361 research outputs found
AAROC/CODE-RADE-container: DevOps for CODE-RADE - Build Container role
No full text<p>CODE-RADE Build Container</p>
<p>A somewhat OS-independent role to build CODE-RADE slaves for use in a continuous integration environment, using Ansible-Container.</p>
<p>Adds a CODE-RADE build container service to your Ansible Container project. To be used in conjunction with CODE-RADE Build Containers. For galaxy info, see meta/main.yml</p>
<p>Run the following commands to install the service:</p>
<p># Set the working directory to your Ansible Container project root cd myproject # Install the service ansible-container install AAROC.code-rade-build-containers Requirements</p>
<ul>
<li>Ansible Container</li>
<li>
<p>An existing Ansible Container project. To create a project, simply run the following:</p>
# Create an empty project directory<br>
mkdir myproject<br>
# Set the working directory to the new directory<br>
cd myproject<br>
# Initialize the project<br>
$ ansible-contiainer init</li>
</ul>
<p>Role Variables</p>
<p>Variables are all in vars/main.yml :</p>
<ul>
<li>modules_path - The OS-dependent path where environment-modules keeps its base configuration by default.</li>
<li>modules - CODE-RADE specific modulefiles ci and deploy which set up the build, test and deploy shells. These contain OS-specific variables, using anisble_os_family</li>
<li>module_domains - The domain-specific modulefile paths to which CODE-RADE can write application modulefiles. Contain :
<ul>
<li>astronomy</li>
<li>bioinformatics</li>
<li>compilers</li>
<li>languages</li>
<li>libraries</li>
<li>physical_sciences</li>
<li>hep</li>
<li>prerequisites: OS-specific dependencies that need to be in the build environment in order to execute compilation and tests. Intentionally kept small.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Dependencies</p>
<p>None</p>
<p>License</p>
<p>Apache-2.0</p>
<p>Author Information</p>
<p>Bruce Becker | [email protected] | C.S.I.R. Meraka Institute Africa-Arabia Regional Operations Centre</p>
<p>Citing</p>
<p><br>
If you use this role in an academic or research context, please cite :<br>
Bruce Becker. (2017). AAROC/CODE-RADE-container: DevOps for CODE-RADE - Build Container role [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.572278<br>
</p>
LIBERALE UND KOMMUNITARISTISCHE AUFFASSUNG DER IDENTITÄT. ZUR ANALYSE DER IDENTITÄT DER KROATISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT
No full textRad tematizira razliku i diskurzivni prijepor između liberalnog i komunitarističkog shvaćanja identiteta,
polazeći od teze da je taj prijepor u središtu pozornosti današnjih teorijsko-istraživačkih rasprava. Stoga se ponajprije ukazuje na načelne razlike između tih dvaju stajališta, pri čemu se više inzistira na recentnim komunitarističkim kritikama, korekcijama ili nadopunama liberalizma, iz kojih proizlazi da je liberalna koncepcija
individualnog jastva prekratka za razumijevanje društvene artikulacije identiteta. Potom se, polazeći od navedenog prijepora, daje jedan mogući model za analizu identiteta hrvatskog društva. Imajući na umu tranzicijski i novonastali nacionalno-državni okvir, rad zastupa stajalište da u tekućim raspravama o identitetu
prevladavaju komunitaristički iskazi. Tipološki gledano, ti su iskazi trovrsni: kulturalno-esencijalistički, političko-diferencijalistički i ekspresivno-dizajnerski. Pojedinačno ih se analizira i na kraju se izvodi zaključak o projektivno-komunitarističkoj perspektivi tematizacije identiteta.The paper points out as a topic the difference and discourse dispute between liberal and communitarian view of identity,
starting from the thesis that this dispute is in the limelight of contemporary theoretical and research debates. Therefore,
the author in the first place points out to principal differences between these two standpoints, in which process it is more
insisted on recent communitarian critiques, corrections or amendments of liberalism, from which it is deducible that
liberal concept of individual peculiarity is to short for understanding the societal articulation of identity. After that, starting from the above-mentioned debate, the author gives us one possible model for the analysis of the Croatian society.
Having in mind the transitional and newly created ethnic and national framework, the author supports the standpoint\ud
that within current debates on identity, communitarian statements prevail. From a typological viewpoint, these
statements have a three-fold quality: that of cultural and essentialism, then of political and differentiality, and that of
expressive and designer quality. They have been analysed one by one, and at the end it has been concluded on projective
and communitarian perspective of the identity theme.Die Arbeit thematisiert den Unterschied sowie das diskursive Dilemma zwischen liberaler und kommunitaristischer
Auffassung der Identität, von der These ausgehend, dass diese Streitfrage im Focus der heutigen theoretischen und
Forschungsdiskussionen steht.
Deshalb wird zuerst auf die grundsätzlichen Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Standpunkten hingewiesen, wobei der
Autor eher auf rezenten kommunitaristischen Kritiken, Korrekturen oder Ergänzungen des Liberalismus besteht, aus
denen hervorgeht, dass die liberale Konzeption des individuellen Ichseins zu knapp sei, als dass man daraus die gesellschaftliche
Artikulierung der Identität verstehen könnte. Danach wird, ausgehend von der genannten Streitfrage ein
mögliches Modell für die Identitätsanalyse der kroatischen Gesellschaft gegeben. Wenn man den durch Transition
neuentstandenen National- und Staatsrahmen bedenkt, wird in der Arbeit der Standpunkt vertreten, dass in laufenden
Diskussionen um die Identität kummunitaristische Aussagen überwiegen. Typologisch gesehen sind diese Aussagen
dreiartig: kulturell-essenzialistisch, politisch-differentialistisch und expressiv-designerisch. Sie werden einzeln analysiert
und am Ende wird ein Schluß über die projektiv-kommunitaristische Perspektive der Thematisierung der Identität
gezogen
Aktualne mere za funkcionisanje saobraćaja u sistemu tržišnog privređivanja
No full textIn view of the fact that effective January J, 1993 a single European market of the EC is introduced and that traffic activities shall as well be adapted to this concept, the author points out the indispensable requirement for our country to absolutely adjust by that term its standards and regulations to those of the EC. Keeping to .the point this would understand for the segment of transport that the conditions are created towards a market-oriented behaviour of traffic/transport community. According to the. author it is necessary to define and adjust the conditions of business (earning the income) of i11dividual traffic segments on the transport service market as well as to introduce radical changes in to the concept and philosophy of the business policy of transport companies in the first place the railways.</p
The Theory of Elites and the Question of Democracy
No full textAutor polazi od konstatacije da je teorija elita i elitizam u suvremenoj sociologiji najviše — ako ne i isključivo — prisutna na tri disciplinarna područja: na području sociologije kulture, na području političke sociologije, te na području analize socijalne strukture d socijalnih konflikata. Na svim tim područjima ona je blisko povezana sa srodnim filozofskim disciplinama, a to znači s filozofijom kulture, političkom filozofijom i socijalnom filozofijom.
Dok klasični teoretičari elita svode povijest društva na borbu elita za vlast, neoelitisti hvale pluralističko natjecateljski aranžman vlasti.The author states that the theory of elites and elitism in the contemporary sociology is mostly, if not exclusively, present in three disciplinary fields: in sociology of culture, in sociology of politics as well as in the analysis of social structure and social conflicts. It is also closely connected with related philosophical disciplines, i.e. with philosophy of culture, political philosophy and social philosophy.
While classical theoreticians of elites identify the history of society with elites struggle for power, the neoelitists on the other hand, praise the organization of government of pluralistic and competitive character
POSTMODERNE UND CHAOS
No full textPolazeći od konstatacije da postmoderno mišljenje i teorija determinističkog kaosa predstavljaju dvije značajne kulturno–znanstvene činjenice, tekst nastoji odgovoriti na pitanje da li njihova pojavna podudarnost ima neki dublji smisao i što ona znači za sociologiju. Stoga se ponajprije definiraju osnovni pojmovi, pri čemu se osobito naglašava da je postmoderno mišljenje proizašlo iz kulturnih a teorija kaosa iz znanstvenih pretpostavki. Potom se analizira njihov odnos prema »klasičnoj znanosti«, konstatira se da je opravdano govoriti o »sociologiji postmodernosti« a ne o »postmodernoj sociologiji«, te se utvr|uju bitne točke u kojima dolazi do izražaja »epistemološki rez« što ga proklamira teorija kaosa: linearnost, predvidljivost i kompleksnost. Tekst pokazuje značenje tih pojmova i zastupa tezu da su oni doživjeli temeljite preinake i u klasičnoj i u suvremenoj sociologiji. Sociologija je konstitutivno zaokupljena odnosom reda i nereda pa se stoga može reći da teorija kaosa, bez obzira na svoje ambiciozne znanstvene implikacije, ne može paradigmatski utjecati na njezina usmjerenja. Kao što postmoderni kulturni ambijent nije dekonstruirao znanstvenost sociološkog mišljenja, tako ni teorije kaosa, uza svu svoju poticajnost, nije otkrila ništa zbog čega bi sociološka znanost morala mijenjati svoj predmetni i metodološki vidokrug.Starting from the conclusion that post–modern view and the theory of deterministic chaos represent two significant cultural and scientific facts, the author tries to answer the questions if their phenomenal coincidence has some deeper meaning and what does it mean for sociology. Therefore, basic notions have been defined in the beginning, while especially emphasizing that the post–modern view resulted from cultural pre–suppositions and the theory of chaos from scientific ones. Then, their relation toward “classic science” has been analyzed, and the fact that it is justifiable to speak about “sociology of postmodernism” and not about “post–modern sociology” has been established. Along with this, basic points of reference, at which “epistemological cut” proclaimed by the theory of chaos becomes prominent, have been established also: linearity, predictability and complexity. The text presents the meaning of these notions and the author represents the opinion that that they underwent through significant changes in classic and modern sociology as well. Sociology is essentially preoccupied with the relation of order and disorder, so it could be said that the theory of chaos, regardless of its ambitious scientific implications, can not paradigmatically influence orientations of sociology. As the post–modern cultural ambience did not deconstruct the scientific quality of sociological view, so the theory of chaos, in spite of its impetus, did not discover anything because of which the sociological science should change its subject and methodological horizon.Ausgegangen von der Feststellung, daß das postmoderne Denken und die Theorie des deterministischen Chaos zwei wichtige kulturwissenschaftliche Tatsachen darstellen, wird in diesem Text der Versuch unternommen, folgende Fragen zu beantworten: Hat ihre übereinstimmende Erscheinung einen tieferen Sinn? Wie wirkt sich diese Tatsache auf die Soziologie aus? Aus diesem Grund werden zunächt die Grundbegriffe definiert, wobei betont wird, daß das postmoderne Denken aus den kulturellen und die Chaostheorie aus den wissenschaftlichen Voraussetzungen hervorgegangen sind. Nachdem ihr Verhältnis zu der “klassischen Wissenschaft” analysiert wurde, konnte festgestellt werden, daß man mit Recht von einer “Soziologie der Postmoderne” und nicht etwa einer “postmodernen Soziologie” sprechen kann. Definiert werden auch wesentliche Punkte, bei denen der von der Chaostheorie proklamierte “episthemologische Schnitt” zum Ausdruck kommt: Linearität, Vorhersehbarkeit und Komplexität. In diesem Text wird die Bedeutung dieser Begriffe erläutert und die These vorgebracht, daß sie ernsthaften Umdeutungen in der klassischen und zeitgenössischen Soziologie unterworfen wurden. Ihrem Wesen nach beschäftigt sich die Soziologie mit dem Verhätnis zwischen Ordnung und Unordnung, so daß sich behaupten läßt, daß die Chaostheorie – ungeachtet ihrer hochtrabenden wissenschaftlichen Implikationen – auf soziologische Richtungen keinen paradigmatischen Einfluß ausüben kann. So wie das postmoderne kulturelle Milieu die Wissenschaftlichkeit des soziologischen Denkens nicht dekonstruieren konnte, war auch die Chaostheorie trotz ihres gesamten Reizes nicht in der Lage, irgendetwas aufzudecken, weswegen die Soziologie ihren gegenständlichen und methodologischen Horizont zu verändern hätte
Plan de la Rade et Ville de la Vera-Cruz
No full textRepresenta la Villa de la Vera-Cruz y las Islas del Golfo.</p
KULTUR UND MACHT
No full textTekst se bavi analizom suvremenih socioloških pristupa problemu kulture. Oslanjajući se na stavove D. Crane i, osobito, N. Smelsera, autor zastupa tezu da suvremeno sociološko mišljenje karakteriziraju tri glavna pristupa: sociologistički, socioantropološki i sociopolitološki. Međutim, u najnovijem razdoblju, odnosno do početka sedamdesetih godina, dominantno mjesto zauzima sociopolitološki pristup, koji je odigrao inovativnu ulogu u sociologiji kulture. Njegova se specifičnost sastoji u tome da kulturne procese analizira u horizontu političke moći. Tako odnos kulture i moći postaje jednom od vrlo značajnih tema suvremene sociologije. U tom pogledu autor osobitu pozornost poklanja Gramscijevu pojmu kulturne hegemonije, britanskoj školi kulturnih studija, Foucaultovoj teoriji znanja i moći, Bourdieuovoj sociologiji kulturnog kapitala i Baudrillardovoj teoriji simulacije i "simulacruma". Njihova se inovativnost sastoji u tome da nadmašuju tradicionalno (»implicitno«) poimanje kulture i sve se više okreću prema zbilji medijsko-komunikacijskog doba, odnosno prema onome što neki današnji sociolozi označavaju kao "recored culture".The text is concerned with the analysis of contemporary sociological approaches to the issue of culture. Relying on the attitudes of D. Crane and, especially, N. Smelser, the author holds that contemporary sociological thought is characterized by the three main approaches: sociologistic, socioanthropologic and sociopolitical science. However, in the latest period, in other words until the early 70s, the dominant place is of an approach of sociopolitical science, that had an innovative role in a sociology of culture. Its peculiarity is that it analyzes cultural processes in the political power range of knowledge. So the relation of culture and power becomes once a very significant topic in contemporary sociology. With regard to this the author particular attention gives to the Gramsci's notion of cultural hegemony, the British school of cultural studies, Foucault's theory of knowledge and power, Bourdieu's sociology of cultural capital and Baudrillard's theory of simulation and simulacrum. Their innovativeness is in that they surpass traditional ("implicite") culture comprehension and even more they turn towards a reality of medium and communicational age, in other words, towards that what some contemporary sociologists denote as "recorded culture".Dieser Text beschaft sich mit der Analyse von den modernen soziologischen Auseinandersetzung mit dem Problem der Kultur. Der Autor vertretet eine These, die sich auf den Stellungen von D. Crane, und besonders von N. Smelser stützt, dass ein modernes soziologisches Denken drei Hauptauseinandersetzungen schildern: soziologistisch, sozioantropologisch und soziopolitisch. Inzwischen nahm in der Soziologie in den letzten Zeitraum, beziehungsweise bis den Anfang der siebzigsten Jahre, eine dominante Stelle die soziopolische Auseinandersetzung ein, der eine innovative Rolle in der Soziologie der Kultur hatte. Ihre Spezifität besteht aus dem Prizip dass die Kulturprozesse im Gesichtkreis der politischen Macht analysiert werden. Damit wird das Verhältnis eine von sehr wichtigen Themen der modernen Soziologie. In dieser Ansicht schenkt der Autor eine besondere Aufmerksamkeit der Vorstellung der kulturellen Hegemonie von Gramsci, der Britischen Schule des Kulturstudiums, dem Studium des Kulturkapitals von Bourdieu, der Theorie von der Wissenschaft und von der Macht von Faucault, und der Theorie von der Simulation und von dem Simulacrum von Baudrillard. Ihre Erfindungsgabe besteht von diesem dass sie eine traditionelle ("implikative") Auffassung übertreffen und dass sie sich noch mehr nach der Wirklichkeit gegen der Ära der Media und der Kommunikation wenden, beziehungsweise nach diesem was von heutigen Soziologen wie "Record Culture" bezeichnet wurde
STAAT UND ENTWICKLUNG
No full textTekst se bavi problematizacijom države kao jednom od najtrajnijih tema socijalnih znanosti i filozofije. No budući da se problem države uvijek postavlja u nekom širem povijesnom sklopu, a ne kao izdvojeno pitanje, tekst polazi od stajališta da je država ključno pitanje razvoja i teorija razvoja. Država se naime uvijek pojavljuje kao razvojno pitanje i stoga se njezini oblici i funkcije također očituju u konkretnoj povezanosti s koncepcijama i pojmovima razvoja. Nakon kratkog osvrta na status države u klasičnoj sociološkoj teoriji (Durkheim, Weber), te sumarne rekapitulacije Parsonsovih pogleda, tekst se usredotočuje na nekoliko tipičnih poimanja države u suvremenim teorijama razvoja: poimanje države ka »razvojnog faktora« (»mit o razvojnoj državi«), poimanje države u teorijama zavisnosti (»mit o marionetskoj državi«) i poimanje države u neoklasičnoj teoriji (»mit o skromnoj državi«), koja je preuzela vodeću ulogu osamdesetih i devedesetih godina. Napokon, tekst propituje i recentne problematizaije države u kontekstu globalizacije, koja značajno utječe na promjene klasičnih značajki državne organizacije.The problem of state is one of the oldest issues in social sciences and philosophy. However, because of the fact that the issue of state has always been put into a wider historical framework, and not as a separate question, the author starts from the point of view that the state is a crucial issue of development and the development theories. The state appears on the scene always as a developmental issue, so that its forms and functions are reflected in a concrete relation with the concepts and notions of development. After a concicse review of the position of the state within the classical sociological theory (Durkheim, Weber), a summary of Parsons ideas, the author focuses upon some typical conceptions about the state in contemporary theories of development: the conception of state as a “developmental factor” (“developing state myth”), the conception of state within the dependence theories (the “puppet state myth”) and the conception of state in the neo–classical theory (the “modest state myth”), whereas the last mentioned conception has become prevailing in the 1980s and 1990s. In the final part of the study, questioned are the more recent conceptions about the state within the globalization framework that significantly has influenced the changes of classical features of the state organization. This only recently opened discussion is as topical as the actual worldwide integration processes and conflicts concerning economic and cultural power.In diesem Text wird der Staat als eines der ältesten Themen der Sozialwissenschaften und der Philosophie problematisiert. Da aber die Frage des Staates schon immer in einem breiteren historischen Zusammenhang behandelt wird, und nicht als eine abgesonderte Frage, wird hier davon ausgegangen, daß im Zusammenhang mit der Entwicklung und der Entwicklungstheorie dem Staat eine entscheidende Rolle zukommt. Der Staat kommt nämlich immer als eine Frage der Entwicklung vor, so daß sich seine Formen und Funktionen auch in einer konkreten Verbindung mit den Konzepten und Begriffen der Entwicklung widerspiegeln. Nach einer kurzen Besprechung des Staatsbegriffs innerhalb der klassischen soziologischen Theorie (Durkheim, Weber) und einer zusammenfassenden Darstellung von Parsons Ansichten werden einige typische Auffassungen des Staates in den zeitgenössischen Theorien der Entwicklung unter die Lupe genommen: der Staat als “Entwicklungsfaktor” (“Mythos vom Entwicklungsstaat”), der Staatsbegriff in den Theorien der Abhängigkeit (“Mythos vom Marionettenstaat”) und der Staatsbegriff innerhalb der neoklassischen Theorie (“Mythos vom bescheidenen Staat”), wobei die letztgenannte Theorie eine führende Rolle in den 80er und 90er Jahren spielte. Schließlich werden die neuesten Auffassungen des Staatsbegriffs im Zusammenhang mit der Globalisierung dargestellt, wobei die Globalisierung die Veränderung der klassischen Merkmale der Staatsorganisation beeinflußt. Diese erst begonnene Debatte ist ebenso aktuell wie die weltweiten Integrationsprozesse und Konflikte um die wirtschaftliche und kulturelle Macht
“Rhythmical stimulations” and early speech and language intervention
No full textRitmičke stimulacije su terapijski postupak proizašao iz spoja logopedske struke, verbotonalne metode i Labanove teorije pokreta. U Poliklinici SUVAG ritmičke stimulacije provodi logoped-ritmičar na Odsjeku za govorne poremećaje. Analizirajući broj, kronološku dob i logopedske dijagnoze sve djece uključene na ritmičke stimulacije u travnju 2006. godine, izdvojen je uzorak djece mlađe od 4 godine s nedovoljno razvijenim govorom i jezikom u odnosu na kronološku dob. Djeca su analizirana u odnosu na kronološku dob, anamnestičke podatke, uključenost djece u ostale oblike terapije, dosadašnje trajanje terapije i preporuke za daljnje postupke. Navedeni su i organizacijski problemi rada s malom djecom te posebno istaknuta potreba iznalaženja načina za što ranijom edukacijom roditelja
i odgojitelja i što pristupačnije savjetovanje, praćenje i terapiju djece nedovoljno razvijenog govora i jezika.“Rhythmical stimulations” is a therapeutic procedure where speech and language therapy, the Verbo-tonal method and the Laban movement theory are used to achieve better verbal and communication skills. In the Polyclinic SUVAG, the “rhythmical stimulations” procedure is conducted by a Speech and Language Pathologist who has also a degree in the “Rhythm and Body Movement”, and works in the Speech and Language Disorders
Department. When examining the number and chronological age of all children engaged in the “rhythmical stimulations” in April 2006, the author focused on a sample of children with language impairments under the age of 4 and he analysed their speech and language
diagnosis. While creating the sample, the following data were used: chronological age, certain anamnesis data, and the engagement in other types of therapy, the duration of therapy and the recommendations for future therapy. The need for early education of
parents and caregivers in kindergartens is also emphasized and within this program, we specifically stress the need for early consulting, monitoring and direct therapy of young children with delayed speech and language development
- …
