193,443 research outputs found
Kaye, P, NX8808
This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396321Surname: KAYE. Given Name(s) or Initials: P. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX8808. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 5364.232753
Item: [2016.0049.28614] "Kaye, P, NX8808
Lamontia calibana Kaye
Lamontia CALIBANA Kaye 1922 Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 67, 991–998 [997], pl. I: fig. 18. Current accepted combination: Monalita calibana (Kaye, 1922) (see Tarmann 1995). Holotype, female, pinned: Specimen data: “Rock | 1 / 1 / 18 ” [Handwritten (by Lamont)]. “Lamont | Collection | 1950 - 16 ” [Printed] with label with “ TYPE ” [Handwritten in red ink] glued to it. “ Lamontia calibana Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cainet label]. Remarks: This specimen collected by Sir N. Lamont at Rock, Trinidad on 1 January 1918 is unambiguously the holotype. It is illustrated in colour in Pl. I: fig. 18 (Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927). Lamontia calibana Kaye is the type species of the genus Lamontia Kaye, 1922 by monotypy. Kaye & Lamont (1927) give the type locality as “Rock-Penal Road”, Trinidad.Published as part of Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394 on page 4, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27586
Kaye, W P C, 418428
This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/396319Surname: KAYE. Given Name(s) or Initials: W P C. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 418428. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 52236.232749
Item: [2016.0049.28612] "Kaye, W P C, 418428
Hydrias albiochrea Kaye
Hydrias ALBIOCHREA Kaye, 1922 Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 67, 991–998 [995], pl. I: fig. 14. Current accepted combination: Euglyphis albiochrea (Kaye 1922) (see Becker & Heppner 1996). Holotype, male, pinned: Specimen data: “P. of Spain 27 | 1 | 21 ” [Handwritten (by Lamont)]. “Lamont Collection 1950 - 16 ” [Printed] with a label with “ TYPE ” [Handwritten in red ink], glued to it. “ Hydrias albiochrea Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label]. Remarks: The holotype was collected at Port of Spain, Trinidad, 27 January 1921, by Sir. N. Lamont; this is that specimen. A colour illustration of the holotype is given in Pl. I: fig. 14 (Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927).Published as part of Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394 on page 9, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27586
Cecharismena tincturalis Kaye
<i>Redara</i> [sic] <i>TINCTURALIS</i> Kaye, 1925 <p> <i>Transactions of the Entomological Society of London</i>, <b>1924</b> (3 & 4), 413–428[421], pl. XLV: fig. 14. Current accepted combination: <i>Cecharismena tincturalis</i> (Kaye, 1925) (see Poole 1989).</p> <p> <b>Holotype</b>, female, pinned:</p> <p> <b>Specimen data</b>: “Palmiste | Oct.21. ” [Handwritten (by Lamont)]. “Radara sp. |? tostola Feld. Ƥ | W.H.T.Tams det.” [Printed].” “Lamont | Collection | 1950.16” [Printed] with label with “ TYPE ” [Handwritten in red ink], glued to it. “Redara [sic] tincturalis Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label]. Label justifying specimen as holotype by M.J.W.Cock, 1997.</p> <p> <b>Remarks</b>: This specimen collected at Palmiste, Trinidad in October 1921 by Sir N. Lamont is unambiguously the holotype. It is illustrated in colour in Pl. XLV: fig. 14 (Kaye 1925, Kaye & Lamont 1927).</p>Published as part of <i>Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394</i> on pages 15-16, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/275866">10.5281/zenodo.275866</a>
Parangitia micapennis Kaye
Parangitia MICAPENNIS Kaye, 1922 Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 67, 991–998 [994], pl. I: fig. 2. Combination still valid (see Poole 1989). Holotype, male, pinned: Specimen data: No locality data. “Lamont | collection | 1950 - 16 ” [Printed] with label with “ TYPE ” [Handwritten in red ink] glued to it. “ Parangitia micapennis Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label]. Label bearing justification of holotype status by M.J.W.Cock, 1996. Remarks: This specimen collected in Trinidad by Sir N. Lamont was considered by Lamont to be unambiguously the holotype. It is illustrated in colour in Pl. I: fig. 2 (Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927). Kaye & Lamont (1927) give the type locality as “Palmiste”. Poole (1989) erroneously suggests that the holotype is in BM(NH).Published as part of Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394 on page 17, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27586
Sisyrosea guaica Kaye
Sisyrosea GUAICA Kaye 1922 Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 67, 991–998 [995], pl. I: fig. 15. Junior subjective synonym of Perola subpunctata (Walker, 1855) (see Becker & Epstein 1995). Holotype, male, pinned: Specimen data: “Guaico | 18 Ap.’ 15 ” [Handwritten (by Lamont)]. “ Type ” [Handwritten]. “ Type [Typewritten in red, large font]. Lamont | 1950 - 16 [Handwritten in black ink]” on verso “ Sisyrosea | guaica Kaye ” [Handwritten in black ink]. “ Sisyrosea guaica Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label]. Remarks: This specimen collected by Sir N. Lamont at Guaico, Trinidad on 18 th April 1915 is clearly the holotype although in the original description (Kaye 1922) the date is erroneously given as “ 18.ix. 15.” However the date is corrected to 18 April 1915 in Kaye & Lamont (1927). It is illustrated in colour in Pl. I: fig. 15 (Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927.)Published as part of Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394 on pages 5-6, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27586
Samea delicata DELICATA Kaye 1922
<i>Samea DELICATA</i> Kaye, 1922 <p> <i>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London</i>, <b>67</b>, 991–998 [996–997], pl. I: fig. 22. Combination still valid (see Munroe 1995).</p> <p> <b>Holotype</b>, male, pinned: also paratype Ƥ, pinned.</p> <p> <b>Specimen data</b>: <i>Holotype</i>: No locality label. “ Type ” [Handwritten]. “ Type | H.T.” [Round label with red border]. “Lamont | Collection | 1950-16” [Printed] with label with “ Type ” [Handwritten in red ink] glued to it. “ Samea delicata Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label]. “Hileithia approprialis | Dyar male | Det. M.J.W.Cock 2002” [Printed].</p> <p> <b>Remarks:</b> This specimen collected in Trinidad by Sir N. Lamont is undoubtedly the holotype. It is illustrated in colour in Pl. I: fig. 22 (Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927). Kaye & Lamont (1927) give the type locality as “Palmiste”.</p>Published as part of <i>Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394</i> on page 7, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/275866">10.5281/zenodo.275866</a>
Hypena brodescens BRODESCENS Kaye 1922
<i>Hypena BRODESCENS</i> Kaye, 1922 <p> <i>Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London</i> <b>67</b>, 991–998[995], pl. I: fig. 8. Junior subjective synonym of <i>Peliala munda</i> Warren, 1889 (see Kaye & Lamont 1927); this synonymy overlooked by Poole (1989).</p> <p> <b>Holotype</b>, male, pinned: also paratype 3, pinned.</p> <p> <b>Specimen data</b>: <i>Holotype</i>; “Palmiste | 14|3|21” [Handwritten (by Lamont)]. “ Type ” [Handwritten in same hand]. “Lamont | Collection | 1950-16” [Printed]. “ Type ” [Typewritten in red large font] on <i>verso</i> “ Hypena brodescens Kaye ” [Handwritten in pencil]. Label justifying its holotype status by M.J.W.Cock, 1997. <b>Remarks</b>: This specimen taken at Palmiste, Trinidad by Sir N. Lamont on 14th March 1921 is unambiguously the holotype. However the date in the original description is erroneously given as “ 14.v.21 ” but is corrected in Kaye & Lamont (1927). The holotype is illustrated in colour in Pl. I: fig. 8 (Kaye 1922, Kaye & Lamont 1927). By 1927, Kaye and Lamont (1927) synonymised <i>H. brodescens</i> with <i>Peliala munda</i> Warren, 1889 and transferred them both to the genus <i>Bromolocha</i>. Poole (1989) appears to have overlooked this synonymy.</p>Published as part of <i>Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394</i> on page 16, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/275866">10.5281/zenodo.275866</a>
Claphe similavis SIMILAVIS Kaye 1925
<i>Claphe SIMILAVIS</i> Kaye, 1925 <p> <i>Transactions of the Entomological Society of London</i>, <b>1924</b> (3&4), 413–428 [423], pl. XLV: fig. 12. Current accepted combination: <i>Euglyphis similavis</i> (Kaye, 1925) (see Becker & Heppner 1996).</p> <p> <b>Holotype</b>, male, pinned:</p> <p> <b>Specimen data</b>: “San Fdo. | 22/2/22 ” [Handwritten (by Lamont)]. “Lamont | Collection | 1950-16” [Printed] with label with “ Type ” [Handwritten in red ink] glued to it. “ Claphe similavis Kaye ” [Handwritten Lamont cabinet label].</p> <p> <b>Remarks</b>: This specimen collected at San Fernando, Trinidad, by Sir N. Lamont on 22nd February 1922 is unambiguously the holotype. It is illustrated in colour in Pl. XLV: fig. 12 (Kaye 1925, Kaye & Lamont 1927).</p>Published as part of <i>Bland, Keith P., 2010, Name-bearing Types of Lepidoptera (Insecta), excluding Rhopalocera, in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, pp. 1-22 in Zootaxa 2394</i> on page 9, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/275866">10.5281/zenodo.275866</a>
- …
