1,721,065 research outputs found
Allergological diagnostics and current allergens in occupational dermatology
No full textA broad spectrum of various substances may cause occupational allergic contact dermatitis. Often, it is difficult to identify potentially or truly relevant allergens at the workplace. Therefore, the consulting physician must have a comprehensive knowledge of possible allergens in different occupations to perform specific diagnostics and to initiate efficient secondary prevention by allergen avoidance. In this review, we give some practically relevant general comments on patch testing in occupational dermatitis, followed by a discussion of important occupational allergens in those occupational groups most frequently affected by occupational dermatitis. Finally, recommendations on which allergens should be tested in the respective occupational groups are given or reported from the literature
The positivity ratio - another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation
No full textPositive patch test reactions to formaldehyde releasers indicating contact allergy to formaldehyde
No full textWhite petrolatum (Ph. Eur.) is virtually non-sensitizing. Analysis of IVDK data on 80 000 patients tested between 1992 and 2004 and short discussion of identification and designation of allergens
No full textSporadic cases of contact allergy to white petrolatum, which is used as a vehicle in patch test preparations, have been reported. The quantitative relevance of the phenomenon remains yet to be elucidated. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patch test data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK, http://www.ivdk.org) between 1992 and 2004. Results: Analysis of 79 365 patients patch tested with pure petrolatum yielded 27 '+' (0.03%) and 2 '+++' (0.003%) reactions. The majority of non-negative reactions (0.3%) was interpreted as doubtful (235) or mild irritant (32). The negative reaction index (RI) (-0.8), and the high positivity ratio (PR) (93%) especially a lack of concordance with patch test preparations containing >= 99% petrolatum indicate that many of the 'positive' (+) reactions have to be considered as irritant. There were 2 '+++' reactions. In 1 case, an 'angry back reaction' was confirmed. The other case is probably a reading or documentation error, as the majority of patch test reactions to preparations containing petrolatum remained negative in this case also. Conclusions: True allergic patch test reactions to white petrolatum are extremely rare and probably due to an individually increased susceptibility to allergens and/or irritants. This is in agreement with considering petrolatum as a non-sensitizer
Current patch test results in consecutive patients with, and chemical analysis of, disperse blue (DB) 106, DB 124, and the mix of DB 106 and 124
No full textDisperse blue (DB) 106 and 124 are important textile dye allergens. However, the dye raw material is impure, leading to uncertainty regarding the actual patch test (PT) concentration. To examine, (i) the allergen content of previously and currently used DB 106 and 124 and a respective mix, and (ii) the frequency of positive PT reactions to the DB 106/124 mix and to the single compounds in consecutive PT patients. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis and purification of DB 106 and 124, respectively. Descriptive analysis of PT data from the Information network of departments of dermatology obtained between January 2003 and December 2005. Retrospectively, 2 batches of the DB 106/124 mix proved to contain an amount of allergen different to the 1 declared (based on information of suppliers of raw material). However, since February 2005, DB 106 and 124, respectively, are available at a reliable concentration of 0.3% petrolatum. In 2005, the prevalence of positive PT reactions to both the mix (0.89%) and the single constituents combined (0.56%) did not qualify them for inclusion in the standard series. Quality control, providing accurate test concentrations of allergens based on technical grade purity raw materials is necessary for valid diagnosis of contact allergy and comparable epidemiological data
Are concomitant patch test reactions to epoxy resin and BIS-GMA indicative of cross reactivity? (vol 57, pg 376, 2007)
No full textA further characteristic of susceptibility to contact allergy: sensitization to a weak contact allergen is associated with polysensitization. Results of the IVDK
No full textAlthough genetic factors probably account for differences in susceptibility to contact allergy, they have not yet been identified, partly due to an insufficient understanding of 'susceptibility'. Regarding polysensitization (PS) as a sign of increased susceptibility, we studied the relationship between PS and sensitization to weak versus strong allergens. Patch test data from 66 835 patients registered by the multicentre project, Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2004, were analysed. The association between the number of sensitization to standard series allergens, and contact allergy to a strong allergen methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) and to a weak allergen (paraben mix), was analysed with adjusted logistic regression analysis. In paraben-positive (++/+++) patients, the risk of >= 2, >= 3 or >= 4 additional reactions were significantly increased by a factor of 2.1-4.6 compared to MDBGN-sensitized (++/+++) patients. Varying the basic model, a higher risk of additional positive reactions associated with paraben sensitization was consistently identified. The association between PS and sensitization to weak allergens adds a further characteristic of susceptibility to former findings of the IVDK, where PS was related to an increased risk of induction, elicitation, and cytokine polymorphisms. PS can be regarded as a phenotype to be considered in genetic studies
- …
