144 research outputs found
House Oversight Hearing on Tax Avoidance and the IRS
Professor Leandra Lederman testifimony for the House Oversight Hearing on Tax Avoidance and the IRS, October 13, 2020.
Click the Download button to read the text of Professor Lederman\u27s prepared testimony, or view the video of the fulll hearing below.
To view just professor Lederman\u27s testimony, click HER
Episode 8: Prof. Leandra Lederman (Indiana Univ.) on Promoting Knowledge About the Tax System
Prof. Leandra Lederman (Indiana Univ.) tells us how she promotes information about the U.S. tax system on YouTube and in the classroom
Session 2: Adjudicating Tax Issues
10:55 - 11:35: Reasoned Explanation and IRS Adjudication featuring Steve Johnson & Keith Fogg
11:35 - 12:15: (Un)Appealing Deference to the Tax Court featuring Leandra Lederman & Keith Fogg
12:15 - 12:40: Audience question and answer sessio
It\u27s Not Just Teaching
Professor Lederman\u27s contribution is titled It\u27s Not Just Teaching.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facbooks/1046/thumbnail.jp
Blurring Realism and Idealism: A Review of Fantasy Interior with Jan Steen and the Family of Gerrit Schouten
About the author
A senior at Armstrong, Leandra Gamble is a Law and Society major with a religious studies and history minor. Following completion of the program she plans to further her studies in History and eventually be a professor of history at a university level
Restructuring the U.S. Tax Court: A Reply to Stephanie Hoffer and Christopher Walker\u27s The Death of Tax Court Exceptionalism
This article is an invited reply to an article in the Minnesota Law Review regarding whether the “reviewing court” provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) apply to the U.S. Tax Court, the principal court hearing disputes between taxpayers and the IRS. (The Tax Court has repeatedly said that the APA does not apply to it). It argues in part that the question of whether the Tax Court must apply the APA’s standard and scope of review when reviewing IRS action is not as clear as a matter of history and doctrine as Professors Hoffer and Walker argue. The author also argues that it is time to clarify the U.S. Tax Court’s place in the federal system and to clear up this and other fundamental questions
2008/09 Indiana University School of Law Faculty
Row One: Amy Applegate, John Applegate, Lauren Robel, Jeannine Bell, Dawn Johnsen, Ajay Mehrotra Row Two: Marshall Leaffer, Charles Geyh, Leandra Lederman, Cindy Dabney, Carwina Weng, John Scanlan Row Three: Hannah Buxbaum, Daniel Conkle, Nona Watt, Sophia Goodman, Ochoa, Christiana Row Four: Susan Williams, Fred Cate, Robert Fischman, Gene Shreve, Mark Hilycord Row Five: Craig Bradley, William Henderson, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Donna Nagy, Seth Lahn, Michael Keller, Dennis Long, Donald Gjerdingenhttps://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facgrp/1003/thumbnail.jp
2008/09 Indiana University School of Law Faculty
Row One: Amy Applegate, John Applegate, Lauren Robel, Jeannine Bell, Dawn Johnsen, Ajay Mehrotra Row Two: Marshall Leaffer, Charles Geyh, Leandra Lederman, Cindy Dabney, Carwina Weng, John Scanlan Row Three: Hannah Buxbaum, Daniel Conkle, Nona Watt, Sophia Goodman, Ochoa, Christiana Row Four: Susan Williams, Fred Cate, Robert Fischman, Gene Shreve, Mark Hilycord Row Five: Craig Bradley, William Henderson, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Donna Nagy, Seth Lahn, Michael Keller, Dennis Long, Donald Gjerdingenhttps://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facgrp/1003/thumbnail.jp
Viva Zapata!: Toward a Rational System of Forum-Selection Clause Enforcement in Diversity Cases
When the Bough Breaks: The U.S. Tax Court\u27s Branch Difficulties
This essay highlights the confusion over which of the three branches of government (if any) is home to the U.S. Tax Court, which hears over 95% of litigated federal tax cases. This uncertainty recently resulted in a separation of powers challenge to the Tax Court. There is a pressing need for the Tax Court’s status to be resolved, to decrease its insularity and increase transparency and accountability
- …
