
23 19 ......... .
24 19 ...... ... .
192.':'. 5.... ..
.. ;~ . .
·-----·-------~AlP .................................. ------·-----,~------···-· .-- 26
19 ......... . ····-----··---·--f.~~:P. ........................................................ .
_____________ ,l>~A.JlL .......................- ------------·---__,_ _ _____ 19 ..2. ..7... . . -------···-------~AI~---··-·······--·--··-···-·-----··-·--·---···········
PAID -·-············-·· · -·· · ·· · ···· · ·· ···· ·····-- · --·······- -· ·· ---- ----- ···· ·-·· ·- -····· · -·· 19 . .2.8... . ................. PAID ............... : ...................................... .. .
P4I:P 19 ..2...9.. . .. .PAID ·······-----·· ·· ·· ······ ······· ···· ············· ·· ·· ··· ···-·· -·-·-- ·---· ······ · ·· · ··· ··
: .. ... .. ...... ~~;o.-··············-·-·-···-··--· 30 19 ...... ... . Jlot JAil>
--- ------ -···· -- ·· ··· ····· ·· ··· ····· ·· ·· ···· ·· ·····-·--··············---· -·· ···· ···-··· -
ASSESSMENTS
Not any
LES PENDENS
Not any
MECHANICS LIENS
Not e.ny
JUDGMENTS
Page ..... l.O.O!!!A. ....... : ..... .
NORTH CAROLINA PARK COMMISSION
ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATE AND OPINION
TRACT Wo.884
IT IS liEREBY CERTIFIED: That tl)e, title to the within described land as disclosed in the attached abstract which
contains a full, complete and correct abstract of all instruments and court proceedings of record affecting the same from
and including the beginning entry there of has been carefully examined and noted, and that the following named
owner ...... :
J~NAJI PHILLIPS
....... iJl .. seized in fee simple of a. good and valid title to the same, subject only to any lien, charge or encumbrance
shown in this abstract and listed hereon.
ENCUMBRANCES
l. One-half UAd1v1ded mlne·ral interest outstanding 1n Love Heirs.
8. Ta~es to~ the year li30 not pa 1d.
This .... S.,h .......... day of .... .D.eoem.b.ar. .................................... , 1!80 ... .
• ,
v
ANALYsts ~"'OF filfLE.
!RA.CW 284 J .B.PBILLii?S OlfOR.
1. Thie boundary ls wholly within State Grant 252, ieauet f;.
As title tothe holdings under
this gra.nt has been fully treated in tbe analysts of t 1. tie to
' ' ' .. ' ' ' ; -, ' ' ' ,• ,
the Siclney Nelaon tract ,from the time the saicl grant was isaue4
·. t 'o John Gray Blaunt 'down .·to the 'time title to the same paslle4 )7
the wili of Jas.f: ~Love t hts Executors, the same w:tll not be
:epeated herein: \nit may :bee seen by reference to paragraphs one
through ten 'of t'he/~nslya1s of the Sidney Nelson ti tle,page ·three
' . . . .
of this ebstract.wherin reference is ~~ de to the various instru-ments:
lllak'ing up t he chain o£ title to said grant.
2. The first instrument we Will. consider -in connection
\Vitb this tract ;as such, is a bond for t itle, by Sama.el L.Love
to !.!.Leatherwood for fifty a.cres,referred to as the Harrel
place ·and as joining the l ands t hen oo~upied by Alfred craig.
This bond bears' date,oc·t.l4,187Z,and is of record in Haywood
County. See page £L_of this abstract.
~ .... On 3ep.26.1896, the ~ecutors of J as . F- .Love executed a bond
for t1 tl• for fifty acres to J!;.A'.Leatheraood. The description
1ri this bond is by metes and bounds, and makes mention of thie
tr:1ot joining the E'.A.Leatherwoo~ borne plnoe on the west. The
bond is of record tn Hsyvrao4 County.
See psge pot this abstract. ·
4. Under date•March 31,1915,1.f .J . Hannah, Trustee and Admin-istrator
for the Love J~ state,conveyed two fifty ac:re trnots to
A.J .Leatherwood, F.eserving unto hi me elf as said. Trustee, onef ha.lf
the mineral interests with mining privileges. For the author-ity
W.J.Ha.nnah as Trustee &dn Administrator for the Love E_state,
see pages 76 through 80 of this abstract. In its recitals,
this deed makes ment1.on of the bond referr e'75.00~the agreed
purchase price~ It ie riot definitely known that this second
tract is the same boun'dary as tha,t intended to have beoll. covered
by the bond to E.A.Le!Jtherwood,mentioned in paragraph two herein;
But it is ,~t least,fn the imr~ed 1ate v1cfnity,and it is the rea-sonable
assumption that it was. tt was upon this traot that
E.A.Leatherwood had established his home at the time he acquired
bomd for title to the tr&ct lying to the w eat of 1 t. · .e\nd it
is known that it was his intention and purpose to renounce all his
claim to l ands in this vicinity, to his son,'l~ .J .:Leathe:rwood;eome
time previous to the ;ve&r.,l915.,at the time of tlle execution of the
deed under discussion in this p aragra~h. The present owners
of fill unsold lands :formblly belonging to the Love Esta.te.,coneiders
that this deed was intended to oomply >Vi th the two Love bonds
referrec'l to. See page 2.:!_ o'f this abstract.
5.· 131' sui'f'ictent ae0d, bearing clate,Sep.5,19lo, A..J •· . .
Leather.vodd and hts wife.,Frances Leat herwood,conveyed a boundar7,
said to contain ten ncrea,more or less,~o Leonard Hall. The
d.escription 1s not as clear as 1t ' n~1ght be,but·it fs . thought that
i.t embraces within its bounde.,eome part of the land covered by
each of the fifty acre trilete mentioned in the previous paragraph.
This is unimportant :from the f nct that by :fUlly re'corded chain of
t1tle.th1~ tract,with the except1on of about one and one-half acres,
previously conveyed to another party , cot'H!IS baok,&long with other
parte of the two fifty acre tracts,to t he present owner.
See l)age I r;.iif this abstr1.::ct.
6. On Oct.27,1917,L£:?onard Hell &nd hie wife,Mollie Hell.
by sufficient deed,conveyed nbou.t nine ncres of t he boundt.ry
mentioned in the previous l)ar agr aph.towelter Grooms.having
conveyed one and one-half acr~s previo'usly, This deed is ;reg-ular
in form,properly executed &nd~f rttcord in Hayeood County.
See page f£...of t his abstract.
7. On Feb.l4 ,19201Walter Groo-s. and hiu w:tfe .Ado:j.e Grooms,
by suffiCient deed recorded in Hajw·ood County,conv~yed the nine
acre boundary,mentioned in the pr~vt()ue . paragraph,to A.o • .Tao'kson.
See page f-C. of this abstract~
" "
Caldwell. · 1'hie deed is re&i\-iar i.n: fo:rrn, properly exewted and
recorded i.n ffa)'Wood .county. ~ee ! page tio:f thts abstract.
9. A yea'! previous to \the' above msntioned transactt on,
na.rnely,June t,li21,A.J .Leatherwood and his 'tVii'e,Franoes Leatherwood,.
e:xecuted a deed to J . Y ~O~ld:~v~'ll :ror the two fifty acre tracts
: ~
.·w:t th certain exc,eptions. These \:f:):xceptions comprise what we now
,' ·~
know as tracts 283.285 and 2 86,wh~ch have already beeh acquired.
They.together with traot 284,now under disouee1on,make up the
two ori.gina.l fifty ac:a r;eatherwood tracts .aeverel tim.es ment'lxmed.
in this a.naly(!iS. This deed 1s regu.la"t" ln form,-properly exe-cuted
and r ecorded in Haywood County. See page~of this abatrnots
10. On llarch 3,l926.J .M.Oal dwell,joiaed by his wife,Etta
Caldwell,eonveyed t he bound~ries of paragrt~.phs a and 9 herein
to J.B • ..Phillips,the present owner of tract 284. This deed is
regU.l.ar in form~properly executed anc1 of record in RnYRood county
4
See page .!l.J_of this abateact.
11. We find on :record one paid deed of trust affec"tifB
a part of thts tr{act. See page -9/~:;f this abstract. "
12. M.ineral res•rvation referred to :tn: pa.ragrapb 4 has
recently been cleared. up by a desd :from l l'tlgb J .sloan end others,
otvners of all unsola ltmd and m:hiera l interests formally owned
by the love P:state. See page q_'s of this t.tbstrsct •
.f.ngineer's a ffidavit at pe.ge f1-o~ th:t.e a bstract.
~
~.c.o !;,!)
~
NORTH CAROLINA PARK COMMISSION
ABSTRACT OF DEED OR GRANT
In Preamble As Signed As Acknowledged
samuel. I. • Love Proven
~----------~------------~------------------------~~------------------------
].. E• .A.. t.ea1Jhe:rwoo4 !;,!)
1. Kind of Conveyance ........ ~~4 .... ~~r .... ~;\..1!~t ....... . 2. Date of Conveyance .......... l~l4~.7.3 ........................ ..
3. Is it properly executed ...... .... ..................... , .... .. , ............ .. .
5. Before what Officer acknowledged ......... J~.t.!..!Q.!L ..
4. Date of Entry and No ........................................................ .
6. Acknowledgements, regular ................. Y08 .............. -.... ..
7. If irregular, copy in full on back. .................................. . 8. Did all grantors acknowledge ........................ NO ............ .
9. Date of acknowledgement... .... l2.~.!1~f3.5 .................. .. 10. Was privy examination of wife taken .............. .N~L .. ..
11. Did officer affix SeaL .................. ...................................... .
13. Does conveyance contain convenants-
(a) of seizin ................................ NO ................................ .
12. Was order of probate correct... ..... Yftll ........................ ..
14. Date of filing for record ....... 1~l-~i5 .................. ..
15. Book ......... ....... f ...................... Page .............. lf.? ........ ..
(b) power to convey .......................... N'O .......................... . for .......... HaJWO.od ..................... , ........... County.
(c) against encumbrances ..................... NQ ................... . 16. Does deed contain any special limitations, provisions
(d) against claims of all others ................... .NO ............ .. or restrictions .................................................................... ..
17. Habendum clause (Quote fully) ...... ............... ... ................. None .... Qiven .................................................................................. .
'----· .................. ....... ........... .................... .. .................. .. ........ .. ............ .. .......... ...... .................... ........ .. .. ..................... ... ... ................................................ .
Exact Description of Property
That the said Samuel L. LOV. doth make or oauee to
bfl made a good and aur:t1o1ent 4ted ot oonveyanoe to~
fifty acres ot lan4 lying on Anne branch, a tributary
ot B1s Ql"eek - formally surveyed by P. w. E4warde
to~ john suton .... known now as the Ha.rel ple.oe adjo1n-
1Il6 the land& now oocup1ed by .Utred Cre.1g.
NORTH CAROLINA PARK COMMISSION
ABSTRACT OF DEED OR GRANT
In Preamble As Signed As Acknowledged
:: w. L• F.J.lliard ancl w. L• If1l.1ia2.'4 and Q
~ s. L• _Love. s. L• tove,
f Executors Exeoutors
Proven
~~----------------------~------------------------~----------------------
1. Kind of Conveyance..-... .Bond .. .fCJr ... .ntl.e ....... . 2. Date of Conveyance ............ -9~.2.&!!94 .......................... .
3~ Is it properly executed .............. c .... . .. . .... . ...... . .... .. .......... . . . 4. Date of Entry and No .................................... .................... .
5. Before what Officer acknowledged ............. C.-..8. •. 0 •... 6. Acknowledgements, regular ............... Y •....................
8. Did all grantors acl..-nowledge ....................... NQ ............. .
10. Was privy examination of wife taken .............. NQ ....... .
7. If irregular, copy in full on back ..... ~ ............................ .
9. Date of acknowledgement ..... .... 8~.9-~l. .................... .
11. Did officer affix SeaL ............. NO ..................................... . 12. Was order of probate correct .......... Y.es ....................... .
13. Does conveyance contain convenants- 14. Date of filing for record ........ B~~-01 ....................... .
(a) of seizin .................................. 110 .............................. . 15. Book ..................... 1.4 .............. Page ............. 24,6 .......... .
(b) power to convey .. ............ .......... JfO ........................... . for ............ F.nywood ............................... County.
(c) against encumbrances .................... N.O. .................... . 16. Does deed contain any special limitations, provisions
(d) against claims of aU others ................... NO .............. . or restrictions ··········································'···························
17. Habendum clause (Quote fully) ............. ......... _______________ NQnO .. G1ven. ............... _________________________________... ................................... .
... .... .. ............................ .... : ... ................ .... .......... .. .' .............. ................. ............................................ ....... .................................................................... .
Exact Description of Property
SAID EXECUTORS ARE TO MAKE A DEED OF C ON'VEYANCE TO
50 ACRES OF l..AJ.'TD ON T".t!E WATERS OF BIG OREEK I.N HAYWOOD
COUNTY •
5EGOO;ING at a ohostnut oak on the soutlf side near th•
top of the Dl()untain, and runs North 35 East 99 poles
to _ a ououmbe;r1 the· Soutbwest oornexo _of his home _traota
thence wi tll tne West boundary line ot the same to the
Norihwet oorner in Aoa J'ttnkln' s line: thonoe w:t th said
line south 50 East 25 poles to his corner; thence south
35 West 20 poles to a stake; thence to the beginning,
containing 50 acres.
. ·:- """"':" -·· ~ - . ~- ~
ABSTRACT OF DEED OR GRANT
In Preamble As Signed As Acknowledged
~ W ;J • . H:annah, Trustee and
i:i Administrator
"..'
Same Same
c~----------------------~----------------------~~----------------------
"~'
~ ;... A.J .Leatherwood
~
L_ __________________ -L--------------------~-------------------
1. Kind of Conveyance .. S.pe.c::tal ... we:r.,;;·.anty. ..... . 2. Date of Conveyance ..... ...... z~zl...,.l-5 ............................ .
3. Is it properly executed ...... yes ..................................... .. 4. Date of Entry and No ............................................ ..... ....... .
5. Before what Officer acknowledged .. H ... .P ................... .. 6. Acknowledgements, regular .... :y-ee················ ················
7. If inegular, copy in full on back ................................ .. .. 8. Did all grantors acknowledge ............. :x; ........................... .
9. Date of acknowledgemenL ........ 4~31~.15 .............. .. 10. Was privy examination of wife taken ... ]: ..................... .
12. Was order of probate correct ...... yetl····························
14. Date of filing for record .... 4~.1D~!!l.fL ...................... .
11. Did officer affix SeaL ...... yea ......................................... .
13. Does conveyance contain convenants-
(a) of seizin .~ .................................................................. .. 15. Book .4.4 .................................... Page .. Z-&9---···················
(b) power to convey ..... y:e,.g ........................................... .. for ·····---Haywood-············· ······················County.
16. Does deed contain any special limitations, provisions
or restrictions ~ ... m.i.n~tr.&l. ... :tnt.er.es.t ........... .
............ :res.e.rv.e.d ........................................................... .
(c) against encumbrances ... :x ........................................ ..
jf;~ ..
(d) against claims of all Jt'Etr1,;;-.... tov.e.a---------------- • .( fi' "C'Tr · #
17. Habendum clause (Quote fully) .To···h&V·e· -and····to··:hold ··t·he---~for-e-s·afd·· ··t·raet·· ··o:f····lti"na······
wi.t.h .... the ... pr.iV:tl.eges ... and ... appurtenan.c.es .... t.here.t.O-'--b.e-l-o.ng-ing-- -~nt-G----t-he···s&i-4··· ··· ···
A .. J .... L.Nt.the~o.o.d ... .ana ... his ... heirEl .. and ... .e.s.s.ig.ns ... to .... h-1-s---:;.nf.---t-he-1-r----on-ly---lle-e···and···
b t?.AoP.f. .... t.o.r.e:v..er. .•.................................................................. · ······---~---··········· ............................................................. ··--··························
Exact Description of Property
This eeed tr.ede this the 31st day of March,l915,by W.J.Rannah,Truste
r..nd Hdm:tnistratoe for the he1Ts-atle.w of Jas ,R.Love ;,deceased,Bnd others,
owners ofthe lands known s s the Love Speeulutdon Lands to A.J.Leatherwood
of the county of Rayaood and state of Norjh Carolina;
Witnesaeth:Thet,whereas ,Jas. H.Love,Deeeaeed,unoe-r a decree of the
Gourt of Equity fo BUncombe County,North Carolina,made in the year
1857 ~nd under the provisions of e. deed o:f agreement entered into on
the icth day of Oct.l857,by Jas. h .Love, E.M.Henry,Jas.L.-Renry.William
i1Jelch ,John .:e.Lov4,Dillard Love and ~illiam I:I.Thornas. became !I'ruatee for
himself snd the said parties above named of the Love Speculation Lands,
lying in the counties of Yancy,Madison,.Buncombe, Ha.~w ood E.nd Jackson,
v'ti th po~ver to ¢onv~i make sales of the same and execute title deeds
therefor;and
Wh0reas, the said. Jaa. n .Lo'fe died seized end
- …
