18 research outputs found
Cancer Causes Control
No full textPurposeInvasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is diagnosed with or without a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component. Previous analyses have found significant differences in tumor characteristics between pure IDC lacking DCIS and mixed IDC with DCIS. We will test our hypothesis that pure IDC represents a form of breast cancer with etiology and risk factors distinct from mixed IDC/DCIS.MethodsWe compared reproductive risk factors for breast cancer risk, as well as family and smoking history between 831 women with mixed IDC/DCIS (n=650) or pure IDC (n=181), and 1,620 controls, in the context of the Women's Circle of Health Study (WCHS), a case-control study of breast cancer in African-American and European-American women. Data on reproductive and lifestyle factors were collected during interviews, and tumor characteristics were abstracted from pathology reports. Case-control and case-case analyses were conducted using unconditional logistic regression.ResultsMost risk factors were similarly associated with pure IDC and mixed IDC/DCIS. However, among postmenopausal women, risk for pure IDC was lower in women with body mass index (BMI) 25 to <30 kg/m2 (Odds Ratio (OR)=0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-1.23) and BMI 6530 kg/m2 (OR=0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67) compared to women with BMI<25 kg/m2, with no associations with mixed IDC/DCIS. In case-case analyses, women who breastfed up to 12 months (OR=0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94) or longer (OR=0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.87) showed decreased odds of pure IDC than mixed IDC/DCIS compared to those who did not breastfeed.ConclusionsAssociations with some breast cancer risk factors differed between mixed IDC/DCIS and pure IDC, potentially suggesting differential developmental pathways. These findings, if confirmed in a larger study, will provide a better understanding of the development patterns of breast cancer and the influence of modifiable risk factors, which in turn could lead to better preventive measures for pure IDC, which have worse disease prognosis compared to mixed IDC/DCIS.U58 DP003931/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United StatesP30 CA016056/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States5U58DP003931-02/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United StatesP30 CA072720/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United StatesR01 CA169175/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United StatesP01 CA151135/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United StatesK22 CA138563/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United StatesN01PC-2013-00021/PC/NCI NIH HHS/United StatesR03 CA17106/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United StatesR03 CA171061/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United StatesR01 CA100598/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United State
Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast Is More Aggressive Than Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Study From a Single Institution and Review of Literature
No full textAbstract P1-09-27: High serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are associated with better quality-of-life, and lower levels of perceived stress, depression, and fatigue among breast cancer survivors
No full textMinimal Disease in the Sentinel Lymph Node: How to Best Measure Sentinel Node Micrometastases to Predict Risk of Additional Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Disease
No full textTime trends in survival in young women with breast cancer in a population-based study: Are there estrogen receptor status differentials?
No full text 85 Background: As mammography is not generally recommended to women under 40, it is reasonable to conclude that documented outcome improvements over time are attributable to treatment advances with screening playing a less important role. In order to determine the contribution of screening and treatment to improvements, we evaluated the odds of presenting with more advanced disease by time-period and examined the time-trends in outcome in a population-based cohort ≤50. We evaluated whether any outcomes differentials existed by ER status. Methods: Patients in SEER diagnosed with breast cancer were divided into 4 by year of diagnosis (1990-1994, 1995-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2008). Patients were categorized into 2 age-groups: <40 and 40-50 years. Odds ratios for presenting with more advanced disease over the 4 time-periods were calculated for the 2 age-groups. Multivariate analysis was done to investigate the association of survival with time-period for the 2 age-groups by ER status. Results: 110,629 patient records were included. Patients 40-50 who were diagnosed in the 3 later time-periods (1995-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2008) were more likely to have small tumors (≤2cm) compared with patients diagnosed in 1990-1994. Similarly, these patients were less likely to have larger tumors (≥3cm) comparing the 3 time-periods relative to 1990-1994. Conversely, patients <40 years had a higher odds of presenting with larger tumors (≥3cm) when the 3 later time-periods were compared to 1990-1994. In the ER positive patients, multivariate analysis showed that being diagnosed in the 3 later time-periods relative to 1990-1994 was associated with improved survival irrespective of age. In the ER negative cohort, those 40-50 years had a higher risk of death in the 3 later time-periods relative to 1990-1994; while there was a no effect of time-period on mortality for the younger age group of <40. Conclusions: Patients who are ER positive and between 40-50 years have had time-trend changes with improvements in breast cancer outcome and smaller tumors likely attributable to both screening and hormonal therapies. Patients who are <40 years and/or ER negative have not had improvements in breast cancer outcome. </jats:p
Long-Term Clinical and Cosmetic Outcomes of Once-Daily Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer
No full textPurpose: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is one of the standard treatment options in early-stage node negative breast cancer in selected patients. However, the optimal dose fractionation schedule still represents a challenge. We present the 12-year follow up results of clinical and cosmetic outcomes of once daily APBI with external beam radiation therapy which provides an APBI radiation dose equivalent to the whole breast radiation with a boost.
Methods and materials: From July 2008 to August 2010, we enrolled 34 patients with T1, T2 (\u3c 3cm) N0 to receive once daily APBI with three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) to a total dose of 49.95 Gy over 15 single daily fractions over 3 weeks at 3.33 Gy per fraction. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), acute toxicity, late toxicity and cosmesis was analyzed. The median follow-up for all patients is 144 months (12 years).
Results: The median age of the patients was 61 years (range 46-83). Nine patients had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 patients had invasive cancer. The median size of the tumor with DCIS pathology was 0.5 cm, while median size of the tumor with invasive cancer pathology was 1.0 cm. All of the patients had negative margins and negative nodes. Two IBTR was observed (5.8%). One patient had DCIS at recurrence and other had invasive recurrence. Two patients died due to non-cancer cause. The 12-year actuarial ipsilateral breast recurrence free survival was 93.5% and the 12-year actuarial overall survival was 93.2%. Late Grade 2 toxicity was observed in 6 patients and late grade 3 toxicity was seen in 1 patient. 91% of the patients had excellent to good cosmesis.
Conclusions: This novel APBI dosing schema is based on an equivalent dose compared to whole breast radiation plus a tumor bed boost. This once daily APBI scheme is well-tolerated and demonstrates good to excellent cosmetic outcome and low rates of late complications on long term follow-up
Abstract OT-32-02: Irene study: Phase 2 study of incmga00012 (retifanlimab)and the oncolytic virus pelareorep in metastatic triple negative breast cancer
No full textReconstructive complications and early toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with proton-based postmastectomy radiation therapy
No full textBackgroundPostmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) decreases the risk of locoregional recurrence and increases overall survival rates in patients with high-risk node positive breast cancer. While the number of breast cancer patients treated with proton-based PMRT has increased in recent years, there is limited data on the use of proton therapy in the postmastectomy with reconstruction setting. In this study, we compared acute toxicities and reconstructive complications in patients treated with proton-based and photon-based PMRT.MethodsA retrospective review of our institutional database was performed to identify breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy with implant or autologous reconstruction followed by PMRT from 2015 to 2020. Baseline clinical, disease, and treatment related factors were compared between the photon-based and proton-based PMRT groups. Early toxicity outcomes and reconstructive complications following PMRT were graded by the treating physician.ResultsA total of 11 patients treated with proton-based PMRT and 26 patients treated with photon-based PMRT were included with a median follow-up of 7.4 months (range, 0.7-33 months). Six patients (55%) in the proton group had a history of breast cancer (3 ipsilateral and 3 contralateral) and received previous RT 38 months ago (median, range 7-85). There was no significant difference in mean PMRT (p = 0.064) and boost dose (p = 0.608) between the two groups. Grade 2 skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity in both groups (55% and 73% in the proton and photon group, respectively) (p = 0.077). Three patients (27%) in the proton group developed grade 3 skin toxicity. No Grade 4 acute toxicity was reported in either group. Reconstructive complications occurred in 4 patients (36%) in the proton group and 8 patients (31%) in photon group (p = 0.946).ConclusionsAcute skin toxicity remains the most frequent adverse event in both proton- and photon-based PMRT. In our study, reconstructive complications were not significantly higher in patients treated with proton- versus photon-based PMRT. Longer follow-up is warranted to assess late toxicities
Breast cancer risk factor associations differ for pure versus invasive carcinoma with an in situ component in case–control and case–case analyses
No full text
