1,720,982 research outputs found
A comparative analysis of generics markets in five European countries
A generic medicine is a faithful copy of a mature drug - no longer under patent - marketed with the chemical name of the active ingredient. This article analyses generics markets in five European countries: France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and the UK. The study investigated all the main issues - patent, approval to market, pricing and reimbursement, prescription and distribution - which affect the life cycle of a pharmaceutical product. The situation in the five countries varied widely. Because of European harmonisation, patent legislation and approval procedures no longer affect much the development of generics. Only national legislation on patent protection approved before the EU directive came into force still plays a role. Approval differences seem to be due mainly to common practice, rather than to the regulations themselves. None of the countries have an efficient public information system on patent expiry. Generics have had more success in countries with more flexible pricing policies. Reimbursement has not yet been used widely to discriminate between generics and proprietary drugs. Financial incentives are based more on physicians' prescribing behaviour than on pharmacists. The freedom of pharmacy ownership and the consequent possibility of dispensing pharmaceuticals through different channels affects dramatically the structure of generics markets. A free market of wholesalers and retailers can enhance a competitive market, through horizontal and vertical integration all along the distribution chain. Such an environment has stimulated the success of unbranded generics by delegating strong purchasing power to distributors. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd
Cost of schizophrenia studies: a methodological review.
The paper first analyses the key points of COI study methodology trying to identify the most appropriate choices. Secondly, following the key methodological points defined, it reviews a sample of studies on the economic costs associated with schizophrenia.
The COI studies analyzed here confirm that schizophrenia is a costly illness, and that indirect costs account for a large share of total costs. In all the studies considered, hospitalization accounted for a large part of direct costs. Pharmacological therapy only marginally affected direct costs, and thus the total cost of schizophrenia. The review showed also that COI studies adopted widely different approaches to estimate the costs of schizophrenia. To increase the credibility of COI studies closer agreement among researchers on methodological principles would be desirable
I costi diretti dell’infezione da HIV/AIDS: una revisione sistematica della letteratura.
L'articolo è una revisione della leteratura sui costi diretti dell'HIV/AID
The cost of epilepsy care in referral centers in Italy.
The study evaluated the cost of diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy by prognostic group in referrals centers for epilepsy
Costs of diabetes - A methodological analysis of the literature
Objective: To review studies on the costs of diabetes and its complications through a scheme designed specifically for assessing the quality of cost-of-illness (COI) studies. Design and Setting: The methodology of COI studies in diabetes was analysed in order to assess the significance of quantitative results. The scheme adopted 7 items identified as the main points for discussing the methodological choices governing the results. We also used a checklist based on questions related to the 7 items. Main outcome measures and results: The answers showed that many studies appear not to give technical details, so it is hard to understand the method. Methodological choices varied widely between the studies. This is probably due to the lack of consensus on the methodology of COI studies. Based on the findings of this review, we suggest also some specific points that could help produce more reliable results on the costs of diabetes. Conclusions: Clearly, a general consensus on COI studies is still remote, making the value of any comparison of results questionable
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of prescriptions in Italian pediatric general practice.
Most drugs used by children are prescribed by general pediatric practitioners (GPPs) in ambulatory settings. Prescription profiles are affected by GPPs' attitudes while the cost is related to the reimbursement modality. This study evaluated the Italian National Health Service (INHS) and family expenditures associated with prescribing practices to children younger than 12 years. Forty-two GPPs from southern Italy participated in the study. All visits recorded by GPPs during a 13-week period (February-April 1998), including telephone contacts and office and home visits were analyzed. The cost analysis of prescriptions is based on a sample of randomly selected consultations. INHS and family expenditures were evaluated according to reimbursement modalities for drug prescriptions. Total expenditure induced by all prescriptions during the study period was about 148 million Italian lire (7650 euros); 54% of this was borne by the INHS and the rest remaining by families. When corrections according to prescription modalities - following appropriate reimbursement form - were applied, only 49% of total expenditure were covered by INHS and 51% by families. Analysis of expenditures showed that drugs for symptomatic therapies (e.g., cough and cold preparations, analgesics, antipyretics) and vitamins accounted for most of the families' expenditure, while antibacterial and antiasthmatic drugs did so for the INHS. Of the ten most prescribed drugs the cost of three fell entirely on the family: paracetamol (the most commonly prescribed drug),morniflumate, and ambroxol. Therapeutic indications causing greatest expenditures for families were all the common,trivial childhood symptoms such as cough, fever, rhinitis, flu, and pharyngitis. Despite the universal coverage for pharmaceutical care more than one-half of drug therapy expenditures for children was covered directly by the parents. Prescription attitudes by GPPs remain the crucial factor for an equal cost distribution between families and the INHS
Direct cost of medical management of epilepsy among adults in Italy: a prospective cost-of-illness study (EPICOS)
Purpose: To investigate the costs of epilepsy from a nationwide survey comparing adult patients included in different prognostic categories.
Methods: A 12-month prospective observational study was conducted in 15 epilepsy centers from Northern, Central, and Southern Italy. The study population included a random sample of individuals aged 18 years and older with newly diagnosed (ND) epilepsy, seizure remission (R), occasional seizures (OS), active non-drug-resistant (NDR) seizures, drug-resistant (DR) seizures, or surgical candidates (SC). Estimates of the direct costs of care of epilepsy were based on the use of diagnostic examinations, laboratory tests, specialist consultations, hospital admissions, day-hospital days, and drugs, taking the Italian National Health Service perspective.
Results: The sample included 631 patients (ND 62, R 158, OS 155, NDR 114, DR 128, and SC 14). The SC group had the highest total cost per patient (Euro3,619) followed by DR (Euro2,190), ND (Euro976), NDR (Euro894), OS (Euro830), and R (Euro561). For each epilepsy group, the main components of the total cost were drugs and hospital admissions. Drug costs increased from the R group to the DR group. The new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were the largest part of the cost of treatment.
Conclusions: The costs of epilepsy in referral patients vary significantly according to the time course of the disease and the response to treatment. Hospital admissions and drugs are the major sources of expenditure
Cost analysis of dialysis modalities in Italy
This study analyses management and costs of dialysis in the Italian National Health Service (NHS). Information on efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) based on the existing literature also is presented. The clinical differences between the dialysis modalities seem to be related to their appropriateness to specific patient groups. Efficacy rates are similar and the only differences are in complications and HRQOL. Traditional haemodialysis (THD) can be done by Italian patients in dialysis centres or in hospital. Highflux haemodialysis (HFHD) is generally only done in hospital. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is usually done at home. The cost analysis was performed on a sample of Italian dialysis centres and hospitals, according to the full cost method. As expected, HFHD was more expensive than THD and PD, but no marked differences emerged among the different HFHD modalities. THD modalities in dialysis centres were less costly than in hospitals. Automated PD (APD) was much more expensive (almost twice) than continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), the cheapest method in absolute terms. This study confirms that dialysis is costly and that it is very difficult to assess the cost-effectiveness of the different approaches. Although this study has limits, it should provide sufficient analytical information to local healthcare managers for more rational allocation of financial resources to dialysis services
How do italian pharmacoeconomists evaluate indirect costs?
Objectives: To investigate how indirect costs are evaluated in pharmacoeconomic studies in Italy and the attitude of Italian pharmacoeconomists toward indirect costs. Methods: A literature review was conducted, specifically focused on pharmacoeconomic studies including indirect costs carried out in Italy, and a suevey among Italian pharmacoeconomics experts. Results: Nineteen studies were available for review. Although the methods used to calculate the value of production loss due to morbidity were all based on the Human Capital Approach (HCA), there was a wide variability among studies in practical methods. The parameters used to value production losses varied widely too. Of the 25 survey responders, 20 considered it important to include indirect costs in pharmacoeconomic studies; 56% of those interviewed stated that health authorities should require indirect cost evaluations. Most of these experts would include indirect cost estimates in drug-pricing calculation. Conclusions: In Italy studies evaluating indirect costs are still only few, although there is evidence of an increase. Italian pharmacoeconomists are far from reaching any consensus on methods for evaluating these costs. Methods need to be standardized particularly with respect to the parameters used to quantify productive time lost in monetary terms
- …
