1,209 research outputs found
Jacob of Serugh on the Eucharist: Homilies 22 and 95
In the two articles reprinted here, Dom Hugh Connolly offers an English translation of two homilies from Jacob of Serugh dealing with the Eucharist. Connolly used the Syriac text of Bedjan’s edition of Jacob’s homilies (also available from Gorgias Press), homilies 22 and 95 in that edition. A short selection from homily 53 is also translated because of its related subject matter. Connolly gives an introduction to each homily and includes some explanatory notes to the texts. These translations originally appeared in The Downside Review, nos. 27 (1908) and 29 (1910).Translated into English from the Syriac text of Bedjan’s edition of Jacob’s homilies.These translations originally appeared in The Downside Review, nos. 27 (1908) and 29 (1910)
Jacob Viner’s Reminiscences from the New Deal (February 11, 1953)
This paper presents and reproduces an unpublished oral history interview given by Jacob Viner in 1953. The interview released by Viner for the Columbia Oral History Project gives us a valuable opportunity to throw light on his advisory activity during the New Deal Era. In our introduction we attempt to make a critical appraisal of Viner's reminiscences and to state the contribution they can provide to our general knowledge of the period. In addition, we also attempt to find out some biographical and interpretative elements useful to understand Viner’s own vision and his contribution to important economic policy processes during the New Deal.
Writing while Reading : Part 1 : First-Pass Thoughts , Early Arg-Line Consideration , Refutations , Commentary , Textual Excursions , Mostly From-Memory Argument Construction : Jacob R. Parr Reads Averroes’s _De Substantia Orbis_
Part 1 in a two-part work , Jacob Parr , the author , has written his first thoughts while he reads a book by Averroes for the first time . Part 2 will be written while reading a book by Nicholas de Autrecourt that specifically mentions Averroes .
In Writing while Reading : Part 1 , you dear reader will find a short refutation against Speculative Philosophy , various contexts addressed among the commentary , wondrously tidy analysis-scopes , some attempts at humor , scholarly references , but most importantly , you will find not any reference to Bernardus Placidus Johann Nepomuk Bolzano nor to anything Bolzano said while lecturing at the Prague University , especially not during 1818 .
The reader will also find the author Jacob Roman Parr elucidating a certain maneuver in Neo-Aristotlean proof-theory , though not without the author addressing contradictions . The author provides various apologies along . The author does not wish to apologize about being exact in keeping the definition for contrary distinct from opposite for Aristotelians .
Writing while Reading : Part 1 : First-Pass Thoughts , Early Arg-Line Consideration , Refutations , Commentary , Textual Excursions , Mostly From-Memory Argument Construction : Jacob R. Parr Reads Averroes’s De Substantia Orbis is 38 pages in length
Writing while Reading : Part 1 : First-Pass Thoughts , Early Arg-Line Consideration , Refutations , Commentary , Textual Excursions , Mostly From-Memory Argument Construction : Jacob R. Parr Reads Averroes’s _De Substantia Orbis_
Part 1 in a two-part work , Jacob Parr , the author , has written his first thoughts while he reads a book by Averroes for the first time . Part 2 will be written while reading a book by Nicholas de Autrecourt that specifically mentions Averroes .
In Writing while Reading : Part 1 , you dear reader will find a short refutation against Speculative Philosophy , various contexts addressed among the commentary , wondrously tidy analysis-scopes , some attempts at humor , scholarly references , but most importantly , you will find not any reference to Bernardus Placidus Johann Nepomuk Bolzano nor to anything Bolzano said while lecturing at the Prague University , especially not during 1818 .
The reader will also find the author Jacob Roman Parr elucidating a certain maneuver in Neo-Aristotlean proof-theory , though not without the author addressing contradictions . The author provides various apologies along . The author does not wish to apologize about being exact in keeping the definition for contrary distinct from opposite for Aristotelians .
Writing while Reading : Part 1 : First-Pass Thoughts , Early Arg-Line Consideration , Refutations , Commentary , Textual Excursions , Mostly From-Memory Argument Construction : Jacob R. Parr Reads Averroes’s De Substantia Orbis is 38 pages in length
Diatessaron in the Syriac Acts of John / Jacob of Serug and the Diatessaron
This volume contains two short studies, originally printed in the Journal of Theological Studies, on the Diatessaron and Syriac literature. In the first, Connolly examines the evidence on the data and order of two biblical passages in the Syriac Acts of John in comparison with some other places in Syriac literature, such as Ephrem’s commentary on the Diatessaron, the Old Syriac Gospels, and Solomon of Basra’s Book of the Bee. In the second investigation, he looks at some material from Jacob of Serug showing his use of the Diatessaron or Old Syriac Gospels over against the Peshitta. Both studies suggest some lines of alteration that had taken place in the Arabic Diatessaron. Readers who study the history of the Gospels in Syriac and their reception and use in Syriac literature will find these two studies of interest
Obituary: Jacob Willem Cohen
Jacob Willem Cohen (August 27, 1923 in Leeuwarden - November 12, 2000) was a Dutch mathematician, well known for over hundred scientific publications and several books in queueing theory.Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Scienc
Author Not Stated- Mr. Jacob Goodman, No date given
Correspondence: Letter to Jacob Goodman, Real Estate and Insurance, New York City, New York regarding property management for 254 West 131st Street, New York, New York. Typed on Holmes Funeral Director Mrs. R. Holmes Walker letterhead, not signed
Correspondence from Jacob C. Kellem to Daniel R. Porter, 1973
The sender, Jacob C. Kellem, disagrees with the opinion expressed and provides reasoning based on Condition 2 of the loan agreement between the Ohio Historical Society and Ms. Pauline A. Young. Condition 2 stipulates that Ms. Young retains all literary rights to the papers. The letter asserts that the society failed in its duty to prevent the public, including those ordering single copies, from violating these rights. Jacob C. Kellem seeks prompt advice on compensation and prevention of future violations. The letter also mentions the potential modification of the existing agreement and Ms. Young's intent to stand firm on her rights while considering a reasonable compromise. The sender requests clarity on whether further legal action will be necessary to uphold Ms. Young's rights
Correspondence from Jacob C. Kellem to Daniel R. Porter, 1973
The letter responds to Mr. Porter's letter from November 14, 1973, regarding a disagreement over the interpretation of Paragraph 4 of a signed Agreement. It disputes the availability of single copy reproductions, emphasizing that they should only be accessible to those studying the collection. The letter also raises concerns about the publication of a microfilm edition and the use of proceeds from its sale, asserting Ms. Young's right to a fair share. Jacob C. Kellem conveys a willingness to escalate the matter if the issue is not resolved satisfactorily
De Maiestate / Praeside M. Jacobo Thomasio, Moralis Philosoph. P. P., publice disputabit Johannes Dunte, R. L. Author & Respon: ad diem 9. Septembr. H L. Q. C.
DE MAIESTATE / PRAESIDE M. JACOBO THOMASIO, MORALIS PHILOSOPH. P. P., PUBLICE DISPUTABIT JOHANNES DUNTE, R. L. AUTHOR & RESPON: AD DIEM 9. SEPTEMBR. H L. Q. C.
De Maiestate / Praeside M. Jacobo Thomasio, Moralis Philosoph. P. P., publice disputabit Johannes Dunte, R. L. Author & Respon: ad diem 9. Septembr. H L. Q. C. (1)
Titelblatt (1)
Widmung (2)
Text (3)
Beiträge (21
- …
