197,923 research outputs found
Letter From Attorney General Langer to P. B. Rognli Regarding T. H. Druen, November 12, 1919
No full textLetter dated November 12, 1919 from William Langer to P.B. Rognli responding to Rognli\u27s letter of November 7, 1919 regarding a plea Rognli received from T.H. Druen. Langer has reviewed Druen\u27s plea and there is no question in Langer\u27s mind that Druen received absolute justice.
See also:
A Plea to the Public and the Taxpayers of North Dakota for Justice by Dr. T. H. Druen, Undated
Letter from P. B. Rognli to Attorney General Langer Regarding T. H. Druen, November 7, 1919
Letter from F. E. Packard for Attorney General Langer to P. B. Rognli Regarding T. H. Druen, November 10, 1919https://commons.und.edu/langer-papers/1343/thumbnail.jp
Letter from Attorney General Langer to W. P. Vincent Regarding Pool Hall in Fortuna, North Dakota, September 4, 1919
No full textIn this letter, dated September 4, 1919, from North Dakota (ND) Attorney General William Langer to Fortuna, ND Village Clerk W. P. Vincent, Langer replies to Vincent\u27s letter of September 2, 1919 regarding whether an ordinance passed by the village restricting hours and days of operation of the pool hall there would be enforceable. Langer acknowledges receipt of Vincent\u27s letter and writes that he has referred the matter to the State Pool Hall Inspector, E. H. Tostevin.
See also:
Letter from W. P. Vincent to Attorney General Langer Regarding Pool Hall in Fortuna, North Dakota, September 2, 1919https://commons.und.edu/langer-papers/1337/thumbnail.jp
Letter from Attorney General Langer to J. P. French asking French to Investigate Source of Threatening Letters, 1917
No full textLetter, dated January 20, 1917, from Attorney General William Langer to J. P. French asking French to investigate Isaac Vennevick of Bismarck, who has been sending threatening letters to Langer and other officials. In the latest letter, Vennevick has threatened to shoot to kill and to burn down the Grand Pacific Hotel. Langer asks French to investigate throroughly and make a report.https://commons.und.edu/langer-papers/1228/thumbnail.jp
Letter from Senator Langer to James Hall Regarding FHA Interest, January 27, 1947
No full textThis letter dated January 27, 1947, from United States Senator William Langer to James Hall, responds to Hall\u27s January 24, 1947 letter regarding FHA interest, and Langer says he will pass it along to a Mr. Maddock (likely Walter Maddock, former North Dakota (ND) Governor and Head of the ND Farm Security Administration Office from 1937-1950).
This letter contains the handwritten notes, Hall, James and P.
See Also:
Letter from James Hall to Senator Langer Regarding FHA Interest, January 24, 1947
Letter from Senator Langer to James Hall Regarding FHA Interest, March 6, 1947https://commons.und.edu/langer-papers/1458/thumbnail.jp
Letter from Senator Langer to Carlyle Onsrud Regarding Medical Care for Fort Berthold Tribal Members, January 31, 1955
No full textThis letter dated January 31, 1955, from United States (US) Senator Langer to Executive Director of North Dakota Public Welfare Board Carlyle Onsrud encloses “copies of letter I have just received from Deputy Attorney General William P. Rogers and Acting Attorney Commissioner Greenwood of the Bureau of Indian Affairs relative to the problems of medical care for the Fort Berthold Indians at New Town.” The letter states that Langer would have sent the originals but he is going to use them on the United States Senate floor. The letter encloses two copies of letters.
The first enclosed letter dated January 25, 1955, is from the United States Deputy Attorney General William P. Rogers. This first enclosure marks the receipt of a letter from Langer which encloses a telegram from Executive Director of the North Dakota Welfare Board Carlyle Onsrud, relative to the hospitalization and medical care for “Indians in North Dakota.” This enclosed letter from Rogers further explains to Langer that Rogers understands the medical care issue “is being handled by the Department of Interior in its administration over Indian affairs” which is why Rogers has taken the liberty to refer the issue to Acting Assistant Solicitor of Indian Legal Activities William Kastler. This first enclosed letter from Rogers refers Langer to continue communication with Kastler over this issue.
The second enclosed letter dated January 27, 1955 is from Bureau of Indian Affairs Acting Commissioner Marlon Greenwood. This second enclosure marks the receipt of a letter from Langer which encloses a telegram from Executive Director of the North Dakota Welfare Board Carlyle Onsrud, relative to the hospitalization and medical care for “the Fort Berthold Indians at New Town, North Dakota.” This second enclosed letter states that responsibility for medical care is defined in “Federal Regulations, Title 25, Indians, Parts 84 and 85, is limited to enrolled members of recognized Indian tribes resigning on Indian reservation lands who are unable to provide such needs for their own purposes. Expenditure of appropriated funds is likewise limited for care of eligible indigent Indians.” This second enclosed letter further states its process for distribution of appropriated funds from the United States Congress for health purposes. This second enclosed letter informs Langer that the entire Aberdeen area is receiving a detailed study to determine the Indian Bureau’s obligations and what financial adjustments need to be made. This second enclosed letter closes by assuring Langer that “the Bureau is willing and anxious to provide needed medical services to all eligible indigent Indians.”
See also:
Letter from Senator Langer to William Mills Regarding Medical Care for Fort Berthold Tribal Members, January 31, 1955https://commons.und.edu/langer-papers/1768/thumbnail.jp
Letter from Senator Langer to William Mills Regarding Medical Care for Fort Berthold Tribal Members, January 31, 1955
No full textThis letter dated January 31, 1955, from United States (US) Senator Langer to Assistant US Attorney William Mills encloses “copies of letters I have just received from Deputy Attorney General William P. Rogers and Acting Attorney Commissioner Greenwood of the Bureau of Indian Affairs relative to the problems of medical care for the Fort Berthold Indians at New Town.” The letter states Langer would send the originals but he is going to use them on the United States Senate floor. The letter encloses Rogers\u27s and Greenwood\u27s letters.
The first enclosed letter dated January 25, 1955, is from the United States Deputy Attorney General William P. Rogers. This first enclosure marks the receipt of a letter from Langer which encloses a telegram from Executive Director of the North Dakota Welfare Board Carlyle Onsrud, relative to the hospitalization and medical care for “Indians in North Dakota.” This enclosed letter from Rogers explains to Langer that Rogers understands the medical care issue “is being handled by the Department of Interior in its administration over Indian affairs” which is why Rogers has taken the liberty to refer the issue to Acting Assistant Solicitor of Indian Legal Activities William Kastler. This first enclosed letter from Rogers refers Langer to continue communication with Kastler over this issue.
The second enclosed letter dated January 27, 1955 is from Bureau of Indian Affairs Acting Commissioner Marlon Greenwood. This second enclosure marks the receipt of a letter from Langer which encloses a telegram from Executive Director of the North Dakota Welfare Board Carlyle Onsrud, relative to the hospitalization and medical care for “the Fort Berthold Indians at New Town, North Dakota.” This second enclosed letter states that responsibility for medical care is defined in “Federal Regulations, Title 25, Indians, Parts 84 and 85, is limited to enrolled members of recognized Indian tribes resigning on Indian reservation lands who are unable to provide such needs for their own purposes. Expenditure of appropriated funds is likewise limited for care of eligible indigent Indians.” This second enclosed letter further states its process for distribution of appropriated funds from the United States Congress for health purposes. This second enclosed letter informs Langer that the entire Aberdeen area is receiving a detailed study to determine the Indian Bureau’s obligations and what financial adjustments need to be made. This second enclosed letter closes by assuring Langer that “the Bureau is willing and anxious to provide needed medical services to all eligible indigent Indians.”
The letter is marked with the handwritten annotation N. Dak Indians [Fort Berthold].
See also:
Letter from Senator Langer to Henry Lahaug Regarding Health Insurance for Fort Berthold Tribal Members, February 22, 1955https://commons.und.edu/langer-papers/1766/thumbnail.jp
Regio- and diastereoselective cyclization reactions of free and masked 1,3-dicarbonyl dianions with 1,2-dielectrophiles
No full textDespite their simplicity and synthetic usefulness, cyclisation reactions of 1,3-dicarbonyl dianions with 1,2-dielectrophiles are problematic, since both dianions and 1,2-dielectrophiles are highly reactive compounds (low reactivity matching). In addition, 1,2-dielectrophiles are often rather labile, and reactions with nucleophiles can result in polymerisation, decomposition, formation of open-chained products, elimination or SET-reactions. These intrinsic limitations can be overcome by a proper reactivity tuning and by the use of electroneutral dianion equivalents (masked dianions) in Lewis acid catalysed reactions. The cyclisations reported herein allow for an efficient, regio- and stereoselective one-pot synthesis of biologically relevant ring systems
Cyclization reactions of 1,3-bis-silyl enol ethers and related masked dianions
No full textDespite their simplicity and synthetic usefulness, reactions of 1.3-dicarbonyl dianions are often problematic, since they represent highly reactive compounds (low reactivity matching). In addition, functionalized electrophiles are often rather labile and reactions with strong nucleophiles can result in polymerisation, decomposition, formation of open-chain products, elimination, or SET-reactions. These intrinsic limitations can be overcome by the use of 1,3-bis-silyl enol ethers, electroneutral 1,3-dicarbonyl dianion equivalents, in Lewis acid catalyzed reactions. 1 Synthesis and Rearrangements of 1,3-Bis-Silyl Enol Ethers 2 Aldehydes and Ketones 3 Acetals 4 1,2-Dicarbonyl Derivatives 5 1,3-Dicarbonyl Derivatives 6 Orthoesters 7 1,4-Dicarbonyl Derivatives 8 Carboxylic Acid Derivatives 9 Oxalyl Chloride 10 Epoxides 11 Michael Reactions 12 [4+2] Cycloadditions 13 SET Reaction
Cyclization reactions of 1,3-bis-silyl enol ethers and related masked dianions
No full textDespite their simplicity and synthetic usefulness, reactions of 1.3-dicarbonyl dianions are often problematic, since they represent highly reactive compounds (low reactivity matching). In addition, functionalized electrophiles are often rather labile and reactions with strong nucleophiles can result in polymerisation, decomposition, formation of open-chain products, elimination, or SET-reactions. These intrinsic limitations can be overcome by the use of 1,3-bis-silyl enol ethers, electroneutral 1,3-dicarbonyl dianion equivalents, in Lewis acid catalyzed reactions. 1 Synthesis and Rearrangements of 1,3-Bis-Silyl Enol Ethers 2 Aldehydes and Ketones 3 Acetals 4 1,2-Dicarbonyl Derivatives 5 1,3-Dicarbonyl Derivatives 6 Orthoesters 7 1,4-Dicarbonyl Derivatives 8 Carboxylic Acid Derivatives 9 Oxalyl Chloride 10 Epoxides 11 Michael Reactions 12 [4+2] Cycloadditions 13 SET Reaction
New strategies for the development of an asymmetric version of the Baylis-Hillman reaction
No full text- …
