1,721,053 research outputs found

    Optimizing Various Aesthetic Criteria in Two-Dimensional Graph Drawing

    No full text
    隨著圖形在不同科學與工程領域中被獲知是最重要的抽象化結構之一,圖形繪製已冒出成為計算機科學中一個快速成長的研究主題。傳統的圖形繪製演算法被設計來遵循好的繪圖之一個或多個美學準則。本研究探討從最簡單到最複雜的三種圖形種類之二維繪圖上不同美學準則之最佳化。先、我們研究有根樹之氣球繪圖。在此種繪圖中,每一個子樹被繪製成包在一個圓形當中,而且角度的大小會嚴重地影響繪圖的清晰度。因此,本研究探討在不同氣球繪圖設定下不同角度測度之最佳化問題,其中包含了最佳化之角解析度、最大角與最小角之比率、和角度之標準差。另外,本研究還提供了在氣球繪圖上的幾個應用。次、我們研究雙層與三層網路繪圖(其中每一個結點分別被畫在兩條和三條垂直線上)及其應用在多對一邊界標示。在多對一邊界標示中,地圖上所有的標籤被置放在包圍著所有特徵點之矩形地圖的四邊上,其中一個以上的特徵點允許連接到共同的標籤,特徵點與標籤之間是用指線(可能是縱橫線段或直線段)所連接。本研究利用雙層與三層網路繪圖來解決在一些單邊與雙邊標示機制下之指線交叉數目最少化問題。更進一步地,我們用超指線換掉指線並採用傀儡標籤來設計完全沒有交叉的邊界標示法。次、我們研究平面圖之能見表示法。在此表示法中,每一個結點被畫成水平線段,使得對應到兩相連結點之兩條水平線段在垂直方向上彼此能見。給定一個n個結點之平面圖,本研究設計一個O(n)時間之演算法,來找出寬度不超過 之此平面圖之能見表示法。我們的結果在寬度上界達到最佳化,因為我們的寬度上界與過去已知最佳之寬度下界只差一單位。As graphs are known to be one of the most important abstract models in various scientific and engineering areas, graph drawing has naturally emerged as a fast growing research topic in computer science. Conventional graph drawing algorithms are designed to confirm to one or more aesthetic criteria of nice drawings. In this research, we investigate to optimize various aesthetic criteria in two-dimensional drawings of three graph classes, form the simplest to the most complicated.irst, we study balloon drawings of rooted trees, in which each subtree is enclosed in a circle. In balloon drawings, the sizes of the drawing angles significantly affect the drawing articulation. Therefore, in this research, we investigate the problem of optimizing various measures of angles, i.e., angular resolution, aspect ratio of angles, as well as standard deviation of angles, under different setting of balloon drawings. In addition, we provide some applications on balloon drawings.econd, we study two- and three- layered network drawings (in which nodes are drawn on two and three vertical lines, respectively) with application to many-to-one boundary labeling, in which more than one point site allows to be connected to a common label on the four sides of an enclosing rectangular map by a leader (which may be a rectilinear or straight line segment). In this research, we apply two- and three- layered network drawings to solving the problem of minimizing the number of crossings among leaders under certain one-side and two-side labeling schemes. Furthermore, we design the labeling without any crossing by substituting hyperleaders for leaders and applying dummy labels.hird, we study the visibility representations of plane graphs, in which each node is drawn as a horizontal line segment such that the line segments associated with any two adjacent nodes are vertically visible to each other. In this research, we give an O(n)-time algorithm to find a visibility representation of an n-node plane graph no wider than /lfloor4n/3/rfloor2 /lfloor 4n/3 /rfloor - 2 , which achieves optimality in the upper bound of width because the bound differs from the previously known lower bound only by one unit.TABLE OF CONTENTS 頁次試委員會審定書 .................................................. i辭 .................................................. ii文摘要 .................................................. iiibstract .................................................. ivhapter 1: Introduction .................................................. 11.1 Balloon Drawing of Rooted Trees .................................................. 21.2 Two- and Three- Layered Network Drawings with Application to Many-to-One Boundary Labeling .................................................. 51.3 Visibility Representations of Plane Graphs .................................................. 131.4 Organization of this Research .................................................. 14hapter 2: Balloon Drawings of Rooted Trees .................................................. 152.1 Preliminaries .................................................. 152.2 Case C1 (Unordered Trees with Even Sub-Wedges) .................................................. 212.3 Case C2 (Ordered Trees with Flexible Uneven Sub-Wedges) .................................................. 252.4 Cases C3 and C4 (Unordered Trees with Fixed/Flexible Uneven Sub-Wedges) .................................................. 272.5 Applications .................................................. 40hapter 3: Two- and Three- Layered Network Drawings with Application to Many-to-One Boundary Labeling .................................................. 423.1 Preliminaries .................................................. 423.2 The Crossing Problem for One-Side Many-to-One Labeling with Type-opo Leaders .................................................. 463.3 The Crossing Problem for Two-Side Many-to-One Labeling with Type-opo Leaders .................................................. 523.4 The Crossing Problem for One-Side Many-to-One Labeling with Type-po Leaders .................................................. 623.5 The Crossing Problem for Two-Side Many-to-One Labeling with Type-po Leaders .................................................. 663.6 Discussions .................................................. 703.7 Many-to-One Boundary Labeling Using Hyperleaders and Dummy Labels .................................................. 71hapter 4: Visibility Representations of Plane Graphs .................................................. 784.1 Preliminaries .................................................. 784.2 Our Results .................................................. 81hapter 5: Conclusions and Future Work .................................................. 115eferences .................................................. 118ABLE OF FIGURESigure Number Page.1 Overview of this research .................................................. 2.2 Illustration of balloon drawings with (a) even sub-wedges and (b) uneven sub-wedges, where each node is drawn by a small red point; each edge is drawn by a solid straight line segment; the center of the largest circle in a balloon drawing is the root node .................................................. 3.3 The balloon drawings with even sub-wedges under two different tree orderings, where (b) achieves the optimality of RE1 and RA1 .................................................. 5.4 An example for labeling a server motherboard .................................................. 9.5 Other labeling approaches .................................................. 9.6 Illustration of leaders .................................................. 10.7 Illustration of boundary labeling with hyperleaders and dummy labels .................................................. 10.8 (a) A plane triangulation and (b) its visibility representation .................................................. 13.1 The SNS approach. (a) Node O is not the root, and the edge between O and its parent goes through a circle with radius R_{min}; (b) is a star graph centered at c_0 .................................................. 16.2 Notations used in a balloon drawing of a star graph with uneven sub-wedges .................................................. 16.3 An example for 2SAL and 2SLW .................................................. 20.4 An experimental result. (The above is its statistics.) .................................................. 25.5 An example showing how Algorithm 3 works .................................................. 33.6 An example showing how Algorithm 4 works. (a) Certain N_{S_i''} with |S_i''| = 15 in N_{APX}. (b) Illustration of the Δφ induced by (a) .................................................. 38.7 Applications to galaxy systems and H-graphs .................................................. 41.1 A four-side many-to-one labeling with type-s leaders .................................................. 44.2 An example reducing from DCP to DMCP .................................................. 48.3 The first category of crossings .................................................. 48.4 The second category of crossings .................................................. 48.5 (a) A instance of two-layered network. (b) The boundary labeling corresponding to (a) .................................................. 48.6 (a) All the possible cases where bends of two leaders are drawn in region T_1. (b) All the possible cases where the bend of leader p_a l_b (resp., p_c l_d) is drawn in region T_1 (resp., T_2)……………………………………………………. 48.7 The distribution of some animals in Taiwan, which is represented by one-side many-to-one labeling with type-opo leaders .................................................. 51.8 Two boundary labeling layouts with type-opo leaders for the same map .................................................. 52.9 G'' (L_0'', L_L'', L_R'', E'') with |L_0''| = N + n(2 C^N_2 + 2) and L_R'' = L1 .................................................. 55.10 The distribution of some animals in Taiwan, which is represented by two-side many-to-one labeling with type-opo leaders .................................................. 62.11 A special case of DCP1ML-po where the y-coordinate of any site is smaller than that of the lowest port of the lowest label. Note that some of the edges are not shown in the figure .................................................. 63.12 The experimental results for DCP1ML-po .................................................. 66.13 A special case of DCP2ML-po where the y-coordinate of any site is smaller than that of the lowest port among the ports of all labels. Note that some of the edges are not shown in the figure .................................................. 67.14 A crossing is produced when the x-coordinate increasing order of two sites does not respect the circular ordering of their corresponding labels, in the case where the two sites are connected to (a) the West side, (b) different sides, and (c) the East side .................................................. 68.15 An example for illustrating how Algorithm 10 is executed .................................................. 69.16 The experimental results for DCP2ML-po .................................................. 70.17 The outputs of an example for each step in Algorithm 12 .................................................. 75.1 Illustration of the coalescing and splitting operations .................................................. 80.2 Illustration of L-shapes .................................................. 82.3 Six possible visibility drawings for a good face v_p v_q v_r .................................................. 83.4 The β_1 operation of node v_{k+1} executed at a right L-shape .................................................. 83.5 The β_2 operation of node v_{k+1} executed at two adjacent L-shapes .................................................. 83.6 The β_3 operation of node v_{k+1} executed at three adjacent L-shapes .................................................. 84.7 Intermediate steps of an example for Algorithm 13 .................................................. 86.8 Discussion of three possible pairs of input L-shapes of a β_3 operation .................................................. 92.9 Illustration of the adjustment of the visibility embedding of faces b_1 and b_2 in case (1-ii-b) of Figure 4.6(a). In general, the y-coordinates of the bases of L-shapes of b_1 and b_2 may not be the same .................................................. 94.10 Illustration of a μ_i operation for i >= 1 .................................................. 96.11 An example of four consecutive μ_1 operations executed at a good face f. Note that the light grey drawings are adjusted to be good for the later μ_1 operation, whereas the dark grey drawings mean those that have been handled .................................................. 100.12 Illustration of subcase (a1) .................................................. 104.13 Illustration of subcase (a2) .................................................. 104.14 Illustration of a μ1 operation executed at face f_1, which is produced after executing a μ3 operation .................................................. 108.15 An example of the comparison between the μ1 operations respectively executed at face f_{k,1} in D(H_k) and face f_1 in D(H_{k+1}) .................................................. 110.16 Illustration of how to adjust face f_1 to be good, when w_b(D_2(f_{k,1})) = 2 .................................................. 110.17 Illustration of how to adjust face f_1 to be good, when w_b(D_2(f_{k,1})) = 1 .................................................. 110.18 First μ_2 and then μ_1 operations can be viewed as first μ1 and then μ_3 operations .................................................. 111.19 Three possible cases of the drawing after executing a u_2 operation at a U-shape .................................................. 113IST OF TABLESigure Number Page.1 The time complexity for optimizing main aesthetic criteria of balloon drawing .................................................. 6.2 The time complexity of the problems for the boundary labeling subject to the constraints where the locations of ports of each labels are fixed; the labels along the same side are of uniform (maximum) size .................................................. 11.1 The three pairs of the input L-shapes of the β_1, β_2, and β_3 operations .................................................. 9

    Exploring the Ecotourism Policy & Practices of the Forestry Bureau-A case study of Dongyanshan National Forest Recreation Area

    No full text
    東眼山國家森林遊樂區位於桃園縣復興鄉,是北橫旅遊線重要據點之一,雖然東眼山國家森林遊樂區設施開發較其他林務局轄管之國家森林遊樂區較晚,然而因靠近大台北都會區(台北、桃園、新竹),自然環境資源豐富多元,因此早已是大眾旅遊的著名景點之一,且也是行政院永續會「生態旅遊白皮書」內定義的生態旅遊地,因此,對於在研究林務局推動生態旅遊計畫,將會有代表性。 本研究主要是藉由生態旅遊的定義、內涵、經營面向、活動深度、發展策略及推動機制等相關文獻資料進行回顧分析,認為生態旅遊包含「環境資源經營管理機制建置」、「遊客服務及學習教育」、「促進產業發展」、「社區參與及尊重在地文化」等四個面向。經檢視林務局推動計畫內容,其發展策略及具體措施,尚符合生態旅遊的定義及原則。 另外,採用質化研究方法,對管理處焦點人物,及仲介旅遊業者進行訪談有關個案生態旅遊活動推廣的經營管理及發展現況所得的結果:整體而言,林務局在推動生態旅遊工作以「環境資源經營管理機制建置」面向及「遊客服務及學習教育」面向的執行的工作較為完整且成效最好。其餘「促進產業發展」面向及「社區參與及尊重在地文化」面向的推動執行成效則較為不足。推測執行較為不足的部份,可能是因為其他產業的營運目標不一定與生態旅遊發展相符,因此在合作機制及理念溝通部份有較多的障礙必須突破;而社區的發展則視社區居民的意願而定,管理處只能提供輔導諮詢,因此進程會較為緩慢。而經營管理成效相對較好的「環境資源經營管理機制建置」及「遊客服務及學習教育」的二個面向,可能與其林業經營及注重遊客服務與環境教育目標有關。 在生態旅遊活動策劃的部份,目前東眼山森林遊樂區的活動類型大多以東滿步道登山健行活動及區內自然體驗活動為主,依照Miller跟 Kaae(1993)定義的生態旅遊深度來看,屬於「被動的謀求減低環境損害的旅遊行為」,仍屬一般淺層的生態旅遊。但是研究又發現東滿步道的生態旅遊活動因為交通的不便性,讓遊客充滿興趣,參加意願提高,因此應該速訂定遊客承載量,實施管理,安排深度生態導覽及環境教育解說。 最後,在研究探討後發現未來林務局推動生態旅遊計畫應該: (一) 儘速辦理森林遊樂區內長期生態資源調查及研究,建立物候資料,作為未來森林遊樂區永續經營之參考。 (二) 繼續推動生態旅遊活動委外工作並研擬生態旅遊活動分級計畫以深化遊客的環境倫理意識。This study explored the executed result of Taiwan Forestry Bureau ecotourism policy. For my project, to select the famous recreation area at the Northern Taiwan-Dongyanshan national forest recreation area basis on personal experience and professional work need. Dongyanshan national forest recreation area is located at Fusing Township, Taoyuan county, is a important spot of North CI Highway Scenic Route. Although Dongyanshan national forest recreation area was development later than other, however, it is next to the Taipei metropolis (Taipei, Taoyuan, Hsinchu ),it has rich and diversity natural resources was attract great quantity tourist, that cause the quality of tourism drop down,income recession. The manager department has to improve this situation. Fortunately, the Economic and social Council proclamation of 2002 as the international year of Ecotourism(IYE) in1998. The Taiwan government has proclamation of 2002 as the tour year of Ecotourism in Taiwan. Taiwan Forestry Bureau has began to conduct the ecotourism and environmental education in the same time, flow the development goal of forest recreation area. The study is want to figure out how the ecotourism program driving, including the travel process, goal, result, and solve the manage problem. We interview the manager and agency owner, collect data, and design the consumer experience satisfaction and aware of ecotourism questionnaire to investigate tourist. The research methods are literature review, participant observation, in-depth interviews and questionnaire survey. We have find in travel active arrangement, was cooperate with travel agency and individual nature education studio. To rely on the agency to design program of tourism, the government department is focus on the principles of ecotourism:to maintain environmental ecological, respect local culture, improve local economical, improve consumer experience satisfaction, ecological interpretation, environmental ethics education. The result can not be quantification, because there is not set up the capacity. The other thing, there is no measure standard of environmental education and ecological interpretation, but in tourist view they consider the programs are connected both of ecological and recreation, and they acceptance highly. Finally, National forest recreation area will be to transform nature education center, for the ecotourism products marketing, tourist manage and the national forest recreation area sustainable management, the most important is doing the environmental monitoring and measure the ecological capacity.目錄 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景..........................................1 第二節 研究動機..........................................2 第三節 研究目的與架構....................................4 第四節 研究限制..........................................7 第二章 文獻回顧 第一節 生態旅遊與森林遊樂之關係..........................8 第二節 林務局的生態旅遊政策與策略.......................21 第三節 生態旅遊的推動...................................29 第三章 研究設計 第一節 研究對象.........................................33 第二節 研究方法與工具...................................33 第三節 資料處理分析方式.................................36 第四章 個案研究結果分析與討論 第一節 受訪者背景資料...................................37 第二節 研究對象資料搜集及概況...........................38 第三節 東眼山森林遊樂區推動生態旅遊活動現況.............44 第四節 推動生態旅遊活動實作檢討.........................62 第五節 綜合討論.........................................65 第五章 研究結論與建議 第一節 研究結論.........................................71 第二節 建議.............................................73 <參考文獻>.............................................75 附錄 附錄一 東眼山森林遊樂區遊客特性調查問卷................79 附錄二 東眼山森林遊樂區旅遊業者訪談卷..................81 附錄三 東眼山森林遊樂區經營者訪談卷....................83 附錄四 東眼山國家森林遊樂區經營者訪談內容..............86 附錄五 東眼山國家森林遊樂區旅遊業者訪談內容...........104 表目錄 表2-1 國外學者(組織)對生態旅遊定義整理表...............11 表2-2 國內學者對生態旅遊定義整理表.....................13 表2-3 生態旅遊層級標準.................................16 表2-4 林務局生態旅遊執行工作分配表.....................23 表2-5 生態旅遊系統組成要素說明表.......................31 表2-6 生態旅遊推動工作分配表...........................32 表3-1 個案研究面向取得資料類型.........................36 表4-1 生態旅遊活動策略作法經營者及媒介者訪談紀錄表.....38 表4-2 東眼山森林遊樂區最近十年收入及人次統計表.........49 表4-3 東眼山森林遊樂區第三次遊客調查社經資料統計表.....51 表4-4 遊客團體類型比較表...............................52 表4-5 遊客團體人數比較表...............................52 表4-6 遊客旅遊目的比較表...............................53 表4-7 遊客從事旅遊活動比較表...........................53 表4-8 遊客取得遊樂區資訊方式比較表.....................54 表4-9東眼山森林遊樂區一般遊客與參加生態旅遊遊客特性比較表......................................................56 表4-10 林務局國家森林遊樂區生態旅遊遊程評鑑分級標準......................................................59 圖目錄 圖一 研究架構流程圖.....................................6 圖二 永續觀光理念圖....................................10 圖三 生態旅遊定義序列與深度圖..........................15 圖四 東眼山森林遊樂區交通系統圖........................40 圖五 東眼山森林遊樂區內設施配置圖......................4
    corecore