133,434 research outputs found
Scrapter Kuhlmann & Friehs, 2020, sp. nov.
No full textFemales The females of S. glareus, S. hergi Kuhlmann sp. nov., S. minutissimus and S. willemstrydomi Kuhlmann sp. nov. are unknown. 1. Stigma bright yellow (Kuhlmann 2014: Fig. 11a) …………………… S. luteistigma Kuhlmann, 2014 – Stigmalighttodarkbrown……………………………………………………………………………2 2. Apical tergal margins broadly brownish to yellowish translucent(Figs 3E, 8E; Kuhlmann2014:figs 1b, 28b, 32e); body length 4.9–6.6 mm …………………………………………………………………3 – Apical tergal margins black or very narrowly brownish translucent; body length 4.3–5.6 mm ……7 3. Punctation on basal part of clypeus much finer than apically (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 28c–d); foretibia entirely or predominantly yellowish to reddish brown (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 28a)……… …………………………………………………………………………… S. sittybon Davies, 2005 – Punctation on clypeus more evenly sized (Figs 3B, 8B; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 1c–d, 32b); foretibia dominantly dark blackish-brown……………………………………………………………………4 4. Metasomal terga between punctures smooth and shiny (Fig. 8E; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 1b)………5 – Metasomal terga between punctures at least finely sculptured and slightly matt (Fig. 3E; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 32e)………………………………………………………………………………………6 5. Clypeus distinctly convex (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 1c–d); scutum with dense punctation (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 1e–f)……………………………………………………… S. acanthophorus Davies, 2005 – Clypeus almost flat (Fig. 8B); scutum with sparse punctation (Fig. 8C)… S. nitens Kuhlmann sp. nov. 6. Clypeus between punctures smooth and shiny (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 32b); scutum superficially reticulate but shiny (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 32c–d)……………………… S. ulrikae Kuhlmann, 2014 – Clypeus between punctures superficially sculptured and slightly matt (Fig. 3B); scutum reticulate and matt (Fig. 3C)…………………………………………… S. fynbosensis Kuhlmann sp. nov. 7. Scutum sparsely and finely punctured, looking almost impunctate and shiny (Kuhlmann 2014: figs 6e–f, 8e–f)………………………………………………………………………………………8 – Scutum more densely and coarsely punctured…………………………………………………10 8. Supraclypeal area, clypeus (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 6c–d) and mesepisternum only partially and superficially reticulate, more shiny…………………………………… S. exiguus Kuhlmann, 2014 – Supraclypeal area apically, clypeus basally (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 8c–d) and mesepisternum extensively and strongly reticulate, matt……………………………………………………………9 9. Facial fovea slightly shorter than in S. gessorum (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 4a–b); a variable species with respect to surface sculpture and punctation (Kuhlmann 2014: figs 3c–f, 4a–d)…………………… …………………………………………………………………………… S. albitarsis (Friese, 1909) – Facial fovea slightly longer than in S. albitarsis (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 8d) ………………………… ……………………………………………………………………… S. gessorum Kuhlmann, 2014 10. Clypeus and supraclypeal area matt, strongly reticulate, very sparsely, finely and shallowly punctate (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 10c–d)…………………………………… S. inexpectatus Kuhlmann, 2014 – Clypeus and supraclypeal area more shiny or just slightly matt, only partly or superficially sculptured, punctation usually stronger and denser………………………………………………11 11. Metasomal terga finely and densely punctate, between punctures smooth and shiny (Fig. 2E; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 18b)………………………………………………………………………12 – Metasomal terga either impunctate or with more dispersed/coarser punctation; if punctation is similar (some specimens of S. punctatus), then terga at least basally with superficial sculpture and slightly matt ……………………………………………………………………………………………………13 12. Scutum very densely (i = 0,5–1 d) punctate (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 18e–f), propodeum basally shallowly but broadly carinate (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 18f)…… S. nigerrimus Kuhlmann, 2014 – Scutum coarser (i = 1–2,5 d) punctate (Fig. 2C), propodeum basally only laterally with distinct but fine carination (Fig. 2D)………………………………… S. bokkeveldensis Kuhlmann sp. nov. 13. Metasomal terga impunctate; scutum distinctly reticulate and shallowly punctate……………14 – Metasomal terga punctate, sometimes punctures minute…………………………………………15 14. Basal area of propodeum distinctly and largely carinate (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 19b)………………… ……………………………………………………………………… S. nigritarsis Kuhlmann, 2014 – Basal area of propodeum along anterior margin indistinctly carinate (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 25c–d)… ……………………………………………………………………… S. pygmaeus Kuhlmann, 2014 15. Scutum very coarsely punctate (Fig. 9C; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 23c–d, 30c–d)…………16 – Scutum finer punctate (Figs 1C, 6 C–D, 5C; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 14e–f, 15c–d, 16e–f, 21c–f, 26c– d)…………………………………………………………………………………………………18 16. Propodeum basally broadly and distinctly carinate (Fig. 9D; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 30c–d)……17 – Propodeum with few, short and indistinct carinae (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 23c–d)………………… ………………………………………………………………… S. punctulatus Kuhlmann nom. nov. 17. Basal area of propodeum shorter, medially only slightly longer than metanotum (Fig. 9D)……… …………………………………………………………………… S. oubergensis Kuhlmann sp. nov. – Basal area of propodeum longer, medially about 1.5 times as long as metanotum (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 30c–d)……………………………………………………………… S. spinipes Kuhlmann, 2014 18. Punctation of metasomal terga minute, almost invisible (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 26e)……………… ……………………………………………………………………… S. roggeveldi Kuhlmann, 2014 – Punctation of metasomal terga much coarser and clearly visible (Figs 1C, 6 C–D, 5C; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 14b, 15e, 16b, 21g–h)…………………………………………………………………19 19. Head distinctly broader than long (Figs 1C, 6 C–D, 5C; Kuhlmann 2014: figs 14c–d, 16c–d)……20 – Head about as long as broad (Kuhlmann 2014: figs 15b, 21b)……………………………………24 20. Clypeus, supraclypeal area and T1mostly polished and shiny,only partially very finely and superficially sculptured, slightly matt (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 14b–d)………… S. minutuloides Kuhlmann, 2014 – Clypeus, supraclypeal area and T1 (particularly anteriorly) mostly finely sculptured and matt (Figs 1C, 6 C–D, 5C; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 16b–d)…………………………………………………21 21. Scutum densely (i = 0,5–1,5 d) punctate (Figs 1C, 5C)…………………………………………22 – Scutum sparsely (i> 1,5 d) punctate (Fig. 6 C–D; Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 16e–f)…………………23 22. Propodeum basally distinctly and broadly carinate (Fig. 1D)… S. avontuuensis Kuhlmann sp. nov. – Propodeum basally only indistinctly and shallowly carinate (Fig. 5D)……………………………… ……………………………………………………………………… S.keiskiensis Kuhlmann sp.nov. 23. Propodeum basally distinctly and broadly carinate (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 16e–f)………………… …………………………………………………………………………… S. nanus Kuhlmann, 2014 – Propodeum basally finer and just very shallowly carinate, sometimes just laterally visible (Fig. 6 E– F)…………………………………………………………… S. mellonholgeri Kuhlmann sp. nov. 24. Metanotum apically more evenly rounded, without distinct carinate depression (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 15d); fore tibia anteriorly largely yellowish-brown……… S. minutus Kuhlmann, 2014 – Metanotum apically with a carinate depression (Kuhlmann 2014: fig. 21d, f); fore tibia anteriorly blackish, only at the base with a small yellowish spot……… S. papkuilsi Kuhlmann, 2014Published as part of Kuhlmann, Michael & Friehs, Thyra, 2020, Nine new species and new records of euryglossiform Scrapter Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) from South Africa, pp. 1-33 in European Journal of Taxonomy 647 on pages 27-29, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.647, http://zenodo.org/record/383605
Colletes ulrikae Kuhlmann 2002
No full textColletes ulrikae Kuhlmann 2002 (Figs 16 c–d) Colletes ulrikae Kuhlmann & Dorn 2002: 106 (holotype— 3, Susuman, VII. 1980, leg. D. Berman, Magadan Prov., Russia, deposited in IBSS); Proshchalykin & Kupianskaya 2005: 5; Proshchalykin 2007 b: 879; 2008 a: 45. Colletes pseudocinerascens: Osytshnjuk & Romankova 1995: 483. Material examined. Russia. Magadan Prov.: 5 3, Susuman [148 ° 10 'E 62 ° 45 'N], VII. 1980, leg. D. Berman (IBSS / IZKU / RCMK). Distribution in Russia. Magadan Prov. (Kuhlmann & Dorn 2002). General distribution. Russia.Published as part of Kuhlmann, Michael & Yu, Maxim, 2011, Bees of the genus Colletes Latreille 1802 of the Asian part of Russia, with keys to species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae), pp. 1-48 in Zootaxa 3068 on page 19, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27896
Colletes issykkuli Kuhlmann 2003
No full textColletes issykkuli Kuhlmann 2003 Colletes issykkuli Kuhlmann 2003: 727 –728, ♂ (holotype –♂. Kara-Koo, near Issyk-Kul Lake, Kyrgyzstan, 1700 m, Kornmilch [OÖLM]). Material examined. Kyrgyzstan. Issyk-Kul Prov.: 3 ♂, Issyk-Kul Lake, Ak-Ulen [75 º 49 'E 46 º 41 'N], 23.VI. 1953, D. Panfilov (ZMMU); 2 ♂, Issyk-Kul Lake, 5 km NE of Kaji-Say [77 º 13 'E 42 º 10 'N], 1626 m, L. Best (PCLP). Published records. Kuhlmann (2005: 1369): Kyrgyzstan. General distribution. Kyrgyzstan.Published as part of Kuhlmann, Michael & Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu., 2013, The genus Colletes (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae) in Central Asia, pp. 401-449 in Zootaxa 3750 (5) on page 417, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3750.5.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24824
Colletes warnckei Kuhlmann 2002
No full textColletes warnckei Kuhlmann 2002 (Figs 2 c, 15 c–d, 24 e–f) Colletes warnckei Kuhlmann 2002: 757 –758, ♀, ♂ (type locality: 20 km W Sarakamis, Turkey). Material examined. Russia. Karachaevo-Cherkesskaya Republic: 1 ♂, Baksan Valley, Elbrus Mt. (42 ° 32 'E 43 ° 15 'N), 7-8.VIII. 1976, C.R. Fraser-Jenkins (NHML). Distribution in Russia (Fig. 2 c). * Karachaevo-Cherkesskaya Republic. General distribution. Turkey, Iran, * Russia.Published as part of Kuhlmann, Michael & Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu., 2014, The bees of the genus Colletes Latreille 1802 of the European part of Russia, with keys to species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae), pp. 201-247 in Zootaxa 3878 (3) on page 227, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3878.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/25229
Colletes paratibeticus Kuhlmann 2002
No full textColletes paratibeticus Kuhlmann, 2002 (Figs 14 d–f, 20 a–b, 31 l) Colletes paratibeticus Kuhlmann, 2002 —Kuhlmann & Dorn 2002: 104–105. Material examined. China. Xizang, 2 ♀, 1 ♂,Yadong Xian (88 º 54 ′E 27 º 24 ′N), 2800m, 7.VI. 1960, coll. Chun- Guang Wang. Distribution in China. Xizang (Fig. 31 l). General distribution. Nepal, China. First record for China. Floral records. No record.Published as part of Niu, Ze-Qing, Zhu, Chao-Dong & Kuhlmann, Michael, 2013, Bees of the Colletes clypearis - group (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae) from China with descriptions of seven new species, pp. 101-151 in Zootaxa 3745 (2) on page 108, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3745.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24887
Colletes arsenjevi Kuhlmann 2006
No full textColletes arsenjevi Kuhlmann 2006 (Figs 18 e–f, 19 d) Colletes arsenjevi Kuhlmann in Kuhlmann & Quest 2006: 3 (holotype— 3, Russia, Primorskiy Terr., Lazovsky Nature Reserve, sandy coast [134 °07' 46 "E 43 °01'07"N], 16–25.IX. 2001, Malaise trap, leg. M. Quest (IBSS); Proshchalykin 2007 b: 878; Quest 2009: 119; Proshchalykin & Quest 2009: 239. Colletes succinctus: Osytshnjuk & Romankova 1995: 483; Proshchalykin 2003 a: 26; 2004: 3; Proshchalykin et al. 2004: 159. Material examined. Russia. Primorskiy Terr.: holotype— 1 3, Lazovsky Nature Reserve, sandy coast [134 °07' 46 "E 43 °01'07"N], 16–25.IX. 2001, Malaise trap, leg. M. Quest (IBSS); 1 3, Lazovsky Nature Reserve, Kordon Petrov, coastal dune [133 ° 48 ' 13 " E N 42 ° 52 ' 29 "], 11.IX. 2003, leg. M. Quest (RCMK); 1 Ƥ, 7 km E Khasan [130 ° 39 'E 42 ° 25 'N], 30.IX. 1975, leg. ASL (IZKU); 3 3, 21 –25.IX. 1974, leg. ASL (IBSS); 1 3, 26.IX. 2008, leg. ASL (IBSS); 1 3, Novokachalinsk [132 °00'E 45 °06'N], 7.IX. 1978, leg. AZO (IZKU); 2 3, Kievka [133 ° 42 'E 42 ° 54 'N], 19.VIII. 1979, 13.VIII. 1982, leg. TGR (IZKU); 1 3, 15 km SW Slavyanka [131 ° 15 'E 42 ° 47 'N], 1, 2.IX. 1995, leg. SAB (ZISP); 9 3, 20 km SW Krounovka [131 ° 28 'E 43 ° 38 'N], 5.VIII. 1998, leg. SAB (ZISP); 1 Ƥ, Kedrovaya pad Nature Reserve [134 °02'E 44 ° 38 'N], 11.IX, leg. A. Kurentsov (IBSS). Distribution in Russia. Primorskiy Terr. (Kuhlmann & Quest 2006). General distribution. Russia, Mongolia, China [Xinjiang].Published as part of Kuhlmann, Michael & Yu, Maxim, 2011, Bees of the genus Colletes Latreille 1802 of the Asian part of Russia, with keys to species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae), pp. 1-48 in Zootaxa 3068 on page 20, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27896
Colletes pauljohni Kuhlmann 2002
No full textColletes pauljohni Kuhlmann 2002 Colletes pauljohni Kuhlmann 2002: 750 –751, ♀, ♂ (holotype –♂, south shore of Issyk-Kul Lake, Teploklyuchenka [Ak-suu], Kyrzyzstan, 2100 m, 19.VI. 1995, W. Dolin [OÖLM]). Material examined. Kazakhstan. Almata Prov.: 1 ♀, Kungei Ridge, Kokbel' [79 º 51 'E 42 º 92 'N], 5.VIII. 1953, D. Panfilov (ZMMU). Kyrgyzstan. Osh Prov.: 1 ♂, Osh, Chon-Byulolyu Ravine [73 º 37 'E 40 º 10 'N], 3500 m, V. Gurko (OÖLM); 1 ♂, Osh, Karakuldzha, Lajsu Ravine [73 º 37 'E 40 º 31 'N], 2050 m, M. Engel (RCMK); Issyk-Kul Prov.: 1 ♂, 10 km E Sary-Bulak, Terskei-Alatau Ridge [78 º 35 'E 42 º 10 'N], 15.VIII. 1988, YUP (ZISP). Tajikistan. Gorno-Badakhshan Prov.: 2 ♀, Vanch, NW Pamir [71 º 25 'E 38 º 21 'N], 30.VIII. 1943, Shtakel'berg (ZISP). Published records. Kuhlmann (2005: 1373): Kyrgyzstan. General distribution. * Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, * Tajikistan.Published as part of Kuhlmann, Michael & Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu., 2013, The genus Colletes (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae) in Central Asia, pp. 401-449 in Zootaxa 3750 (5) on page 425, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3750.5.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24824
Colletes kaszabi Kuhlmann 2002
No full textColletes kaszabi Kuhlmann 2002 Colletes kaszabi Kuhlmann in Kuhlmann & Dorn 2002: 92, ♀, ♂ (type locality: Mongolia). Colletes uralensis: Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2011: 8 (misidentification). Material examined. Tyva Republic: 1 ♂, Balgazyn [95 ° 11 'E 51 °00'N], 22.VII. 2010, SAB (ZISP); 1 ♀, 5 ♂, Tore- Khol Lake [95 °08'E 50 °04'N], 30.VI– 3.VII. 2013, MYP, VML (IBSS); 20 ♀, 273 ♂, 11–12.VII. 2014, ASL, MYP, VML (IBSS / RCMK); 2 ♂, 31 km NEE Erzin, Erzin River [95 ° 33 'E 50 ° 21 'N], 16, 18.VII. 2014, ASL, MYP, VML (IBSS); Buryatia Republic: 1 ♂, Dureny, Chikoi River [106 ° 88 'E 50 ° 32 'N], 15.VI. 1924, Mikhno [ZISP]; 1 ♂, Gusinoe Lake [106 ° 15 'E 51 ° 15 'N], 21–22.VII. 1927, Mikhno [ZISP]. Distribution in Siberia. *Tyva Republic, *Buryatia Republic. General distribution. * Russia (Table 2), Mongolia, China. Remark. Colletes kaszabi and C. uralensis Noskiewicz are closely related and both have been rarely collected so their individual variation has been little understood. As a part of the present project it was possible for the first time to study a larger number of specimens of both species making us aware that misidentifications have occurred in the past and that a female of C. kaszabi (instead of C. uralensis) was used earlier for illustrating keys for species identification (Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2011: Figs 7 b, 8 c, 20 c, d; Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2014: Figs 5 b, 7 b, 27 c, d). To facilitate their identification we provide images of females (Fig. 2) and males (Fig. 3) of both species and and present updated distribution maps (Fig. 4). Colletes uralensis generally has a more southwestern distribution than C. kaszabi that is centred in Mongolia and neighbouring parts of Russia and China (Fig. 4). Previous records of C. uralensis from Russia (Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2011, 2014) turned out to be C. kaszabi, so C. uralensis had to be removed from the list of species known to occur in Russia. Osytshnjuk et al. (1978) reported C. uralensis for the European part of Russia but neither was locality data provided nor could specimens be found in any collection so we assume that this record was merely based on assumption rather than a specimens. A male C. uralensis mentioned by Noskiewicz (1936: 255), "von Kozlow am 21 /VII. 1900 am Alasz-Fluß erbeutet" (collected by P. Kozlov at Alasz river 21.vii. 1900) was checked and turned out to be collected in 1909, not 1900, when P. Kozlov was in the Alashan desert, eastern part of Etszin-gol river, at Chzhargalante near Kharo- Khoto (41 ° 45´N 101 °05´E), which is in present day China (Kozlov 1923).Published as part of Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. & Kuhlmann, Michael, 2015, Additional records of the genus Colletes Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae) from Siberia, with a checklist of Russian species, pp. 323-344 in Zootaxa 3949 (3) on pages 326-328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3949.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/24028
Colletes kaline Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2013
No full textColletes kaline Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2013 Colletes kaline Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2013 a: 421, ♀ (holotype: ♀, Repetek, Lebap Prov., Turkmenistan, 24.VI. 1937, leg. Yu. Kostylev [ZMMU]). Material examined. Turkmenistan: 2 ♂, Repetek [63 ° 10 'E 38 ° 34 'N], 23.V. 1974, leg. M. Kozlov [ZISP / RCMK]. Remarks. The male of C. kaline has been unknown and is described here for the first time based on specimens collected at the same locality and season as the female. The pilosity pattern of the male differed from that of C. morawitzensis Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin as predicted (Proshchalykin & Kuhlmann 2015 a). Diagnosis. Within the C. flavicornis -group the only male with an apically smooth and shiny, conspicuously raised clypeus known so far has been C. morawitzensis. As explained in the description of this species (Proshchalykin & Kuhlmann 2015 a) it is very unlikely that it is the male of two species only known from females that have a similarly formed clypeus, namely C. kaline Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin and C. pallipes Noskiewicz. Recently two male specimens with the characteristic raised clypeus became available for study that fit the body size and pilosity pattern expected for C. kaline. The male of C. kaline differs from C. morawitzensis by its larger body (9 mm instead of 7.5 mm), shorter malar area (medially about 1.2 times as long as width of mandible base; 1.5 times as long in C. morawitzensis), broader apical tergal hair bands and more extensive pilosity of short, appressed hair at the base of metasomal terga (Figs 5 b, c) compared to C. morawitzensis (Fig. 5 d). S 7 is apically distinctly broader (Fig. 5 e) than in C. morawitzensis. Description. Male. Bl = 9.0 mm. Head. Head slightly wider than long. Integument black except part of mandible dark reddish-brown. Face densely covered with long, white, erect hair. Malar area medially about as long as width of mandible base, finely striate, matt and sparsely covered with short appressed, white hairs. Clypeus apically smooth and shiny, conspicuously raised. Antenna black, ventrally dark yellowish-brown. Mesosoma. Integument black. Mesoscutal disc smooth and shiny between punctures; disc sparsely punctate (i = 2–3 d) with small punctures. Mesoscutellum almost impunctate,t with dense punctation on apical margin, surface smooth and shiny. Mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, metanotum, mesepisternum and propodeum covered with long, greyish-white erect hairs (Fig. 5 a). Wings. Slightly yellowish-brown; wing venation light yellowish-brown. Legs. Integument black to dark reddish-brown, tarsi dark yellowish-brown. Vestiture greyish-white. Metasoma. Integument black except depressed apical tergal margins yellowish translucent (Fig. 5 c). Most of T 1 and basal parts of T 2 –T 3 sparsely covered with short appressed, white hairs; T 1 and disc of T 2 additionally covered with long, white, erect hairs; apical tergal hair bands broad (Figs 5 b, c). Terga apically slightly depressed. Terga with very dense and fine punctation (i <0.5 d), slightly matt, smooth and shiny between punctures (Figs 5 b, c). Terminalia. Genitalia and S 7 as illustrated in Figs 5 e, f. Distribution. Turkmenistan.Published as part of Kuhlmann, Michael & Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu., 2015, New and remarkable Asian and North African species of Colletes Latreille (Hymenoptera: Colletidae), pp. 81-101 in Zootaxa 4028 (1) on pages 87-89, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4028.1.3, http://zenodo.org/record/23979
Colletes himalayensis Kuhlmann 2002
No full textColletes himalayensis Kuhlmann, 2002 (Figs 8 d–f, 17 e–f, 31 i) Colletes himalayensis Kuh 1 mann, 2002 -Kuh 1 mann 2002 b∶ 1167-1168. Material examined. No additional specimens examined. Distribution in China. Xizang (Fig. 31 i). General distribution. China. Floral records. No record.Published as part of Niu, Ze-Qing, Zhu, Chao-Dong & Kuhlmann, Michael, 2013, Bees of the Colletes clypearis - group (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Colletidae) from China with descriptions of seven new species, pp. 101-151 in Zootaxa 3745 (2) on page 106, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3745.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24887
- …
