1,723,627 research outputs found
Friendship Park - 18
No full textLawrence V. Smith filming in Friendship Park, Jacksonville Florida. Lawrence V. Smith, right. Circa 1977-1985https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/lvsmith_main/3877/thumbnail.jp
Friendship Park - 15
No full textLawrence V. Smith filming at Friendship Park, Jacksonville Florida. Lawrence V. Smith center right, wearing blue shirt Date: August 1973https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/lvsmith_main/3758/thumbnail.jp
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia Commercial - 11
No full textLawrence V. Smith filming a commercial for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia/Columbus. Lawrence V. Smith filming an unidentified person.https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/lvsmith_main/7577/thumbnail.jp
Lawrence v. Texas: 18 Years Later
No full textAt an April 6 event co-sponsored by the Diversity and Inclusion Advisory Council, the Black Law Students Association (BLSA), the Women\u27s Law Caucus (WLC), and the Student Bar Association (SBA), Catholic Law students, faculty, and staff gathered virtually for a discussion regarding “Lawrence v. Texas: 18 years later,” led by the litigator who argued the case before the Supreme Court—Paul M. Smith. Smith is a Professor from Practice at Georgetown Law, as well as the Vice President for Litigation and Strategy at the Campaign Legal Center. Until 2017, Smith worked in private practice at Jenner & Block LLP. He has presented oral arguments in 21 Supreme Court cases, Lawrence v. Texas among them
Tyrone Garner\u27s Lawrence v. Texas
Get PDFDale Carpenter\u27s Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. Texas has been roundly greeted with well-earned praise. After exploring the book\u27s understanding of Lawrence v. Texas as a great civil rights victory for lesbian and gay rights, this Review offers an alternative perspective on the case. Built from facts about the background of the case that the book supplies, and organized in particular around the story that the book tells about Tyrone Garner and his life, this alternative perspective on Lawrence explores and assesses some of what the decision may mean not only for sexual orientation equality but also for equality along the oftenintersecting lines of gender class, and race. Lawrence emerges in this light not as a singular victory for lesbian and gay civil rights, or perhaps even for civil rights more generally, but as a complexly mixed opinion about and for equality in society and under law
What Lawrence v. Texas Says About the History and Future of Reproductive Rights
Get PDFThis article explores the ways in which the court\u27s recognition of a broad zone of personal liberty in Lawrence v. Texas may serve to strengthen a woman\u27s constitutionally protected reproductive rights in future Supreme Court decisions. Part of the author\u27s analysis focuses on using particular Justices\u27 opinions (and dissents) to predict the direction of future challenges to abortion rights in front of the Supreme Court
Clothing Commercial 9
No full textFilming a clothing commercial, Lawrence V. Smith (forefront). Circa 1975-1980https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/lvsmith_main/2676/thumbnail.jp
Vietnam - 7
No full textLawrence V. Smith, B57 Canberra Bomber, Bien Hoa Viet Namhttps://digitalcommons.unf.edu/lvsmith_main/7540/thumbnail.jp
- …
