5,457 research outputs found
Letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville L. Kress - June 1, 1939
No full textA letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville Kress, dated June 1, 1939, in which Sinclair writes he has enclosed a letter from Helen Woodward, indicating that it is not a positive response by stating, ""I knew she would do her best. I fear that you and I do not realize how very bad conditions are in the literary market in New York."" Sinclair goes on to offer further assistance to Kress
Letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville L. Kress - November 17, 1943
No full textA brief letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville Kress, dated November 17th, 1943, in which Sinclair sends 'a big batch' of his latest manuscript and a letter Kress requested to read. He includes in pen 'I read Jack London'
Letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville L. Kress - March 8, 1951
No full textA brief letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville Kress, dated March 8th, 1951, in which Sinclair writes he is sending 'a lot of documents from Britain' and a book from France that he thinks Melville will enjoy. He also replies to Melville's comments about Fascism and it's affects on the 'labor movement'. At the end of the letter, Sinclair penned 'I am trying to save your soul'
Letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville L. Kress - November 16, 1936
No full textA letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville Kress, dated November 16, 1936, in which Sinclair admits ""it is quite possible that I have made a mistake about [Dr. Albert] Abrams."" Sinclair was an enthusiastic supporter and staunch defender of Abrams, whose first invention was a diagnosing machine called the ""dynomizer."" Abrams claimed he could diagnose and cure almost any disease. The American Medical Association and Scientific American deemed the machine and its creator fraudulent
Letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville L. Kress - October 9, 1958
No full textA letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville Kress, dated October 9, 1958, in which Sinclair describes his sentiments toward the Soviet Union. Writing of Kress's biography of him he notes, ""I'm afraid you won't get far. . .I can't get my own stuff published."
Letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville L. Kress - March 14, 1941
No full textA letter from Upton Sinclair to Melville Kress, dated March 14, 1941, in which Sinclair offers a critical review of Kress's manuscript. He writes, 'what I thought was going to be an interesting story turned out to be just an introduction to a sermon.
Sinclair – Gipson 1931-1932 Correspondence
No full text{"value":"1931 January 12 from P.J. Sinclair (Moshi) to Lawrence H. Gipson (Lehigh Univ.) (Typed letter indicating that Sinclair has received letters from Gipson and Professor Tomlinson who took a trip with Sinclair on the Serengetti Plains. Sinclair says he will send a manuscript to Gipson regarding Beamish which may be of interest to Gipson regarding matters of the British empire.) Scanned 1931 May 29 from P.J. Sinclair (Moshi) to Gipson (Lehigh Univ.) (three page typed letter relates Sinclair\u27s point of view regarding the troubles in East Africa and acknowledge Gipson\u27s interest in the crisis. Sinclair describes life in Tanganyika hunting on the veldt, and planting pineapples in the Hawaiian manner through paper.) Scanned 1931 October 27 from P.J. Sinclair (Moshi) to Gipson (typed letter acknowledges letter of September 15 remarking on the situation in England exceeding expectations referring to Beamish\u27s forecasting a crash. East Africa\u27s affairs are in the background but the efforts made seem to have good effect. Sinclair reports that Adm. Beamish is retiring and hope is that H.H. Beamish be nominated to replace him. Sinclair refers to "the old Manuscript" and its author – most of what Sinclair knows about it is from his grandmother.) Scanned 1932 April 11 from P.J. Sinclair (Moshi) to Gipson (handwritten letter "In view of events in England I did not send the papers relating to Beamish and De la Mothe as I first intended and I hope for some culminative event to round them off, when you would then have had a full perspective view point which would have enabled you to judge of the matter as a whole. However the papers I now send will hold some interest for you I think as they are by no means dry in themselves but hold the interest in a way which is only possible when dealing with the personal element. Your "Studies in Colonial Connecticut Taxation," is intensely interesting and somewhat parallels our case in degree, and I could not stop until I had read every word of it. Thank you very much for sending it I greatly appreciate it.\u27) Scanned (Unrelated handwritten jottings but dates mentioned are interesting "Excise 1785-1786, Phila. 1786 on brown folded paper possibly in Gipson\u27s handwriting) 1932 April 11 from P.J. Sinclair to Gipson (handwritten letter "The paper herein For a mosaic of actual history being the minor facts which make up the Tapestry and the threads of which are rarely seen. As I mentioned before it would be dangerous and not right to expose them to publicity at present, but I understand well your interest as a scholar and historian in the true facts and therefore I leave them to you with confidence.") Scanned","attr0":"description"
The Sinclair Lewis Society Newsletter, Vol. 13, No. 1
No full text“Memories of the Sinclair Lewis Memorial Service,” by John Kleinschmidt
“Fay Wray, Lewis’s Theatrical Collaborator, Dies”
“Our Literary Diogenes”: rev. of Sinclair Lewis as Reader and Critic by Martin Bucco, by Frederick Betz, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale
Abstracts from Sinclair Lewis at the ALA Conference:
“Sinclair Lewis and Americans Abroad,” by Stephen L. Tanner, Brigham Young University
“From the Cultural Margin: Sinclair Lewis’s Quest for Symbolic Goods,” by Madeline Walker, University of Victoria, Canada
“Japanese Adventures with Sinclair Lewis,” by Rusty Allred
“Babbitt’s Mysterious Inscription,” by Ingrid Wilson
“Lewis and the Literary Immortality Polls of 1936 and 1948,” by Frederick Betz, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale
“Meeting Sinclair Lewis: First Encounters and Initial Impressions, Part I” Compiled by Dana Cookhttps://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/slsn/1046/thumbnail.jp
The influence of toughening-particles in CFRPs on low velocity impact damage resistance performance
No full textThe role of particle-toughening for increasing impact damage resistance in carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites was investigated. Five carbon fibre reinforced systems consisting of four particle-toughened matrices and one system containing no toughening particles were subjected to low velocity impacts ranging from 25 J to 50 J to establish the impact damage resistance of each material system. Synchrotron radiation computed tomography (SRCT) enabled a novel approach for damage assessment and quantification. Toughening mechanisms were detected in the particle-toughened systems consisting of particle–resin debonding, crack-deflection and crack-bridging. Quantification of the bridging behaviour, increase in crack path length and roughness was undertaken. Out of the three toughening mechanisms measured, particle systems exhibited a larger extent of bridging suggesting a significant contribution of this toughening mechanism compared to the system with no particle
Roughness-and plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure under single overloads: finite element modelling
No full textResults from finite element modelling of plasticity-induced crack closure (PICC) and roughness-induced crack closure (RICC) of fatigue cracks subjected to single overloads are presented. Effects of L/r(p) ratios on RICC, where L and r(p) represent crack asperity length and plastic zone size, respectively, are seen to be functionally similar to results presented previously for constant amplitude fatigue loading [Kamp N.. Parry MR, Singh KD, Sinclair I. Acta Mater 2004;52:343-53], particularly in the saturation of the influence of RICC for L/r(p(OL)) >= I, where r(p(OL)) is the overload plastic zone size. The present work is seen to map out overload regimes where RICC and PICC effects may be expected to influence crack growth transients. Comparisons of modelled and experimental closure levels, and growth rate studies are presented, with the accompanying paper [Singh KD, Khor KH, Sinclair I. Acta Mater (in press)] considering a simplified analytical representation of the effects presented here
- …
