1,721,008 research outputs found

    Replication data for: "Choosing among Regularized Estimators in Empirical Economics: The Risk of Machine Learning"

    No full text
    Abadie, Alberto, and Kasy, Maximilian, (2019) “Choosing among Regularized Estimators in Empirical Economics: The Risk of Machine Learning.” Review of Economics and Statistics 101:5, 743-762

    Replication data for: "How to Use Economic Theory to Improve Estimators: Shrinking Toward Theoretical Restrictions"

    No full text
    Kasy, Maximilian, and Fessler, Pirmin, (2019) "How to Use Economic Theory to Improve Estimators: Shrinking Toward Theoretical Restrictions." Review of Economics and Statistics 101:4, 681-698

    Replication data for: "Choosing among Regularized Estimators in Empirical Economics: The Risk of Machine Learning"

    No full text
    Abadie, Alberto, and Kasy, Maximilian, (2019) “Choosing among Regularized Estimators in Empirical Economics: The Risk of Machine Learning.” Review of Economics and Statistics 101:5, 743-762

    Matlab implementation for "Why experimenters might not always want to randomize, and what they could do instead"

    No full text
    We provide attached 1) Matlab-code for the replication of Table 1 in the paper (designsexampletable.m), and 2) a zip-file with Matlab-code for implementation of the proposed approach to experimental design. For details, please refer to the readme file

    Replication data for: Partial Identification, Distributional Preferences, and the Welfare Ranking of Policies

    No full text
    Kasy, Maximilian, (2016) "Partial Identification, Distributional Preferences, and the Welfare Ranking of Policies." Review of Economics and Statistics 98:1, 111-131

    Partial Identification, Distributional Preferences, and the Welfare Ranking of Policies

    No full text
    We discuss the tension between “what we can get” (identification) and “what we want” (parameters of interest) in models of policy choice (treatment assignment). Our nonstandard empirical object of interest is the ranking of counterfactual policies. Partial identification of treatment effects maps into a partial welfare ranking of treatment assignment policies. We characterize the identified ranking and show how the identifiability of the ranking depends on identifying assumptions, the feasible policy set, and distributional preferences. An application to the project STAR experiment illustrates this dependence. This paper connects the literatures on partial identification, robust statistics, and choice under Knightian uncertainty. (author's abstract
    corecore