1,720,969 research outputs found
Two new species of the Southeast Asian Dwarf tarantula genus Phlogiellus Pocock 1887 (Theraphosidae, Selenocosmiinae) and a discussion on the taxonomic problem of the genus: Addendum
No full textSivayyapram, Varat, Kunsete, Chawakorn, Songsangchote, Chaowalit, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Warrit, Natapot (2020): Two new species of the Southeast Asian Dwarf tarantula genus Phlogiellus Pocock 1887 (Theraphosidae, Selenocosmiinae) and a discussion on the taxonomic problem of the genus: Addendum. Zootaxa 4869 (4): 599-600, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4869.4.
Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand
No full textKunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat, Warrit, Natapot (2020): Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand. Zootaxa 4819 (3): 521-543, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.
Bemmerinae Simon 1903
No full textBemmerinae Simon, 1903 Bemmereae Simon 1903: 894. Bemmerinae Raven 1985: 90.Published as part of Kunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand, pp. 521-543 in Zootaxa 4819 (3) on page 523, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/439708
FIGURE 5 A–D in Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand
No full textFIGURE 5 A–D. Atmetochilus songsangchotei sp. nov. female paratype (ARA-2017-117) habitus; A (left) dorsal habitus, A (right) ventral habitus; B. Carapace; C. Eye tubercle; D. Maxillae & labium.Published as part of Kunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand, pp. 521-543 in Zootaxa 4819 (3) on page 530, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/439708
FIGURE 10 A–F. Atmetochilus, metatarsi I and II, ventral view. A–B in Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand
No full textFIGURE 10 A–F. Atmetochilus, metatarsi I and II, ventral view. A–B of A. songsangchotei sp. nov., female paratype (ARA2017-117); C–D. A. fossor female neotype (ARA-2018-132); E–F. A. atriceps female (ARA-2018-173).Published as part of Kunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand, pp. 521-543 in Zootaxa 4819 (3) on page 538, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/439708
FIGURE 6 A–D in Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand
No full textFIGURE 6 A–D. Atmetochilus fossor female neotype (ARA-2018-132). A. Habitus; A dorsal (left), ventral (right); B. Carapace; C. Eye tubercle; D. Maxillae & labium.Published as part of Kunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand, pp. 521-543 in Zootaxa 4819 (3) on page 533, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/439708
FIGURE 3 A–D in Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand
No full textFIGURE 3 A–D. Atmetochilus songsangchotei sp. nov. male holotype (ARA-2017-116) habitus; A (left). dorsal habitus, A (right). ventral habitus; B. Carapace; C. Eye tubercle; D. Maxillae & labium.Published as part of Kunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand, pp. 521-543 in Zootaxa 4819 (3) on page 528, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/439708
FIGURE 4 A–H in Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand
No full textFIGURE 4 A–H. Atmetochilus songsangchotei sp. nov., male. A–F. Holotype (ARA-2017-116). A–C. Palpal tibia and tarsus, retrolateral, ventral and prolateral view; D–F. Tibia, metatarsus and tarsus I showing tibial spur, prolateral, retroventral and retrolateral views; G–H. Male paratype (ARA-2017-120), tibial spur, retrolateral view.Published as part of Kunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand, pp. 521-543 in Zootaxa 4819 (3) on page 529, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/439708
Damarchus Thorell 1891
No full textDamarchus Thorell, 1891 Damarchus Thorell, 1891: 14. Type species. Damarchus workmani Thorell, 1891 from Singapore, by monotypy. Species included: D. montanus (Thorell, 1890), D. workmani Thorell, 1891, D. oatesi Thorell, 1895, D. assamensis Hirst, 1909, D. bifidus Gravely, 1935, D. cavernicola Abraham, 1924 and D. batuensis (Roewer, 1962). Diagnosis: Similar to Atmetochilus and Damarchilus in overall size and shape, but differ from the two by the presence of few cuspules on labium and all pairs of sigilla are weakly pronounced and close to the sternal edge.Published as part of Kunsete, Chawakorn, Sivayyapram, Varat, Traiyasut, Prapun, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Khamwan, Kitiwat & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Records and redescription of a mygalomorph spider genus ignored for over 100 years with a new species: the genus Atmetochilus Simon, 1887 (Araneae Nemesiidae) in Thailand, pp. 521-543 in Zootaxa 4819 (3) on page 523, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4819.3.5, http://zenodo.org/record/439708
Phlogiellus daweiensis Sivayyapram & Kunsete & Songsangchote & Thanoosing & Traiyasut & Warrit 2020, sp. nov.
No full textPhlogiellus daweiensis Sivayyapram & Warrit, sp. nov. zoobank.org:act: 098A7449-8D97-432C-B024-001E8E927AC6 Type material. Holotype ♂. MYANMAR: Dawei (14°4.272’ N, 98°15.913’ E) 179 m, 4 May 2018, Warrit N. et al. (ARA-2018-159). Paratypes as noted in Sivayyapram et al. (2020). All deposited in Chulalongkorn University Museum of Zoology (CUMZ), Bangkok. Diagnosis. Males differ from those of other Phlogiellus species, except P. moniqueverdezae, in possessing long white setae dorsally on tibiae and metatarsi I and II (Fig. 1a) and from the latter species in the absence of a maxillary lyra and embolus process (Figs 3b, 5). Females differ from those of P. moniqueverdezae in the less swollen tip of the spermathecae and the narrower spermathecal groove (Fig. 9). Description. see Sivayyapram et al. 2020.Published as part of Sivayyapram, Varat, Kunsete, Chawakorn, Songsangchote, Chaowalit, Thanoosing, Chawatat, Traiyasut, Prapun & Warrit, Natapot, 2020, Two new species of the Southeast Asian Dwarf tarantula genus Phlogiellus Pocock 1887 (Theraphosidae, Selenocosmiinae) and a discussion on the taxonomic problem of the genus: Addendum, pp. 599-600 in Zootaxa 4869 (4) on page 599, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4869.4.7, http://zenodo.org/record/442326
- …
