1,721,011 research outputs found

    The Herbicide Glyphosate and Its Apparently Controversial Effect on Human Health: An Updated Clinical Perspective

    No full text
    Glyphosate (G) is the most common weed-killer in the world. Every year tons and tons of G are applied on crop fields. G was first introduced in the mid 1970s and since then its usage has gradually increased to reach a peak since 2005. Now G usage is approximately 100 -fold what it was in 1970. Its impact on human health was considered benign at the beginning. But over the years evidence of a pervasive negative effect of this pesticide on humans has been mounting. Nonetheless, G usage is allowed by government health control agencies (both in the United States and Europe), that rely upon the evidence produced by the G producer. However, the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) in 2015 has stated that G is probable carcinogenic (class 2A), the second highest class in terms of risk. Objective. In this review we explore the effect of G on human health, focusing in particular on more recent knowledge. Results. We have attempted to untangle the controversy about the dangers of the product for human beings in view of a very recent development, when the so -called Monsanto Papers, consisting of Emails and memos from Monsanto came to light, revealing a coordinated strategy to manipulate the debate about the safety of glyphosate to the company's advantage. Conclusions. The story of G is a recurrent one (see the tobacco story), that seriously jeopardizes the credibility of scientific study in the modern era.

    Free Radicals and Obesity-Related Chronic Inflammation Contrasted by Antioxidants: A New Perspective in Coronary Artery Disease

    Full text link
    We are surrounded by factors called free radicals (FR), which attach to the molecules our body is made of, first among them the endothelium. Even though FR are to a certain extent a normal factor, nowadays we face an escalating increase in these biologically aggressive molecules. The escalating formation of FR is linked to the increased usage of man-made chemicals for personal care (toothpaste, shampoo, bubble bath, etc.), domestic laundry and dish-washer detergents, and also an ever wider usage of drugs (both prescription and over the counter), especially if they are to be used long-term (years). In addition, tobacco smoking, processed foods, pesticides, various chronic infectious microbes, nutritional deficiencies, lack of sun exposure, and, finally, with a markedly increasing impact, electromagnetic pollution (a terribly destructive factor), can increase the risk of cancer, as well as endothelial dysfunction, owing to the increased production of FR that they cause. All these factors create endothelial damage, but the organism may be able to repair such damage thanks to the intervention of the immune system supported by antioxidants. However, one other factor can perpetuate the state of inflammation, namely obesity and metabolic syndrome with associated hyperinsulinemia. In this review, the role of FR, with a special emphasis on their origin, and of antioxidants, is explored from the perspective of their role in causing atherosclerosis, in particular at the coronary level

    Case report: Diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy that escaped clinical and echocardiographic investigations for twenty years: Reasons and clinical implications

    Full text link
    BackgroundApical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM) is a rare form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which predominantly affects the apex of the left ventricle. The diagnosis can be challenging due to several factors, ranging from no typical clinical and electrocardiogram (EKG) findings to potential difficulties in executing and interpreting the echocardiographic examination.Case presentationWe report the case of an 84-year-old woman who came to our echo-lab to undergo a routine echocardiogram. She had a history of permanent atrial fibrillation, paced rhythm and previous episodes of heart failure (HF), allegedly explained by a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease that had been confirmed many times over the previous 20 years. The clinical examination and the EKG were unremarkable. The echocardiographic images were poor quality. But a senior cardiologist, expert in imaging and echocardiography, noted the lack of delineation of the endocardial border of the left ventricular (LV) apex region. Contrast echocardiography was performed and severe apical hypertrophy discovered.ConclusionApHCM can be a challenging diagnosis. Contrast echocardiography must always be applied in cases of poor delineation of the LV apical endocardial border at baseline echocardiography. Timely detection and appropriate lifestyle intervention might slow the development of LV hypertrophy, and possibly minimize and delay heart failure (HF) related symptoms and arrhythmias. The prognosis remains relatively benign during long term follow-up

    Assessment of the Severity of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Stenoses by Enhanced Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography: Validation of a Method Based on the Continuity Equation

    Full text link
    Background: To verify whether the severity of coronary stenosis could be non-invasively assessed by enhanced transthoracic coronary echo Doppler in convergent color Doppler mode (E-Doppler TTE) over a wide range of values (from mild to severe). Methods: Color-guided pulsed wave Doppler sampling in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was performed in 103 diseased LAD segments (corresponding to 94 patients examined) as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) or intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS). The E-Doppler TTE examinations consisted of measuring the velocity (vel) at the stenosis site and a reference adjacent segment. Then the continuity equation (C-Eq) was applied to calculate the percent cross-sectional area reduction (%CSA) at the stenosis site. The applied formula was: %CSA = 100 x (1 - [TVIref x 0.5]/TVIs). TVI = the time velocity integral at the stenosis [s] and the reference site [ref], respectively); 0.5 = the correcting factor for a parabolic profile was used only when the % accelerated stenotic flow was >122% (AsF = diastolic peak vel at first site - diastolic peak vel at second site/diastolic peak vel at second site x 100). Results: E-Doppler TTE feasibility was 100%. Doppler and QCA/IVUS-derived %CSA stenosis showed very good agreement over a large range of values (from mild to severe), with no significant bias; the maximum difference between QCA/IVUS and transthoracic Doppler %CSA was mostly around 20% with a few patients exceeding this limit (limits of agreement = -27.53 to 23.5%). The scattering was slightly larger for the non-significant stenoses. The correlation was strong (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). Conclusion: E-Doppler TTE is a feasible and reliable method for assessing the severity of LAD stenosis by applying the C-Eq
    corecore