783 research outputs found

    THE EFFECTS OF THE PENDL TRAINING ON HIP FLEXIBILITY, BALANCE, BACK STRENGTH AND FUNCTIONAL SIT-TO-STAND POWER IN ADULTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN FOLLOWING AN 8-WEEK TRAINING PROGRAM WHEN COMPARED TO A CONTROL GROUP: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT Core stability training is one of the most common rehabilitation strategies for improving lumbopelvic hip control and the dynamic stability of the lumbar spine in people with low back pain (LBP). A new device called a PENDL, that allows exercise while suspended, may be helpful in improving strength and flexibility in people with CLBP. PURPOSE: To evaluate a PENDL training program in adults with CLBP by quantifying changes in 1) hip flexion/extension flexibility, 2) functional sit-to-stand peak power, 3) isometric/isotonic back strength and 4) balance. METHODS: Participants with CLBP pain intensity equal to or less than 40% in the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were randomized into experimental (n = 4) and control (n = 6) groups. Range of motion (ROM) of the hip was assessed using a sit and reach test and the Imire and Barbuto hip extension (ROM-HE) test. Balance was assessed using a BTrackS system and back strength (BS) using a dynamometer (BS-DYN). The core was assessed using a plank (BS-PLNK) and functional sit-to-stand peak power (FSSPP) measured with a Tendo unit. Experimental group participants completed 10 exercises on the PENDL three times per week for 8 weeks. RESULTS: There were significant increases improvements in BS-DYN (p = .018), BS-PLNK (p < .001), FSSPP (p = .04), and ROM-HF (p = .017). Changes in ROM-HE (p = .047) and balance (p = .77) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The PENDL may be a viable modality for improving hip flexibility, back strength and functional sit-to-stand power in people with CLBP.Ph.D

    Uintah Pep Club at Hotel Vernal

    No full text
    The Uintah High School Pep Club attended a banquet at the Hotel Vernal for the new members. Sitting front left at the bottom is Chloe Pope. First row, Jerrie Helen Bennett, Sherryl Eaton, Shirley Erickson, Gloria Wardell, Leslie Spendlove and Sue Parkinson. Second row, L to R. Linda Kindt, Vivial Allen, Laurel Searle, Sharon Stevens, Lynne Webb and Raema Coltharp. Third row, Nadene Stringham, Faye Jones, Marsha Fox, Sharon W. Green, Mary Gardiner and Carolyn Goodrich. Fourth row, Sandra McKonkie, Karen Birchell, Pama Rae Campbell, Patty Winkler, Janet Robins. Fifth row, Marilyn Call, Pam Couture, Jan Tate, Uvene Haws, and Eileen Searle. Back row, Ruth Joseph, Chloe Ed Ruppe, and Joyce Udy

    1965 Jay-Cee-An BJC -- Page 50

    No full text
    Photographs of the BJC Today's Secretaries [club]ROW 1: Julie Schreiner, Cathy Kremer, Cheryl Berge, Marlene Gallagher, Pegi Steinert, Allegra Perm ann, Phyl11S Berger, Phyllis Buckley, Ingrid Josephson. l<.uW 2: Ioann Keller, Myrna Lundgren, Mary Landgren, Mary Moyes, Margaret Priddy, Joan Olmsted, Shirley Jordan, Charlotte Bickler. ROW 3: Colleen Hendrickson, Oddie Bertsch, Shirley Rohrbach, Bonnie Eichenberger, Sandt a Erickson, Deona Singer, Sheryle Brezden, Judy Price, Nadine Duppong, Mary Kist, Ileen Hoffman. ROW 4: Sandra Hochhalter, Janice Jensen, Janice Ackerman, Pat Griff, Margaret Loock, Peggy McGarvey, Sharon Thompson, Hilma Ahl, Evelyn Leno, Linda Johnson, Joan Marshall. Today's Secretaries Indicate Growth ROW 1: Candy Wilkins, Diane Wainio, Sylvia Shaw, Judy Siems, Jeanette Kurth, Mary Knudson, Barbara Schulz, Lyl a Sayler, Mary Byrd, Sandra Grekoff, Cheryl Poffenberger, Marie Mosset. ROW 2: Elaine Steffen, Judy Bornhoeft, Sharon Atkinson, Correne Opp, Sandra Pfeifer, Judy Zuern, Beverly Schrempt, Olrve Norman, Gloria Colberg, Eunice Johnson, Mable Schwede, ROW 3: Jane Edinger, Norine Lyngstad, Angela Schramm, Marlys Brenneise, Carol Ecklund, Barbara Willert, Nancy Gustafson, Inez Hermunstad, Beverly Kubler, Carol Mehl, Janice Eback, Barbara Younker. ROW 4: Teresa Reguena, Loretta Nelson, Ilene Hildre, LaVerne Roth, Lynn Stevens, Mary Lawrence, BevaJean Sabot, Leona Kinsella, Leatrice Keddie, Annette Gratz, Carol Morast, Gron a Mehlhoff, Janet Youness, Wynnette Price. 5

    The modernist angel: Art at the Limits of the Human in D. H. Lawrence, H. D. and Mina Loy

    No full text
    PhDThe subject of this thesis is a figure that might provisionally be called the *modemist angel'. Focusing on modernist literature, and more particularly on the work of D. H. Lawrence, H. D. and Mina Loy, it aims to isolate from the many angels found in all periods and all types of art a historically specific and intellectually coherent paradigm: an angel of and for its modernist times. A figure of precisely this type could be said to exist in the form of Walter Benjamin's 'angel of history'. Critics who address the question of the modern angel in texts by Franz Kafka and Rainer Maria Rilke often do so in conjunction with the problem posed by the angel of history. Beginning with a chapter on Benjamin, this thesis nevertheless follows a different trajectory. Over five chapters, it explores a modernist landscape formed not only by Lawrence, H. D. and Loy, but also by European and American writers such as A. R. Orage, Allen Upward, Ezra Pound, Wallace Stevens, Havelock Ellis, Edward Carpenter, Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche. Although the angel that emerges from this investigation might, in some respects, be said to anticipate Benjamin's later version, this figure is also very different, standing for a project that is distinctively, and recognisably, modernist in nature. He/she (the sex of the modernist angel is often open to question) represents an attempt to reconcile the divine responsibilities of the artist with the material and gendered conditions of being, specifically of being human, in the modem world. This thesis looks again at the clash of intellectual paradigms in the early-twentieth century - notably, the confrontation of the Romantic view of art as a superhuman or sacred undertaking with the psychoanalytical or evolutionary idea that all human endeavour is underpinned by sub-human motives - and suggests the angel as a new and instructive figure through which to think the perilous limits between the human and the divine in modernist literature

    Figure 19. A, C, E in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy

    No full text
    Figure 19. A, C, E, Apatosaurus, Diplodocus, and Barosaurus, respectively, with horizontalized neck [according to Stevens and Parrish 2005a (A, C) and Lovelace, 2007 (E), in light grey]. B, D, F, Apatosaurus, Diplodocus, and Barosaurus, respectively, with a more upward-facing neck, in dark grey (according to the authors). In F, the Cv13 vertebra is a simple line art representation. No scale.Vidal, L. S., Bergqvist, L. P., Candeiro, C. R. A., Bandeira, K. L. N., Tavares, S., Brusatte, S. L., & Pereira, P. V. L. G. C. (2024). Figure 19. A, C, E in The axial biomechanics of Trigonosaurus pricei (Neosauropoda: Titanosauria) and the importance of the cervical-dorsal region to sauropod high-browser feeding strategy. In Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (Vol. 201, Number 3, pp. 1–33). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1383596
    corecore