2,510 research outputs found

    Sustainable Companies

    No full text
    Summary Raising consciousness of social and environmental problems on a global scale requires more awareness for the responsible behavior of companies (Avery and Bergsteiner 2011). The economic growth and wealth creation that are essential to achieve sustainable development goals will come primarily from private enterprise (Nelson and Prescott 2008). In this regard a key role is played by sustainable companies that can assume different forms. Among the diverse possible types, community-based enterprises, as well as territorial company, convivial enterprises, benefit corporations, and B Corp, are all examples of actual declinations of promising models for a sustainable development seeing communal values and the notion of the common good as essential elements (Del Baldo 2014; Jenkins et al. 2010)

    Holistic Development

    No full text
    The way in which holistic development can be pursued depends on how sustainable business models are constructed by actors involved in the value creation (Boons and Lüdeke-Freund 2013). In this respect, consistent leadership models (i.e., ethical leadership and responsible leadership) are crucial because entrepreneurs and managers play a key role in shaping the organizational culture and the decision-making process that affect their everyday routine, as well as intra-organization procedures and structures (Melé 2012; Del Baldo 2016). Ethical leadership rests on personal traits and behaviors such as integrity and transparency in communication with stakeholders (Brown 2005; Capaldi 2013). Responsible leadership facilitates the involvement of stakeholders and the creation of a cohesive internal and external community cemented by values and moral convictions (Jones 2014). The ‘pillars’ by which responsible leaders guide the company toward holistic development include stakeholder consideration, communication, empowerment, inclusion, and long-term orientation (Magni and Pennarola 2015). In summary, holistic development rests on a business model consistent with a leadership model that allows companies to share a strategic orientation toward an integrated development paradigm

    Il cibo nella letteratura latina

    No full text
    G. Baldo: 1. Una mensa letteraria: Filemone e Bauci, pp. 85-90; L. Beltramini: 2. L'apologia del cibo umile nella "vocatio ad cenam", pp. 90-98; Riferimenti bibliografici: pp. 98-100

    Orazio, Odi

    No full text
    Il volume contiene un'edizione di Orazio, Odi I-II, così articolata: Introduzione (a cura di E. Pianezzola); Nota al testo e nota metrica (L. Nosarti), testo latino con apparato critico (L. Nosarti), traduzione (E. Pianezzola), commento (G. Baldo e A. Duso). La cura generale del volume è di E. Pianezzola e G. Baldo

    ISO 26000 Standard

    No full text
    ISO 26000 is considered a principle-based guidance that attempts to operationalize SR principles by providing suggestions for a concrete implementation. As a “practice of reference,” it is intended for use by all organization, thus including both the ones that are starting the CSR journey and those that are more experienced with its implementation. ISO 26000 represents a practical tool companies may use to assess if and how they are achieving sustainability goals. It thus concretely contributes to their strategic management and governance betterment

    Disability Management

    No full text
    Summary Diversity management manifests in a set of transversal business practices – under the “umbrella” of the corporate social responsibility policies – that affect the corporate culture, the strategy, the financial and control management system, the operational activities, as well as the system of relations with the stakeholders and the company reporting (Angeloni 2013; D’Amato 2009; Metallo et al. 2009; Migliaccio 2016). The growing attention paid by policy makers, businesses, and institutions to diversity management is attributable to the increased complexity of society, characterized by a multiplicity of social, cultural, and individual subjectivities tied to gender, age, ethnic origins, disability, sexual orientation, personality characteristics, cognitive styles, level of education, background, etc. In such a context disability management is conceived as a proactive strategy aimed at identifying and solving the factors that prevent people with any type of disability from accessing work (Geisen and Harder 2011). While diversity management consists in practices that an organization implements to create an inclusive climate and an organizational culture (Oberfield 2014), aimed to allow workers attitudes and capabilities flourish and ensure growth and success of their personal and professional paths, disability management is not only limited to a process or to a set of procedures (O’Brien 2013; Sabharwal 2014), but it represents a professional activity which considers all the relational aspects (personal contacts and interactions) that contribute to the success of disability management. Currently disability strategies are often implemented as a reaction to the problems of a single person or an organization, while empirical studies suggest to consider such problems in advance through appropriate policies and procedures for overcoming and preventing them (Geisen and Harder 2011). Namely, workplace disability management concerns all cases of disability from personal and congenital disabilities tothose acquired during the working period (ranging from accidents to chronic-degenerative diseases). In this sense, disability management is conceived as a proactive strategy oriented to identify and remove all the factors that prevent people, with any type of disability, from accessing to developing a professional path (Bruyére and Filiberto 2013; Rahim et al. 2017). This conception differs from a more restrictive one according to which disability management coincides with the return to work, of disable people who are already working

    Authentic CSR

    No full text
    The “missing link” between the theory and practice of CSR and sustainability in the daily life of companies can be attributed to the lack of coherent and authentic leadership models and styles which should be consistent to a sustainability orientation and based on a moral and ethical construct. Adhering to these lines of thought, authentic CSR orientation can be considered a step in the business strategy (Schmidpeter 2014) that rests on a coherent leadership model. The latter incorporates transformational, charismatic, servant, spiritual, or other forms of positive leadership (Avolio and Gardner 2005). Proactive entrepreneurial and managerial behaviors nurtured by authenticity contribute to orient businesses’ strategies and actions toward effective stakeholder orientation, transparency, and sustainable growth (Walker and Salt 2006). Running a company that is genuinely oriented toward CSR and sustainability requires a consistent leadership model based on values (such as justice and integrity), in directing the corporation so as to ensure its prosperity based on transparency, accountability, and responsibility (Von Ahsen 2015; Oreg and Berson 2011). A common trait of authentic CSR rests on the moral construct of entrepreneurs and managers, which generates the capacity to communicate the vision and strengthen a cohesive organizational culture, thus inspiring in others the will to emulate their choices (Hoivik von Weltzien 2014). Accordingly, a challenging approach Visser (2011) rests on the notion that business survival depends on a continuous striving for sustainability and that moral leadership is a key driver to implementing authentically CSR and sustainability-driven strategies

    Sunken CSR and SMEs

    No full text
    Summary Despite the increased recognition and emphasis attributed to CSR, numerous problems and scandals involving large corporations continue to emerge. This contradiction nurtures a growing interest in intrinsic CSR rooted in ethical concerns spread among the company’s culture. While larger companies have to consider the expectations of shareholders and multiple stakeholders, SMEs do not need to be accountable to stakeholders through a systematic and formalized approach grounded on the adoption of sustainability reports useful to assess and demonstrate their CSR performance. However, the difference between extrinsic and intrinsic CSR is often very difficult (first) to understand and (second) to bridge and some authors advocate that the extrinsic and the intrinsic motive for CSR could evolve and be integrate

    Integrated Reporting for Sustainability

    No full text
    IR has prompted a challenge that unfolds new frontiers for both academic research and business applications (Eccles and Krzus 2010; Adams 2015) and enhances the transition to new processes of communication and stakeholders’ management. The necessity to assess, monitor, and communicate traditional (economic and financial) and ESG – governance, ethical, social, and environmental – performance underpins the expansion of new accounting and accountability tools and processes like integrated reporting that help companies better understand whether responsible and sustainability-oriented practices are contributing to the enhancement and disclosure of intangible resources. In this regard, the IIRC has devised a holistic approach that draws attention to the way a company creates value. Companies have demonstrated a growing interest in adopting IR to integrate the outcomes of intangible and tangible resource management within their reports, thus prompting IR developments both in theory and practice
    corecore