34,100 research outputs found

    Folder 40: Kusko, B.H. and S. Colinart. Analyse des Pigments “A la Momie” par la Méthode PIXE, 1988-1989

    No full text
    This folder contains various versions of a typewritten report: Kusko, Bruce H., and Sylvie Colinart. "Analyse des Pigments 'A la Momie' par la Méthode PIXE." Rapport d’Activité 1988-1989. Service de Physique, LRMF Most of the text is written in French.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers

    Folder 34: Kusko, B.H. Cyclotron Analysis of the Paper and Ink Reveals the Secrets of the Written and Printed Word, 1988

    No full text
    This folder contains an entire issue of a journal containing the published article: Kusko, B. H. "Cyclotron Analysis of the Paper and Ink Reveals the Secrets of the Written and Printed Word." _Literary Research: A Journal of Scholarly Method and Technique_ 13: 2&3 (1988): 123-136. The folder also contains two photocopies of the article as well as a typewritten manuscript of the article and correspondence with the publisher. The journal issue and duplicate article photocopy have not been digitized and are not represented here.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers

    Folder 59: Kusko, Bruce H. The Analysis of High-Temperature Acclerant Fire Debris using PIXE, 1992

    No full text
    This file contains a typwritten version of a report: Kusko, Bruce H. "The Analysis of High-Temperature Acclerant Fire Debris using PIXE". Report to Richard Gelhausen and Dennis Fowler, Fire Investigator, Seattle Fire Department.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers.«;~,dm!~ijt'rif41 aab ~re~aeo"8if41~r08ram Crocker Nuclear Laboratory University of California, Davis Davis, CA 95616 Richard Gelhausen Dennis Fowler Seattle Fire Department 301 Second Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Rich and Denny, Iam sending you an interim report on the cyclotron analysis of samples from suspected high temperature accelerant fires. It is still really a draft, and it rambles at times, but Iknow you need something now, so here it is. Please send it around to others for conunents, criticisms, and suggestions. Iwould like the feedback to write a good report, so we can show that this method is worth pursuing. Thanks for being patient. June and July will be busy months for me (which aren't?), so I will not have much time to work on it until August. But feedback is welcome anytime. Sincerely, Dr. Bruce H. Kusko Group Leader, CHAP encl. cc. T.A. Cahill High Temperature Accelerant Fire Debris: Samples Analyzed by PlXE Draft Report Introduction Over the past (10) years there have been (6 -91) building fifes in the Pacific Northwest suspected to be the work of an experienced arsonist using special materials. These fires reached temperatures of 3000 degrees F, yet many buildings were empty so the "fire load" was only the building itself. What little was there either melted or was vaporized. Fire investigators have yet to fwd conclusive evidence in the building debris of the fuel or oxidant used, yet the physical effects of the fire are evidence enough to class them as high temperature accelerant, or HTA fires. We were asked by investigators of the Seattle Fire Department to help them with their forensic study. They are already getting the help of other regional and federal crime laboratories, University laboratories, and laboratories in private industry, but firm results have been elusive. It is suspected that the high temperature accelerant is a mixture of a metallic fuel and a solid or liquid oxidizer. A number of small and large-scale test fires have been conducted and the mixture that came the closest to reproducing the characteristics of the suspected HTA fires was aluminum (powder and turnings) and ammonium nitrate or ammonium perchlorate as the oxidant (all bound together in gasoline or diesel fuel). Of course, any number of metals could be used as a fuel, including Li, Be, Na, Mg, AI, K, Ca, Ti, V, Zn, Zs, and even U. Potential solid oxidizers include nitrates, chlorates, chromates, and oxides. Since the possibilities are quite numerous, it was thought that PIXE would be a good method to try. PIXE is a multi-elemental technique, sensitive to all elements above Na on the periodic table if they are present in major, minor or trace amounts. In addition, PlXE is non-destructive, relatively rapid, and sensitive to surface composition. The beam-in-air PIXE system at CNL allows us to analyze even large and bulky pieces of debris. It was hoped that PIXE could be used to identify some of the chemical elements remaining from the fuel-oxidant-binder mixture. The materials brought to CNL for testing consisted of burned concrete, melted metal, charred wood, carpet remnants, and plastic bucket bottoms with residue of perhaps the fuel-oxidant-binder mixture. Debris from the large scale test burn was used as contol samples. The PIXE system was arranged to optimize the sensitivity for the elements in the range Ca to Pb. We also tested a new technique called PIGME, used to detect gamma-rays emitted during proton bombardment. This technique is sensitive to elements impossible or very difficult to detect with PIXE, (such as Li, Be, Na, Mg, and AI). Unfortunately PIGME did not work properly and no information was obtained at this time. We thus did not obtain information on AI, Mg, Na, Li, or Be. Nothing obviously unusual was detected with PIXE, but the data is being scrutinized by forensic scientists for clues. There were differences between clean and burned concrete; burned concrete usually had excess Fe, Cu, Zn, and Pb; burned wood also picked up inorganic materials. The fact that certain suspected elements were not found is also useful information. All this is now being combined with other HTA data, and it is hoped that a clearer picture of the arsonist is forthcoming. Methods We used the standard CHAP proton milliprobe, or beam-in-air PIXE system (for the first time in ahnost 3 years) (designed for books and other flat objects.) It was fairly easy to orient any piece, large or small, in the proton beam. A schematic of the milliprobe is shown in figure 1. Beam size was 2 mm x 3mm diameter. Beam currents were not measured but were typically 10 - 20 nanoamperes. Analysis times were 5 minutes (twice as long as a standard run, giving 1.5 times better sensitivity. A 1 mil Kapton filter was placed over the detector to attenuate the low energy X-rays, allowing us to use higher beam currents than usual (3 - 5 na). This also increased our sensitivity to the other elements (> Ca). But this meant that the elements Na, AI, and Mg were not detected. A typical spectrum is shown in figure 2. Dennis Fowler brought 60 specimens (pieces of evidence) to Davis on April 23. [See table 1.] About half (31) of these samples were analyzed. Since our method is comparative, we tried to find (or make) a clean surface to analyze along with the burned surface. Replicate measurements were made on 23 of the samples, resulting in 61 separate analyses. Results Results are given in Tables 2a -2e. Values are uncorrected, meaning that even ratios of elements are not correct. {We can still compare data within this set ofPIXE results.} [The problem is solvable in theory, but we did not run enough "standards" in order to recalculate the cross-section table.] Since beam current was not being measured during each run, (the sample stops the beam) we had occasional problems with overload, resulting in "live times" of less than 20%. At other times the beam current was much too low, and not enough charge was accumulated. These runs need to be looked at carefully. The elements commonly found included S, K, Ca, Ba or Ti, Fe, Cu, and Zn, and occasionally, Si, CI, Cr, Ni and Pb. Comparisons of burned versus unburned concrete, for example, shows elemental differences, attributable to the fire, and perhaps linked to the accelerant used. Nothing obvious stands out, but the data are being examined carefully for clues. Conclusion PIXE was used to analyse debris from high temperature fires. A lot of information was obtained, and the data are being evaluated. A formal report is being prepared. Bruce H.Kusko Crocker Nuclear Laboratory University of California Davis, CA 95616 June 7, 1992 \" o.~\eI HTA Arson Sample Inventory Arson Samples U.C.Davis PIXE Anal"sis April23.24 1991 Fire Matertal Sample Description rN--u-m-b-e-r -R-un--n-o.-- 1.0. analyzed Puvallup Test Fire Metal PA molten AI - - Puyallup Test Fire Metal PB Cu wire - ----- Puyallup Teat Fire Metal PC steel bucket bail - - Puyallup Test Fire Metal PO molten brase - - Puvallup Test Fire Metal PE Cu - - Puvaltun Test Fire Metal PF Steel? - - Puvallun Test Fire Metal PG Cu - - Puyallup Test Fire Metal PH molten AI 3 309-311 Puyallup Test Fire Metal PI melted steel tubing/chrome platec 2 319,320 Puyallup Test Fire PK Explosive residue -1---4--- 3-1-5--3-18-- PuvallUDTest Fire PJ Assorted stuff 3 312-314 Artificial Ice Concrete AI-1 Floor 2 353354 Artificial Ice Concrete AI-2 Floor 2 355,356 Blackstock Lumber Wood B5-1 chips 4 347-350 Blackstock Lumber Metal 85-2 slag 3 344-346 ~_kstock Lumber Metal 1,B15--3 ----~9. _______ - -1------- Blackstock Lumber Metal ,B5-4 slag - - Brock Candles Metal BC-1 melted metal 2 374375 Brock Candles Wood - BC-2 charred wood 1 376 Cal Wood Concrete CW-1 Wall 2 336,337 Cal Wood Concrete CW-2 Floor 2 340341 Cal Wood Concrete ---C-W--3--- 1Fl-o-o-r ------- 2 -33-8-,339 Cal Wood Concrete CW-4 Floor (Control) - - Cal Wood Concrete CW-5 Floor - - Cal Wood Concrete CW-6 Blister from wall - - Cal Wood Concrete CW-7 Blister from wall ------- --------- Cal Wood Concrete CW-8 Cooked red 1 379 Cal Wood Concrete CW-9 Wall 1 380 Cal Wood Wood CW-10 Charcoal in metal 1 381 ------ ----- --------- Carpet Exchange Metal CE-1 slag 1 335 --- 1------- -c------ -------- Golden Ox Concrete GO-1 Golden Ox .__ .- Metal GO-2 melted AI + char 2 char 377 378 Golden Ox Metal GO-3 AI leg of metal desk - -- - - ------- Hansen Fruit WarehouMetalHF1slagHansenFruitWarehousMetalHF2aslagHansenFruitWarehou Metal HF-1 slag - - Hansen Fruit Warehous Metal HF-2a slag - - Hansen Fruit Warehou Metal HF-2b debris - - Hansen Fruit Warehous Metal HF-2c wire - - Hansen Fruit WarehouMetalHF3br::CopperbeadsHansenFruitWarehou5JMetalHF3aMeltedAluminum2351,352HansenFruitWarehousMetalHF4slag .nn ruitW.r.hou.Motal  .6.Iagt """.,"HTAArsonSampleInventoryi,U.C.DavisPIXEAna JsisApril23,241991iArsonSamplesFireMaterialSaml! DescriptionNumberRunno.1.0.analyzedLandMetalLM1castironradiator2333,334MaritimeConcreteMT1Footing2329,330MaritimeConcreteMT2Footing2327,328MaritimeConcreteMT3ControlMaritimeConcreteMT4weatheredMaritimeConcreteMT5FootingcMaritimeConcreteMT6FootingMaritimeMetalMT72331332MaritimePlasticMT8bucketbottom2321322MaritimePlasticMT9bucketbottom2  ,3 LMaritimePlasticMT10bucketbottom2325326MaritimeMetalMT11slagPlerceWMetalPW1GussetplatePlerceWMetalPW2Gussetplate1360PlerceWMetalPW3GussetplatePierceWWoodPW4charcoal1361TriStateDistributersConcreteTS12342343VictoryBumpersConcreteVB1Floor2357358VictoryBumpersMetalVB2slag1359ArsonsamplesU.C.DavisPlXEanalysisIApril23241991UncorrecteddataRunno.309310311312313314315316317318319320Sampleno.PH1PH2PH3PJ1PJ..2PJ3PK1PK2PK3PK PI1Pt2DescriptionmeltedAImeltedAImeltedAIconcreteconcretewoodcarpetpipepipeburnedcleancharcleanbumedSilicon250.22PhosphorusSulfur2.72.60.7917.80.27ChlorineAraon12.13620.318.242.829.72621.520.422.21.61.8Potassium9.784.2Calcium2143451070832420321298224011504520.461.1Titanium919.74.10.410.44Barium5881275603612161760Chromium0.0190.016Manganese7.10.140.10.37lroo1.66.10.342.30.641.81720.980.497467Copper0.89281.90.56NickelZinc6.7yes8.30.610.590.820.21.214Strontium0.260.290.170.58LeadLreeTime805274154341717675588788Charge912128624834732718871125227814page1.Arson,samplesU.C.DavisPIXEanalvsisApril23241991UncorrecteddataRUI1no.321322323324325326327328329330331332333334saml)leno.MT8MT82MT91MT92MT101MT102MT2MT21MT11MT12MT71MT72LM1LM2Desc:riptionplasticbucketplasticbucketmetalmetal!concreteconcreteconcreteconcretemetalmetalmetalradiatorresiduecleanresiduecleanburnedburnedcleanburnedcleanburnedburnedburnedcleanburnedSilicon0.182.9!PhosplhorusSulfur6.69.81.74.2orPbM2.40.540.240.36ChlorineArgon57.953.99.637.134.63118.817.554.217.425.738.91.93.6Potassaum"Calciu11102012301958211819401150160014304945280.391.8Trtanium8.8287.45.50.261.11.2346.50.850.42Barium30Chromium0.73Manga.nese0.360.240.040.0670.10.130.61.30.67Iron127600.21155.8193.1194.57.19372Co per0.980.4327360.150.6919Nickel0.052Zinc1.80.533.829820.0210.570.917.517Strontium0.0620.0740.13lead0.336.71.45.80.3210.460.730.088liveTime2828n166661rr81647873588187CharOE!574538380195226718273783011112012781931page2ArsonsamplesU.C.DavisPIXEanalvsisIApril23,241991UncorrecteddataRunno.335336337338339340341379380381342343SamDleno.CE11CW11CW12CW31CW32CW21CW22CW4JCW4JCW10T Metal HF-3b --r::------- Copper beads - - Hansen Fruit Warehou5J Metal HF-3a Melted Aluminum 2 351,352 Hansen Fruit Warehous Metal HF-4 slag - - ~.n_n ~ruitW.r.hou. Motal ~~.6 .Iag --t---~ ---"--- " '-".,- " HTA Arson Sample Inventory i , U.C.Davis PIXE Ana~Jsis 'April23,24 1991 i Arson Samples Fire Material Saml!~_ Description -- -N-um-b-e-r -R-u-n--n-o-. - 1.0. analyzed Land Metal LM-1 cast iron radiator 2 333,334 - -- Maritime Concrete MT-1 Footing - 2 329,330 Maritime Concrete MT-2 Footing 2 327,328 Maritime Concrete MT-3 Control - - Maritime Concrete MT-4 weathered - - Maritime Concrete MT-5 Footing -- ------- c--------- Maritime Concrete MT-6 Footing - - Maritime Metal MT-7 2 331 332 Maritime Plastic MT-8 bucket bottom 2 321 322 Maritime Plastic MT-9 bucket bottom --- 2 ~~,3~L-Maritime Plastic MT-10 bucket bottom 2 325326 Maritime Metal MT-11 slag - - PlerceW Metal PW-1 Gusset plate - - PlerceW Metal PW-2 Gusset plate 1 360 PlerceW Metal PW-3 Gusset plate ----- -- ---------- PierceW Wood PW-4 charcoal 1 361 Tri-State Distributers Concrete TS-1 2 342343 - ------- '----- Victory Bumpers Concrete VB-1 Floor 2 357358 Victory Bumpers Metal VB-2 slag 1 359 Arson samples U.C.Davis PlXE analysis IApril 23 24 1991 Uncorrected data Run no. 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 Sample no. PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PJ-1 PJ..2 PJ-3 PK-1 PK-2 PK-3 PK~ PI-1 Pt-2 Description melted AI melted AI melted AI concrete concrete wood carpet pipe pipe burned clean char clean bumed Silicon * 25 0.22 Phosphorus Sulfur * 2.7 2.6 0.79 17.8 0.27 Chlorine * Araon * 12.1 36 20.3 18.2 42.8 29.7 26 21.5 20.4 22.2 1.6 1.8 Potassium* 9.7 84.2 Calcium 214 345 1070 832 420 321 298 2240 1150 452 0.46 1.1 Titanium 91 9.7 4.1 0.41 0.44 Barium 588 127 560 361 216 1760 Chromium 0.019 0.016 Manganese 7.1 0.14 0.1 0.37 lroo 1.6 6.1 0.34 2.3 0.64 1.8 17 2 0.98 0.49 74 67 Copper 0.89 28 1.9 0.56 Nickel Zinc 6.7 yes 8.3 0.61 0.59 0.82 0.2 1.2 14 Strontium 0.26 0.29 0.17 0.58 Lead Lree Time 80 52 74 15 43 41 71 76 75 58 87 88 Charge 91 212 86 248 347 327 188 71 125 227 8 14 page 1 .Arson, samples U.C.Davis PIXE analvsis April 23 24 1991 Uncorrected data RUI1 no. 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 saml)le no. MT-8 MT-8-2 MT-9-1 MT-9-2 MT-10-1 MT-10-2 MT-2 MT-2-1 MT1-1 MT1-2 MT-7-1 MT-7-2 LM-1 LM-2 Desc:ription plastic bucket plastic bucket metal metal !concreteconcrete concrete concrete metal metal metal radiator residue clean residue clean burned burned clean burned clean burned burned burned clean burned Silicon * 0.18 2.9 !Phosplhorus Sulfur'* 6.6 9.8 1.7 4.2 orPbM 2.4 0.54 0.24 0.36 Chlorine * Argon * 57.9 53.9 9.6 37.1 34.6 31 18.8 17.5 54.2 17.4 25.7 38.9 1.9 3.6 Potassaum" Calciu'11 1020 1230 195 82 118 1940 1150 1600 1430 494 528 0.39 1.8 Trtanium 8.8 28 7.4 5.5 0.26 1.1 1.2 34 6.5 0.85 0.42 Barium 30 Chromium 0.73 Manga.nese 0.36 0.24 0.04 0.067 0.1 0.13 0.6 1.3 0.67 Iron 12 7 60 0.2 11 5 5.8 19 3.1 19 4.5 7.1 93 72 Co~per 0.98 0.43 27 36 0.15 0.6 9 19 Nickel 0.052 Zinc 1.8 0.53 3.8 29 82 0.021 0.57 0.91 7.5 17 Strontium 0.062 0.074 0.13 lead 0.33 6.7 1.4 5.8 0.32 1 0.46 0.73 0.088 live Time 28 28 n 16 66 61 rr 81 64 78 73 58 81 87 CharOE! 574 538 380 1952 267 182 73 78 301 111 201 278 19 31 page 2 Arson samples U.C.Davis PIXE analvsis IApril 23, 24 1991 Uncorrected data Run no. 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 379 380 381 342 343 SamDle no. CE-1-1 CW-1-1 CW-1-2 CW-3-1 CW-3-2 CW2-1 CW-2-2 CW4J CW-4J CW-10 T-1-1 T12Descriotionmetalconcreteconcreteconcreteconcreteconcreteconcreteconcreteconcretewoodconcreteconcreteburnedcleanburnedcleanburnedcleanbumedburnedbumedcharburnedburned(red)Siieon1.12.92.21.62.5Phosphorus2.61.8Sulfur.7.40.460.47Chlorine6.226059164.252Argon2.5615.513.616.916.711.720.316.515.8Potassium35.42023.4Calcium4.1887745700126017001120275219055012501670Titanium0.520.31180.161.60.0861.90.420.120.420.750.045BariumChromium0.015Manganese0.870.0730.260.0320.0910.0340.0860.0730.430.140.028Iroo838.2285.39.26.614579.40.857.14r0.05NickelZinc0.023.90.0640.380.0320.360.0330.640.53S1rontium0.0630.110.10.220.2Lead0.140.161.1Zr0.07LneTime8584rttt8079788075598180Cbaroe2010811198706011912911653510092page3.ArsonsamplesU.C.DavisPIXEanalvsis.April23241991UncorrecteddataRunno.344345346347348349350351352353354355356Sampleno.BS21BS22BS238-1-2 Descriotion metal concrete concrete concrete concrete concrete concrete concrete concrete wood concrete concrete burned clean burned clean burned clean bumed burned bumed char burned burned (red) Siieon - 1.1 2.9 2.2 1.6 2.5 Phosphorus 2.6 1.8 Sulfur .• 7.4 0.46 0.47 Chlorine - 6.2 260 59 16 4.2 52 Argon - 2.56 15.5 13.6 16.9 16.7 11.7 20.3 16.5 15.8 Potassium- 35.4 20 23.4 Calcium 4.1 887 745 700 1260 1700 1120 275 2190 550 1250 1670 Titanium 0.52 0.31 18 0.16 1.6 0.086 1.9 0.42 0.12 0.42 0.75 0.045 Barium Chromium 0.015 Manganese 0.87 0.073 0.26 0.032 0.091 0.034 0.086 0.073 0.43 0.14 0.028 Iroo 83 8.2 28 5.3 9.2 6.6 14 57 9.4 0.85 7.1 4 r 0.05 Nickel Zinc 0.02 3.9 0.064 0.38 0.032 0.36 0.033 0.64 0.53 S1rontium 0.063 0.11 0.1 0.22 0.2 Lead 0.14 0.16 1.1 Zr 0.07 LneTime 85 84 rt tt 80 79 78 80 75 59 81 80 Cbaroe 20 108 111 98 70 60 119 129 116 535 100 92 page 3 .Arson samples U.C.Davis PIXE analvsis .April 23 24 1991 Uncorrected data - Run no. 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 Sample no. BS-2-1 BS-2-2 BS-2-3 8-1-1 BS-1-2 BS-1-3A BS-1-4A HF-3A-1 HF-3A-2 AI-1-1 AJ-1-2 AI-2-1 AI-2-2 Description metal metal metal wood wood wood wood residue residue concrete concrete concrete concrete cleaned burned burned away towards away towards ? ? clean burned clean burned Silicon • IPhos~lhorus :Sulfur .• 0.11 0.62 0.09 1.5 0.71 2.1 0.43 0.8 1.2 Chlorine • 83 11.9 2.6 ,Argon • 1.63 3.9 2.56 48.2 56.8 50.2 31.7 33.3 23 16.7 13 16.6 16.2 IPotass;ium* (::alciulTI 0.63 1.7 3.6 156 290 162 226 392 152 1970 1520 1580 2150 Titanium 0.38 0.54 0.61 4.4 4.5 22 1.3 0.083 0.38 IBariurn 2.6 Chromium 0.17 0.021 0.12 0.54 IManga.nese 0.45 0.55 1.4 0.38 4.3 0.034 0.078 0.088 llron 75 78 74 9.9 0.42 11 0.078 24 44 4.6 5.9 2.6 4.4 Co~per 0.021 0.092 0.021 0.028 6.7 7 INickel 0.021 ;Zinc 9.2 5 0.056 0.67 0.028 0.085 Strontium 0.078 0.074 ILead 0.71 0.19 0.092 .Au 0.15 ILive Time 87 86 86 19 35 31 18 65 72 80 82 83 78 Cha!llE~ 15 33 19 464 431 397 410 311 181 53 54 60 55 page 4 Arson samples U.C.Davis PIXE analysis IApril 23. 24 1991 Uncorrected data Run no. 357 358 359 360 361 374 375 376 3n 378 sample no. VB-1-1 VB-1-2 VB-2-1 PW-2 PW4 BC-1-1 BC-1-2 BC-2-1 00-2-1 G0-2-2 Description concrete concrete metal metal wood metal metal wood wood wood clean burned burned char burned burned char char char Silicon * Phosphorus Sulfur * 0.36 0.9 2 1.6 Chlorine * Argon * 14.1 11.3 12.3 3.33 26.3 1.28 1.59 5.03 44.4 16.3 Potassium* 14.6 Calcium 1530 1320 1330 14 1470 5.5 4.8 238 782 1550 Titanium 0.5 0.52 0.16 0.54 0.52 0.9 0.5 7.8 Barium Chromium 0.029 0.028 0.33 Manganese 0.023 0.008 0.78 1 Iron 14 17 7.1 82 0.91 n 88 56 0.51 2.1 Copper 2.7 0.16 0.15 0.15 Nickel 4.3 7.6 1.7 Zinc 0.51 0.51 0.56 0.14 0.32 0.73 0.64 Strontium 0.18 Lead 0.1 0.43 Live Time 80 82 84 86 rr 86 85 85 34 69 Charge 43 27 42 13 97 16 12 79 836 311 page 5 PIERCED "FU N NY" FILTER KAPTON WINDOW PLASTIC COLLI MATOR -- FARADAY CUP TO CURRENT INTEGRATOR .••..P. AGE BEAM INTERCEPTOR AND MIRROR ADJUSTABLE COLLIMATOR ~R~ COLLIMATORS .-." ecn: ;0 I'T1 MIRROR ~--------~~--~ He-Ne LASER DETECTOR TO X-RAY AMPLIFIER RUN EOalS p)(e ~~~i;" I COUNTS 9!J28161i11i1 F. In Pb Dr ~~. I H

    Folder 41: Kusko, B.H. and J. P. Rioux. Analyse des Pigments de “La Vierge et l’Enfant” par la Méthode PIXE en Faisceau Extrait, 1988-1989

    No full text
    This folder contains three copies of a typewritten report: Kusko, Bruce H., and J. P. Rioux. "Analyse des Pigments de 'La Vierge et l’Enfant' par la Méthode PIXE en Faisceau Extrait." Rapport d’Activité 1988-1989, Service de Physique, Laboratoire de Recherche des Musees de France, Paris, April, 1989. Only one copy has been digitized and is presented here.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers.ANALYSE DES PIGMENTS DE "La Vierge et l'Enfant" PAR LA METHODE PIXE EN FAISCEAU EXTRA IT Bruce H. Kusko, J.-P. Rioux Apres avoir montre les possibilites de la methode PIXE pour l'etude des pigments purs, nous avons entrepris d'analyser les pigments du tableau "La Vierge et l'Enfant" avec le faisceau extrait. Les conditions d'analyse ont ere choisies de facon a respecter parfaitement l'integrite du tableau: courant de protons de faible intensite (200 a 300 pA), refroidissement par ventilation au niveau du point d'impact, limitation du temps d'analyse a moins de cinq minutes. Les resultats quantitatifs ont ete determines au moyen du logiciel PIXAN. Les elements legers, en particulier l'oxygene et le carbone, n'etant pas analyses, les concentrations absolues ont ete calculees a partir des stoechiometries probables en supposant la somme egale a 100%. Les resultats sont donnes dans les tableaux 1 et 2. Les erreurs experimentales sont de 10 a 20 %. Resultats et discussion Les resultats du PIXE (1,2) concordent bien avec ceux du rapport etabli au LRMF en 1975 (3,4). Ils ont montre que non seulement le tableau n'est pas du Xveme siecle, mais qu'il ne peut etre anterieur a la fin du XtXeme. L'analyse de la couche mince presente au dessous de la couche d'or et du pigment a ete fai~ a un endroit ou la couche d'or est ecaillee. Cette couche mince se compose d'un melange a parts egales de sulfate de baryum et de sulfure de zinc, connu sous le nom de lithopone. Elle contient aussi du fer qui indiquerait la presence de bol, Plusieurs des pigments que nous avons trouve ne sont pas du Xveme siecle, par exemple le jaune d'antimoine (ditjaune de Naples) et le rouge de cadmium. Conclusion Des etudes complementaires sont necessaires afin de mieux connaitre les possibilites d'application a l'etude des tableaux du PIXE en faisceau extrait. Cette etude montre deja certains avantages du PIXE, notamment sa rapidite: les resultats presentes ici ont ete acquis en quelques heures. Cette methode ne necessite aucun prelevement, elle permet d'analyser une large gamme d'elements avec une grande sensibilite. Le PIXE, et les autres techniques d'analyse par faisceau d'ions, representent un precieux moyen d'ameliorer la connaissance de notre patrimoine culturel. References: (1) B.H.Kusko, Compte rendu, Bourse Fulbright, 1988-1989. (2) B.H.Kusko, M.Menu, T.Calligaro, J.Salomon, PIXE at the Louvre Museum, presente au Verne conges PIXE, Amsterdam, aoiit 1989. (3) LRMF, Ecole siennoise - Xveme siecle (?) Madone, Etude de 1a matiere picturale, Musee du Louvre INV 20642. (4) LRMF, La Vierge et l'Enfant, La vie mysterieuse

    Folder 43: Cahill, T.A., R.A. Eldred, B.H. Kusko, D. Dutschke, R.N. Schwab, G. Möller, and A. Pooley. Comparison of PIXE Microprobe and Removed Microparticle…, 1989

    No full text
    This folder contains three copies of an abstract of a conference presentation: Cahill, Thomas A., R. A. Eldred, B. H. Kusko, D. Dutschke, R. N. Schwab, Greg Möller, and Alan Pooley. "Comparison of PIXE Microprobe and Removed Microparticle Analyses of the 'Vinland Map'." Presented at the Fifth International PIXE Conference, Amsterdam, August 25-30, 1989. Only one copy has been digitized and is presented here.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers.PIXE V, VU, AMSTERDAM. Abstract form. COMPARISON OF PIXE MICROPROBE AND REMOVED MICROPARTICLE ANALYSES OF THE "VINLAND MAP" Thomas A. Cahill, Robert A. Eldred, Bruce H. Kusko*, Dennis Dutschke, Richard N. Schwab, Greg Moller, and Alan Pooley** Crocker Historical and Archoeological Projects, Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 U.S.A. The "Vin1and Map", discovered in the 1950s, was thought for two decades to be the first map to show part of North America at a pre-Columbian date around 1440 A.D. However, optical and X-ray analyses of micropartic1es removed from the map in 1974, were interpreted as proof that the map was a 20th century fake. Our re-ana1ysis of the map in 1987 showed the prior "proof" to be erroneous, and opens once again the map to serious study. This paper will describe the differences between the two approaches and the present state of the controversy. *** AGLAE, Lourve Museum, Paris, France Peabody Museum, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut I. t:./3 -

    Folder 54: Cahill, T.A., B.H. Kusko, R.A. Eldred, and R.N. Schwab. Compositional Comparison of the Mark Hoffman “Oath of a Freeman” and the “whole Booke of Psalmes", 1991

    No full text
    This folder contains an offprint of a published article: Cahill, T.A., B.H. Kusko, R.A. Eldred, and R.N. Schwab. "Compositional Comparison of the Mark Hoffman 'Oath of a Freeman' and the 'Whole Booke of Psalmes'. _The Judgment of Experts: Essays and Documents about the Investigation of the Forging of The Oath of a Freeman." Edited by J. Gilreath. American Antiquarian Society, 1991. Pages 75-96.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers.Compositional Comparison of the Mark Hoffman "oath of a Freeman" and the ~ole Book of Psalms." T.A. Cahill, B.H. Kusko, R.A. Eldred, and R.H. Schwab Crocker Historical and Archeological Projects (CHAPS), University of California, Davis 95616 The Mark Hoffmann "Oath of a Freeman" and the "Whole Book of Psalms" were analyzed by the external proton milliprobe at the Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, University of California, Davis for elemental constituents of the paper and ink. These analyses were supported by Mr. Justin Schillet of the Schiller-Wapner Galaries, New York, with the collaboration of E. Dunlap of the Rosenbach Library, Philadelphia, who supplied the "Whole Book of Psalms". The purpose of these analyses was to compare the documents in order to bring compositional data to bear on the authenticity of the "oath". In this article, we will give a little background to the analyses, reproduce the original report in its entirety, and then comment on the results with knowledge of events. Proton Milliprobe Techniques The proton milliprobe technique at Davis is a refinement of the technique of Proton Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) designed to generate quantitative composition data on fragile objects without any harm. The 4.5 MeV proton beam for the Crocker Cyclotron passes through the paper and ink generating Cahill et ale characteristic X-rays that reveal the mass and type of elements silicon and heavier (Figure 1). Sensitivities are generally about 1 part per million, while accuracy and precision are about ±S absolute. Each analysis covers an area of between 0.5 mm2 and 3mm2, depending on the task. A few points must be noted. Since the data reveal only elemental composition, chemical states are not revealed. Thus, the iron in Fe203 cannot be told from the iron in Fe02. Secondly, the ink must be analyzed with the substrate, as shown in Figure 1. Thus to obtain .the composition of the ink, one must subtract the result of the "substrate only'; from that of "substrate plus ink". For some elements, this is easy, but in the best cases, a severe loss of sensitivity ensues. In the worst case, in which there is a large amount of a given element in the substrate, the "ink alone" values are quite insensitive. Finally, all results are merely comparisons. No dates are involved. Thus, for those periods in which many documents are available for comparisons puposes, such as the Incunabula Period of printing, a high degree of confidence can be attained. For others, such as the first years of the Stephen Daye press in Cambridge, little is available for comparisons' sake. This latter problem is compounded by the diverse sources of Stephen Daye's paper, originally from England in multiple batches, which make paper comparisons quite complicated. with this background of the method, both documents were tested by the CHAPs tearn at Davis during the afternoon and early evening of April 17, 1986. The preliminary report of those analyses follows. Fi gure I Faraday Parchment C/ 4.5 MeV Proton 8ea~ <=_---,..r- ~-_- .•_'~_ZZ-_~~_2Cg~~~:_/ HeNe Laser X-ray Detector "'-- ~ To Computer April 28, 1986 Preliminary Report on the Comparision ../ of the "oath of a Freeman" and the "Bay of Psalm Book" by B. Kusko, T. cahill, R. Schwab and R. Eldred The Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 On April 17, 1986, two documents, the "oath of a Freeman", from J. Schiller of the Schiller-Wapner Galleries, NY and the "Whole Booke of psalmes", E. Dunlap, Rosenbach Library, Philadelphia, were analyzed by PlXE on the exter-nal proton milliprobe of the CHAPs group, Crocker Nuclear Laboratory. For a description of the procedures and quality assurance protocols, see Appendix~. For this run, several standards were used: 1) Pb foil, CUS foil (both from Micromatter, Inc., WA) 2) NBS thin film standard 1607, and the 1180 AD Manuscript (TAC) previously analyzed on almost every CHAPSs run since 1978. Agreement was excellent, and no normalization correction had to be applied (RE-NORM ~ 1.000). The beam spot was set to 1.5 x 1.S rom,giving a 1.S x 2.1 rom spot on the documents. Twenty analyses were made on the "oath of a Freeman" (see Figure 1). Since the paper, ink, and verso manuscript inscription were very similar at all points, we proceeded to analyze the "Bay of Psalm Book". Twenty two analyses were made of the "Whole Booke of Psalmes". These in-cluded a paper and paper-pIus-ink analysis for the 5 major paper types, the fac-simile pages, the two end papers, and front and back covers of the Book. An early analysis of the paper and ink is shown in Table 1. All data have been corrected for x-tay attenuat}on by the code IPAPA (REA), and results are given in absolute units (ng/cm). The data are presented for the major paper types, for comparison with the "oath of a Freeman". As can be seen, the "Oath", while appearing to contain old (pre 1830) paper similar to others analyzed at Davis, differs sharply from every type of paper in the Bay of Psalm Book. The lack of S, Cl, K, and Hg in the oath paper are significant, as is the presence of Pb. The Bay of Psalm book paper contains large amounts of S, CI, and K, and does not contain pb but has Hg. The elements Si, Ca, Mn, Fe, CU, and Zn are found in varying but comparable amounts in the two documents. April 28, 1986 The printing inks of both documents were similar in having only trace am-ounts of any element above silicon on the periodic table, and therefore 20stly carbon based. Both inks showed significant amounts of Pb (100-200 ng/cm ) and traces of Fe. The manuscript ink on the verso of the oath of a Freeman contained large amounts of Fe, as well as P, K and Cl. This is typical of iron-gall ink, a corn-mon manuscript ink used since the 1100's. Summary The dramatic differences in the papers of the "oath of a Freeman" and "Bay Psalm Book" clearly indicate a different paper type. The very low values of S, Cl, and K are unusual but not unique in our studies of pre~1830 papers. Some examples of other papers are given in the appendices, but nonJ~particularly re-levant to the present papers. We do not mean to imply that the oath is either a forgery or authentic, just that different paper was used. The printer may in fact have used different paper when. printing this broadside as opposed to the book, and we have only a very limited number of documents ·to compare. The ink used in both documents appears to be carbon-based, containing small amounts of Pb. The ink used in the Oath may also have n.ft Ti. They are neither unusual nor statistically different from each other, and it is possible they are from the same source. Again, we have very few inks of the period for compari-sian, and carbon based inks with trace impurities are found routinely in many documents. April 28, 1986 Appendices 1. Original record of analyses for the "Oath of ~ Freeman" and Bay Psalm Book 2. Results of Elemental analyses for both documents 3. Description of the Davis PIXE milliprobe from "the Calov Bible of J.S. Bach" 4. Examples of various papers-a) 18th through 19th century b) Incunabula period, 15th century c) the Calov Bible of J.S. Bach, German 17th century Tabl!! 1 COMPARARTIVE ELEMENTAL COMPOSITIONS OF PAPER AND INK ( ng/cm2 ; corrected for absorbtion by IPAPA ) E;i 1 icon < Si ) PAPER Oid~_h of a Fr-f.:lf?Ill,:\r1 (t1E?an ± a ) 14, ::::'00 ± 4 ~500 F'tlCl'sptlCll- us; < I , ~500 (P) Su If ttr: (E)) ell I01- i ne ([;1 ) F'Clta~;5i um (V) Calcium ( c:.:\ ) TiLan ium eli ) M,3nqanese ("In) I1'-- on (Fe) Copper-- (eu) Zinc (Zn) t-Ier cur- y CHq) L._ead (Pb) <400 < ~)()() <200 1~::'.190 ± 2, ~140 < 75 :1,2::25 ± ~::'10 ± 1:? 199 ± 4~i < 25 ~.?6B ± 291 D6~) ± 140)-{' INK Bay Psalm BODk (t-1.3:: / t'1i n ) Oath of a Freeman (print) <writing) B,"':\y F'salm BODk (pr- i n+ ) .16 500 t 1. an al va ia deletr.",d ** 5 (Jut C)-f "1 analv ses when lead \l'la5 found Values marked with a _have a standard deviation as large as the values given. 2(~, 7001 < 4 ~500 ..,~ 4-,900 4B~500/ :l9~OOO :?2~500/ 2,080 R30 7,490/ ~)!f 5~t2() 1~:~r,600/ B,7:l0 NA - 140 190 2,2BO/ ~'?:~:6 60 ::~;~720/ 1~290 - -11-00 .19, 600 10:?/ tEl 261/ 1:13 :::.~ 1:::'0/ 298 1~)5/ < ~?5 - :?70 1. 19B1 Cahill, T.A., B. Kusko and R.N. Schwab. Analyses of inks and papers in historical documents through external beam PIXE techniques, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 1B1 205-20B. 2. 19B1 Schwab, R.N., T.A. Cahill, B.H. Kusko. "The Cyclotron and Descriptive Bibliography: A Progress Report on the crocker Historical and Archaeological Project at Davis" The Quarterly Newsletter, The Book Club of California, 42 3-12. 3. 19B1 Cahill, T.A., C.G. Higgins and S. Howard. Accelerator-based methods for fingerprinting marble: A preliminary report. The B3rd General Meeting of The Archaeological Institute of America. 4. 19B3 Eldred, R.A. External beam PIXE programs at the University of California, Davis. IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science, NS-30:1276-1279, Seventh Conference on the Application of Accelerators in Research & Industry, North Texas University, (invited paper). 5. 1983 Schwab, R.N., T.A. Cahill, B.H. Kusko, and D.L. wick. Cyclotron analysis of the ink in the 42-line bible. The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America. 77:3 285-315. 6. 1984 Cahill, T.A., B.H. Kusko, R.A. Eldred and R.N. Schwab, Gutenberg's inks and papers: non-destructive compositional analyses by proton milliprobe. Archaeometry, 26:1 3-14. 7. 1984 Eldred, R.A., B.H. Kusko and T.A. Cahill. The external PIXE milliprobe at Davis: Laser alignment, PIXE calibration, and quality assurance, Nuclear Instruments and Methods, B3, 579-5B3. 8. 1984 Kusko, B.H., T.A. Cahill, R.A. Eldred and R.N. Schwab. Proton milliprobe analyses of the Gutenberg Bible. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, B3, 689-694. 9. 1984 Howard S., T.A. Cahill, N. Herz, C. Higgins, E. Kinmoth and B.H. Kusko, Computer-assisted accelerator-based methods of determining the provenance of ancient marbles, presented at the second Conference on Automatic Processing of Art History Data, Pisa, Italy. 10. 1984 Bliss, A.S. cyclotron analysis and a fake gospel lectionary of 1328. Scriptorium, International Review of Manuscript Studies XXXVIII, 2. 11. 1985 Schwab, R.N., T.A. cahill, R.A. Eldred, B.H. Kusko and D.L. Wick, New evidence on the printing of the Gutenberg Bible, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 79:3, 375-410. 12. 1985 Almquist, H.J., Color of the Ledger Lines of the Large Numerals issue of Mexico, 1887. The American Philatelist, vol 99, pp.241-2. 13. 1985 Kusko, B.H, Proton milliprobe analysis of the hand-penned annotations in Bach's Calov Bible, in The Calov Bible of J.S. Bach, Howard H. Cox, ed. Studies in MusIcology, No. 92, UM! Research Press, Ann Arbor, p 31-106. 14. 1986 Schwab, R.N., T.A. Cahill, B.H. Kusko, R.A. Eldred, D.L. Wick, Ink patterns in the Gutenberg New Testament: The proton milliprobe analyses of the Lilly Library copy, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 80:3, 305-331. 15. 1986 Cahill, T.A., D.W. McColm, B.H. Kusko, Control of temperature in thin samples during ion beam analysis, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods, B14. 38-44. 16. 1987 Cahill, T.A., R.N. Schwab, B.H. Kusko, R.A. Eldred, G. Moller, D. Dutschke, D.L. wick and A.S. Pooley. The Vinland Map, revisited: new compositional evidence on its inks and parchment. Analytical Chemistry, 59, 829-833. 17. 1987 Kusko, B.H., and R.N. Schwab, Historical analyses by PIXE. 4th Int. PIXE Conf., Tallahassee FL, 9-13 June 1986. Nucl. Instrum Methods B22, 401-406. lB. 1987 Cahill, T.A., The Nuclear Bibliophile: Cyclotron studies of rare documents. Transactions of the XIvth Congress of the International Association of Bibliophiles, ed. Stephen Tabor Los Angeles, 1987, 37-50. 19. 1987 Schwab,R.N., The history of the book and the proton milliprobe: an application of the PIXE technique of analysis. Library Trends, Summer 19B7, 53-B4. 20. 19BB Kusko, B.H., Cyclotron analysis of paper and ink reveals secrets of the written and printed word. Presented at a special seccion of the 1987 convention of the Modern Language Association of America, December 2B, 19B7. To be published in Literary Research. 21. 19BB Cahill, T.A., Gutehberg and the cyclotron. Accepted for publication, The Library Associates, UCO. Cahill et al. Post-Revelation Commentaries The compositional uniformity of the Mark Hoffman "Oath" is clearly evident in the results for the paper and ink. Thus, good average values are obtained, especially for the paper. The inks were harder to evaluate, since the mass of elements heavier than silicon was so low that the ink was clearly carbon based. The minor trace elements, derived as we now know from the combustion of 17th century paper, were of the same magnitude as that in the printing of the "Bay Psalm Book". The iron-rich manuscript ink looked a little too clean (i.e. see our results on the "Tartar Relation' (le-)), but we now know that Hoffman added pure (modern) tannic acid to the inks for the verse inscription. Processing from oak galls would have added additional trace elements, yet the results were not outside of the range of other inks of the period (fb) The clear and consistent differences between the papers was the strongest evidence against the "Oath". As was stated in the report, the Oath ".. differs sharply from every type of paper in the "Bay Psalm Book". Yet, without better knowledge of the paper sources, who can say definitely that such paper was impossible? In fact, we know that the papers dated for the 17th century, England, but 30 or 50 years later, why were the papers of the "Bay Psalm Book" so chemically complex? Until we have more examples of this period, we may never know

    Folder 27: Kusko, B.H. Proton Milliprobe PIXE Analysis of the Inks in the Cincinnati Haggadah, 1987-1988

    No full text
    This folder contains a research report: Kusko, B.H. Proton Milliprobe PIXE Analysis of the Inks in the Cincinnati Haggadah. Report to H. Zafren, Hebrew Union College Library, Cincinnati, May, 1987.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers.UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS BERKELEY • DAVIS • mVINE • LOS ANGELES • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA· SANTA CRUZ CROCKER NUCLEAR LABORATORY DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 Mr. Herbert Zafr en Director or Libraries Hebrew Union College 5 j 0 1 Clifton Avenue Cincinnati. Ohio 45220-2488 Dear Mr Zatren, I am pleased to send you the final report on the PIXE analysis of the Cincinnati Haggadah. I apologize for taking so long. but in the last year a series of major beam line changes and a new computer system lead to more than the usual number of difficulties. I finally did all the number crunching on my home computer. The purpose of this project was to perform non-destructive tests of the chemical composition of the parchment, manuscript inks and painted illuminations in the Cincinnati Haggadah. The results of these analyses are important to the CHAPs group of scholars, who are studying the history of the book and early priming in Europe. A second reason for performing this investigation was to compare the manuscript inks in the Cincinnati Haggadah with the typographic ink used in the contemnor aneous 42-!ine U;menherg j Bible. The method used in-the examination of the Cincinnati Haggadah was proton-induced x-ray emission, or PIXE, and the tests were conducted with the beam -in -air proton milliprohe. This analyiical technique is very well suited for the analvsis of the parchments. inks, and painted illu rninai ions TI..&)C-lc, .m1.1 ai:nu11s-c...r in!-it j'111,'c...• w'..tI.I e re••••.•����� "d"Ce;t\.e."r",ml.1line.dI U". to he......1;1'-(1_ 11 bo!al r! .;.1•1'.h'<:•.v.. wv,h1ic1•h.•,&...1.. <~ ••:• I-}'-I, ,\\.••.'•i•.•·••,...d _ nLa"\) re se rnb lance to the priming inks u~~ed in the 4?-iine Hib!e ThE:'clL-H-ed pj~::n:eDl~ ,\-,'::',e ;JJ~ed 10 be pigments well !~IIO\vn to medieval na.nter s and illU min a tors. 11 was a privilege to he involved 111 the examination 01 the Cincinnati Haggadah. If you have any questions about the report Of Jl(:t;U help in inte.r..p.,reti.n•.g.. It'\ V':"l.ll"y' mate..ri:c..,..::tl, !n~.lle'Ca...s...e. cit'J, _11,'_(1'~, h1_e._s•i•·t. ta.·..tt.v:> fL,'t,.' ~....,.._1·"1"1:•:...,•:...,t·-,\. \1.1.·.t·:' :! "~'.J:qL h!_.._~_,. lie'a''l'll,j l'):;\l'~ in Ce'f"'l611-1l.. ,".11" ,.'j snen rl ,) .\ 'J',,' ~';l··l,-t. ;1'1" 1\' 1i'f) con ,,::,., "I' ;,'\!~ 'V b u. •.. J. .1..) t' 'I; u~ lit... ~ ~h .•·.!. 'U " ~•.. t;,;:.t..4.l Vv _1 hi ?- i..\.\.. ",lv \....•.. I ••••.. .1 ~ \AL..t.-.'lJ labor atorv of the Louvre Xluseurn. but t \\dl still be 111 close touch \:"iLl; 'ic.m Zafrcn-2 Calli1i and Dick Schwall. 'You can still write to me at Crocker \uclear Laboratory, Of else the Laboratoire de Recherche des Musees de France, Palais du Louvre. 7<;04 i Paris CEDEX0 j . Sincerely. Bruce R. kustn Technical Coordinator. CH/',P encl. cc Richard f'\. Schwab PIXE ANALYSIS OF THE CINCINNATI HAGGADAH Final Report to Mr. Herbert Zafren. Director of Libraries, Hebrew Union College. Bruce H. Kuske. Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, University of California at Davis. Proton-induced x-ray emission (PIXE) analysis of the Cincinnati Haggadah was commissioned by the Hebrew Union College in the winter of 1987, and performed by the Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project ICHAP) at the Crocker Nuclear Laboratory of the University or California at Davis on 13 Mav. 1987. Introduction The purpose of this project was 10 perform non-destructive tests of the chemical composition of the parchment, manuscript inks and painted illuminations in the Cincinnati Haggadah. The results of these analyses are important to the CHAPs group of scholars, who are studying the history of the book and early printing in Europe. As part or their research, CHAP SCholars are building a database consisting of "chemical fingerprints" of the papers, parchments, and inks of books, manuscripts, and historical documents. according to era and date, region, scribal school or primer. paper mill or parchment maker. The focus of their research has been Gutenberg and the history of printing in western Europe. A second reason for performing this investigation was to compare the manuscript inks in the. Cincinnati Haggadah with the typographic ink used in . , the contemporaneous 42-line (Gutenberg') Bible. The CHAP database contains the the results oj' 17<)2 analyses of ink from five 42 -Iine Bible:::. Experimental Method PIXE is an analvucal iechnique that uses a beam or high energv protons to probe ihe compositionof 'the paper and inks .n a document under examination '\ more deD.decL yet nqfl-tf',~tlnf.c(~!dp~c.r;pt!()n nl lJI.XF is given in appendix B after an introducuon on the nature ()f x -r avs in appendix A. The most irnpor tarn advantage of P1XE for the analysis of books and III anuscr ipts is that the technique IS compleiety nondestructive 1t is therefore nul. necessary to remove' even the smalles: atiquot from Uk document heingtt~Sled In addllinl';, PIXE I~~a sensitive. m ult i-ele me ma; method. since any element from sodium 10 the end or the periodic table can be detected by its X -fa-y' signature if it is present in major, minor, or trace a mounts. It is also extremely Iast, in that good sensitiviry is usually attained in one to three minutes. And if an accelerator is available 11is relatively inex pensive. The need for an accelerator to produce high-energy proton beams is the primary Iim itation or PlXE. Although we use a cyclotron a much smatter electrostatic or van de Graaff accelerator IS adequate, The other major limitation of PIXE is the inability to detect U1e elements llydrogen, carbon, and oxygen. Therefore, if an ink were purely organic it woulo he 'Invisible to the PIXE technique. Procedures The testing of the Cincinnati Haggaoah took place on May 1.3. 1987. The proton beam was directed into the North Cave experimental area of CNL, and tuned through a thin plastic window on the end or the evacuated beam line, into the air. The final beam collimator was adjusted to provide a 2 m m by ,3 m m beam spot on the target leaf. hence the name "proton milliprobe". Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the proton milliprobe The Cincinnati Haggadah was supported hy a special lectern designed 10 hold it securely in the proper orientation for analysis yet put no more stress on it than if it were lying open on a table. The lectern allows [or millimeter adjustments laterally and vertically. so the desired spot on a leaf to be tested can be positioned to exactly intercept the proton beam. Alignment is checked with a (harmless i laser beam that can be positioned with mirrors to be exactly co-linear with the proton beam (see figure I). A series of thin ele mentat standard foils from silicon !./", 141 to lead i7 L'~'~)"':''"1,i'" \"er",t. ,r~•/•~Cn~•• te-;s."te'd.\., I O.J 'c-'o.1nfLi,rm I thI'e;:. "'.Y.:·:"-rl,<-..U••l.,., l'··«,1.;d},·}·l •..,·-1'1·;.'·-·''Ur'. 1i."Lll, addl\i.r,iicl,)u.•.. '"" 13th century' parchment leaf whose composition \\~e rest at the t)eglnIling ()(' ev er v. beam-in- air cv.ctotron run -w'. as measured to confirm 3 set uf values on a materia! similar in nature to theparchment leaves in t he Cincinnati Haggadah. Thirty-six tests were made on the Cincinnati Haggadah. PIXE was used to deter mine the elemental composition 01"eigi1~ parchment leaves, the black manuscript ink on twelve leaves. the brown manuscr intink (in two leaves and T'\1 iI1P l'OIt')I'': elf i;, '.c> f) ai n ted I'J1u mi n ')1ion I~ T hi:' ~. r \' "'1' b j.J :', "} \'.' '1 t: '111,' I" '1 ..\ Ii J. ..•••••.• 'V. \. l.' _ ..I._V\_" t- l(~ .•..l ..I'... J .~~\..- t-.'. ''.It., J ''-'<.Ail f'\- u....Li;.,.I\'v..\...~~ to strike the page for 100 seconds, and the x -r a. ~:were recor de d Data was 2 analyzed bv the computer oroeram RACEwhich provided a list of the elements mat were Iound. If an element were nor round me program gave the minimum detectable limit. which is a measure of the sensitivity of the analysis. Results The complete results are presented in two tables and three figures. Table I presents the results for parchment and ink, and table 2 presents the results for the colored illuminations. The results are given two ways. One set uables 1a and 2aJ is presented in nanograms per square centimeter, a measure of areal density, or mass per unit area. (One nanogram is one billionth of a gram, or 1/28,000,000,000 of an ounce.I This is as close as we can get to 'parts-per-million", a more common unit, since we can not weigh a leaf, or the ink on a leaf. The other way the data are presented (tables! b and 2b) is as values normalized to the element argon. Argon x-rays come from the air surrounding the leaf. Since the argon level of air remains ex tremelv constant, by laking ratios to argon we eliminate some of the variations in the experimental data due to fluctuating proton beam currents and varying thickness of parchment from leaf to leaf. Experimental uncertainties were on the order of 10 to 20 per cent. The results for parchment and ink in table I have been separated to compare the differences between them more easily. Since the proton beam goes through the leaf, exciting x-r ays all along the way, an ink analysis is really an analysis or ink -plus-parchment. In order to determine the composition of the ink we must subtract out the contribution or the parchment. A "chemical finger prim" for parchment was determined by averaging the elemental values for the eight leaves tested. t The standard deviation is a ~lJL-:LlCJI measure of the variation of the eiemental valuos.l Chemical [in~erprinls fry (;lJck manuscript ink and brown m anuscr ipt ink \\'ere (J~[ermjnec! in a similar wav These chemica! Iingerpr ints are presented graphically in figure 2. P~ing lh~ parchment as a baseline one can ~ee the e le me m s that ar e enhanced In the ink: -plus-p arch ment : Of pigment! -rlu~- ,,t-}(a11rc.h.... 1.1n._1f>\"1111'i • aU.nal(All.-~~" "1'".:.~. Discussion The parch ment cornposiiion is somewhat variable. as \\ as expected ,!! i..Ilp' ,'t, e1' t(· I h''It /'Ql' !)P ~M' .)_ L 1"" \...l •••._..:.l 41.· L. "'" 'vc..i..,! ~ ••.•. detected by PIXE, sulfur. calcium, iron. lead and sometimes copper were found. The black manuscript ink composition is also variable, but contains elevated amounts of sulfur (810';(.)' potassium. iron (630tH:.). copper (570(H~! and zinc. This is also shown in figure 2. In mv opinion this is an iron gall ink with copper and zinc occurring as impurities or as intentional additives, such as drying agents, color enhancers or antiseptics. l.ead appears not 10 be a component or the hlack manuscript ink. The brown manuscript ink is similar to the black manuscript ink: containing similar amounts or potassium, iron, and copper, slightly lower amounts of sulfur, and no zinc. There may be some lead in the brown into The colored paints are very interesting. but we are limited in what we can say about them because PIXE cannot detect organic components of the paint. \\ie do see the trace metals and in the Cincinnati Haggadah we can generally determine the pigments that were used. A more complete analysis could be done but it would require the removal of a sample. The chemical fingerprints of some of the pigments in the illuminations (1). leaves 33 and 51 are presented in figures 3 and 4. These figures contrast the elements found in the pigments with the elements found in the parchment. The following are my persona! opinions on the colored pig ment s round in the Cincinnati Haggadah Reds and pinks: Lead red, Pb3(}1. r; pigment or anuquitv, ii. was probably known a~ early as lead itself Red lead occurs naturally. hut it is usuallv made by heating litharge {PbOl to high temperatures until the desired color is obtained. _R.l1!~~~Azurite. or basic copper carbonate 2(=uC~C~~·{~ut.C!H~2- /"'.. m.s: i.nportant blue pigment from U1C 1)n1 centurv uati: the midule or UK I cU-I cent ur v It is found more frequently man ultramarine ;,luc ! lapis I,!ZUli i in ~l:cdic\~al works. (~I'~'V' \XThl·l·eIe ad DI-,C() .Dl'(\ ('r !~I\"('(\I·r-jh:(}'P; •.. md b lack t carbon r' _- "'_, .4..1. V U. j l'~"-1l r v; ... r __ .1 L,. __ J'_., •.... \._1 _' Ut1 .• tA.\,.._ •... \.rLA. •. 1.1. •• \'(tilt.: lead was abo a pigment of anuouiiv and one ur the most important or a!; the lead pigments. It was the first pig mcnt to lk svntheticatlv prepare o L)ra1-lli£~ R.p<ltgar /i.S2\;. or Orni ruent {L :nR ~ ye!lo'cl/ I. As 2SI, l.nown ..•~. -!-,l..•~'-(,-(, c•••l~.•as••s,i,'c...al ..Ii..t. im~e• _s .•.• -:-1. ~1l1,.l')()U,~')J';I1,... 'v'""•1.!....•: <.'" '::!1)if,'~_I\IL"j",..1':.I"••....,."' \..,,,),.,lf:I\I1'IU,.;,)1 \,.- \".~ ·1", \;;J.1!.1. .1-.1 I"'1'_,'(4_! J.'"-':"£IA(IU' (fl.'f{"1l,J!\,J flrvwn: Iron oxide, Fe203. Used from prehistoric limes to the present Gold: Gold mixed 'with white lead. Powdered gold leaf was used in medieval times for a writing ink. It was made by amalgamating the gold with mercury. then driving off the mercury with heat. leaving behind high-purity gold powder. :';"5. Many medieval manuscripts used rin sulfide (SnS2) as a substitute for gold, since the pigment is golden in COiOL Other pigments sometimes used for gold include lead-tin yellow (Pb2SnOq + Si02) {used 1300-17501. and Naples yellow (Pb3(Sb04h (first synthesized in i758, although it occurs naturally and was used since the l-ith century). Conclusion The parchment, inks, and colored pigments of the Cincinnati Haggadah were analyzed with the proton mitliprobe of the Crocker Nuclear Laboratory of the University of California, Davis, The manuscript inks were determined to be iron gall inks, which were used almost exclusively during the l Sth century. The inks showed no resemblance to the printing inks used in the 42-1ine Bible, attributed to Johannes Gutenberg. The colored pigments were JUdged to be pigruerus well known 10 medieval painters anci illuminators. Credits The Cincinnati Haggadah was brought to Davis by H. Zafren, Director of Libraries of Hebrew Union College. The PIXE work was performed by member s of the CHAP group. especially R.N. Schwab, B.H. Kuske, T.A. Cahill. and R.A. Eldred. The final report was written by BJI. Kuske. The project was paid for hv the Hebrew Union CcHege, the LCDCommittee on Research. and the Crocker Historical and Archaeotogical Project. through a MacArthur grant ~(}.vdr ian YCi1::(}D. 5 Ci nci nnati Haggadah CHAPS.. 13 r-·lay1987 Table 1a. Afr)(lUl!tS in nanograms per square centi meter. Experi mental uncertei nties are 10 to 20%. Parchment Pun # leaf 7.J:..C..; 2.0 *' 40 *" 160 105 i • \ Argon ; Sulfur i Potassi urn Celci IJm §. Iron Copper Zinc lead 16 50 18 51 106 153 167 46 141 39 146 36 133 .39 .34 121 26 30 *: 45 50 133 37 80 * i ~~4~7 ~2~~~2~0~:~,~ 6~7 379 i,f1e8fJ i 147 47--r--- 124 ' \,--S_·tfl_r_lw_r_d_[)_)(:_vl_·a...:.:ti..:..o..:..fI~1 __ ...:.:3"-'0=--_-'-1.-:...:S~4 --,-I 1O~._.. 6.6 23 54 55 33 Black Ink 7.J-.7.J ~A 34 50 2 41 42 46 95 88 120 130 I 118 , 110 109 r•.._* I~ ••• r:-u" '.. Lt:;ij! 6ro~r. ..I.n.:.t..::.:..=-----,---- -------.--------~.:-. . 49 Staruiard DeviAtion! 137 38 80 *" 36.7 84 80":, 28.6 80 *: .Ij' C' <. , .J 30.7 56.6 14.0 2.0 ..:, 40.4 26.2 i.O *: 10.0 2.0 l' 2.0 *: 47.1 5.7' 2.0 *; 20.4 2.G *' 2.0 *\ 20.4 3.9 2.0*: 74.5 7.7 5.5 216 45 235 134 60 27.9 37.5 8. i 24 I 1i8 -"---=.:.2..:1....::5::.---' 8.3 . 12.-=-~ ___C7...7.:_,___' .7.J 0./.7.J 7..Q- ~...:.:~~~u_~_n_#~Le~a~fl~A~r~g~o~fJ--~l:~~IJ~lt~·IJ~r--~,.:...:_P_r~~~t:~ca~sa~~l~~ic'~~jiru~~n~~o~§+:~lr~o~n--4:C~·~o'L~PZL~pei~~_rn_(~;~Lp~~a_~_d~ 17 SO i 35 485 308 24.5' 2090 436.0 107.0 60 19 51 96 434 403 20.9 2810 845.0 2.0*: 104 22 51 124 235 170 22.8 1370 353.0 49.0' 167 25 54 154 270 208 20.0 1900 510.0 93.0 64 78 91 127: 20.6 i37 1600 4570 1620 291.0 167.0_~_215 347 24.1 1758 369.:5 861 122 ~---=?-:;'-"--'-~1 :~; 1----'-----.-3-4.8------ 4.:3...::....1.1.-4'7--...,2..1...:7...4.~~..~-7-:-?..3---------4.7-~---- . Araon : Sulful:--~_P.o;;-;i-~_f!.::..._-_=f!'lciurr~_E:,~J.rlJn-- 'Cop..Eer- : zinc- ' Lt:~r:j __ : 205' 361 32.7 990' 2230 20 + 326 --=5~O,--' =2__ -,1...:.:~4:...;.1. I 8 0 __~~i'.~. __._3 4J_~. 1540 341. 0 2.0 7:~ 391) . t1e?jfl 142 193 456 33.8' 1265 282.0 2.0 361 1H 134 1.5: 389 83.4 0.0 49 19.7 22.1 23.7 26.7 225 i c.~, I-..J{... .340 23.1 18.9 .J -:z: L: .;.....~..-' 951 701 i 7""ZCt i ·.J·JU 210.0 59.0 520 49.0 69.0 262.0 170 106 121 146 H34 1200 337 2G.9 50G 29.3 ; -::II.U 107 345 310 32.3 366.0 4::, J .0 461.0 * Denot.:s the element \·/3S not found. The vaiue given i~; t.he minimum detec1able limit ~: (CaUum vaiue::: fl8Ve t,2en !jiv1ded t!!j 100) 814 7 Table 1b Ci nci nnatt Haggada h CHAPS.. 13 1'"R11J 1987 Aroounb nor meltzed to Argon. Expert mental uncertai nties are j 0 to 20%. Parchment I ! CalAr I I I , Run :# leaf SIAr , KIAr fe/Ar Cu/Ar \ Zn/Ar II Pb/Ar i I, .cJ '/f~;! I Cu/Pbi . i 16 50 '7C c-i 75.S: 34.61 29.01 '7 ':' i 1.9\ ':'77' 1.221 i -J-J . .J: .J• .J; ..J .!; I 18 51 55.2\ 52.3i 18.7\ 37.0! 9.2i 1.3\ 104.6: 1.49! 0.088! 24 54 27.s1 47.91 1651 24.2\ 1 cJ.,,iI 1 ·L'I..ii 62.9( 1.1SI 0.2501 ·-.r. c-c C6 -n ; , LO _'J 27.S! .J .. I: 14.0: 7.1 t l.4j 1.4: 31.9' 3.881 0.044! 33 7_'_7.J 24.B. 91.1, zscJ. 21• 32.3; 3.9\ 1.4\ 161.0\ 0.77\ 0.0241 .39 'l-j-~'l ".:t:....L')'l 66.1; 18.31 16.91 i.-I.ii 1.71 69.4; i.26! 0.0241 45 50 27.9\ 60.2: 17.81 15.31 2.9i LSi 45.1 ! 1.821 0.0651 32.5: 184.9: 13.0; I I , 47 2 36.3; 381 2.7\ 1os 4\ 0.89! 0.0361 C'! . I .J. i i ! rtean '71 79.3: 19.9i 24.8! 5.2: 161 77.21 1.56) i "_f I "-'1 , I 0:51 0.0761 iStandard Devietion 10.5: 44.8! 7.2j io.ei 4.9i 43.91 0.99: 0.080! I Black: Ink LJ.un :# leaf , S/Ar , KiM \ C3/Ar : Fe/Ar I Cu/Ar I Zn/Ar ; Pb/Ar j S/fe i ! Cu/Pb I i ! ! 1 ; , i I , 17 50 560: 3~t!1'! 291 24471 511: 125: 70; 0.23! 7.267\ 19 51 452\ 420, 22; 29271 880; 21 108; O.lS! 8.125; 22 t:' ! 190: 137: i ~I I 181 11051 2?_C'.J':; 40! 135f 0.17i 2.i 14; I I 25 54 175! 135\ 13\ 1234i 331 ; 601 42i 0.14\ 7.969\ 71 C'C' 1 1..,1 i ss: 261 i 101 49i 14; 0.23\ I ..J' .J.J I; ld ! 503; 1 0.0891 ! '7_IC_I 77 236: 144! 241 9981 220; 62' 1291 0.24\ 1.7071 J-J 22; 1721 ; ~., 77 173; 138: 797: 59; j??; 0.22\ 1 .41 11 .~I I .,.;.J ~~. 41 .34 283: 1 :,;) 20: 1 108: 'IUc: 41: 1 4'7' P'IFi r- lC'7! -'-; I .J~ .J i ~. _'.L J: !.. ·_I.Ji A--; ~ .i• 2r::q~ 142: 2i 1231 ! 332; t:"71 0;= 0.21 : 4.066; '"1"'::'" .J...,. .J.J' JJ",,' 46 50 424; i0171 'cI:e_)_'l 7.J877.J\, 391 222: 1 161 0.1 'I:i 3.3651 48 ? 314' 740: 1473! 2651 152' 0.21 ! i '- , , 29; 195: 1.353~ I , , t'1t'3f1 , 290.0~ 319. L 22.7t 1608.8: 336.4; 78.6: 1 14.0: 0.20; 3.61 :Standard Deviation , 138.9i , 300.6; 4.8; 103Q.9: ~?_20 ~?' _6_2 .f,o.~I. 405; c' '? 9' O.O.J; ~ nrevn Ink Run #: Leaf 49 2 ~;/Ar 150 KiAr C<liAr 176; 23.9: 306; 23,7: Fe/Ar 122 723 1048 ClJiAr ' Zn/Ar PblA:- 3/Fe , Cu/Pb i 6:::.4, 861 : ,'1eflrt ;~;tan,i<1rct Deviation 50 ?'- 163: .?:..."_"_ZI.:.?.,. 23Fi. ~' u 269" 1 r ..,. I. ( i36.0' 19.2, 240.8i 23.0' 915: o.i. 885.1 229.8 197A 48.9' 0.0 a.o; 77.3i ~_..........::..6.:-.4_..~:.~:.1. 2.5 i6.2 Table 2 a (loci nnett Hagqaoatl CHAP;:,-' 13 t'lay 1987 Aro(lunb in !1dflogrd!l\3per square ctilti meter. Expert mental uncertei nties are 1(\ to 20%. lRun #-==~~..=~=-AI_rqslr.!i]~!!!j}~.LFu\.r;ti1~Tsst~' ~I~~~IJ!ir.-;c(l~t=.-u;~ff;~_-._~Jad J __. O_~het=- ! I 1eat c: ' ; ;' , , , ' " , ;, ·U ~ --.' ! -+-- I , ~ __ --+- _. .L -.-.\- ~,__ .•~ : ; 18 (parchment) 153! 84.4i 8u *: 28.6\ 56.6; 1<1: 2 *: 160: ;20 (blue) 42.4; 7.6: 80 *: 9.73; 81.2l 9356: ") *' 257: '21 (pink) 97.3; 283; eo *' 30.5' 63.5; 27.2 2 *' 432 .z--s {,·t·~~;o·\., -:=:;-=R=-.-7=r.-. 't-=.S-':.!,. 17--::; •·. t·"!).·.·1"-r.o\): --~;:'.·:1~'/~; ~::~·t'-f------=?-1*, ;:-7::-G.-.:0+,..----. leaf 54 ......J ..__ • J_ •• _. ~. ~' -+- \24 (parchment) 1671 6.4; 80 *i 27.5' 40.4; 26.2: 2 *, 105, _'!.-'?'.:'..•{.•~'~. old) 4·'.:'.,.;.. oPH~.!.',_·.: 0°0·1 *. ;i :_'..'.':, '•:1.".L•,O! ",7::I••o• .-t,"' r~.,' i ·L-'U,-_''jU"'''(•).\.i.• li,~\".l,d l-'•L•~u~i . . .---t"---.--------t--.----.~0--" ---7--- ----;---------j--.-----,---'--------'--- , leaf 3~ I ' : " • !33 (parehlnent) -'--··1461-- 36.2~ 133! 38~·~4·T- 1f--s. 7~---2*: 23-51--------: !34 (blue) 40.6; 25.2( 80 *1 i 1.81 4921 9220; 2 *l 963; :36 (brown) ;:;4.6: 4371 2441 29.9: 18031 133 7021 350' ! 38 (qreu) 124i 1802, 80 *i 3.7i 36.9\ 4. i, 2 *; 33000, ;---·---I~.f ~.,~ ------- ----r--"-- ----r-------c·_-----t-----·---; . !e,~, _'""t • ,: : , , . ., , ;39 fparc-hment)----121l·-2S·:7r---- 8(f*T---i2~T-·-XO~4r-----·-·-·-----2 *7 84}f----·------~· ;40 -<gold) 6.8-.2~, ---8-1-9-, .-.----80--*-,-.----c-.-t,----1-40-.---1-7.8.5.;,..--2-4-8-;--19-7-0-(1~. --G--o-ld-2-3-1_(I. 1eaf s ~ !! ! I i ~ ! t I· '- ~ ---+._~~ -!-- i -i-----.l..--- .:.. ~.---_--_--' !43 (parchment) 190: 53, 80*1 33.7\ 30.9i 4 *, 2 -i'. 1131 ;44l"+·~1·n\ 11··; ~5C;: C;u'l; 19~ QA··' sot .')* 14.91, ! '\.::iU1 .•- : ~ • br _ __; _: dl l,.l~_bj -il",; ~_. u:-'-- _ :---. lea1i----. ---···-------·-··----------·----r---- -.--.-----. ,51_~~~j~)·=_~:,~_i.L?L1iQJ =.._. .~.~~9J_._. JJiL_~l~lL.._:)6ci~ 19~ 1Q*1~~~~-i~c9·5·00, * Denotes the element was not found. he vel ue given ie the mi ni mum detectable Ii mit :3 Calcium val

    Folder 7: Cahill, T.A., B.H. Kusko, R.A. Eldred, and R.N. Schwab. Gutenberg’s Inks and Papers: Non-Destructive Compositional Analyses by Proton Milliprobe, 1983-1984

    No full text
    All of the items in this folder are related to a published article: Cahill, T. A., B. H. Kusko, R. A. Eldred, and R. N. Schwab. "Gutenberg's Inks and Papers: Non-Destructive Compositional Analyses by Proton Milliprobe." _Archaeometry_ 26.1 (1984): 3-14. Two of the items are offprints of this article while three items are photocopies of the offprint. Three of the items are typewritten manuscript versions of the article while another item is a typewritten manuscript of only a portion of the article. The remaining items are correspondence between the authors and the staff of the _Archaeometry_ journal, and related materials, regarding the publication of the article. Non of the offprints have been digitized and are not represented here.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers

    Folder 33: Kusko, B.H. The Potential of Particle Induced X-Ray Emission for the Study and Conservation of Books, Manuscripts and Historical Documents, 1988

    No full text
    This file contains an abstract and typewritten manuscript of a paper presented at a conference: Kusko, B. H. "The Potential of Particle Induced X-Ray Emission for the Study and Conservation of Books, Manuscripts and Historical Documents." Presented at the Conference on Technological Advances in Conservation and Geoarchaeology, Santa Barbara, California, June 12-14, 1988.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers.. ", .. \ \ I! \ \, ABSTRACT FORM TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND GEOARCHAEOLOGY JUNE 12-14, 1988 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA PLEASE TYPE YOUR ABSTRACT IN THE SPACE BELOW --------- DEADLINE MAY 1 -------------------------------• -------------------------------------- Jhe Potential of Particle In<.1ucedX-Ray Emission for the SJudy and Conservation of Books, Manuscripts, and Historical Documents Bruce H. Kusko Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project University of California / Crocker Nuclear Laboratory Davis, CA 95616 The Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project (CHAP) at the Crocker Nuclear Laboratory of the University of California at Davis has been using Particle Induced X-Ray Emission (PIXE) for the' arialyst's' of thepaper. parchment, and inks of books, manuscripts, and historical documents. PIXE is i _ a non-destructive method capable of determining the elements from sodium (Na, Z= 11) through uranium (U, Z=92) that are present in major, minor. or trace amounts. The primary focus of CHAP has been historical: we have been using PIXE data to answer certain long standing questions about the development or printing in western Europe in the l Sth century. PIXE data can also be useful in conservation and restaura~ion··8tuEiie3;·in:·wl1ich·the first step is to understand the physical and chemical properties of the papers, parchments, and inks of the document in question. For example, chlorine bleaching, alum sizing, and mineral fillers or colorants can be detected easily, and the composition of the ink can be studied if it is not purely organic. This paper will describe the capabilities of PIXE and explore its potential in the field of document conservation: -------------------------------------------------------------------- ARE YOU INTERESTED IN LEADING A WORKSHOP SESSION? YES NO >( ~o c;>~ 7 tAo.l-\ J ~c..v--, r:' f\'z; k.,f oJ" \ Doc.'-'v '" (I-J->" I . C-- '1/' ~lA\G A V +'5 SEND THIS COMPLETED FORM TO: DR. STANLEY V. MARGOLIS MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA SANTA BARBARA, CA. 93106 TOPIC OF INTEREST TELEPHONE # (805) 961-4496 The Potential of Particle Induced X-Ray Emission for Ule Study and Conservation of Books, Manuscripts, and Historical Documents Bruce H. Kuske Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project Crocker Nuclear Laboratory University of California Davis, CA956 16 The Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project (CHAP)at the Crocker Nuclear Laboratory of the University of California at Davis has been using Particle Induced X-Ray Emission (PIXE)for the analysis of the paper, parchment, and inks of books, manuscripts, and historical documents. PIXEis a non -destructive method capable of determining the elements from sodium (Na, 2= 11) through uranium (U,2=(2) that are present in major, minor} or trace amounts. The primary focus of CHAPhas been historical; we have been using PIXEdata to answer certain long standing questions about the development of printing in western Europe in the 15th century. PIXEdata can also be useful in conservation and restoration studies, in which the first step is to understand the physical and chemical properties of the papers, parchments, and inks of the document in question. For example} chlorine bleaching, alum sizing, and mineral fillers or pigments can be detect~d easily} and the composition of the ink can be studied if it is not purely organic. This paper Willdescribe the capabilities of PIXEand explore its potential in the field of document conservation. I. Introduction I would like to thank Stan Margolis and Luis Monreal for inviting me to to speak at this conference. I am an atomic physicist and relatively new to the field of conservation, but for the last ten years I have been involved in the cyclotron analysis of books and manuscripts through the Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, or CHAPfor short. CHAPconsists of a group of scholars in the sciences and humanities who are engaged in Potential of PIXE... B.Kusko 2 historical, art-historical, bibliographical, archaeological and other related research programs which employ the facilities of the Crocker Nuclear Laboratory (CNL).The instrument we use to study books and manuscripts is called a proton milliprobe, which is based on a technique known as Particle Cvj\,\\tl.... S WIll ~es v,,,,e ,...1 ?J-+ j) Induced X-Ray Emission, or PIXE1\Ourfocus has been the~ history of the book. The largest effort has gone into our study of Gutenberg and the incunabula period, when printing with movable metal type was invented and spread throughout Europe (1450-1500). 1 _' :/0 ~~;t4 As the technical coordinator of the CHAPsprogram I affiAconfidentof rf fl\A-1.. ~ ~ '(' e'S00V\$\01€ the numbers+ obtain. But as e.,~. 1r1>.r" J)'"A .{(.,o. -.((.0...rr;;.c'-l ofov-r ~;,J~A10_ ••• :~.J..0. p-€"w~ evt-fovl ~S(-\tTs. ~ 't a scientist collaborating with humanist scholars, I often find myself ignorant of the details of the historical or bibliographical side of an issue. I sometimes , feel that I have answers, but that I don't know what the questions are. I will tell you a briefly about CHAPsand the technique called PIXE,with the hope t .iJ;l (that conservators of documents will see a use for the information provided ~ byPIXE. \ --\ rt---- ~--.....-./0 C. Utilization of the CNLcyclotron to the study of books, manuscripts, and historical documents grew out of fortuitous circumstances that brought i together two very different research projects that were being pursued on \ the Davis campus. The one has to do with the cyclotron analysis of smog (figure 1). Essentially, air pollution is collected by pulling air through clean filters and its elemental composition is determined by PIXE.Physics professor Tom FL Potential of PIXE... B.Kusko 3 cahill and colleagues use the (PIXE)results to help pinpoint the sources of the air pollution; whether it comes from man -made sources like automobiles and power plants, or natural sources like forest fires and volcanos. The second project is history professor Dick Schwab's investigations Of. r-2\t the great 16th century Encyd{~jje of Diderot (figure 2). Diderot's covrt-vuvel!'5%\ t Encycjope.:iie.,printed over a period of 20 years, contained 35 volumes, t=- s R including 11 volumes of magnificent engraved plates. It was so highly admired and sought after that almost immediately, counterfeits were being ~ made. Schwab's researches, based on careful visual examination of over 100 folio sets, resulted in a seven-volume Iaveatory t>f the En{yd{~ilewhich was designed, in part, to establish the original text out of the many counterfeits, cancels, censored pages and confusion of variant editions. As Schwab and Cahill became a-ware of the problems with which each was dealing in their widely differing fields, they became persuaded that the PIXE technique that worked so well on aerosol filters might be effectively ),-/D:J applied to problems of physical bibliography and the history of the book. After all, to the cyclotron, the ink on a page of a book is almost identica1-te ~ '7Ts-r smog collected on a clean filter. 2 _Proton Induced I -ray Emission Figure 4 shows the essential features of PIXE.A beam of high energy f~L protons generated by the cyclotron passes through the page I exciting the ink and paper being analyzed into emitting characteristic x-rays. By Potential of PIXE... B.Kusko 4 characteristic I mean that these x-rays contain information about the atoms in the object being analyzed. The energy and intensity of the x-rays are used to determine what elements are present in the ink and paper, and in what amounts. There are a great many advantages to using PIXE.(Table ) Most important for the analysis of books and manuscripts, the technique can be made completely non -destructive, so that one cannot determine, even with careful examination, that any analysis had been performed. It is therefore not necessary to remove even the smallest aliquot from the document being tested. Furthermore, PIXEis a multi -elemental method, since any element from sodium through to the end of the periodic table can be detected (by its x-ray signature) if it is present in major, minor, or trace amounts. It is a very sensitive method, with the capability to detect elements present in amounts down to lO- 13 to 10-14 grams. {It is quantitative in an absolute sense, needing no standards for calibration purposes, only the parameters of the experimental setup} It is extremely fast, in that good sensitivity is usually attained in 60 to 180 seconds. And if an accelerator is available, it is relatively inexpensive. This need for an accelerator to produce high -energy proton beams is the primary limitation of PIXE.The other major limitation is the inability to detect the elements hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen. Therefore, if an ink were purely organic it would be "invisible" to the PIXEtechnique. Also, as with any x-ray method, we see elements and not compounds. 3- The Davis Proton Milliprobe IJ-0( Qt At Davis we do PIXEwith what we call the proton milliprobe. The Davis proton mi11iprobeis located at the Crocker Nuclear Laboratory of the University of California at Davis (figure 5) At the heart of the laboratory is a 300 ton cyclotron (figure 6). the one used a Berkeley for many years before it was "retired" to the Davis campus is 1965. The cyclotron provides the high energy proton beams that are used to probe the o 1A}-\1~ \-1-R composition of paper and ink. 'lll:is is the control room of the cyclotron (figure 7). Although it is quite complicated, once the beam is tuned up it takes very little effort to keep it going. ~ ~-( -r-'\'Jt..,-\- ~l5--Y1J e _ CovV\1-Vv-9 vI~ e The proton milliprobe is at the end of the target beam line and is '8 shown here schematically (figure 101. The proton beam passes out of the evacuated beam line through a thin plastic window, and reaches the target page after traveling through about one inch of air. It then passes through the page, exciting x-rays, and is collected and counted in what is known as a Faraday Cup. The x-rays emitted from the page are detected with a detector just below the beam line. i, ~+ed. +0 0 e l:i-d ~~V\ 0 _'?> c-, '" ~ '3, 0 'W\ '-"'1 -' \tIe~\<Aw\~~\[ *fl1e. /oQ~",,", c (AV1 \,~ t?\. j 0 (CAlI\taQ.V\~e... "'L1r, .Vl I-- 1.\ \ -t -+~ A CO\I"lQCA-r'VJ'-1 7V\-€. T0.1~+S O\.V"'€. O\.\l~V\e~ j-Ia CA. (}.:se~ ~Qro ~ 1\ ~~+cV\ la-e~fI""\ I by --t'1e. UJe of' VV\\'4'vo-r::' ' Because of the low beam currents used, the energy lost in the target page is always quite small. Typically, the energy deposited is equivalent to that provided by a 100 Watt light bulb at a distance of 50 em, and much less Potential of PIXE... B. Kuske than sunlight or the energy deposited by a photocopy machine. Nevertheless we performed extensive tests to assure ourselves that the proton beam is completely harmless to papers and parchments. The actual process of analysis is so safe that it is possible for us to stand directly next to the book 5 Potential of PIXE... B.Kusko so that we can supervise the safe handling of it. As a matter of policy we require the curator or other representative to be present at all times during the testing of their book. [+- \J J--;( 6 LrIt? F \ I For the testing of large bound books aBe oti'ieI balky w(}rks, we needed to design a special lectern so that the individuat pages could be positioned quickly, accurately, and safely on the target plate (figures 11 and 12). We consulted with rare book conservators and designed it so that it can hold the volume securely, make it possible to position a single leaf of a bound volume in position (at 45 degrees) on the target plate, but in no way put a strain on the binding or pages they would not get from normal reading. When hanging sideways, the weight of the volume is distributed along the bottom and side edges. The device is designed so that there can be precise adjustments of the book up or down or laterally in relation to the target plate and proton beam coming through it. /( ~ r) '"") ~e l'7CtAV>'\ ',5 t'"- "",oJ4 s-; L-0: \.1 '1CI..( L . Th~~figuret (figures 13 a ) ~ representative of the x-ray ::f I'"LR spectrum acquired with the proton miniprote, and are taken from one of out: \t ~O1;.l5 -+\-\e ~~~{ (.\£15 Ie. . S eW\ rII.(d early G tenberg analyses. ~u is the x-ray spectrum-of pape .and on ~ e e \~ • the ig:htis4~ay spectrum of black ink. Since the beam goes through the page, when we analyze ink we get x-rays from the ink and also x-rays from the paper. We have found paper to be relatively homogeneous chemically, so by subtracting its contribution to the paper -plus-ink spectrum, we can arrive at the elemental composition of the ink. (Unable to get absolute numbers for ink atone.) Potential of PIXE... B.Kusko These x-ray spectra are analyzed by computer. Quantitative results are available for all elements (above sodium) 30 seconds after the completion of data acquisition. This immediate access to results allows the intelligent modification of protocol if something unexpected turns up. 4. Applications of the PIXETechnique An early example of the sensitivity of the PIXEmethod is shown here (figure 15). We analyzed 33 consecutive pages of an 18th century travel book by Savary (let/res sur lEgypt~1786), and plotted the results. It was puzzling to the scientists in the group that the elemental values were consistent for eight pages, then jumped to a different value for eight pages, and so on. Of course Dick Schwab immediately recognized that we were seeing signatures, (figure ) and differences in composition from one large sheet of paper to another. These results encouraged us to pursue the PIXEmethod for the testing of the papers and inks of books and manuscripts. The information we have obtained has made it possible to make new contributions to the discipline of descriptive or physical bibliography. We have been able, for instance, to peer into the day-to-day workings of Gutenberg's printing shop. While these data tJ~~vV) o v..,te V 7 Potential of PIXE... B.Kusko 8 are interesting they are not relevant to this symposium. The point is that the proton milliprobe is a tool that can be exploited for conservation studies. OUrexperience in this field has been limited. I will describe our part bt' in a large study tf0nducted by Timothy Barrett, now the director of the Papermaking Facility of the University of Iowa). Barrett had collected 126 leaves of book-paper manufactured between 1400 and 1800,62 of which were in good condition, and 64 of which were in poor condition. One of his aims was to determine why some paper remained in good condition while others deteriorated badly. His measurements included tests of pH, fiber length, gelatin content, and ultrasound properties. Our job was to measure the sulfur, c torine, and residual metal l,. \~'>lO ~DY'V\e ov« fv~\ n$v\+S w~~ Joo~ bQ ~1o\\5"'€c!a,:r ''''Vl VI'71 ~r o.r\.{ content of the papers" In general we found that the good paper had higher. ~-..re\~'~vW.+lO()., ~~ calcium levels, while the poor paper had higher sulfur, aIId potassium, levels . .air pal19tien A \uvv) Y- Af- 50t1) )se~ ? I~ I~~ \ V) ~ e I -,\ . ~V\~-e.'vv\IA\.(~~ ~(e.eJS Mo...\£e"'J ~~ ~e;..~e"o...C\O cc k\c c;,.. ~ ���•.•+--te-r- <, atWll~ b~~, \1I'\\-e(/\+lool'-g.l(y IOlr 0c-c~~ev\+1i LV\t~'vc41 Pages were seen with very high chlorine levels, which probably means the page was washed or bleached at some time. (Clin papermaking only after 1774.) ;;; I f2vf'v-\ fa,x.e 1 5J 0~ S vJ e f? ~ VIC-.. \,Y~~ - --::J (2 5 (' c:' 0C S>vV)G \ I \ov\)vVVI\S~ ~ y.Q U()~\sL." '7e v-}5 -f-hct1 J\5 cot Dv ~ ~ \j'Je", ~V""\ 0 \~ G~ re'-f., \~ey ~~ ")~o vJ L.,+ ~ ~Q c:::..J€ vv\l CIjX1 5~ floc VVl'otLs. ~~ c-.l-:-o ~ ~7~L_<A\ VV\-e-h·Js +h<A+- c-,c+ CAS cuJ~/1 '2RV3 -+0 o"f~6~~'vV)- WQ. {ovv'"/1 G o~ f~ II ~ox.e ~ S~o+5 \.Ne.~ v--.v ~~f·\Oll\_t fY\)~ [\.-e J J rfOV---~\~) C ~-e~~ ~ -fCv- \!-,ye.e s()Z~ f ~ r:0 V\ ~ \v-t-e ~ v..v'\. 0 r: ~ ~..J 0-t II"\A fA 0V'I \-:) u ~ ~ VV\ ~ IV'0Y'\) ,0.-", t.. 0 V) a, C7~"Qt ('v~\~-e~ 2...0 -t\VV\e5 VVC0~ ~v- ~~'v\ f1-o sVVJ'<;)vV'\~C~ (""'F-ev ~ l+ \~ (\ev.-v VV\O--re vv~,,\<- Y\~~5 ~ 012. ~()""«' OV'-{;XI'V\-) I L::,Q-}h. vvd'--. ?\~& c- I-,~ 0 f",",-J" vv"-€ j.~1. ~;s. r>.Kusko "---- - Cl--~88!!t'6!\f!leallll "iI'[f9S. We stuoieo three leaves that were high in sulfur in more detail. We scanned the top, outer and bottom margins as shown in figure .The results for sulfur, potassium, calcium, iron and zinc are sho-wnin figure . It appears that sulfur can enter a book through airborne sources, probably as sulfur dioxide gas and sulfate _-"p,--~rtic1es.7 ( ~------- ..-- / I I Potential of PIXE... B.Kusko 10 6. Conclusion I have tried to show that the proton rnilliprobe is a tool that has a wide range of potential applications. PIXEcan be applied to parchment, papyrus, and other writing surfaces, as well as art forms that use ink, crayon, paint and other writing media.IOf course, to be most effective, data provided by the proton mittiprobe should be used in conjunction with other {more traditional} methods of the study of documents. A broader knowledge of the chemical and physical properties of ink and paper will assist the custodian in evaluating good storage conditions and restoration procedures ~ -----___ ~f~o~r~boo~k:s~a~n~d~m~a~nu~oc~n~·p~ts~. --------------------~------- "'\ \ \ \' l . v-e ~\.-eeo r ~'5I'OV\ \~y~\f'5 O\{ 01'~Q...r ~o-t-eVl /(r, ~~ \ <..CA.ft()V'\S o. ~ I' e' -I' -'I\U.«;h1 (-e~~"",",\...[ '5~YlG- tA~~o--J.'5 . 0\.l"'1~ o-: 0 V\ "V\ J1?'- '" J 6. Acknowledgements This work has been almost entirely supported by a MacArthur Foundation award to Adrian Wilson. Additional funding has come from the University of California, Davis

    Folder 39: Kusko, B.H. The Development of Particle Induced X-Ray Emission for the Study and Analysis of Museum Objects, 1989

    No full text
    This folder contains two copies of a typewritten report: Kusko, Bruce H. "The Development of Particle Induced X-Ray Emission for the Study and Analysis of Museum Objects." Progress Report to J. Ligot, Director, LRMF. Only one copy has been digitized and is presented here.The items in this folder are part of the Thomas A. Cahill Papers--Crocker Historical and Archaeological Project, 1981-2009. They are from Series 1: Thomas A. Cahill Research Papers, 1981-1994. This series consists of various research papers and published articles based upon Dr. Cahill's research using Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) techniques in analyzing inks and papers.PROGRESS REPORT: The Development of Particle Induced X-ray Emission for the Study and Analysis of Museum Objects Submitted by: Bruce H. Kusko Fulbright Research Scholar AGLAE Laboratoire de Recherche des Musees de France to: M. Ligot Directeur, LRMF 28 February, 1989 RESUME Le Louvre est le premier musee au monde a posseder un acceIerateur de particules pour l'etude et l'analyse des oeuvres d'art et d'archeoLoqi.e. Le Laboratoire de Recherche des Musees de France s'est donc equipe d'un outil t res puissant qui offrira aux scientifiques de musee la palette des techniques d'analyse par faisceaux d'ions acceleres qui comprend PIXE, PIGME, NRA, RBS et plus tard datation C14. Le rapport d'avancement consigne les travaux que j'ai accomplis entre le 15 septembre et le 28 f'evr i.er 1989. Pendant cette peri ode nous avons commence par monter un systeme PIXE d'analyse des oeuvres d'art des collections de musee. PIXE est une technique multi-elementai re, sensible, bon marche, rapide et ce qui est le plus important dans le cas d'espece non destructive. Nous avons ainsi obtenu des resultats preliminaires sur des echantillons de verre, des etaIons qeoLoqi.ques , des pigments de peinture et des objets en or. D'une certaine mani.ere, ces experiences ont ete plut6t un apprentissage pour moi et l'equipe AGLAE. Nous nous sommes familiarises avec l'accelerateur, la chambre d'analyse, le detecteur de rayons X, l'eIectron.ique d'acquisition. Les premiers resul.t ats sent; t res encourageants, il reste pourtant beaucoup de travail a fournir pour que le systeme PIXE d'AGLAE soit operationnel en routine. Nous n'avons, de plus, qu'un temps limite de faisceau pour le PIXE, puisque la priorite est donnee aux tests -verifier que l'accelerateur est bien conforme aux specifications du constructeur. L'accelerateur presente quelques problemes avec la source d'ions avec comme consequence un courant de faisceau Leqeremerrt instable. De plus, nous avons utilise une chambre provisoire. La nouvelle chambre definitive a ete construite a Strasbourg et est en cours d'installation. Il n'y a pas a l'heure actuelle un moyen sur pour mesurer le courant de particules dans le cas d'echanti Ll.oris epai.s, c'est pourquoi les resultats presentes ici ne s~nt que relatifs. Un hacheur de faisceau (un composant pour mesurer le courant en prelevant peri.odq.uiement; une partie du faisceau) est en cours de construction a Jussieu-Universite Paris VII et sera monte au Louvre en avril. Nous avons porte nos efforts particulierement sur 'quatre etalons de verre, qui represent erit les d.i f ferent s types de verre etud.ies par les archeo Loques et les historiens d 'art. Ces etal.ons sont bien connus et contiennent 27 elements chimiques entre le sodium et le plomb dans des quarit i.tes variables comprises entre 100ppm et 35%. On a obtenus des resu l.tats avec une erreur relative comprise entre 10 et 20% ,avec parfois des desaccords d'un facteur trois. Les premiers echant i l.Lons que nous avons ree.l Lemerit analyses sont des pigments de pe inture broyes provenant de la boutique "A la momie", une maison de commerce en exercice pendant les 18 et 1gemes siecles. Nous avons alors prouve que PIXE pouvait etre utilise pour determiner les elements majeurs, mineurs et traces rent rant dans la composition de ces pigments. De subtiles differences ont ete decelees entre des pigments de meme denomination, et au contraire des pigments avec des noms differents ont la meme composition chimique. Le systeme de faisceau extrait a ete teste sur plusieurs objets, y compris sur un tableau-faux primitif italien- , un cadre dore du 15eme siecle et une petite statue en or antique. Pour l'analyse de la plupart des objets de musee nous serons amene s a utiliser ce systeme a l'air. 11 est donc crucial que ce systeme soit parfaitement regle. On a egalement commence a etudier l'atmosphere a l'interieur du Louvre afin de determiner si des poussieres presentes dans les galeries s~nt nocives pour les oeuvres d'art qui y sont conservees. L'analyse des filtres aerosols pourra etre effectuee par AGLAE avec seulement des modifications mineures sur le porte-cible. Les resultats presentes ici ne s~nt pas entierement satisfaisants. 11 est tout a fait rassurant que tous les equipements et composants fonctionnent bien pour acquerir les spectres. Mais je pense qu'il faut encore reduire les erreurs experimentales en ameliorant le traitement des spectres(materiel et logiciel) pour que le Louvre soit dote d'un systeme PIXE sur et precis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Louvre Museum is the first museum in the world to have its own particle accelerator for the study and analysis of works of art and archaeology. The Laboratoire de Recherche des Musees de France has thus taken a bold leap into the future with AGLAE, a powerful "high-tech" approach to the conservation of our cultural heritage. This accelerator will enable the museum scientists to use a variety of ion-beam techniques on works of art and archaeology, including PIXE, PIGE, NRA, RBS and C-14 dating. o This progress report describes the work I accomplished between 15 September 1988 and 28 February 1989. During this time we have begun to set up a PIXE system for the analysis of works of art in the museum's collection. PIXE is multi-elemental, sensitive, inexpensive, rapid, and most importantly, non-destructive. We have so far acquired preliminary data on samples of glass, geological standards, painting pigments, and gold artifacts. In a sense, these experiments have been more of a learning experience for me and the AGLAE team. We are becoming familiar with the accelerator, the target chamber, the x-ray detector, the fast-pulse electronics, and the x-ray spectrum reduction code. Although we have made a good start, much work still needs to be done to make the AGLAE PIXE system "state-of-the-art". We have had limited access to beam time for PIXE. Of course the highest priority has been to ensure that the accelerator meets the manufacturers specifications. The accelerator has had problems with the ion source; as a result the beam current has not been very stable. The target chamber we are using is a temporary one. A new one has been built in Strasbourg and will be installed in March. There is presently no reliable way of measuring the incident beam current for thick samples, thus all the results presented here are relative. A beam-chopper (a device for measuring the beam current) is being built at Jussieu and will brought to the Louvre in April. We have concentrated our efforts on four glass standards, which were designed to duplicate the types of glass studied by archaeologists and historians. These standards are well characterized and contain 27 elements between Na and Pb in quantities from 100 ppm to 35%. We have been able to obtain results that are generally within 10 - 20% of the given values, however, some occasionally there is a discrepancy of a factor of three. The firt "real" samples we have analyzed were pure pigments from the boutique "A la Momie", a house of commerce in Paris during the 18th and 19th centuries. We have seen how PIXE can be used to quantitatively determine the major, minor, and trace elemental composition of these paint pigments. Subtle differences were detected between similar pigments, and pigments with different labels were shown to have the same chemical composition. The beam-in-air system has been tested on several samples, including a false italian primitive, a gilded frame from the 15th century, and a small gold statue from antiquity. For the analysis of most museum objects we will be using this extracted beam system. It is thus vital that we get it working well. We are about start running air sampling equipment inside the Louvre Museum in order to determine if any harmful pollutants are present in the galleries that hold precious works of art. Analysis of the aerosol filters can be done at AGLAE with only minor modifications of the target holder. I must say that I do not feel very confident about the numbers presented here. I am glad we have all the equipment working to the point that we can get results, but I have doubts that all the hardware and software is working properly. We must now work to find and reduce the experimental uncertainties, in order for the Louvre to have a reliable and accurate PIXE system. Progress Report, Fulbright Grant, 15 September 1988 - 28 February 1989 Bruce H. Kusko AGLAE - LRMF I. INTRODUCTION During the last four years the Louvre Museum has been undergoing a major renovation. Not only is the main entrance going to be a giant glass pyramid, but three stories under the pyramid a team of scientists will be bombarding precious works of art with a particle accelerator. Analyse au Grand Louvre par Accelerateur Electrostatique (AGLAE) is a part of the Laboratoire de Recherche des Musees de France (LRMF), which has been given more space and equipment in a new underground laboratory. It is only recently that methods of analysis using high energy ion-beams (protons, alphas, 15N, etc) have been applied to works of art and archaeology, and usually by physicists working in nuclear laboratories in their spare time. The Louvre Museum is thus the first museum to have an accelerator to be used exclusively for the study and analysis of works of art and archaeology. The LRMF has taken a bold leap into the future with this powerful "high-tech" approach to the conservation of our cultural heritage. II. PIXE at AGLAE My expertise is with particle induced x-ray emission (PIXE) and I have been concerned with developing a PIXE system at AGLAE for the study and analysis of works of art. We have had several opportunities to do some PIXE analyses under vacuum, including pigment samples, glass standards, geological standards, and gold samples. Although the spectra were acquired under conditions that were not ideal, we were able to perform tests of the target chamber, x-ray detector and electronics, and the PIXE spectrum reduction code. All results presented here are therefore considered preliminary and subject to change. a. Accelerator The accelerator, a 2.0 Mev tandem pelletron, was purchased from National Electrostatic Corporation in Middleton Wisconsin. It is capable of accelerating protons from 0.3 to 4.0 Mev, alpha particles from 0.3 to 6.0 Mev, and 15N ions to 8.0 Mev. In addition it can accelerate deuterons and 3He ions. Guaranteed beam current for protons is 5 pa through a 1 mm2 collimator. It was installed in the winter and spring of 1988, and the first beam was realized in June 1988. Tests and practice with the machine have been taking place ever since then, and are expected to continue through the end of March. B. Target area The target chamber we are using is a temporary one. The target ladder can hold up to six samples and is moved manually. The sample surface is perpendicular to the axis of the incident beam. X-rays are detected at a backward angle of 135 degrees. The detector is collimated, and subtends a solid angle of 0.5 sr. A new target chamber has been fabricated in Strasbourg and will be delivered to the Louvre on 3 March. This new chamber is very versatile and will be used for PIXE, PIGE, RBS, and NRA. A beam-chopper for measuring the incident beam current has been built at Jussieu. It is presently undergoing tests and will be brought to the Louvre at the end of March. Presently the beam current is determined by measuring the charge acquired by the target, target holder, and target chamber, which are electrically isolated from the rest of the accelerator. Since this method is not reliable, I have designed and will be building a device to determine the beam current by measuring the protons backscattered from a thin mylar foil placed in front of the target. This thin foil monitoring technique has the advantages of eliminating charge buildup on insulating samples analyzed under vacuum, and it can be used to monitor the beam current when analyzing samples in air with an extracted beam. C. Electronics The experimental setup for the x-ray electronics during PIXE analyse is shown in figure 1. The detector is an EG&G Ortec 7900 2 Si(Li), with 30 mm2 area, 8.0 pm Be window, and a FWHM resolution of 147 ev at 5.895 kev. The high voltage bias is supplied by an Ortec 459 power supply. An Ortec 972 spectroscopy amplifier and an Ortec 444 biased amplifier are used together for pulse-processing and dead-time corrections. A Seiko EGG 7800 multi-channel analyzer with a Seiko 1820 ADC interface is used to collect the spectra. An Enertec 7143 linear ratemeter is used to monitor the x-ray count rate. The charge induced by the beam current is measured by a Brookhaven Instruments Corporation 1000a current integrator, and stored in an Ortec 996 counter and timer. In order to obtain a resolution of 147 ev on a real sample it is necessary to keep the amplifier close to the detector (less than 3 m) and to acquire the data with the vacuum pumps off. Mechanical vibration from the pumps adds almost 15 ev to the resolution. (We are working to better isolate the pumps from the target chamber.) D. PIXAN reduction code Since my experience with computers has been with DEC and Apple computers, I have had to become familiar with SUN (UNIX) and IBM (DOS) computers. PIXE spectra are analyzed on a SUN MS 3/260 workstation. The computer program PIXAN is used to reduce an x-ray spectrum to its elemental composition, and it does this in two parts. The first part of the program calculates the areas of the characteristic peaks. The background is subtracted and then the peaks are fitted to a modified gaussian form. The area of the characteristic peaks are directly proportional to the number of x-rays coming from the characteristic elements. The second part determines the theoretical x-ray yield given the composition of the sample and the energy of the proton beam. It is then necessary to combine the results of the two parts to get the elemental composition in parts per million (ppm). The program is designed to be used for both thin and thick targets. I have had to spend most of my time geting PIXAN to run correctly. It is an excellent program, but it evolved over a long period of time at the Australian Atomic Energy Commission. Thus it is 3 suited to the types of samples they analyze in Australia and the experimental conditions in their laboratory. The results are critically dependent on the x-ray detector parameters (crystal diameter, sensitive depth, silicon dead-layer, and the gold electrode layer), any external detector filters, the x-ray electronics, and even the target composition (which determines the self-absorption/self-enhancement effects). The most important step, and perhaps the most difficult one, is a proper subtraction of the background continuum. With PIXAN the background can be modelled either by a polynomial (up to 5th order), or by an iterative method that removes the characteristic peaks and progressively reduces the spectrum to the background continuum. We have found that small changes in the parameters used to model the background leads to large changes in the final results. We have found that the iterative method works better than the polynomial method for our samples, and have achieved results on glass standards that are generally within 20% of the given values for the elements Na to Pb (see section 4). The exact experimental uncertainties are hard to determine. The precision when measuring an element well above the limit of detection and isolated from any interfering peaks is better than 5%. Elements found near the limit of detection have greater uncertainties. Elements with low energy x-rays (less than 2 kev) and high energy x-rays (greater than 30 kev) have larger uncertainties since the detector efficiency is quite low and poorly known in these regions. The case of interfering peaks must be considered individually. For example, the uncertainty in the measurement of sulfur (Ka = 2.307 kev) depends on the amount of lead (Ma = 2.346 kev) in the sample. The overall accuracy of a PIXE measurement depends on the uncertainties in the following factors: the number of x-rays in a characteristic peak; the number of incident protons; the detector efficiency; and the absorption/enhancement corrections. In general, uncertainties of around 10% - 20% can be expected with PIXE. Most of the results to date have been determined without seeing graphically the background or least-squares fit to the spectrum, a most unfortunate circumstance. Thomas Calligaro has recently written a program that displays the x-ray spectrum, the background, and the fit 4 of the data, an indispensible step in proper spectrum analysis. Good spectrum analysis, even with the best computer programs, still requires experience. One must know what to look for in the background subtraction, the gaussian fit, the calculation of the sum and escape peaks, the relative peak intensities, the unfolding of overlapping peaks, and so forth. One must be careful and not simply accept the results given by the computer program. The data files included with PIXAN lacked some vital information to make it work correctly for the samples we have at the Louvre, and needed to be supplemented. First of all they did not include any M-line x-ray data, which are necessary for quantitative results on the elements Na through Cl (1-3 kev). We have therefore added M-line data for Pb, Hg, Pt, and Au into the PIXAN data files. (The elements whose M-line data is important for us to know immediately.) Secondly, the data file of relative peak heights is appropriate only for 2.5 Mev protons. The relative peak heights are important to know since PIXAN uses them to untangle the overlap of peaks. Although the Ka/KB ratio is independent of energy, the LalLi ratio, (where i is anyone of the many other L-line x-rays), and the Ma/Mi ratios vary unsystematically as a function of incident proton energy. Therefore it will be necessary for us to modify the data tables for energies lower and higher than 2.5 Mev in order to obtain the most accurate results. (We will use the tabulated theoretical x-ray cross sections of D.D. Cohen and M. Harrington, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 33, 1985, 255- 343.) Thirdly, L- and M-shell sum (pile-up) peaks are not included in the peak search and are therefore not removed from the x-ray spectra. The justification for not including the L- and M-shell sum peaks was to make it easier for PIXAN to determine accurate amounts of Ti (Ka=4.508 kev) and Ba (La=4.467 kev) when both are present in the sample. However, L- and M-line pileup peaks are a serious problem when a sample contains major or minor amounts of platinum, gold, mercury, lead, tin, or barium. III. RESULTS We have acquired 52 PIXE spectra to date: 12 on glass standards, 36 on paint pigments, 3 on ceramic standards, and 10 on gold samples. 5 A. Glass We have concentrated our efforts on four colored glass samples. These samples have been well characterized, and they contain 27 elements between Na and Pb in quantities of 100 ppm to 35%. The elements between Na and K (X-rays between 1 and 3 Kev) are difficult to determine yet important in archaeometric studies of glass, pigments, ceramics, and geological samples. In addition these glass samples are ideal PIXE targets, being completely homogeneous, flat, and small enough to fit into a vacuum chamber. We felt it was necessary to get good results on these standards before we started analyzing unknown targets. The glass samples were prepared in 1964 by R. H. Brill and A. A. Erickson of the Corning Glass Works in Corning New York. The four samples were designed to duplicate the types of glass studied by archaeologists and art historians. Two samples (known as Brill A and Brill B) are soda-lime-silica glasses, which are similar to ancient Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Ionan, Byzantine, and Islamic glasses. One sample (Brill C) is a glass with high-lead and high-barium levels, which is similar to glasses from Eastern Asia. The fourth sample (Brill D) is a potash-lime-silica glass which is similar to certain medieval glasses and some glasses of the 17th to 19th centuries. Minor and trace elements were also introduced at levels that are comparable to those actually found in ancient glasses. The method of fabrication of these samples is given in R. H. Brill, A Chemical-Analytical Round-robin on Four Synthetic Glasses, Proceedings of the IX International Congress on Glass, Versailles 27 September, 1971. The glass samples are several millimeters long and are embedded in amber. They were analyzed at 1.0 and 2.5 Mev, with the intention of obtaining the light elements (Na to Cal at 1.0 Mev, when there is no detector filter, and the heavy elements (K to Pb) at 2.5 Mev, while using a detector filter which allows the use of higher beam currents and better (lower) sensitivity. The spectrum for Brill C at 2.5 Mev is shown in figure 2 and the best results to date for the glass samples are given in table 1. The element K was chosen to be an "internal 6 standard", so all the results are relative and normalized to the K concentration. A comparison between the experimental resu
    corecore