266 research outputs found
sj-pdf-1-jfi-10.1177_0192513X211041990 – Supplemental Material for The Double-Edged Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chinese Family Relationships
No full textSupplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-jfi-10.1177_0192513X211041990 for The Double-Edged Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chinese Family Relationships by Yongqiang Jiang, Yuxin Tan, Dazhou Wu, Jinxiu Yin and Xiuyun Lin in Journal of Family Issues</p
Bhatiahamus flabellata Shang & Shen, new comb.
No full textBhatiahamus flabellata (Shang & Shen), new comb. (Figs. 1 A–M) Bhatia flabellata Shang & Shen, 2006: 571, Figs. 32–38 Material examined. China: Holotype, male, Guangxi Prov., Jinxiu County, Mt. Shengtang, 900–1900m., 28.vi. 2000, coll. Yao Jian (IZCAS); 1 male, Henan Prov., Neixiang County, Mt. Baotianman, 1300m, 11.vii. 1998, coll. Hu Jian (NWAFU); 1 male, Guangxi Prov., Jinxiu County, Mt. Shengtang, 900–1900m, 18.v. 1999, coll. Yao Jian (IZCAS), topotypic; 1 male, Sichuan Prov., Mt. Emei, Temple Wannian, 1000m, 23.vii. 2009, coll. Zhang Xinmin (NWAFU). Remarks. This species was originally described from one male from: Guangxi Prov., Jinxiu County, Mt. Shengtang, 900–1900m., 28.vi. 2000, coll. Yao Jian (IZCAS).Published as part of Lu, Lin & Zhang, Yalin, 2014, A new leafhopper genus Bhatiahamus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) from China with description of a new species and a new combination, pp. 371-375 in Zootaxa 3835 (3) on page 372, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3835.3.6, http://zenodo.org/record/22614
Mimela bidentata Lin 1966
No full text<i>Mimela bidentata</i> Lin, 1966 <p> <i>Mimela bidentata</i> Lin, 1966: 138, fig. 1 [original description, type locality: Guangxi, Yaoshan]; Lin 1993: 39, fig. 23 (in text), pl. IV, fig. 30, pl. VIII, fig. 22, pl. XIX, fig. 15 [redescription, <i>pachygastra</i> -group, recorded from China: Yunnan]; Sabatinelli 1994: 63 [recorded from Vietnam: Sapa]; Zorn 2006: 267 [catalogued]; Krajčik 2007: 84 [catalogued]; Zorn & Bezděk 2016: 344 [catalogued].</p> <p> <b>Type material examined.</b> None. The identification is based on the original description and Lin (1993).</p> <p> <b>Additional material examined</b> (16♂♂, 3♀♀). <b>CHINA: Guangdong:</b> 1♂, 1♀ (SCAU), Chebaling, 1991.IV.27, Chuan-Chuan Lu leg.; 1♂ (ZMPC), Guangdong; <b>Guangxi:</b> 1♂ (CCPC), Rongshui, Mt. Jiuwan, Alt. = 1000m 2015, VIII-9 ~10 Yu-Tang Wang leg.; 4♂♂, 1♀ (ZMPC), Jinxiu County, Mount Dayaoshan, Changtongxiang Township, 2018. V, Chun-Fu Feng leg.; 3♂♂ (ZMPC), Jinxiu County, Mount Dayaoshan, Hekou 2015.VII.8 Lu Qiu leg.; <b>Guizhou:</b> 1♂ (ZMPC), Tongren, Jiangkou County, Mount Fanjingshan, 2016.VI.19–22, 1770m, Bo-Yan Li leg.; <b>Yunnan:</b> 1♂ (ZMPC), Pingbian County, Mts. Daweishan, Maditang, 2017.VI.6, Zhi-Wei Dong leg.; 1♂ (ZMPC), Honghe, Pingbian, Mt. Daweishan 2017.VII.5 Zhi-Wei Dong leg.; 1♂ (LPPC), Jinping 2019.V.20 1800m Chao-Ming Chen leg.; 1♀ (ZMPC), Jinping, Ma’andi 2016.VII.13 light trap Xiang Zhu leg. <b>VIETNAM: Quang Nam:</b> 1♂ (ZMPC), Tay Giang Dist., Mt. Axan 1300m October 2019 local collector leg.; <b>Vinh Phuc:</b> 1♂ (ZMPC), N. VIETNAM Vinh Phuc Prov. vic Tam Dao Town, Tam Dao NP, 02.-05.V.2013, 21°27′N 105°38′E, 700-1000m, A. Skale.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> Examined material updates the northern- (Guizhou), southern- (Quang Nam) and easternmost (Guangdong) distribution of this species. The elytral punctures of specimens from Yunnan are slightly coarser than those that from other regions. But the male genitalia do not have distinct differences.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> China: Guangdong *, Guangxi, Guizhou *, Yunnan; Vietnam: Lao Cai, Quang Nam *, Vinh Phuc *.</p>Published as part of <i>Zhao, Ming-Zhi, 2021, On the genus Mimela Kirby, 1823 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae) from China and adjacent countries, with description of five new species, pp. 201-230 in Zootaxa 4995 (2)</i> on pages 219-220, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4995.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5056160">http://zenodo.org/record/5056160</a>
Anaches Lin & Weigel, 2022, sp. nov.
No full text<i>Anaches m-signatus</i> Lin & Weigel sp. nov. <p>(Figs. 1–3, 9, 12–13)</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Male (Figs. 1–2). Length 9.9–12.0 mm, width 3.0–3.6 mm. Body more than 3 times as long as wide; integument black brown to black; surface of head, pronotum, elytra, femora and ventral surface densely covered with short recumbent pubescence, mostly brown or greyish white. Scape with fine recumbent short brown or white pubescence, all antennomeres provided with long brown setae sparsely at ventral side, and sparser toward apical segments. Antennomeres III to XI provided with a whitish basal ring. Occiput, pronotum, basal third and apical fourth of elytra mostly brownish, with some blackish and whitish spots. Elytra with a distinct whitish transverse band near middle, narrowed towards elytral suture, with grayish parts in middle. The anterior margins of the whitish bands on two elytra together form “V”-shaped (Figs. 1a, 2a, 3a). The posterior margin of the whitish band on each elytron forms “m”-shaped (Fig. 3a). Legs with femora and tibiae mostly clothed with grayish pubescence with many black spots; dorsum of tarsal segments densely clothed with fine recumbent black brown or whitish pubescence. Ventral surface of thorax similar to pronotum, metasternum with more grayish pubescence, similar to ventral side of femora. Abdominal sternites (Fig. 1c) mostly clothed with grayish to brownish pubescence except the apical margin of sternite III and the sexual setal patches on sternite IV covered with golden brown long sexual setae (Figs. 1c, 9a, 9b).</p> <p>Head slightly narrower than pronotum. Labrum trapezoidal with rounded angles, covered with golden yellow setae at margin, maxillary palpi brown, apical palpomere conical. Inferior eye lobe slightly longer than gena below it. Antenna with last three segments surpassing elytral apex; relative lengths of segments from base to apex: 15: 4: 20: 19: 18: 18: 18: 17: 17: 16: 16. Pronotum wider than long, 1.2 times as width as long; disc with clear basal and distal transverse grooves (Figs. 1a, 2a) and a middle longitudinal groove (Fig. 2b). Prosternal process moderately constricted between procoxae, then steeply declined toward dilated apex. Procoxal cavities completely closed. Elytra ca. 2.2 times as long as wide, parallel sided before apical tenth, then roundly narrowed to truncated apices; inner angles and outer angles are obtuse. Apical margin of sternite VII curved. Apex of hind femur reaching middle of abdominal sternite V.</p> <p> <b>Female</b> (Figs. 3a–3c). Length 10.2–11.8 mm, width 3.1–3.6 mm. Female is identical to male, with antenna slightly shorter, with last two segments surpassing elytral apex and abdominal sternites quite different. Unlike the male, female abdominal sternites (Fig. 3c) covered with grayish pubescence intermixed by many black spots, without any golden brown long sexual setae.</p> <p> <b>Male terminalia</b> (Figs. 12–13). Tegmen length about 2.0 mm; lateral lobes rather straightly tapered from middle to narrowly rounded apices, each about 0.4 mm long and 0.2 mm wide; median lobe plus median struts slightly curved, subequal to tegmen in length; median struts shorter than half of whole median lobe in length; apex of ventral plate weakly projected (Fig. 13a); median foramen elongate; internal sac with two hook-shaped sclerites (Figs. 13b, 13c). Tergite VIII (Figs. 12a & 12c) trapezoidal, apex truncated with round angles, provided with medium long setae along apical and lateral sides.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> This new species belongs to the “narrow banded” species group. It is mostly similar to <i>A</i>. <i>yitingi</i> Holzschuh & Lin, 2013, but can be easily distinguished from it by the following features: the whitish band wider; the anterior margins of the whitish bands “V”-shaped, instead of “U”-shaped; the posterior margin of the whitish band forms “m”-shaped, instead of an oblique line; the apex of tergite VIII truncated, not slightly emarginated; the apex of ventral plate of median lobe not as shaped as that of <i>A</i>. <i>yitingi</i>.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> This species is named after the m-shaped macula margin (Fig. 3a, in the red rectangle) on each elytron.</p> <p> <b>Distribution. China:</b> Zhejiang Province, Hunan Province, Guangxi Province.</p> <p> <b>Type specimens examined.</b> <b>Holotype</b>, 1 ♂, Guangxi Province, Longsheng County, Maoershan (<b>广OiAEüDz 儿山</b>), 2011-VI-3, leg. Xin-Lei Huang (<b>ëadz</b>) (IZCAS, IOZ (E) 2224561). 9 Paratypes: 1 ♂, Guangxi Province, Jinxiu County, Dayaoshan, Gubao (<b>广Oiŵħkä山古保</b>), 850m, 2021-IV-09, leg. J. T. Zhao (CCCC, C21Z0046); 1 ♀, Guangxi Province, Jinxiu County, Dayaoshan, Pingbanshan (<b>广Oiŵħkä山平Ú山</b>), 2016-V-14, leg. Jin-Teng Zhao (<b>ŭffiss</b>) (CCCC, C16Z0698); 1 ♂, Hunan Province, Yanling County, Shennonggu (<b>DZAE ẍĸ县ñƌ ĕ</b>), alt. 640m, 2008-VII-5, leg. Zhuo Yang (<b>杨卓</b>) (IZCAS, IOZ (E) 2224562); 1 ♀, Hunan Province, Yanling County, Shiduxiang, env. Taoyuandongcun (<b>DZAE ẍĸ县十δ乡fiů洞村周B</b>), alt. 870m, 2008-VII-6, leg. Gan-Yan Yang by beating (IZCAS, IOZ (E) 2224563); 2 ♂, 3 ♀, Zhejiang Province, Gutianshan National Nature Reserve (CAW): 1♂: CSP15, 2010, 618m, 118,13°E / 29,25°N, NE2; 1♂: same data, SE1; 1♀: CSP03, 2010, 720m, 118,12°E / 29,24°N, NW2; 1♀: CSP06, 2010, 880m, 118,15°E / 29,25°N, NW2; 1♀: CSP09, 2010, 348m, 118,11°E / 29,24°N, SW3.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> This new species is quite similar to <i>Desisa pterolophioides</i> Gressitt from Fujian, China (Gressitt, 1942a) (now in the genus <i>Macropraonetha</i> Breuning, 1961) by color and pubescence pattern, but can be separated from it by the elytron with one tubercle with tufted hairs before basal one fifth, the elytral apex truncated instead of narrow rounded, and the anterior and posterior margins of white band on elytra with different shapes.</p>Published as part of <i>Lin, Mei-Ying & Weigel, Andreas, 2022, A study on the genus Anaches Pascoe, 1865 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae Pteropliini), with a new species and two new synonyms, pp. 123-132 in Zootaxa 5133 (1)</i> on pages 124-126, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.1.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6521516">http://zenodo.org/record/6521516</a>
Meges tonkineus Bi & Chen & Lin 2022, comb. nov.
No full textMeges tonkineus (Clermont, 1932) comb. nov. (Figs. 2, 7, 9) Magninia tonkinea Clermont, 1932: 215, fig. on page 215. Type locality: Tien-Yen, Tonkin, Vietnam. Type material examined. Holotype, female, “ Tonkin / Tien-yen ”, “ex. Jeanvoine / Coll. Clermont ”, “ Type ”, “ Magninia / tonkinea / Clerm. / type ”, “ tonkinea Clerm ”, “TYPE”, “ Museum Paris / Coll. M. Pic ” (MNHN). Examined by photographs taken by Gan-Yan Yang & Hong-Liang Shi in 2011. Other material examined. China (Guangxi): 1 male, Guangxi, Jinxiu, Dayaoshan, 900 m, 2018.VIII.11, local collector (CCCC). China (Hainan): 1 male, Hainan, Ledong, Jianfengling, 950 m, 2015.V.7-12, leg. Yu-Tang Wang & Nan-Yi Tsai (CCCC); 1 female, ditto except 2018.V.21, local collector (CCCC); 1 female, ditto except 2018.VI.2, local collector (CCCC). Complementary description. Male (Fig. 2). Body length 48.5–49.4 mm, humeral width 14.6–15.0 mm. General appearance similar to the female described by Clermont (1932). Body slightly slenderer. Antenna about 2.0 times of body length. Legs relatively longer and thicker. Endophallus in everted condition (Fig. 9), almost identical to Meges gravidus as described above, but relatively slenderer. Female. Body length 55.0– 57.3 mm, humeral width 16.6–17.8 mm. Distribution. China: Hainan (new Province record), Guangxi; Vietnam: “ Tonkin ”. Remarks. The resemblances of the endophallic structures between this species and Meges gravidus (Figs. 8. 9.), indicate a close relationship. This species can be easily distinguished from the latter by its larger body size, antennae longer, protibial subapical tooth sharper, elytra broader with smooth base which lacks remarkable granule, elytral humeri remarkably spined and elytral disk bearing fewer maculae of relatively lighter color. Huang et al. (2002) firstly recorded this species from Guangxi, China. We confirmed the distribution in Guangxi and added Hainan as a new locality based on new material.Published as part of Bi, Wen-Xuan, Chen, Chang-Chin & Lin, Mei-Ying, 2022, Taxonomic studies on the genera Meges Pascoe, 1866 and Pseudomeges Breuning 1944 from China (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Lamiini), pp. 242-250 in Zootaxa 5120 (2) on pages 245-247, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5120.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/638922
Anchocerus wenxuani Lin & Hu 2021, sp. n.
No full text<i>Anchocerus wenxuani</i> Lin & Hu, sp. n. <p>(Figs. 1–11)</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> <b>Holotype: CHINA:</b> male, ‘China: Guangxi Prov., Xing’an County, Maoer Mt., nr. Hongjunting, 25°54’15.28’’N, 110°28’03.66’’E, 1400–1500 m, 7.v.2021, Yin, Zhang, Pan & Shen leg.’ (SNUC). <b>Paratypes: CHINA:</b> 2 females, same data as holotype; 1 female, same data, except ‘ 25°54’05.08’’N, 110°28’13.51’’E, 1360 m’; 1 male, same data, except ‘ Jiuniutang, 25°58’24’’N, 110°21’32’’E, 1150 m, 31.vii.2014, X.-B. Song & Z. Peng leg. ’; 1 female, same data, except ‘ 25°53’7’’N, 110°29’14’’E, beech forest, mixed leaf litter, humus, sifted, 1143 m, 31.vii.2014, Peng, Song, Yu & Yan leg. ’; 1 male, same data, except ‘ Jinxiu County, Dayao Mt., 7 km, 24°09’07’’N, 110°12’29’’E, 1300 m, 16.vii.2014, Peng, Song, Yu & Yan leg.’ (SNUC).</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> BL: 10.9–13.5 mm, FL: 4.7–5.1 mm.</p> <p>Body (Fig. 1) dark brown; mouth parts, tarsus and apical margin of abdominal tergites reddish brown.</p> <p>Head (Figs 2, 3) shorter than wide (HL/HW=0.85–0.87), slightly dilated behind eyes. Temples 1.66–1.77 times as long as eyes. Dorsal macrosetae (one side only): one near antennal base; one medially between eyes; one postero-medially, closer to neck constriction than to posterior margin of eye; one medially near neck constriction; two laterally on temple, of which one near posterior margin of eye, one near neck constriction. Surface with dense and fine non-setiferous punctation, lacking microsculpture. Antennae with segment 1 about as long as three following segments combined, segment 2 distinctly longer than segment 3, segments 4–8 longer than wide, becoming vaguely shorter, segment 9 about as long as wide, segment 10 slightly wider than long, last segment short, about as long as wide.</p> <p>Pronotum (Figs 2, 3) shorter than wide (PL/PW=0.83–0.88), longer (PL/HL=1.33–1.41) and wider (PW/ HW=1.36–1.40) than head; with punctation slightly finer than those on head, lacking microsculpture. Dorsal macrosetae (one side only): One medial and two lateral.</p> <p>Elytra (Figs 2, 3) with dense and coarse punctation and brown setae, lacking microsculpture, shorter than wide (EL/EW=0.79–0.84), slightly longer (EL/PL=1.00–1.05) and wider (EW/PW=1.06–1.10) than pronotum. Wings well developed. Scutellum with punctation and setae similar to those on elytra.</p> <p>Abdomen (Fig. 1) with coarse punctation except for median part of tergite II; tergite VII with whitish apical seam; all tergites with dense and very fine transverse microsculpture.</p> <p>Legs densely covered with brown setae, all tibiae with lateral spines.</p> <p>Male. Sternite IX (Fig. 4) long and slender, with numerous long setae at apical portion; tergite X (Fig. 5) gradually narrowing apically, with several long setae situated at apical and lateral margins. Aedeagus (Figs 6–9): median lobe slightly constricted near middle, with wide apex in ventral view; paramere (Figs 8, 9) gradually narrowed apicad, distinctly shorter than median lobe, with bunch of three or four apical setae and numerous closely set sensory peg setae, forming a continuous transverse group.</p> <p>Female. Tergite X (Fig. 10) with several long setae situated at apical and lateral margins.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> The species is known from Guangxi, southern China.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> The new species is very similar to <i>A. shibatai</i> Smetana, 1995, but can be separated by the slightly truncate apex of median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view (in <i>A. shibatai</i>, with round apex), and by the sensory peg setae of paramere forming a continuous transverse group (in <i>A. shibatai</i>, forming two separate groups).</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The species is named in honor of Wen-Xuan Zhang, who collected some of the type specimens.</p>Published as part of <i>Lin, Xiao-Bin & Hu, Jia-Yao, 2021, New species and records of Anchocerus Fauvel in China (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae), pp. 290-294 in Zootaxa 5032 (2)</i> on pages 291-293, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5032.2.10, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5486991">http://zenodo.org/record/5486991</a>
The correlation between renal function and arterial elasticity function in essential hypertensive patients
No full textCorrelation and impact factors between pulse wave velocity and indexes of arterial elasticity function on different sites of arterial system in hypertensive patients
No full textOreonectes platycephalus Gnther
No full textOreonectes platycephalus Gnther Fig. 5 Oreonectes platycephalus Gnther, 1868, Catalog Fishes British Museum 7: 369 (small stream near top of Hongkong Moutains, China); Zheng, 1981, Freshwater Fishes of Guangxi: 162; Zheng, 1989, The Fishes of Pearl River: 46 (Jinxiu, Guangxi, China); Zhu, 1989, The Loaches of the Subfamily Nemacheilinae in China: 23 (Fuluo Mountain, Kwangtung, Jinxiu, Guangxi, China); Kottelat, 2001, Freshwater Fishes of Northern Vietnam: 46 (Quang Ninh Province, Vietnam). Homaloptera rotundicauda Martens, 1868, Monatsb. Akad. Wiss. Berlin: 608 (Hong Kong, China) Oreonectes yenlingi Lin, 1932, Lingnan Sci.J.Canton 11 (3): 380 (White Cloud Mountain, Kwangtung, China) Material examined: 25 ex. KIZ 200304597 – 600, 50.9–58.6 mm SL, 63.5–72.5 mm TL; KIZ 200304226, 49.2 mm SL, 60.7 mm TL; KIZ 200304009, 64.7 mm SL, 76.5 mm TL; KIZ 200304410 – 411, 59.8–67.8 mm SL, 75.3–83.6 mm TL; KIZ 200304434 – 440, 39.8–52.1 mm SL, 48.8–64.8 mm TL; KIZ 2003041136 – 1137, 66.7– 66.8 mm SL, 79.4–83.3 mm TL; KIZ 200510215034, 48.5 mm SL, 59.6 mm TL; KIZ 200510193741, 43.7 mm SL, 55.8 mm TL; KIZ 200510266401, 49.1 mm SL, 60.7 mm TL; KIZ 200510235472 – 5474, 57.4–70.6 mm SL, 69.3–86.8 mm TL; KIZ 20051016672 – 673, 54.4–60.6 mm SL, 66.9–73.8 mm TL, from Jinxiu County, Guangxi Zhuang Antonomous Region, China. Diagnosis: Dorsum of head flat; eyes present; dorsal-fin origin posterior to pelvic-fin origin; dorsal-fin base and caudal-fin base with black pigment; caudal fin rounded; body covered with minute scales except for head; lateral line incomplete, with 16-18 pores; cephalic lateral-line system with 8 supraorbital, 3 + 10 infraorbital pores; sexual dimorphism, males have the genital papilla located immediately posterior to anus; gonad opens at end of fleshy prominence; vertebra 4 + 31 ~ 32 (3). Distribution: Hong Kong, China; Fuluo Mountain and White Cloud Mountain, Kwangtung, China; Jinxiu County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China; Quang Ninh Province, Vietnam. Remark: This species has a broad distribution, especially within Jinxiu County, Guangxi. For example, it can be found in Jinxiu River, Puquan River, Gufan River, Changdong River, Tongmu River, Jiajiang River and Guman River (Fig. 6).Published as part of Du, Li-Na, Chen, Xiao-Yong & Yang, Jun-Xing, 2008, A review of the Nemacheilinae genus Oreonectes Günther with descriptions of two new species (Teleostei: Balitoridae), pp. 23-36 in Zootaxa 1729 on pages 29-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18126
Anaches medioalbus
No full textAnaches medioalbus (Breuning, 1956) (Figs. 18–21) Paramesosella medioalba Breuning, 1956: 234. Sthenias semicylindricus Hayashi, 1974: 45. syn. nov. Paramesosella medioalba; Löbl & Smetana, 2010: 316; Lin & Yang, 2019: 369; Danilevsky, 2020: 453. Anaches semicylindricus: Holzschuh & Lin, 2013: 152; Lin & Yang, 2019: 362; Danilevsky, 2020: 449; Lin & Lazarev, 2021: 74. Sthenias (s. str.) murzini Lazarev, 2020: 57, figs. 1-3. syn. nov. Anaches medioalbus: Lin & Lazarev, 2021: 73. Anaches murzini: Lin & Lazarev, 2021: 74. Remarks. According to the type pictures of Sthenias semicylindricus Hayashi, 1974 (Figs. 20-21), it is similar to A. medioalbus (Breuning, 1956) (Figs. 18-19), by the body shape, elytral apex shape, antennal segments, main pubescence maculae on elytra, with differences on irregular grayish white spots over pronotum and elytra. However, the pair of type specimens were obviously rubbed, which was the reason of lacking the white spots. Compared with a fresh specimen from Taiwan (Fig. 7 by Holzschuh & Lin 2013) and specimens from Fujian (Fig. 19), we cannot find differences between the two taxa, so we propose the synonymy. This is agreed by Carolus Holzschuh (personal communication). However, Wen-Xuan Bi proposes a more complicated opinion, that all the records of A. dorsalis from Mainland China were misidentifications, and all of them, including the Anaches medioalbus from Fujian, should be Anaches albonotatus Pic, 1932. We agreed with Wen-Xuan Bi that the specimens in IZCAS we examined are not the true A. dorsalis and we re-identify them as A. medioalbus (Breuning, 1956) in this paper. To clarity the true identity of A. albonotatus described from northern Vietnam (Tonkin) it needs more study. Holzschuh (2021) synonymized Sthenias murzini Lazarev, 2020 with Sthenias dorsalis Pascoe, 1858, which is the type species of the genus Anaches Pascoe, 1865. However, Anachus murzini (Lazarev, 2020) is not a synonym of A. dorsalis (Pascoe, 1858), because it is much closer to A. medioalbus (Breuning, 1956) than to A. dorsalis (Pascoe, 1858), which has been misunderstood for a long time. The true A. dorsalis (Pascoe, 1858) is endemic to India and nearby. We understood that the “ A. dorsalis ” in Holzschuh (2021) is infact A. medioalbus in this paper, and we agreed with him on the variations of elytral maculae and the shape of elytral apex both are infrasubspecific features, therefore we synonymized A. murzini (Lazarev, 2020) with A. medioalbus (Breuning, 1956) herein. Type specimens examined. Holotype of Paramesosella medioalba Breuning, 1956 (Figs. 18a, 18b), ♀, Kwangtseh-Fukien, 1937-VIII-19 (ZFMK); Holotype and paratype of Sthenias semicylindricus Hayashi, 1974, holotype (Fig. 21), ♂, Taiwan, Mizuho, 1972-VII-6, leg. Mizunuma (OSAKA, M. Hayashi Coll. OMNH [98-32]); paratype, 1 ♀ (Fig. 20), Taiwan, Mizuho, 1972-VII-5, leg. Mizunuma (OSAKA, M. Hayashi Coll. OMNH [98- 32]). Other specimens examined. Zhejiang: 1 ♂, Tianmushan, 350 m, 1999-VI-5, leg. Ming-Yuan Gao (IZCAS, IOZ (E) 1896988); 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Hangzhou, Lin’an, Qingliangfeng Ziranbaohuqu (Nat. Rev.), Shunxiwu, 450m, 118°56'19.51" E, 30°02'38.47" N, 2012-VI-24, leg. Hao Xu & Jian-Yue Qiu by malaise trap (MYNU). Fujian: 1 ♀, Huangkeng, 1965-VII (IZCAS); 1 ♀, Jianxi, 1981-IV-21 (IZCAS). Guangxi: 1 ♀, Jinxiu, Fenzhan, alt. 800 m, 1999-V-13, leg. Hui Xiao (IZCAS, IOZ (E) 1896989). Guizhou: 1 ♀, Guiyang, Huaxi, 2011- VI (IZCAS). Distribution China: Shaanxi, Zhejiang, Fujian, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan.Published as part of Lin, Mei-Ying & Weigel, Andreas, 2022, A study on the genus Anaches Pascoe, 1865 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae Pteropliini), with a new species and two new synonyms, pp. 123-132 in Zootaxa 5133 (1) on page 130, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/652151
- …
