1,506 research outputs found

    Whistleblowing in Italy : rights and protections for employees

    No full text
    This paper examines the whistleblowing in the Italian legal system. In the lack ofproper rules on such a phenomenon (quite uncommon in the Italian social reality, also due to cultural reasons) except for the civil servants, the paper goes on analysing, on the one hand, the provision applicable to the civil servants (i.e. art. 54 of the Legislative Decree no. 165/2001), and on the other hand, the instruments provided for by the Italian legal system as general principles, which can be applied by the judge in order to protect the whistleblowers in the private sector (in particular the rules against retaliatory and discriminatory acts and mobbing). The Author stresses that the recalled protection, although effective (also after the so-called 'Monti's reform', id est the Law No. 92/2012), could be not sufficient both because of the allocation of the burden of proof, and because it is applicable to the employees and only partially (as the Author explains in the last paragraph) to the whistleblowing in the context of self-employment. Then the paper analyses the balancing performed by the Italian caselaw between the right to information and the right of criticism, on one side, and the right to secrecy set forth by law in respect of business facts and information, and the personality rights granted to the employer by the Constitution,on the other side. Finally the paper deals with the applicable procedures, introduced by disciplinary codes, also according to the Legislative Decree No. 231/2001, and the problems related to internal reporting systems, in particular the balancing between the needs for the whistleblower's protection and the positive law in the matter of protection of the privacy of the person to whom the complaint relates according to the Legislative Decree No. 196/2003

    L'obbligo di ripescaggio nel licenziamento per giustificato motivo oggettivo di tipo economico alla luce del Jobs Act

    No full text
    Il contributo si interroga sul ruolo che, in seguito alle ultime riforme del lavoro, ha assunto il cd. ripescaggio all’interno del licenziamento per giustificato motivo oggettivo di tipo economico. Nella prima parte del saggio, l’esame dei più recenti orientamenti della giurisprudenza, in particolare di quella sull’onere della prova, conduce alla conclusione che il ripescaggio è parte integrante del gmo posto dall’art. 3, l. 604/1966 inteso quale limite interno (o causale) dell’atto di licenziamento, in quanto costituisce il nesso causale negativofra riorganizzazione disposta dal datore e mansioni del lavoratore. Il significato così assunto dal gmo, pur costituendo certo un limite “minimale” dell’atto di licenziamento, risulta comunque conforme ai principi costituzionali, eurounitari e internazionali, secondo l’interpretazione consolidatasi fino ad oggi. La seconda parte del lavoro analizza come la nuova disciplina dello ius variandi (art. 2103 c.c. come modificato dall’art. 3, d.lgs. 81/2015) impatta sulla struttura e sull’ampiezza del ripescaggio. Partendo dal presupposto che il nuovo testo dell’art. 2103 c.c. amplia il debito del lavoratore, includendovi tutte le mansioni appartenenti al medesimo livello di inquadramento rispetto alle mansioni di assunzione (1 co.) e le mansioni del livello immediatamente inferiore (co. 2) – l’A. giunge alla conclusione che il ripescaggio costituisce oggi oggetto di un vero e proprio onere e si estende a tutte le mansioni che integrano il debito di lavoro. Il datore di lavoro infatti ha l’onere, a pena di ingiustificatezza del licenziamento, di cooperare all’adempimento del lavoratore e, dunque, di adibire il lavoratore, nell’esercizio del proprio potere direttivo, ad una delle mansioni dovute, dello stesso livello o del livello immediatamente inferiore rispetto alle mansioni di assunzione. Il mancato rispetto del ripescaggio, così trasformato dall’art. 2103 nuovo testo c.c., è poi corredato da un successivo ed autonomo obbligo di formazione, che grava sul datore di lavoro. Infine, a corollario del ragionamento, l’A. ritiene che il “fatto giuridico” la cui “manifesta insussistenza” dà luogo, ai sensi dell’art. 18, co. 5, St. lav. alla tutela reintegratoria attenuata includa anche il mancato rispetto del ripescaggio, nell’accezione risultante dal combinato disposto dell’art. 3 l. 604/1966 e art. 2103 nuovo testo c.cTHE DUTY OF «REPECHAGE» IN THE DISMISSAL FOR OBJECTIVE ECONOMIC REASONS IN THE LIGHT OF THE JOBS ACT REFORM. The essay focuses on the role of repêchage in the definition of the dismissal for objective economic reasons after the recent Italian labour law reforms. In the first part of the essay, moving from the analysis of the case-law, especially the one concerning the burden of proof, the author highlights that repêchage is part of the definition of dismissal for objective economic reasons as provided for by Art. 3 Law no. 604/1966, as it represents the causal link between the reorganization of the firm and the workers’ skills. This is in line with both the Italian Constitution and the principles at supranational and international level. In the second part of the essay, the author analyses how the new text of Art. no. 2103 c.c. (as reformed by delegated decree no. 81/2015) affects the duty of repêchage. According to the author, the new art. 2103, broadening the range of tasks the employee can be assigned to in the workplace, has also broadened the notion of repêchage. In her conclusive remarks, she argues that an employer’s failure to fulfil the duty of repêchage, should lead to the reinstatement of the employee under art. 18, co. 5, St. la

    Make notifications great again: learning how to notify in the age of large-scale vulnerability scanning

    No full text
    As large-scale vulnerability detection becomes more feasible, it also increases the urgency to find effective largescale notification mechanisms to inform the affected parties. Researchers, CERTs, security companies and other organizations with vulnerability data have a variety of options to identify, contact and communicate with the actors responsible for the affected system or service. A lot of things can – and do – go wrong. It might be impossible to identify the appropriate recipient of the notification, the message might not be trusted by the recipient, it might be overlooked or ignored or misunderstood. Such problems multiply as the volume of notifications increases. In this paper, we undertake several large-scale notification campaigns for a vulnerable configuration of authoritative nameservers. We investigate three issues: What is the most effective way to reach the affected parties? What communication path mobilizes the strongest incentive for remediation? And finally, what is the impact of providing recipients a mechanism to actively demonstrate the vulnerability for their own system, rather than sending them the standard static notification message. We find that retrieving contact information at scale is highly problematic, though there are different degrees of failure for different mechanisms. For those parties who are reached, notification significantly increases remediation rates. Reaching out to nameserver operators directly had better results than going via their customers, the domain owners. While the latter, in principle, have a stronger incentive to care and their request for remediation would trigger the commercial incentive of the operator to keep its customers happy, this communication path turned out to have slightly worse remediation rates. Finally, we find no evidence that vulnerability demonstrations did better than static messages. In fact, few recipients engaged with the demonstration website.Accepted Author ManuscriptOrganisation & Governanc

    Il controllo a distanza dell’attività dei lavoratori dopo il “Jobs Act” (art. 23 D.Lgs. 151/2015) : spunti per un dibattito

    No full text
    L’introduzione mira a offrire una panoramica del nuovo art. 4 St.lav., in materia di potere di controllo del datore di lavoro, recentemente modificato dall’ultima riforma del lavoro (c.d. Jobs Act). In particolare, dopo una sommaria esposizione delle ragioni sottostanti la nuova norma, volte ad adeguare il potere di controllo del datore di lavoro all’evoluzione dei dispositivi tecnologici presenti sul luogo di lavoro, l’Autrice individua e si sofferma, in una prospettiva critica, sulle eterogenee e complesse questioni interpretative poste dalla novella.The introduction aims at giving an overview of the new article 4 of the Worker’s Statute (Law no. 300/1970), concerning the employer’s monitoring powers, as recently reformed by the latest Italian Labour Reform (the so called Jobs Act). In particular, after a brief explanation of the rationale underlying the new rule, in order to make the employer’s control power compatible with the improvement of technological tools in the workplace, the Author critically lists and takes into consideration the heterogeneous and complicated interpretative issues raised by the brand new reform

    Ayaanella M.T. Khan & Anis 2017, gen. nov.

    No full text
    Ayaanella M.T. Khan & Anis gen. nov. (Figs 1–10) Type species. Ayaanella globugaster M.T. Khan & Anis sp. nov. Description. Female. Head (Fig. 1); antennal torulus placed slightly above lower margin of eye; malar space dark, as long as or shorter than eye width; ocelli arranged in obtuse triangle; mandible (Fig. 2) 4-dentate, third tooth shorter, and a concavity between third and fourth teeth; maxillary palp (Fig. 3) unsegmented, swollen basally, with one seta at apex. Antennal formula 1, 1, (2), 2, 3; antenna (Figs 5–8) with 2 anelli (Figs 7, 8: A1 and A2); funicle 2 segmented, segments asymmetrical, with PLS, F2 broader than long; clava 3-segmented with very long setae and PLS. Mesosoma with pronotum medially divided into two plates; mid lobe of mesoscutum and scutellum each with 2 pairs (2+2) setae; side lobe of mesoscutum with 1 seta along anterolateral corner and axilla; propodeal margin almost straight posteriorly and about as long as metanotum medially; posterior two-thirds of mesoscutum, and scutellum with longitudinally cellulate sculpture, anterior one-third of mesoscutum with polygonal cells. Fore wing hyaline with venation extending to slightly less than half wing length; costal cell very narrow; marginal vein longer than premarginal or stigmal veins; premarginal vein broader than marginal vein; RS1 absent [except two or three setae below stigmal vein]; disc moderately densely setose with setae arranged in rows. Legs with tarsal formula 3-3-3. Metasoma longer than mesosoma; ovipositor short, extending from TV of gaster and hardly exserted. Male. Unknown. Etymology. The genus is named after the son of the second author (SBA), Ayaan + ‘-ella’ Latin suffix added to generic name.Published as part of Khan, Mohd Talib & Anis, Shoeba Binte, 2017, A new genus of Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from India, pp. 165-168 in Zootaxa 4344 (1) on pages 165-166, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4344.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/104236

    Il licenziamento nullo perchè discriminatorio, intimato in violazione di disposizioni di legge o in forma orale

    No full text
    L’articolo esamina le varie forme di licenziamento nulle ai sensi del Jobs Act (licenziamento discriminatorio; licenziamento per ritorsione; licenziamento per violazione di legge; licenziamento per disabilità fisica e psichica; licenziamento per mancato superamento del periodo di comporto; licenziamento intimato in forma orale) sia al fine di definire i confini delle varie figure – anche rispetto alla nozione di licenziamento ingiustificato – sia per dipanare la questione delle tutele applicabili. Tale secondo problema è rilevante perché il Jobs Act a fronte delle varie ipotesi di licenziamento nullo non sempre esplicita la forma di tutela applicabile. Nel contributo l’A. sostiene l’idea che – benchè sia indubbio che in via generale il Jobs Act ha elevato a regola la tutela indennitaria e ha relegato ad eccezione la tutela reintegratoria – tuttavia con specifico riferimento all’area del licenziamento nullo esso ha riconfermato la centralità della tutela reintegratoria in considerazione dei particolari interessi della persona del lavoratore che entrano in gioco. Ne deriva che le varie ipotesi di licenziamento nullo – anche ove la legge non contempli una previsione specifica; sono soggette alla tutela reintegratoria ex art. 18 St.lav. o alla tutela reintegratoria “di diritto comune”.The article examines the various forms of dismissal void under the Jobs Act (discriminatory dismissal, dismissal for retaliation, dismissal for violation of the law, dismissal for physical and mental disability, dismissal for failure to exceed the period of compensation, dismissal announced orally) in order to define the boundaries of the various figures; also with respect to the notion of unfair dismissal; and to solve the problem of the applicable protections. This second problem is relevant because the Jobs Act in the face of the various hypotheses of invalid dismissal does not always explicitly the form of protection applicable. In the contribution, the Author supports the idea that; although it is undoubted that in general the Jobs Act has elevated to rule the indemnity protection and has relegated to exception the reinstatement protection; however, with specific reference to the area of invalid dismissal it has reconfirmed the centrality of the reinstatement protection in view of the particular interests of the person of the worker who come into play. It follows that the various hypotheses of invalid dismissal; even where the law does not provide for a specific provision; are subject to the reintegration protection pursuant to art. 18 of Statuto dei Lavoratori or to the reintegration protection "under common law

    Using loops observed in traceroute to infer the ability to spoof

    No full text
    Despite source IP address spoofing being a known vulnerability for at least 25 years, and despite many efforts to shed light on the problem, spoofing remains a popular attack method for redirection, amplification, and anonymity. To defeat these attacks requires operators to ensure their networks filter packets with spoofed source IP addresses, known as source address validation (SAV), best deployed at the edge of the network where traffic originates. In this paper, we present a new method using routing loops appearing in traceroute data to infer inadequate SAV at the transit provider edge, where a provider does not filter traffic that should not have come from the customer. Our method does not require a vantage point within the customer network. We present and validate an algorithm that identifies at Internet scale which loops imply a lack of ingress filtering by providers. We found 703 provider ASes that do not implement ingress filtering on at least one of their links for 1,780 customer ASes. Most of these observations are unique compared to the existing methods of the Spoofer and Open Resolver projects. By increasing the visibility of the networks that allow spoofing, we aim to strengthen the incentives for the adoption of SAV.Organisation & Governanc

    Factors Associated to Purchase of Quality-Labelled Beef

    No full text
    The aim of the present study is to identify the factors associated to purchase of quality-labelled beef. For this purpose a total of 364 surveys were carried out on buyers of beef in three Spanish cities. The sample was divided into three groups of buyers according to the beef purchasing habits with a quality label. A logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the differences between groups. The results show the importance of the production region as a quality aspect. Income level, association of quality-labelled beef with “guarantee and tradition” aspects, purchasing frequency, place of purchase, production systems and lifestyles are all variables that enabled us to establish differences between groups.beef quality, quality label, consumer perception, Demand and Price Analysis,

    Anomaly detection through information sharing under different topologies

    No full text
    Early detection of traffic anomalies in networks increases the probability of effective intervention/mitigation actions, thereby improving the stability of system function. Centralized methods of anomaly detection are subject to inherent constraints: (1) they create a communication burden on the system, (2) they impose a delay in detection while information is being gathered, and (3) they require some trust and/or sharing of traffic information patterns. On the other hand, truly parallel, distributed methods are fast and private but can observe only local information. These methods can easily fail to see the “big picture” as they focus on only one thread in a tapestry. A recently proposed algorithm, Distributed Intrusion/Anomaly Monitoring for Nonparametric Detection (DIAMoND), addressed these problems by using parallel surveillance that included dynamic detection thresholds. These thresholds were functions of nonparametric information shared among network neighbors. Here, we explore the influence of network topology and patterns in normal traffic flow on the performance of the DIAMoND algorithm. We contrast performance to a truly parallel, independent surveillance system. We show that incorporation of nonparametric data improves anomaly detection capabilities in most cases, without incurring the practical problems of fully parallel network surveillance
    corecore