1,743,581 research outputs found
Tanbīhātun li ’l-ghāfilīn suntingan teks, analisis struktur, dan resepsi
Full text linkListiyono. C0204041. 2010. ” Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn: Suntingan Teks, Analisis
Struktur, dan Resepsi”. Skripsi: Jurusan Sastra Indonesia Fakultas Sastra dan Seni
Rupa Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah (1) Bagaimanakah suntingan
teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn? (2) Bagaimanakah analisis struktur sastra kitab
pada teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn yang dibatasi yaitu struktur penyajian teks,
gaya pengisahan, pusat pengisahan, dan gaya bahasa teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn? 3) Bagaimanakah resepsi pembaca terhadap teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn?
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) menyediakan suntingan teks Tanbīhātun li
‘l-Ghāfilīn yang baik dan benar Baik dalam arti mudah dibaca karena telah
ditransliterasikan dari huruf Arab Melayu ke huruf Latin. Benar maksudnya
adalah isi teks dapat dipertanggungjawabkan (2) Mendeskripsikan struktur sastra
kitab Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn yang meliputi struktur penyajian teks, gaya
penyajian, pusat penyajian, dan gaya bahasa teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn (3)
Mengungkapkan resepsi pembaca terhadap teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn.
Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian kualitatif. Sumber data yang
digunakan adalah naskah Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn dengan nomor kode ML 328
D. Metode penyuntingan yang digunakan adalah metode edisi standar. Metode
edisi standar disebut juga edisi kritik, yaitu menerbitkan naskah dengan
membetulkan dari kesalahan-kesalahan kecil dan ketidakajegan, sedangkan ejaan
disesuaikan dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. Metode analisis struktural teks
Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn menggunakan analisis struktural yang terdiri dari
struktur penyajian teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn, gaya pengisahan Tanbīhātun li
‘l-Ghāfilīn, pusat pengisahan teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn, dan gaya bahasa teks
Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn. Metode analisis terhadap analisis resepsi menggunakan
metode deskripsi yaitu memberikan uraian dan penjelasan serta memaparkan apa
yang menjadi pokok permasalahan.
Berdasarkan penelitian tersebut dapat disimpulkan beberapa hal. Pertama,
dalam penyuntingan terhadap teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn ditemukan kesalahan
salin tulis yaitu 9 kesalahan berupa lakuna, 17 kesalahan berupa substitusi, 4
kesalahan berupa adisi, 10 kesalahan ditografi, 4 kata tidak dapat terbaca; Kedua,
Struktur teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn dapat dilihat dari struktur penyajiannya,
teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn berstruktur eksposisi yang sistematis terdiri dari
pendahuluan, isi, dan penutup. Adapun dilihat dari segi gaya pengisahannya,
dalam teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn banyak dijumpai bentuk interlinier dengan
penggunaan kalimat bahasa Arab yang diterjemahkan ke dalam bahasa Melayu.
Di samping itu, pusat pengisahan teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn menggunakan
metode orang pertama. Dari segi gaya bahasa, teks Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn
memiliki 4 buah diksi yaitu : (1) kosa kata yang terdiri dari kosa kata Arab yang
sudah diserap ke dalam bahasa Indonesia sebanyak 58 buah dan kosa kata Arab
yang belum diserap ke dalam bahasa Indonesia sebanyak 28 buah; (2) ungkapan
ada 6 buah kata-kata khusus; (3) sintaksis yang terdapat dalam teks Tanbīhātun li
‘l-Ghāfilīn adalah penggunaan kata ”dan” sebagai kata tumpuan maupun sebagai
kata penghubung; kata ”maka” yang berfungsi sebagai kata tumpuan; dan kata ”bagi” sebagai penunjuk kepunyaan; (4) sarana retorika yang terdiri dari sarana
retorika penguatan, pertentangan, hiperbola, retorika, pertanyaan retorika, dan
penyimpulan; Ketiga, Berdasarkan analisis resepsi pembaca terhadap teks
Tanbīhātun li ‘l-Ghāfilīn, dapat diketahui bahwa dari keempat pembaca
memberikan tanggapan-tanggapan yang berbeda-beda Keempat narasumber
tersebut mempunyai persamaan dan perbedaan dalam menanggapi isi teks
tersebut
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
