1,721,090 research outputs found
Energiatehnoloogia innovatsioonis\ufcsteemid rahvusvahelises perspektiivis: v\ue4ikeriigid, riigiettev\uf5tted ja erinevad poliitikaloogikad. Energy Technology Innovation Systems in a Transnational Perspective: Small States, Public Ownership and Diverging Policy Rationales
No full textThe Economics of Late Development, Industrialization and Economic Integration: with Case Studies of Ethiopia. Hilise arengu, industrialiseerimise ja majandusliku integratsiooni \uf6konoomika Etioopia n\ue4ite varal
No full textFinancial Fragility and Economic Instability in the Context of Transition Economies: The Case of Estonia. Finantsiline haavatavus ja majanduslik ebastabiilsus \ufcleminekuriikide kontekstis Eesti n\ue4itel
No full textTechnology Foresight and the Catching-up Strategy in Small Countries: The Case of Estonia. Tehnoloogiaseire ja konvergeerumisstrateegia v\ue4ikeriikides: Eesti n\ue4ide
No full textIntersection Thesis and Pathways for AI-Prosperity Alignment in the Global South: An Examination of AI for Good in Thailand
Full text linkThis thesis explores how AI for Good is conceived and pursued within the Global
South, specifically in the context of Thailand. The research introduces a novel framework of
three intersections where notions of the “South” and “Good” in AI converge: the traditional
intersection, where AI is viewed as a tool for national competitiveness; the hybrid intersection,
which adopts a human-centred approach to AI; and the transformative intersection, which
reimagines AI as a means of emancipation from the status quo. Through an in-depth analysis
of Thailand's AI landscape, governance mechanisms, and specific initiatives, the research
reveals the tensions between economic imperatives and social good in AI development and
deployment. The study proposes the concept of AI-Prosperity Alignment as a new evaluative
framework to examine the potential of AI in promoting holistic well-being, justice, and
resilience within ecological boundaries. Findings indicate that while Thailand exhibits
elements of all three intersections, it faces significant challenges in achieving a transformative
approach to AI due to limited multivocality and policy objectives primarily focused on
enhancing economic growth and national competitiveness. This research contributes to
bridging the gap between AI for the Global South and AI for Good discourses, offering insights
into the contextual factors shaping AI trajectories in developing nations and advocating for
more inclusive, emancipatory approaches to AI governance and implementation
Innovatsioonipoliitika valitsemine \ufclemineku\ufchiskondades: teoreetilised l\ue4henemised ja juhtumianal\ufc\ufcsid Kesk- ja Ida-Euroopa riikides. Governance of Innovation Policy in Catching-up Context: Theoretical Considerations and Case Studies of Central and Eastern European Economies
No full textInnovation Policy and Development in the ICT Paradigm: Regional and Theoretical Perspectives
Full text linkInnovation policy forms a foundation, and probably the most important one, of economic development in any society, especially in today’s society driven by information and communication technologies (ICT). The Schumpeterian processes of creative destruction need stewardship – creative destruction management – and this paper aims to explore some key aspects of innovation policies from the perspective of the current ICT paradigm. The basic feature of the latter is the trend towards globalisation, towards facilitation of heterogeneity, diversity, and adaptability, which leads to market segmentation and niche proliferation as well as to production disaggregation and segment relocation. Analysis of innovation policies of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries shows that their current national innovation system based innovation policies are lacking several crucial features. First, one of the central arguments of creative-destruction management is paradigm-based, activity-specific priority-setting, but such wide-scale selection mechanisms have been and are still missing, and currently innovation policies by themselves can not lead to economic restructuring. Second, the whole concept of innovation systems has to a large extent focused on activities related to the production and use of codified scientific and technical knowledge leading to the situation where existing policies have essentially nothing to do with the average companies. Third, the current paradigm is characterised by globalised and open financial markets which, in case of the CEE countries, have enforced speculative economic growth, fuelled by domestic consumption and based on foreign borrowing. Finally, while the state is generally considered an important factor influencing how concrete innovation systems develop, linkages to policymaking itself and administrative capacities are quite missing and need to be revived, including the reconsideration of governance.innovation, economic development, innovation policy, ICT Paradigm, open innovation, governance, dissertations,
Governance of Innovation and Development Financing: Policies, Strategic Functions and Bureaucracies. Innovatsiooni ja arengu finantseerimise valitsemine: poliitikad, strateegilised funksioonid ja b\ufcrokraatia
No full textInnovatsiooni- ja k\uf5rgtehnoloogiapoliitika, selle kujundamine ja elluviimine Kesk- ja Ida-Euroopa riikides Eesti n\ue4itel. Innovation and High-Technology Policy, Policy-Making and Implementation in Central and Eastern European Countries: The Case of Estonia
No full text- …
