1,724,937 research outputs found
Campaigns as gendered institutions: stereotypes and strategy in statewide races
No full textThis dissertation begins the process toward understanding the many ways in which campaigns are gendered institutions. Specifically, I ask how candidates and campaign professionals negotiate the gendered landscape on which campaigns are contested. Through analysis of 2008 and 2010 senate and gubernatorial races and a survey of campaign consultants, I investigate the role that gender stereotypes and dynamics play in drafting campaign images, messages, and tactics. Findings demonstrate to what extent female candidates adapt to the masculine norms of U.S. campaigns or, instead, challenge their prescriptions for strategy and behavior. In addition to exposing institutional constraints on women, probing internal campaign decision-making in mixed-gender races illuminates potential shifts in men’s campaign strategy when gender becomes salient. Existing scholarship describes gender’s function in political behavior, electoral outcomes, and even campaign output and communications. However, research to date has done little to investigate how gender functions in campaign strategy development and why campaigns cultivate the images and messages that they do. Engaging candidates and campaign professionals directly remedies this omission and provides direct insight to the interaction between institutional norms, identity, and individual actions. Moreover, recognizing campaign professionals as political actors who perceive and perform gender also highlights potential differences in campaign strategizing by gender.Ph. D.Includes bibliographical referencesby Kelly E. DittmarThis work has been revised and updated in the author's monograph, "Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns", published by Temple University Press, EAN: 9781439911488 (cloth), EAN: 9781439911495 (pbk.), EAN: 9781439911501 (electronic book)
Kelly, E, 54344
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396538Surname: KELLY. Given Name(s) or Initials: E. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 54344. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: SEA-1909.233189
Item: [2016.0049.28831] "Kelly, E, 54344
Kelly, E J, VX6350
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396660Surname: KELLY. Given Name(s) or Initials: E J. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: VX6350. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 5178.233433
Item: [2016.0049.28953] "Kelly, E J, VX6350
Kelly, E G, QX13365
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396617Surname: KELLY. Given Name(s) or Initials: E G. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: QX13365. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 22269.233347
Item: [2016.0049.28910] "Kelly, E G, QX13365
Kelly, E J, 2412255
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396560Surname: KELLY. Given Name(s) or Initials: E J. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 2412255. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: SEA-2933.233233
Item: [2016.0049.28853] "Kelly, E J, 2412255
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
