171,786 research outputs found
Rhodacaroides levis Karg 1977
No full text433. Rhodacaroides levis Karg, 1977 Rhodacaroides (Nodacaroides) levis Karg, 1977: 333. Rhodacaroides levis.— Karg, 1977: 334. Rhodacaroides (Nodacaroides) levis.— Karg, 1979: 198. Type depository. Ungarische Naturwissenschaftliches Museum, Budapest, Hungary. Type locality and habitat. Azapa (alt. 2,000 m), Tarapacá, Chile, 2 December 1965, in soil trap.Published as part of Castilho, Raphael C., Silva, Edmilson S., De, Gilberto J. & Halliday, Bruce, 2016, Catalogue of the family Ologamasidae Ryke (Acari: Mesostigmata), pp. 1-147 in Zootaxa 4197 (1) on page 98, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16844
Levis - 126842 (C)
No full textBuilt in 1910 at Lauzon, Levis, Que., this steel ferry was first owned by the Levis Ferry Co. of Levis, Que. About the middle of the 1920s, she was owned by the Prescott and Ogdensburg Ferry Co. of Prescott, Ont. Further records show she was purchased in 1951 by McNamara Construction Co., Ontario, Canada and her rig changed to a barge in 1958. She was scrapped in 1875
The taxonomic status of Myotis levis levis and Myotis levis dinellii (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)
No full textInvestigating the Myotis levis complex is important for understanding the taxonomic status of the two subspecies currently recognized in it: Myotis levis levis (I. Geoffroy, 1824) and M. levis dinellii Thomas, 1902. Both M. levis levis and M. levis dinellii have been recently observed in sympatry in Argentina. This finding suggests that these populations might in fact correspond to distinct species rather than subspecies, as they have traditionally been designated. By using a multivariate morphometric approach, we demonstrate that M. l. levis has secondary sexual dimorphism in several measurements, with females being larger than males; sexual dimorphism was not detected in M. levis dinellii. However, we found morphometric differences between the two taxa. These differences exceeded those documented for other Neotropical Myotis. Based on their sympatry, morphological, and morphometrical differences, we propose a change in the status of both subspecies to M. levis and M. dinellii
Lasioseius levis A.Berlese 1916
No full text26. Lasioseius levis (Oudemans & Voigts 1906). Fundorte: Binnendeichsweide, Pferdeweide, Grassoden, 19. VI. 49. - Mähwiese, Binnendeich, südlich Bahnhof, 8. X. 49. Weit verbreitet. Wurde gefunden bei Bremen (Voigts), Hohe Tauern (Franz), Schweiz (Schweizer), Irland (Halbem), aber nicht als Küstenform.Published as part of Willmann, C., 1952, Die Milbenfauna der Nordseeinsel Wangerooge, pp. 139-186 in Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung Bremerhaven 1 on page 14
Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) levis
No full textAtrichopogon (Atrichopogon) levis (Coquillett) Ceratopogon levis Coquillett, 1901: 604 (Maryland). Culicoides levis: Kieffer 1906: 54 (combination). Atrichopogon levis: Johannsen 1943: 777 (combination). Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) levis: Wirth 1965: 123 (in Nearctic catalog; distribution); Wilkening et al. 1985: 514 (Florida records); Borkent and Grogan 2009: 5 (in Nearctic catalog; distribution). Ceratopogon exilis Coquillett, 1902: 86 (Washington D. C.). Discussion. Wilkening et al. (1985) listed this common Nearctic species in Florida from Alachua, Dade, Leon and Levy counties. We provide the first records from Charlotte, Dixie, Gilchrist, Hardee, Highlands, Hillsborough, Liberty, Martin, Putnam and St. Lucie counties. New records. Charlotte Co., Englewood Beach, 16 June 1960, W. Jernigan, 1 male (FSCA). Dixie Co., Steinhatchee, Oct 1961, S. B. H., 1 female (FSCA). Gilchrist Co., Trenton, VIII-1961, S. B. H., 1 female (FSCA). Hardee Co., Wauchulla, 17 April 1961, S. B. H., 1 female (FSCA). Highlands Co., Archbold Biological Station, 13-19 April 1989, W. W. Wirth, light trap, 2 females; Lake Placid, Archbold Biological Station, W. W. Wirth, at UV light, 6 females (FSCA). Hillsborough Co., Tampa, Sept. 1961, S. B. H., 1 female (FSCA). Liberty Co., Torreya St. Park, 20-V-1966, H. V. Weems, 2 females (FSCA). Martin Co., Stuart, 25-XI-1961, S. B. H., 1 female (FSCA). Putnam Co., E. Palatka, V-1961, S. B. H., 2 females (FSCA). St. Lucie Co., (no locality given), 20-VIII-1986, R. L. Escher, 1 male, 1 female (WLGC).Published as part of William L. Grogan, Jr., Hribar, Lawrence J., Murphree, C. Steven & Cilek, James E., 2010, New records of biting and predaceous midges from Florida, including species new to the fauna of the United States (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), pp. 1-59 in Insecta Mundi 2010 (147) on page 5, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.535290
Streblocera (Streblocera) levis GRANGER 1949
No full text<i>Streblocera</i> (<i>Streblocera</i>) <i>levis</i> GRANGER 1949 <p> <i>Streblocera levis</i> n.sp.: GRANGER 1949: 318 (key), 319 (figs 319, 320), 320 (descr. ♀, Madagascar).</p> <p> <i>Streblocera levis</i> GRANGER 1949: SHENEFELT 1969: 127 (cat.).</p> <p>D i s t r i b u t i o n: Madagascar: Prov. Toamasina: Andasibe (Perinet).</p> <p>Endemic.</p>Published as part of <i>Madl, M. & Achterberg, C. Van, 2014, A catalogue of the Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) of the Malagasy subregion, pp. 5-220 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 46 (1)</i> on pages 109-110, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4507364">10.5281/zenodo.4507364</a>
Munidopsis levis
No full textMunidopsis levis (Alcock & Anderson, 1894) Bathyankyristes spinosus. — Alcock & Anderson, 1894: 174, pl. 9, fig. 2 (Andaman Sea, 485 m) (not M. spinosa (A. Milne Edwards, 1880). — Alcock & McArdle, 1901: pl. 55, fig. 2 (no record). Bathyankyristes levis Alcock & Anderson, 1894: 175 (type locality: Laccadive Sea, 1164 m, types in ZSIC?). — Alcock & McArdle, 1901: pl. 55, fig. 3 (no record). Munidopsis (Bathyankyristes) tenax Alcock, 1901: 273 (replacement name of Bathyankyristes spinosus Alcock & Anderson, 1894 preoccupied by Galacantha spinosa A. Mile Edwards, 1880). — Tirmizi, 1966: 211, fig. 27 (Zanzibar and Maldives, 640–797 m). Munidopsis (Bathyankyristes) levis. — Alcock, 1901: 274 (Arabian Sea in the vicinity of Laccadives, 1164 m). Munidopsis tenax. — Baba, 1988: 170, fig. 69 (South China Sea off SW Luzon, 454 m). — Komai, 2000: 359 (list). Munidopsis levis. — Baba, 2005: 156, figs 70, 71, 290 (key, synonymies, Moro Gulf off Zamboanga, Mindanao, 458 m). — Macpherson, 2007: 79 (off Madagascar (700–880 m), Philippines (483–610 m), Kei Islands (466–699 m) and the Solomon Islands (283–523 m)). — Poore et al., 2008: 21 (SW Australia, 726–732 m). Type data: holotype, male, ZSIC 9329 /9. Type locality: Laccadive Sea, 1164 m.Published as part of Baba, Keiji, Macpherson, Enrique, Poore, Gary C. B., Ahyong, Shane T., Bermudez, Adriana, Cabezas, Patricia, Lin, Chia-Wei, Nizinski, Martha, Rodrigues, Celso & Schnabel, Kareen E., 2008, Catalogue of squat lobsters of the world (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura-families Chirostylidae, Galatheidae and Kiwaidae), pp. 1-220 in Zootaxa 1905 (1) on page 148, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1905.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/513458
Lasioseius levis A.Berlese 1916
No full text<p>26. Lasioseius levis (Oudemans & Voigts 1906).</p> <p>Fundorte: Binnendeichsweide, Pferdeweide, Grassoden, 19. VI. 49. - Mähwiese, Binnendeich, südlich Bahnhof, 8. X. 49.</p> <p>Weit verbreitet. Wurde gefunden bei Bremen (Voigts), Hohe Tauern (Franz), Schweiz (Schweizer), Irland (Halbem), aber nicht als Küstenform.</p>Published as part of <i>Willmann, C., 1952, Die Milbenfauna der Nordseeinsel Wangerooge, pp. 139-186 in Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung Bremerhaven 1</i> on page 14
Neojordensia levis Oudemans & Voigts 1904
No full text<p> <b> <i>Neojordensia levis</i> (Oudemans & Voigts</b> , <b>1904)</b></p> <p> <i>Seiulus levis</i> Oudemans & Voigts, in Voigts & Oudemans, 1904: 655.</p> <p> <i>Seiulus levis</i>.— Halbert, 1915: 76; Nesbitt, 1951: 42.</p> <p> <i>Lasioseius levis</i>.— Hull, 1918: 65; Franz, 1943: 87.</p> <p> <i>Laelaspis laevis</i>.— Buitendijk, 1945: 297.</p> <p> <i>Proctolaelaps</i> (<i>Neojordensia</i>) <i>levis</i>.— Evans, 1958a: 204; Athias-Henriot, 1961: 453.</p> <p> <i>Neojordensia levis</i>.— Schweizer, 1961: 130; Hirschmann, 1962: 48; Chant, 1963: 257; Lindquist, 1964a: 338; Lindquist & Evans, 1965: 24; Ishikawa, 1969a: 122; Karg, 1971b: 246; 1982: 72; 1993: 248; Athias-Henriot, 1973a: 30; Lapina, 1976a: 85; Bregetova, 1977a: 174; Farrier & Hennessey, 1993: 41; Gwiazdowicz, 2007: 99; Moraza & Lindquist, 2011: 20.</p> <p>TYPE DEPOSITORY: not stated.</p> <p>TYPE LOCALITY AND HABITAT: Oslebshausen, on the “old” Weser, Germany, in chicken house and under brick.</p> <p> NOTE: specimens reported as <i>N</i>. <i>levis</i> by Westerboer (1963: 445) were reidentified as <i>Neojordensia sinuata</i> Athias-Henriot by Athias-Henriot (1973a: 26).</p>Published as part of <i>De Moraes, Gilberto J., Britto, Erika P. J., Mineiro, Jefferson L. De C. & Halliday, Bruce, 2016, Catalogue of the mite families Ascidae Voigts & Oudemans, Blattisociidae Garman and Melicharidae Hirschmann (Acari: Mesostigmata), pp. 1-299 in Zootaxa 4112 (1)</i> on page 122, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4112.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/399477">http://zenodo.org/record/399477</a>
LEVIS: Large Exact Verifiable Input Spaces for Neural Networks
No full textThe robustness of neural networks is paramount in safety-critical
applications. While most current robustness verification methods assess the
worst-case output under the assumption that the input space is known,
identifying a verifiable input space , where no adversarial
examples exist, is crucial for effective model selection, robustness
evaluation, and the development of reliable control strategies. To address this
challenge, we introduce a novel framework, , comprising
- and -.
- locates the largest possible verifiable ball within
the central region of that intersects at least two boundaries. In
contrast, - integrates multiple verifiable balls to
encapsulate the entirety of the verifiable space comprehensively. Our
contributions are threefold: (1) We propose equipped with
three pioneering techniques that identify the maximum verifiable ball and the
nearest adversarial point along collinear or orthogonal directions. (2) We
offer a theoretical analysis elucidating the properties of the verifiable balls
acquired through - and -. (3) We
validate our methodology across diverse applications, including electrical
power flow regression and image classification, showcasing performance
enhancements and visualizations of the searching characteristics
- …
