75 research outputs found
Federated Analysis in COINSTAC Reveals Functional Network Connectivity and Spectral Links to Smoking and Alcohol Consumption in Nearly 2,000 Adolescent Brains
No full textNational Institutes of Health http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002National Science Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001Horizon 2020 Framework Programme http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010661Medical Research FoundationNational Institute for Health Research http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272National Institute for Health Research http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272National Institute for Health Research http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272Medical Research Council http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265Sixth Framework Programme http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011103Human Brain ProjectMedical Research Council http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/50110000026
Odontamblyopus rebecca Murdy & Shibukawa, 2003, sp. nov.
No full textOdontamblyopus rebecca sp. nov. (Fig.1; Tables 1-2) Holotype: ROM 72279, 141.0 mm SL, male. Paratypes: AMS I.41549-001, 2: 110.8-125.6 mm SL; MNHN 2002-3010, 1:78.5, MNHN 2002-3011, 1:89.0, MNHN 2002-3012, 1: 92.0 mm SL; ROM 72625, 2:96.1- 136.8 mm SL; ROM 72626, 26:75.1-132.6 mm SL; USNM 369736, 3:113.1-137.8 mm SL. All material was collected on 29 February 2000 by Richard Winterbottom from a fish market located on the east side of Haiphong City, Vietnam (20º52' N, 106º41' E). Diagnosis. Odontamblyopus rebecca can be diagnosed from congeners by the following combination of characters: total dorsal-fin elements 44-48 (mean 45.8), anal-fin elements37-42 (mean 38.5), pectoral fin with 40-51 rays (mean 45.8), and caudal vertebrae 20-21 (mean 20.1). A brownish streak courses from the dorsal surface of the head along dorsum to the caudal fin; chin blackish; caudal fin blackish. Description. Counts of holotype given first, followed by those of paratypes in parentheses. D VI (VI), 40 (38-42), first non-spinous dorsal-fin ray segmented and branched; spinous dorsal-fin pterygiophore formula 3-12210 (holotype and all paratypes); dorsal fin connected by membrane to the caudal fin. Anal-fin rays 38 (37-42), first element of anal fin segmented but not branched. Anal fin connected by membrane to caudal fin. Pectoralfin rays 45/45 (40-51), all pectoral-fin rays segmented, occasionally one or more ventralmost rays branched, all others unbranched; for distal half of fin, membranous connection lacking so that rays are free and silk-like. Pelvic-fin rays I, 5; frenum present; interradial membrane uniting fins present throughout length of innermost rays. Caudal fin with 17 (17) segmented rays including 8+7 (8+7) branched rays and a dorsal and ventral simple ray. Scales cycloid, embedded, non-imbricated, and difficult to discern without magnification; present on body and head, largest posteriorly. Head scales most abundant on dorsum with some scales on cheeks and a few on operculum. Two lateral rows of teeth in each jaw, more than two rows anteriorly; outer-row teeth much larger and more pointed than those of inner rows; lower-jaw teeth longer than upper-jaw teeth; 19 (7-20) fang-like teeth in outer row of upper jaw, typically interlocking with those of lower jaw; numerous conical teeth on inner rows of upper jaw; 9 (6-10) fang-like teeth in outer row of lower jaw; numerous conical teeth in inner rows of lower jaw. Two (occasionally only one) stout caninoid teeth internal to symphysis of lower jaw. No palatine or vomerine teeth present. Precaudal vertebrae 10 (10), caudal vertebrae 20 (20-21). Coloration. Head and body tannish brown. Chin with diffuse blackish blotch. Dorsal surface of head dusky brown as is dorsal-fin base almost to the caudal peduncle. From midpoint of caudal fin posteriad, blackish. Other fins translucent. Distribution. Known only from a single locality, a fish market located on the east side of Haiphong City, Vietnam. The collector of these specimens, Dr. Richard Winterbottom, assumes the specimens were obtained along the Gulf of Tonkin coast, which is near the market, or in a nearby estuarine environment. Nguyên (1991) reported an unidentified species of Odontamblyopus from coastal provinces in northern Vietnam and stated that the species possessed: VI, 39-42 dorsal-fin rays; 37-41 anal-fin rays; 43-50 pectoral-fin rays; 10+19 (18-20) vertebrae. With the exception of the caudal vertebral count, we believe that Nguyên's description is a match with the subject specimens. (As we do not know Nguyên's methodology for counting vertebrae, we cannot be sure that our counting methods are the same.) Unfortunately, attempts to contact Mr. Nguyên were unsuccessful so his specimens were not available to us. Etymology. This species is named for Rebecca Rootes, the life partner and spouse of the first author. Comparisons with congeners. The following data and information pertaining to Odontamblyopus, excepting the new species described herein, were taken from Murdy and Shibukawa (2001) unless otherwise cited. With respect to O. rebecca, O. roseus differs in having a chocolate-brown distal margin on the median fins (vs. translucent in O. rebecca); more caudal vertebrae (22 in O. roseus vs. typically 20 in O. rebecca) and in having a longer pelvic fin (pelvic-fin length/SL 0.124-0.151, mean = 0.141, in O. roseus vs. 0.074- 0.126, mean = 0.107, in O. rebecca). In comparison to O. rubicundus, O. rebecca has more caudal vertebrae (20-21 in O. rebecca vs. 17 in O. rubicundus); a longer pectoral fin with respect to head length (pectoral-fin length/head length 0.673-1.050, mean = 0.852, in O. rebecca vs. 0.628-0.965, mean = 0.719, in O. rubicundus); and fewer anal-fin pterygiophores anterior to the first hemal spine (typically 2 in O. rebecca vs. 3 in O. rubicundus). Whereas there is considerable overlap in most meristic values between O. rebecca and O. lacepedii, a significant difference exists in the number of pectoral-fin rays (40-51, mean = 45.8, in O. rebecca vs. 24-33, mean = 27.9, in O. lacepedii). Several morphometric measures also serve to distinguish O. rebecca from O. lacepedii: SL/TL (range 0.761-0.829, mean = 0.788, in O. rebecca vs. 0.808-0.850, mean = 0.825, in O. lacepedii); pelvic-fin length/head length (range 0.508-0.842, mean = 0.703, in O. rebecca vs. 0.665-1.08, mean = 0.810, in O. lacepedii); and pectoral-fin length/SL (range 0.093-0.154, mean = 0.130, in O. rebecca vs. 0.082-0.132, mean = 0.101, in O. lacepedii). Within the genus Odontamblyopus, only O. tenuis and O. rebecca have pectoral-fin ray counts greater than 39; the average pectoral-fin ray count for O. tenuis is 59.5 (range = 46-65) whereas for O. rebecca it is 45.8 (range = 40-51). (No other species of Odontamblyopus has more than 33 pectoral-fin rays.) We hypothesize that the shared possession of high numbers of pectoral-fin rays connotes a greater degree of relatedness between these two species than with species that do not possess this feature. In contrast with O. rebecca, O. tenuis has barbels on the underside of the chin (O. rebecca has none). O. tenuis typically has fewer elements in both the dorsal and anal fins than does O. rebecca (range of dorsal-fin elements 40-42, mean = 40.4, in O. tenuis vs. range of 44-48, mean = 45.8, in O. rebecca; range of anal-fin elements 32-35, mean = 33.2, in O. tenuis vs. range of 37-42, mean = 38.5, in O. rebecca). O. tenuis and O. rebecca differ in vertebral numbers; O. tenuis has 17 caudal vertebrae whereas O. rebecca typically has 20. Epineurals are present from 1st precaudal vertebra to the 5th caudal vertebra in O. tenuis, and 1st precaudal vertebra to the 4th, 5th, 6th, or 7th caudal vertebra in O. rebecca. The following morphometric measures also show differences between the two species: head length/SL (range of 0.078-0.130, mean = 0.114, in O. tenuis vs. 0.130-0.179, mean = 0.152, in O. rebecca); head width/SL (0.040-0.059, mean = 0.054, in O. tenuis vs. 0.062- 0.110, mean = 0.083, in O. rebecca); and pectoral-fin length/SL (0.084-0.119, mean = 0.102, in O. tenuis vs. 0.093-0.154, mean = 0.130, in O. rebecca). Key to the species of Odontamblyopus (modified from Murdy and Shibukawa, 2001) 1a. Pectoral-fin rays 40 or more.......................................................................................... 2 1b. Pectoral-fin rays 33 or fewer......................................................................................... 3 2a. Chin with numerous small barbels; pectoral-fin rays 46-65; total dorsal-fin elements 40-42; anal-fin elements 32-35; 17 caudal vertebrae. (Pakistan, Myanmar).... O. tenuis 2b. Chin lacking barbels; pectoral-fin rays 40-51; total dorsal-fin elements 44-48; anal-fin elements 37-42; 20-21 caudal vertebrae. (Vietnam)........................ O. rebecca sp. nov. 3a. In preservative, distal margins of dorsal and anal fins tinged chocolate-brown; dorsal surface of skull bony lacking portions of adductor mandibulae muscle; epineurals present from 1st precaudal vertebra to 10th caudal vertebra. (west coast of India).................................................................................................................................... O. roseus 3b. In preservative, distal margins of dorsal and anal fins the same color as rest of fin but not chocolate-brown; dorsal surface of skull covered by adductor mandibulae muscle; epineurals present from 1st precaudal vertebra to 3rd, 4th, or 5th caudal vertebra............ 4 4a. Caudal fin very long, standard length typically less than 80% of total length; total dorsal-fin elements 40-47; anal-fin elements 33-40; caudal vertebrae 17; 3 anal-fin pterygiophores preceding first hemal spine. (east coast of India, Bangladesh, Myanmar)...................................................................................................................... O. rubicundus 4b. Caudal fin long, standard length more than 80% of total length; total dorsal-fin elements44-54; anal-fin elements 36-45; caudal vertebrae 20-24; 2 (rarely 3) anal-fin pterygiophores preceding first hemal spine. (China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan)...................................................................................................................... O. lacepediiPublished as part of Edward O. Murdy & Koichi Shibukawa, 2003, Odontamblyopus rebecca, a new species of amblyopine goby from Vietnam with a key to known species of the genus (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae)., pp. 1-6 in Zootaxa 138 on pages 2-
Supplemental materials for preprint: Federated analysis of neuroimaging data: A review of the field
No full textSupplemental materials for preprint: Federated analysis of neuroimaging data: A review of the field
No full textCorrection: Obesity and brain structure in schizophrenia - ENIGMA study in 3021 individuals
No full textCorrección de: Molecular Psychiatry https://doi-org.udd.idm.oclc.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01616-5 , publicado en línea el 14 de junio de 2022
El nombre de uno de los coautores (Javier Vázquez-Bourgon) había sido escrito incorrectamente en el pasado, lo que ya ha sido corregido.
The article “Obesity and brain structure in schizophrenia – ENIGMA study in 3021 individuals”, written by Sean R. McWhinney, Katharina Brosch, Vince D. Calhoun, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Nicolas A. Crossley, Udo Dannlowski, Erin Dickie, Lorielle M. F. Dietze, Gary Donohoe, Stefan Plessis, Stefan Ehrlich, Robin Emsley, Petra Furstova, David C. Glahn, Alfonso Gonzalez- Valderrama, Dominik Grotegerd, Laurena Holleran, Tilo T. J. Kircher, Pavel Knytl, Marian Kolenic, Rebekka Lencer, Igor Nenadić, Nils Opel, JuliaKatharina Pfarr, Amanda L. Rodrigue, Kelly Rootes-Murdy, Alex J. Ross, Kang Sim, Antonín Škoch, Filip Spaniel, Frederike Stein, Patrik Švancer, Diana Tordesillas-Gutiérrez, Juan Undurraga, Javier Váquez-Bourgon, Aristotle Voineskos, Esther Walton, Thomas W. Weickert, Cynthia Shannon Weickert, Paul M. Thompson, Theo G. M. Erp, Jessica A. Turner, Tomas Hajek, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 14 June 2022 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 20 May 2022 to © The Author(s) 2022 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/.Versión Publicad
Mobile technology for medication adherence in people with mood disorders: A systematic review
No full textData_Sheet_1_Clinical and Structural Differences in Delusions Across Diagnoses: A Systematic Review.DOCX
No full textDelusions are marked, fixed beliefs that are incongruent with reality. Delusions, with comorbid hallucinations, are a hallmark of certain psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia). Delusions can present transdiagnostically, in neurodegenerative (e.g., Alzheimer's disease and fronto-temporal dementia), nervous system disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease) and across other psychiatric disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder). The burden of delusions is severe and understanding the heterogeneity of delusions may delineate a more valid nosology of not only psychiatric disorders but also neurodegenerative and nervous system disorders. We systematically reviewed structural neuroimaging studies reporting on delusions in four disorder types [schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BP), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and Parkinson's disease (PD)] to provide a comprehensive overview of neural changes and clinical presentations associated with delusions. Twenty-eight eligible studies were identified. This review found delusions were most associated with gray matter reductions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (SZ, BP, and AD), left claustrum (SZ and AD), hippocampus (SZ and AD), insula (SZ, BP, and AD), amygdala (SZ and BP), thalamus (SZ and AD), superior temporal gyrus (SZ, BP, and AD), and middle frontal gyrus (SZ, BP, AD, and PD). However, there was a great deal of variability in the findings of each disorder. There is some support for the current dopaminergic hypothesis of psychosis, but we also propose new hypotheses related to the belief formation network and cognitive biases. We also propose a standardization of assessments to aid future transdiagnostic study approaches. Future studies should explore the neural and biological underpinnings of delusions to hopefully, inform future treatment.</p
The utility of PHQ-9 and CGI-S in measurement-based care for predicting suicidal ideation and behaviors
No full textFederated analysis of neuroimaging data: A review of the field
No full textThe field of neuroimaging has embraced sharing data to collaboratively advance our understanding of the brain. However, data sharing, especially across sites with large amounts of protected health information (PHI), can be cumbersome and time intensive. Recently, there has been a greater push towards collaborative frameworks that enable large-scale federated analysis of neuroimaging data without the data having to leave its original location. However, there still remains a need for a standardized federated approach that not only allows for data sharing adhering to the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) data principles, but also streamlines analyses and communication while maintaining subject privacy. In this paper, we review a non- exhaustive list of neuroimaging analytic tools and frameworks currently in use. We then provide an update on our federated neuroimaging analysis software system, the Collaborative Informatics and Neuroimaging Suite Toolkit for Anonymous Computation (COINSTAC). In the end, we share insights on future research directions for federated analysis of neuroimaging data
The Various Ways to Say Goodbye: Professional Awareness of Death Related Rituals
No full textThe numerous approaches of saying goodbye to a deceased loved-one have many different perceptions and traditions attached to them. The author of this study organized a review of current, published literature on studies that contained the rituals and elements of funeral services across several geographical locations, cultures and religions. Of the original 32 articles, only 13 met the criteria of having enough detailed information and definitions of rituals. The author organized the information into six core themes of origins, rituals, purpose, outcomes (if ritual performed), decline of ritual and outcomes (if ritual not performed). The author hypothesized that most rituals originated and performed for the preservation of culture; however, the findings of the research suggest the top factors in most rituals originate from a combination of religious beliefs and cultural traditions. Communal support, preserving the afterlife and naturally building coping skills after loss are the other key findings within this study. Taking into account the limitations of studies that describe and define death rituals, research is lacking in the actual outcomes of performed rituals and rituals not performed. There are few studies indicating the results in the coping skills of bereaved individuals, bearing in mind the decline in religiosity and the decline of the traditional funeral. There is a need for research on the impacts of individuals lost in grief and in the diagnosis of complicated grief and/or depression if expected traditions are not accomplished. Awareness and education must occur for professionals working in end-of-life care to advocate and advise participation of rituals in hopes of ensuring healthy grieving and an individual’s ability to move forward after loss
- …
